{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":9,"sheets":["Overview","FinancialData","Procurement","Risk Assesment","Rating","Project Indicators","Lessons Learned","Results Tracker","Units for Indicators"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":2,"macros":0,"external_links":2,"defined_names":2,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"Overview","index":0,"n_rows":177,"n_cols":16,"rows_kept":177,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[22,3,23,3],[15,1,15,2],[26,1,26,2],[35,1,35,2],[25,1,25,2],[18,1,18,2],[22,1,23,2],[24,1,24,2],[31,1,31,2]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,null,"Project Performance Report (PPR)"]
[]
[null,null,"Period of Report (Dates)","28 January 2013 - 28 January 2014"]
[]
[null,null,"Project Title: ","Enhancing Resilience of Coastal Communities to Climate Change in Samoa"]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Project Summary: ","This programme is designed to complete a holistic and country-wide approach to climate change adaptation in the coastal zones in Samoa. It will provide the vehicle to revise and implement the approved Coastal Infrastructure Management (CIM) Plans on the ground as a practical community based response to adaptation. The program will result in a “whole of country” adaptation response for coastal management at the nationwide scale. The implementation of appropriate responses will be supported by the programme through site specific design of adaptation interventions and active community engagement in the process.\nThe programme will serve to implement the CIM Strategy, which was originally prepared in 2000 and revised in 2006 to include specific reference to CC related issues. In particular the predicted hazard zones were reviewed against the NAPA data (2005) and inter-alia the Climate Risk Profiles (2007) and reference was made to expected land use impacts from more frequent and intense cyclone events. There is an opportunity under this programme to consider the more detailed and updated climate change projections now available for Samoa. The Strategy which has as its central focus a theme of “resilience”, directs coastal adaptation to focus upon activities which will have a positive effect upon community resilience. It sets out a range of adaptation actions with a strong preference for “soft” actions such as managed retreat over “hard” engineered solutions such as seawalls. The CIM Strategy has been endorsed by Cabinet as official Government policy with respect to coastal management.\n"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Countries","Project Type:  ",null,"GEF Focal Area: ","GEF 4 Focal Areas","GEF 2 / 3 Operational Programme: ","Overall Rating of the project in the evaluation by the project evaluator: ","GEF-4 Focal Area Strategic Program: ","GEF-3 Focal Area Strategic Program: "]
[null,null,"Database Number: ","PIMS No. 4667",null,null,null,"Afghanistan","FP","Yes","Biodiversity",1,1,"U","BD-SP1-PA Financing","1: Arid & semi-arid ecosystems"]
[null,"Implementing Entity (IE) [name]:",null,"UNDP",null,null,null,"Albania","MSP","No","Climate Change Adaptation",2,2,"S","BD-SP2-Marine PA","2: Coastal, marine & freshwater ecosystems"]
[null,null,"Type of IE:","MIE",null,null,null,"Algeria","EA",null,"Climate Change Mitigation",3,3,"MU","BD-SP3-PA Networks","3: Forest ecosystems"]
[null,null,"Country(ies): ","Samoa",null,null,null,"Angola",null,null,"International Waters",5,5,"Good","BD-SP5-Markets","13: Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biological Diversity Important to Agriculture"]
[null,"Relevant Geographic Points (i.e. cities, villages, bodies of water):",{"$nulls":5},"Argentina",null,null,"Multiple Focal Area",null,null,null,"BD-SP7-Invasive Alien Species(IAS)","6: Promoting the adoption of renewable energy by removing barriers and reducing implementation costs"]
[{"$nulls":12},"CC-SP2- Industrial EE","8: Waterbody based operational program"]
[null,null,"Project Milestones",{"$nulls":9},"CC-SP3-RE,CC-SP4-Biomass","9: Integrated Land and Water multiple focal area"]
[null,null,"Milestone",{"$nulls":4},"Bahamas",{"$nulls":6},"CC-SP5-Transport","10: Contaminants based operational program"]
[null,"AFB Approval Date:",null,"2012-02-01"]
[]
[null,"IE-AFB Agreement Signature Date:",null,"2012-04-01",{"$nulls":9},"CC-SP6-LULUCF","12: Integrated Ecosystem Management"]
[null,"Start of Project/Programme:",null,"2013-01-28",{"$nulls":9},"Cross cutting capacity building","14: Persistent Organic Pollutants"]
[null,"Mid-term Review Date (if planned):"]
[null,null,"Terminal Evaluation Date:"]
[]
[null,null,null,"List documents/ reports/ brochures / articles that have been prepared about the project.",null,null,null,"Cyprus"]
[null,null,null,"Programme Reports: Inception Workshop Report, Quarterly Progress Reports, AF/PPCR Joint Programme Steering Committee meeting (3 March 2014) minutes\nTORs for Programme Institutional Arrangement (AF/PPCR) - Technical Advisory Group, National Steering Committee, Joint Programme Management Unit (Programme Manager, Financial Management Specialist, Procurement Specialist, Environmental and Social Safeguards Specialist, Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist), Technical Advisor, Project Assistant (AF Specific), Technical Support Team (Community Liaison Officer, GIS Specialist, Coastal Morphology Specialist, Civil Engineer, Technical Planner)\nTechnical Reports/Documents - Methodological Report on the review and Implementation of the Coastal Infrastructure Management (CIM) Plans, Preliminary Review of Coastal Protection Measures, Matrix of preliminary costing and prioritization of CIM Plan actions.\nLight Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) Software Training - PACCSAP ",null,null,null,"Czech Republic"]
[null,"List the Website address (URL) of project.",{"$nulls":5},"Democratic People's Republic of Korea"]
[null,null,null,"www.undp-alm.org/projects/af-samoa ",null,null,null,"Democratic Republic of the Congo"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Denmark"]
[null,null,"Project contacts:  ",{"$nulls":4},"Djibouti"]
[null,"National Project Manager/Coordinator",{"$nulls":5},"Dominica"]
[null,null,"Name: ","MNRE (PUMA) - Kirisimasi Seumanutafa",null,null,null,"Dominican Republic"]
[null,null,"Email: ","kirisimasi.seumanutafa@mnre.gov.ws",null,null,null,"Ecuador"]
[null,null,"Date: ","2013-01-28",null,null,null,"Egypt"]
[null,null,"Government DA",{"$nulls":4},"El Salvador"]
[null,null,"Name: ","Mr. Aiono Mose Pouvi, Chief Executive Officer, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade",null,null,null,"Equatoral Guinea"]
[null,null,"Email: ",{"$nulls":4},"Eritrea"]
[null,null,"Date: ","2011-07-11",null,null,null,"Estonia"]
[null,null,"Implementing Entity",{"$nulls":4},"Ethiopia"]
[null,null,"Name: ","UNDP, Gabor Vereczi ",null,null,null,"Fiji"]
[null,null,"Email: ","gabor.vereczi@undp.org",null,null,null,"Finland"]
[null,null,"Date: ","2011-07-11",null,null,null,"France"]
[null,null,"Executing Agency",{"$nulls":4},"Gambia"]
[null,null,"Name: ","Pou Onesemo, Assistant Chief Executive Officer, Planning and Urban Management Agency. ",null,null,null,"Georgia"]
[null,null,"Email: ","pou.onesemo@mnre.gov.ws",null,null,null,"Germany"]
[null,null,"Date: ","2014-04-28",null,null,null,"Ghana"]
[null,null,"Executing Agency",{"$nulls":4},"Greece"]
[null,null,"Name: ",{"$nulls":4},"Grenada"]
[null,null,"Email: ",{"$nulls":4},"Guatemala"]
[null,null,"Date: ",{"$nulls":4},"Guinea"]
[null,null,"Executing Agency",{"$nulls":4},"Guinea Bissau"]
[null,null,"Name: ",{"$nulls":4},"Guyana"]
[null,null,"Email: ",{"$nulls":4},"Haiti"]
[null,null,"Date: ",{"$nulls":4},"Honduras"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Hungary"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Iceland"]
[{"$nulls":7},"India"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Indonesia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Iran (Islamic Republic of)"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Iraq"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Ireland"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Israel"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Italy"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Jamaica"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Japan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Jordan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Kazakhstan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Kenya"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Kiribati"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Kuwait"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Kyrgyzstan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Lao People’s Democratic Republic"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Latvia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Lebanon"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Lesotho"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Liberia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Libyan Arab Jamahiriya"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Liechtenstein"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Lithuania"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Luxembourg"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Madagascar"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Malawi"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Malaysia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Maldives"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Mali"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Malta"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Marshall Islands"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Mauritania"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Mauritius"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Mexico"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Micronesia, Federated States of"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Monaco"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Mongolia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Montenegro"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Morocco"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Mozambique"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Myanmar"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Namibia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Nauru"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Nepal"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Netherlands"]
[{"$nulls":7},"New Zealand"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Nicaragua"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Niger"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Nigeria"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Norway"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Oman"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Pakistan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Palau"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Panama"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Papua New Guinea"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Paraguay"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Peru"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Philippines"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Poland"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Portugal"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Qatar"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Republic of Korea"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Republic of Moldova"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Romania"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Russian Federation"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Rwanda"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Saint Kitts and Nevis"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Saint Lucia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Saint Vincent and the Grenadines"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Samoa"]
[{"$nulls":7},"San Marino"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Sao Tome and Principe"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Saudi Arabia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Senegal"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Serbia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Seychelles"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Sierra Leone"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Singapore"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Slovakia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Slovenia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Solomon Islands"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Somalia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"South Africa"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Spain"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Sri Lanka"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Sudan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Suriname"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Swaziland"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Sweden"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Switzerland"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Syrian Arab Republic"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Tajikistan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Thailand"]
[{"$nulls":7},"The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Timor-Leste"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Togo"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Tonga"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Trinidad and Tobago"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Tunisia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Turkey"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Turkmenistan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Tuvalu"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Uganda"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Ukraine"]
[{"$nulls":7},"United Arab Emirates"]
[{"$nulls":7},"United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland"]
[{"$nulls":7},"United Republic of Tanzania"]
[{"$nulls":7},"United States of America"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Uruguay"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Uzbekistan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Vanuatu"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Viet Nam"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Yemen"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Zambia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Zimbabwe"]

{"sheet":"FinancialData","index":1,"n_rows":66,"n_cols":11,"rows_kept":66,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[75,4,75,5],[71,4,71,5],[71,2,71,3],[75,2,75,3],[74,2,74,3],[73,2,73,3],[74,4,74,5],[62,2,62,3],[62,4,62,5],[63,2,63,5],[65,4,65,5],[64,2,64,3],[64,4,64,5],[8,4,8,5],[7,2,7,5],[67,2,67,3],[68,4,68,5],[70,2,70,3],[70,4,70,5],[68,2,68,3],[35,2,35,3],[65,2,65,3],[61,2,61,5],[2,2,2,6],[8,2,8,3],[9,2,9,3],[34,2,34,3],[4,2,4,5],[3,1,3,5],[12,2,12,3],[6,2,6,3],[9,4,9,5],[11,2,11,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,"Financial information:  cumulative from project start to [insert date]"]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"DISBURSEMENT OF AF GRANT FUNDS ",{"$nulls":6},{"$error":"#DIV/0!"},{"$error":"#DIV/0!"}]
[null,null,"How much of the total AF grant as noted in Project Document plus any project preparation grant has been spent to date?",{"$nulls":6},96441.99999999999]
[null,null,"Estimated cumulative total disbursement as of 28 January 2014",null,94606]
[null,null,"Add any comments on AF Grant Funds. (word limit=200)",null,"The relatively low expenditure in the first year is due to the focus on the alignment of the Adaptation Fund Programme with the Pilot Programme for Climate Resilience (PPCR), in terms of establishing methodology for CIM Plan review as well as setting up joint programme management arrangements, all of them delayed due to PPCR processes.  The update of the CIM Plans and the implementation of proposed options to enhance resilience of communities is a key activity of the project and the definition of the methodological approach for the revision is quite complex. This activity relies mainly on the procurement of new spatial data to be co-funded by the two projects (AF and PPCR) during 2014 (LiDAR survey).  The PPCR Project Appraisal Document was finally signed in November 2013. \nFor the first time, the Government of Samoa has adopted a sector wide approach for the implementation of these two large projects and has set up a common coordination mechanism by sharing the same Programme Steering Committee (Programme Board) and Programme Management Unit. These processes have faced some institutional challenges and delays particularly the procurement of personnel for the PMU, currently being finalized and expected to be operational during May 2014.  "]
[]
[null,null,"EXPENDITURE DATA"]
[null,null,"List ouput and corresponding amount spent for the current reporting period",null,"ITEM / ACTIVITY / ACTION","AMOUNT"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Outcome 1 - Community Engagement in coastal vulnerability assessment, adaptation planning and awareness"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 1.1. CIM Plans reviewed in 25 districts with climate induced disaster risk management fully integrated, adopting a Watershed and Ridge to Reef Management approach "]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 1.2.Village hazard zone relocation plans formulated at least 15 villages in selected districts",1836.27]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 1.3. Training delivered to 300 village leaders in 139 villages on review of CIM Plans and relocation planning process integrating climate risks.",2228.17]
[{"$nulls":4},"Outcome 2 - Integrated Community-Based Coastal Adaptation and Disaster Risk Management measures"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 2.1 Climate proofing measures implemented on coastal roads and related infrastructure in at least 10 districts and 40 villages"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 2.2. Shoreline protection measures implemented in at least 10 districts and 40 villages.",21611.8]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 2.3. Water supply enhanced to withstand climate change risks in least 5 districts and 15 villages."]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 2.4. Flood protection measures are implemented in at least 5 districts and 15 villages."]
[{"$nulls":4},"Outcome 3 - Institutional strengthening to support climate resilient coastal management policy frameworks","No spending under this output to date"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Project Management"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Procurement of Project vehicle (new)",35211.27]
[{"$nulls":4},"Stationery and Other Office Supplies",7006.39]
[{"$nulls":4},"Procurement of IT Equipment ",15675.72]
[{"$nulls":4},"Local Consultant - Short Term Technical/Support",11806.96]
[{"$nulls":4},"Contractual Services - Individual",1065.42]
[]
[]
[]
[{"$nulls":4},"TOTAL",96441.99999999999]
[]
[null,null,"PLANNED EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE"]
[null,null,"List outputs planned and corresponding projected cost for the upcoming reporting period",null,"ITEM / ACTIVITY / ACTION","PROJECTED COST","Est. Completion Date"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Outcome 1 - Strengthened awareness and ownership of coastal adaptation and climate risk reduction processes at community and national levels in 25 Districts and 139 villages"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 1.1. CIM Plans reviewed in 25 districts with climate induced disaster risk management fully integrated, adopting a Watershed and Ridge to Reef Management approach ",20000,"2015-01-28"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 1.2.Village hazard zone relocation plans formulated at least 15 villages in selected districts",25000,"2015-01-28"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 1.3. Training delivered to 300 village leaders in 139 villages on review of CIM Plans and relocation planning process integrating climate risks.",10000,"2015-01-28"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Outcome 2 -  Increased adaptive capacity of coastal communities to adapt to coastal hazards and risks induced by climate change in 25 Districts and 139 villages"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 2.1 Climate proofing measures implemented on coastal roads and related infrastructure in at least 10 districts and 40 villages",600000,"2015-01-28"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 2.2 Shoreline protection measures implemented in at least 10 districts and 40 villages.\n",350000,"2015-01-28"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 2.3. Water supply enhanced to withstand climate change risks in least 5 districts and 15 villages.",350000,"2015-01-28"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 2.4 Flood protection measures are implemented in at least 5 districts and 15 villages.",200000,"2014-10-05"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Outcome 3 - Institutional strengthening to support climate resilient coastal management policy frameworks"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 3.1 Revised national organisation and institutional structures for CIM Plans implementation.",20000,"2015-01-28"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 3.2 Village hazard zone relocation handbook prepared to guide further relocation planning activities.",20000]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 3.3 Regulatory procedures for physical works implementation revised with climate change risks integrated.",20000]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 3.4 - • Policymakers and technical officers in the relevant Ministries and Authorities are trained on climate risk assessment and planning processes for coastal adaptation.",10000,"2015-01-28"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 3.5 Adaptation lessons learned and best practices generated through the adaptation implementation and related policy processes are captured and disseminated nationally and globally ",25000,"2015-01-28"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Project Management"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Quarterly TAG meetings ",3000,"2015-01-28"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Procurement of 2 laptop computers",7000,"2015-01-28"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Procurement of office furniture",10000,"2015-01-28"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Procurement of Project Vehicle",45000,"2015-01-28"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Asset branding and vehicle servicing",10000,"2015-01-28"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Recruitment of Project Personnel",140000,"2015-01-28"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Stationery materials and supply",4000,"2015-01-28"]
[{"$nulls":4},"TOTAL",1869000]
[]
[null,null,"ACTUAL CO-FINANCING (If the MTR or TE have not been undertaken this reporting period, DO NOT report on actual co-financing.) "]
[null,null,"How much of the total co-financing as committed in the Project Document has actually been realized?"]
[]
[null,null,"Estimated cumulative actual co-financing as verified during Mid-term Review (MTR) or Terminal Evaluation (TE). "]
[null,null,"Add any comments on actual co-financing in particular any issues related to the realization of in-kind, grant, credits, loans, equity, non-grant instruments and other types of co-financing. (word limit=200)"]

{"sheet":"Procurement","index":2,"n_rows":24,"n_cols":8,"rows_kept":24,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[27,2,29,2],[27,6,29,7],[27,8,29,8],[15,8,17,8],[18,2,20,2],[18,5,20,5],[18,6,20,7],[24,2,26,2],[24,6,26,7],[24,8,26,8],[18,8,20,8],[21,2,23,2],[21,5,23,5],[21,6,23,7],[21,8,23,8],[2,2,2,7],[3,1,3,7],[4,2,4,7],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,7],[5,2,5,5],[12,2,12,3],[13,2,13,4],[14,6,14,7],[15,2,17,2],[15,5,17,5],[15,6,17,7]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,"PROCUREMENT DATA"]
[]
[null,null,"Please provide information for all contracts over $2,500 USD"]
[null,null,"Please provide the number of  contracts under $2,500, signed during this reporting period:",null,null,null,"N/A"]
[]
[null,null,"LIST OF CONTRACTS"]
[null,null,"List all contracts related to the project/program with signature dates"]
[null,null,"Contract Type","Agency / Contracted party","Contract Value/Amount (USD)","Signature Date","Payment to Date","Remaining Balance"]
[null,null,"Service Contract (Programme Staff)",null,"$21,356.53 (for contract period of 5 weeks)","2013-11-22","Full payment has been processed. Final payment was made upon receipt of Final Technical Report on the 17th January 2014."]
[]
[null,null,"BIDS"]
[null,null,"List all bids for each contact signed with date of open call and winning bid"]
[null,null,"CONTRACT & Procurement Method","Submitted Bids","Bid Amount (USD)","Winning Bid Amount (USD)","Selection Justification for the Winner"]
[null,null,"Procurement of Project Vehicle",null,40869.57,34782.96,"Winning Bid as per government procedures is that with the lowest price "]
[{"$nulls":4},42086.96]
[{"$nulls":4},34782.61]
[null,null,"Procurement of Heavy Duty Printer/Copier",null,10652.18,11564.79,"Winner provided a quotation for the best quality colored printer as requested by the Agency.  Also offers all parts and servicing requirements from professionally trained staff for the repair and supply of spare parts."]
[{"$nulls":4},9956.53]
[{"$nulls":4},11564.79]
[null,null,"Procurement of Computer Workstations (x3)",null,3763.05,3717.4,"Winner was selected as the supplier as they offered the lowest values for the items required. All three prices given were for the same model and brand of computer desktop workstation."]
[{"$nulls":4},4500]
[{"$nulls":4},3717.4]

{"sheet":"Risk Assesment","index":3,"n_rows":32,"n_cols":9,"rows_kept":32,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[25,4,25,5],[19,4,19,5],[8,4,8,5],[9,4,9,5],[30,2,30,5],[21,2,21,5],[22,2,22,5],[15,4,15,5],[16,4,16,5],[27,4,27,5],[24,4,24,5],[2,2,2,5],[3,1,3,5],[4,2,4,5],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,5],[18,4,18,5],[10,4,10,5],[11,4,11,5],[12,4,12,5],[13,4,13,5],[14,4,14,5],[32,2,32,5],[31,2,31,3],[17,4,17,5],[26,4,26,5],[23,4,23,5],[31,4,31,5],[46,4,46,5],[57,2,57,3],[57,4,57,5],[53,2,53,3],[53,4,53,5],[43,2,43,3],[44,2,44,3],[47,4,47,5],[49,2,49,3],[45,2,45,5],[46,2,46,3],[55,2,55,3],[56,2,56,3],[56,4,56,5],[50,2,50,3],[50,4,50,5],[52,2,52,3],[52,4,52,5],[47,2,47,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,"RISK ASSESMENT"]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"IDENTIFIED RISKS"]
[null,null,"List all Risks identified in project preparation phase and what  steps are being taken to mitigate them"]
[null,null,"Identified Risk","Current Status","Steps Taken to Mitigate Risk"]
[null,null,"As this programme is designed to be complementary to the CRIP/PPCR programme, any delay in that would impact on achieving desired “whole of country” joint project outputs and outcomes and reduce scope to deliver programme as outlined in proposal","High","Status increased to high due to delays in 2013 reporting period. Actions taken:  There is currently a joint Technical Advisory Group (TAG) and Steering Committee for both the AF and PPCR programmes, and a joint Programme Management Unit is being set upper and efficient coordination and alignment of the two projects. This PMU will be operational in May 2014. At the same time, the AF project has already incorporated a Senior technical Advisor who is supporting the PUMA division to move ahead with the initial stages of the AF project. Project Document for the relevant PPCR investment component has been completed, securing funding with a total of USD$ 14 M.  Currently the recruitment of a comprehensive expert team is taking place to provide technical advise on CIM Plan review and implementation supporting PMU and national partner agencies for both AF and PPCR covered areas. The TAG meetings have already reasulted in important exchanges and towards a harmonized whole of government and Ridge-2-Reef approach. The project team is confident that once the PMU and the expert team is operational the project will move in a more expedited way and the risk levels can be revised towards lower grade in next PPR.",null,null,null,"IS THIS APPROACH WORKING TO REDUCE THE RISK? IF SO, SAY SO. - Stated"]
[null,null,"Extreme climatic events and geophysical hazards damage or eradicate programme results, or cause major disturbances resulting in delays due to needed emergency and recovery processes","High","Status increased to high due to delays in 2013 reporting period, caused by Cyclone Evan, Dec. 2012. Actions taken:  Disaster Management Office has been drawn in as one of the key stakeholders of the project. They are a member of the Technical Advisory Group and have offered Disaster Risk Reduction options for the project activities, aligned with CIM Plan action, and supporting an integrated planning framework incorporating existing Disaster Management Plans. Closer collaboration with MNRE Meteorological Division is also being pursued, to maximize the us of available Climate Early Warning Information system, to inform project site communities."]
[null,null,"Poor collaboration between project partners","High","Status increased to high due to delays in 2013 reporting period. Actions taken:  Inception meeting held in 2013 January with various follow up meetings facilitated also by UNDP. Broad meetings were organized involving village leaders from target districts were held in February and March 2014 in Upolu and Savaii. A Technical Advisory Group (TAG) has been developed comprising of technical personnel from identified relevant national gov. agencies and civil society organizations. There have also been regular progress meetings between the project team, UNDP as well as MOF and World Bank reps  to discuss project alignment and project progress.",null,null,null,"IS THIS APPROACH WORKING TO REDUCE THE RISK? IF SO, SAY SO."]
[null,null,"Weak cooperation by villages in proposed districts.","Low","The meetings for village leaders from target districts, held in February and March in Upolu and Savaii, involved key representatives (mayor, chief, women and youth group reps). Further village consultations are scheduled to gauge perspective and support from the village members, supported through the application of participatory 3D modelling techniques, and through the establishment and revitalization of watershed and district level  coordination committees of villages."]
[null,null,"Land disputes amongst village members adversely affecting village relocation land use planning.","Medium","consultation with communities for the development of the  Relocation Handbook to capture the necessary processes and procedures, ensure village ownership and minimize disputes"]
[null,null,"Limited human resources in Government ministries and agencies to contribute to the activities.","Medium","A TOR for the Technical Advisory Group has been developed and approved by all members identified for their involvement in the project. A joint PMU with the PPCR project is currently being established to support the Government with the implementation of these large projects. Additional technical staff is being recruited to key project agencies, to support their functions in programme implementation. The consultant expert team will have tasks to strengthen also existing gov. tech staff capacity, as a capacity transfer mechanism."]
[null,null,"A series of unusually adverse climatic conditions damage adaptation measures being implemented, or weaken the interest of key stakeholders to addressing adaptation issues.","Low","Disaster Management Office has been drawn in as one of the key stakeholders of the project. They are a member of the Technical Advisory Group and have offered Disaster Risk Reduction options for the project activities and CIM Plan actions identified. The impacts of Cyclone Evan actually reinforced the interest of stakeholders in the project. Suggest to remove this risk, and focus on the above medium and high risks."]
[null,null,"The techniques and technologies developed are not gender sensitive – i.e. they increase inequity between men and women or change the social roles of men and women in a way that reduces self reliance.","Low","The approach taken on board by the project team with engaging communities and stakeholders is to ensure the involvement of all men, women and youth especially in the community level. Initial workshops have identified a member of each of these groups to participate. Gender is also at the core of the Economy-wide Adaptation project proposal being finalized through extensive consultations (LDCF 13M), also supported by UNDP and highly relevant to the AF programme. Suggest to remove this risk."]
[null,null,"The government is not supportive, politically and financially, to a cross-sectoral and integrated approach to the management of climate risks and opportunities.","N/A","This ceased to be a risk at this stage, as gov. reiterated its commitment to cross-sectoral and integrated approach, delays occurred are due to multiple factors operational aspects, being sorted out (see mitigation measures in first risk above). Gov is finalizing a new CC Policy which will further support this approach, which is also taken in upcoming initiatives, such as the Economy-wide Adaptation project (LDCF 13M), also supported by UNDP and highly relevant to the AF programme. "]
[null,null,"Stakeholders are not able to perceive reductions in vulnerability over the time-scale determined by programme duration;","Low","Maintain proactive outreach communications strategy for duration of programme. Current approach is to implement initial no-regret adaptation solutions already identified in CIM Plans (e.g. flood protective structures conditioning, water supply), while designing more integrated and larger interventions through detailed consultations and technical assessments."]
[null,null,"Stakeholders are not able to distinguish vulnerability to climate change from baseline weaknesses in land, coastal, and water resources management","Low","Maintain proactive outreach communications strategy for duration of programme. The application of visual tools, such as P3DM, combined with high-tech assessments, such as LiDAR is expected to support such differentiations and stakeholder understanding"]
[]
[null,null,"Critical Risks Affecting Progress (Not identified at project design)"]
[null,null,"Identify Risks with a 50% or > likelihood of affecting progress of project"]
[null,null,"Identified Risk","Current Status","Steps Taken to Mitigate Risk"]
[null,null,"As this programme is designed to be complementary to the CRIP/PPCR programme, any delay in that would impact on achieving desired “whole of country” joint project outputs and outcomes and reduce scope to deliver programme as outlined in proposal","High","Status increased to high due to delays in 2013 reporting period. Actions taken:  There is currently a joint Technical Advisory Group and Steering Committee for both the AF and PPCR programmes, and a joint Programme Management Unit is being set upper and efficient coordination and alignment of the two projects. This PMU will be operational in May 2014. At the same time, the AF project has already incorporated a Senior technical Advisor who is supporting the PUMA division to move ahead with the initial stages of the AF project. Project Document for the relevant PPCR investment component has been completed, securing funding with a total of USD$ 14 M.  "]
[null,null,"Extreme climatic events and geophysical hazards damage or eradicate programme results, or cause major disturbances resulting in delays due to needed emergency and recovery processes","High","Status increased to high due to delays in 2013 reporting period, caused by Cyclone Evan, Dec. 2012. Actions taken:  Disaster Management Office has been drawn in as one of the key stakeholders of the project. They are a member of the Technical Advisory Group and have offered Disaster Risk Reduction options for the project activities, aligned with CIM Plan action, and supporting an integrated planning framework incorporating existing Disaster Management Plans. Closer collaboration with MNRE Meteorological Division is also being pursued, to maximize the us of available Climate Early Warning Information system, to inform project site communities."]
[null,null,"Poor collaboration between project partners","High","Status increased to high due to delays in 2013 reporting period. Actions taken:  Inception meeting held in 2013 January with various follow up meetings facilitated also by UNDP. Broad meetings were organized involving village leaders from target districts were held in February and March 2014 in Upolu and Savaii. A Technical Advisory Group (TAG) has been developed comprising of technical personnel from identified relevant national gov. agencies and civil society organizations. There have also been regular progress meetings between the project team, UNDP as well as MOF and World Bank reps  to discuss project alignment and project progress."]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Risk Measures: Were there any risk mitigation measures employed during the current reporting period?  If so, were risks reduced?  If not, why were these risks not reduced?"]
[null,null,"Add any comments relevant to risk mitigation (word limit = 500)"]

{"sheet":"Rating","index":4,"n_rows":73,"n_cols":9,"rows_kept":73,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[7,5,7,6],[25,4,25,7],[26,4,26,7],[24,3,24,8],[29,3,32,8],[8,5,8,6],[12,5,12,6],[19,5,19,6],[20,5,20,6],[21,3,21,4],[10,5,10,6],[9,5,9,6],[12,3,12,4],[52,4,52,7],[18,5,18,6],[34,3,34,4],[41,3,41,4],[41,5,41,6],[34,5,34,6],[38,5,38,6],[56,3,56,4],[56,5,56,6],[49,3,49,4],[35,5,35,6],[48,5,48,6],[49,5,49,6],[39,3,39,4],[39,5,39,6],[40,3,40,4],[47,3,47,4],[46,3,46,4],[46,5,46,6],[18,3,18,4],[17,3,17,4],[17,5,17,6],[35,3,35,4],[47,5,47,6],[44,3,44,4],[44,5,44,6],[45,3,45,4],[45,5,45,6],[40,5,40,6],[42,3,42,4],[42,5,42,6],[43,3,43,4],[2,2,2,8],[3,2,3,8],[28,2,28,7],[8,3,8,4],[9,3,9,4],[11,3,11,4],[10,3,10,4],[6,3,6,4],[6,5,6,6],[21,5,21,6],[7,3,7,4],[15,5,15,6],[13,3,13,4],[14,3,14,4],[19,3,19,4],[20,3,20,4],[16,5,16,6],[11,5,11,6],[13,5,13,6],[14,5,14,6],[15,3,15,4],[16,3,16,4],[72,6,72,8],[57,5,57,6],[67,6,67,8],[68,6,68,8],[69,6,69,8],[64,5,64,8],[71,6,71,8],[38,3,38,4],[48,3,48,4],[36,3,36,4],[36,5,36,6],[37,3,37,4],[37,5,37,6],[57,3,57,4],[53,4,53,7],[55,3,55,4],[55,5,55,6],[43,5,43,6],[62,4,62,7],[64,3,64,4],[58,3,58,4],[58,5,58,6],[70,6,70,8],[61,4,61,7]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,"RATING ON IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS "]
[null,null,"For rating definitions please see bottom of page."]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,"Progress on Key Milestones",null,"Expected Progress",null,"Progress to Date","Rating"]
[null,null,"Project Manager/Coordinator: ","Outcome 1: Strengthened awareness and ownership of coastal adaptation and climate risk reduction processes at community and national levels in 25 Districts and 139 villages through gender-sensitive processes\n"]
[null,null,null,"1.1. CIM Plans reviewed in 25 districts with climate induced disaster risk management fully integrated, adopting a Watershed and Ridge to Reef Management approach ",null,"1. Inception workshop to review approach and develop programme\n2. Development of revised CIM Plan template\n3. Review of flood protection requirements\n4. Preparation of revised IAMP 1 districts CIM Plans – Group 1 – Year 1.\n",null,"The Inception Workshop was successfully conducted on the 28th January 2013, and served for initial engagement of stakeholders. The WB-PPCR supported methodological review was rather delayed and did not provide the expected thorough results. Discussions are ongoing to pilot a new approach converting the CIM Plans to Community Integrated Management Plans with a Ridge-to-Reef approach, involving various Ministries and Departments, withe the support of a Technical Advisor started in Feb 2014.","Marginally unsatisfactory"]
[null,null,null,"1.2. Village hazard zone relocation plans formulated at least 15 villages in selected districts",null,"1. Development of selection criteria\n2. Village consultations\n3. Preparation of Village Hazard Zone Relocation Plans – Group 1 – 5 villages\n",null,"This was supposed to be developed through the PPCR consultancy on methodological review, but it did not produce the expected results. Development of relocation plans will await the completion of the Village Hazard Zone Relocation Hand Book that shall document protocols and procedures as well as a system for prioritization. Initial activity will include compilation of information on specific sites and features to be relocated for the database","Unsatisfactory"]
[null,null,null,"1.3. Training delivered to 300 village leaders in 139 villages on review of CIM Plans and relocation planning process integrating climate risks.",null,"1. Preliminary Sui o le Nuu briefing – Year 1",null,"No trainings in reporting period. Initial Workshops with Sui o Nuu (village major), Sui Tamaitai o Nuu (Women Group Rep) was held for Upolu and Savaii on 27 of February and 7 of March 2014. These involved approx. 250 village leaders in 139 villages. ","Unsatisfactory"]
[null,null,null,"Outcome 2: Increased adaptive capacity of coastal communities to adapt to coastal hazards and risks induced by climate change in 25 Districts and 139 villages"]
[null,null,null,"2.1. Climate proofing measures implemented on coastal roads and related infrastructure in at least 10 districts and 40 villages",null,"1. Review of CIM Plans Project database to specify roading projects.\n2. Procurement of design consultant.\n3. Preparation of site-specific designs and cost estimates for selected projects.\n4. Implementation Year 1 projects - 10 villages.\n",null,"Not undertaken. Currently close collaboration taking place with LTA to determine roading, culvert and protective structure conditioning program for prioritization. ","Unsatisfactory"]
[null,null,null,"2.2. Shoreline protection measures implemented in at least 10 districts and 40 villages.",null,"1. Review of CIM Plans Project database to specify shoreline protection measures projects.\n2. Procurement of design consultant.\n3. Preparation of site-specific designs and cost estimates for selected projects.\n4. Implementation Year 1 projects - 10 villages.\n",null,"Has been initiated in reporting period, consultant team is under recruitment currently. Initial field visits scheduled for the 2nd quarter of 2014 to identify projects identified in the CIM Plans that have yet to be implemented. Aim of this initial audit is to identify projects for prioritization.","Unsatisfactory"]
[null,null,null,"2.3 Water supply enhanced in least 5 districts and 15 villages.",null,"1. Review of CIM Plans Project database to specify Water supply enhancement projects.\n2. Procurement of design consultant.\n3. Preparation of site-specific and cost estimates for selected projects.\n4. Implementation Year 1 projects – 3villages.\n",null,"It did not happen in the reporting period, but liaison has been initiated in February with SWA and the MWCSD on water maintenance program in the villages and the designs used.","Unsatisfactory"]
[null,null,null,"2.4 Flood protection measures are implemented in at least 5 districts and 15 villages",null,"1. Review of CIM Plans Project database to identify candidate flood protection measures projects.\n2. Procurement of design consultant.\n3. Preparation of preliminary designs and cost estimates for selected projects.\n4. Implementation Year 1 projects –3 villages.\n",null,"Did not happen in reporting period, but currently being considered in line with 2.1. there will be opportunities to look at the respective sectors with assets that required protection. i.e. clinics, schools","Unsatisfactory"]
[null,null,null,"Outcome 3: Strengthened institutional capacity of government sectors to integrate climate and disaster risk and resilience into coastal management-related policy frameworks, processes and responses."]
[null,null,null,"3.1. Revised national organization and institutional structures for CIM Plans implementation.",null,"1. Review current organizations and structures.\n2. Develop revised arrangements and suggested method of implementation.\n3. Prepare MOU’s for agreement between key partners.\n",null,"Has been initiated through internal discussions and the Technical Advisory Group, analyzing existing planning frameworks. There is currently an institutional review of MNRE, in which PUMA is one of the divisions. The development and implementation of CIM Plans will be a critical activity in the process. ","Marginally Unsatisfactory"]
[null,null,null,"3.2 Village relocation handbook prepared to guide further relocation planning activities.",null,"1. Preparation of draft Village Relocation Handbook.\n2. Consultation with key stakeholders and Sui o le Nuu briefings.\n3. Finalized Village Hazard Zone Relocation Handbook\n",null,"Develop TA for a consultant to develop the handbook.  To be recruited in May 2014","Unsatisfactory"]
[null,null,null,"3.3 Regulatory procedures for physical works implementation revised with climate change risks integrated. ",null,"1. Review of contracts and procurement procedures.\n2. Preparation of revised procurement manual and design guidelines for adaptation works incorporating CCA and DRM components.\n",null,"Not completed in reporting period. Liaison initiated with MWTI to develop ToR for a TA to implement this activity.","Unsatisfactory"]
[null,null,null,"3.4 Policymakers and technical officers in the relevant Ministries and Authorities are trained on climate risk assessment and planning processes for coastal adaptation.",null,"1. Conduct introductory workshop and training needs analysis.\n2. Develop training plan and materials.\n3. Training Workshops – Year 1.\n",null,"Introductory workshop for 25 districts is scheduled for February 2014. Training needs of the communities and stakeholders are to be determined from these initial workshops.","Unsatisfactory"]
[null,null,null,"3.5  Adaptation lessons learned and best practices generated through the adaptation implementation and related policy processes are captured and disseminated nationally and globally through appropriate mechanisms",null,"1. Develop programme communications strategy and plan.\n2. Prepare and operationalize web site material.\n3. Prepare and publish programme communications. \n4. Prepare material for Environment Week – Year 1.\n",null,"Website has been prepared through UNDP assistance, project information has been disseminated at Environment week","Marginally satisfactory"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Overall Rating","Unsatisfactory"]
[]
[null,null,null,"Please Provide the Name and Contact information of person(s) responsible for completing the Rating section"]
[null,null,null,"Name: ","Kirisimasi Seumanutafa "]
[null,null,null,"Email: ","kirisimasi.seumanutafa@mnre.gov.ws"]
[]
[null,null,"Please justify your rating.  Outline the positive and negative progress made by the project since it started.  Provide specific recommendations for next steps. . (word limit=500)"]
[null,null,null,"The project has been delayed significantly and this supports the  unsatisfactory rating it has been given. The first year of the project (2013) has passed with very little activities being implemented and funds are left unspent as a result.  The delay in the finalization of the PPCR which is supporting core activities for developing the necessary information which is critical for formulating plans and training materials as per other project activities contributed to this delay. Furthermore, This delay is a result of the tedious procurement process for procuring the PMU and securing the personnel with full attention given to the project and its execution. However, the project team have been able to identify activities for implementation prior to the set up of the PMU. It is anticipated that the project will progress rapidly from now on with major activities already scheduled for implementation and project set up in a solid state. The Technical Advisor and Project Assistant will offer the capacity and services to map out the areas/activities that the project can proceed with. \nThe formulation of the Technical Advisory Group has been very helpful in moving the project forward, and securing collaboration with the stakeholders and ensuring their support on the implementation of activities."]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,"Progress on Key Milestones",null,"Expected Progress",null,"Progress to Date","Rating"]
[null,null,"Implementing Agency  ","Outcome 1: Strengthened awareness and ownership of coastal adaptation and climate risk reduction processes at community and national levels in 25 Districts and 139 villages through gender-sensitive processes"]
[null,null,null,"1.1. CIM Plans reviewed in 25 districts with climate induced disaster risk management fully integrated, adopting a Watershed and Ridge to Reef Management approach ",null,"1. Inception workshop to review approach and develop programme\n2. Development of revised CIM Plan template\n3. Review of flood protection requirements\n4. Preparation of revised IAMP 1 districts CIM Plans – Group 1 – Year",null,"The Inception Workshop was conducted on the 28th January 2013 with significant delays from the approval of the project in April 2012. The workshop served for initial engagement of key stakeholder groups, but did not allow in-depth discussions on methodology and institutional aspects. \nA key initial study was planned  (as per project document)  to assess the frame and content of the 2 generations of CIM Plans developed between 2000-2007, with the purpose of devising a methodology and related intuitional process for the systematic update and review of the CIM Plans. This methodological study aimed at addressing gaps in the CIM Plans, such as full integration of climate change and associated risks (e.g. flood), broadening the scope from the coastal zone to whole-of watershed (Ridge-to-Reef), integrating related planning frameworks lead by partner gov. agencies, and updating the identified interventions to current community needs and field reality with enhanced design (through covering the before-mentioned gaps). The preparations for this study started on time, in 2012, through the joint formulation of a ToR (Gov. of Samoa, WB, UNDP) for a comprehensive expert team to undertake this. The assignment was financed and managed by WB also as a key component for PPCR project design. Both UNDP and the Government (esp. MNRE PUMA) provided significant inputs to the ToR and participated in in-country consultations by the expert team to ensure alignment with AF. However, the recruitment process got hugely delayed and the final report and methodology presented by the consultant team in 2013 was not conducive to the purposes, and it was not approved fully by the Government. Realizing that the PPCR-sourced TA will not provide the timely and substantive input, UNDP has been advocating for alternative TA arrangements to fast-track the methodological process. This involved recruiting a Senior Technical Advisor, and by trying to bring in an international expert, already employed for a highly related LDCF project proposal development through USAID-ADAPT support. While a technical advisor came on board after much delay (in February 2014) the formal engagement of the other international expert was not pursued further by government. \nThe process was also impacted by government decision on changing the originally agreed distribution of districts between AF and PPCR programmes. A key change has been the allocation of the Apia area to AF, as originally AF focused on rural areas, and the inclusion of the most urbanized, populated and highly vulnerable area, represented considerable change in priorities.\nCorrective actions taken in current reporting period: The process to identify an integrated methodology for CIm Plan review has advanced through the formulation of the Technical Advisory Group, and there is a convergence to bring together various current planning frameworks (Integrated Watershed management Plans, CIM Plans, DRM Plans, Village Sustainable Development Plans) managed by different gov. agencies towards an integrated watershed management and Ridge-to-Reef approach. Agreement was made on piloting this new approach in 3 selected watersheds involving 7 districts (including the broader Apia area). \nThere is also a clear plan now on getting a LiDAR coverage of the complete country in collaboration with the PPCR. The availability of this type of high resolution topography and spatial data, and then provision of the currently lacking near-shore bathymetry data will allow for a much more accurate analysis of risks and adaptation options on the coast and also identification of flood hazard zones in the watersheds.\nToR is being developed for a comprehensive expert team of specialists to support the pilot watershed process and its rolling out country-wide, including a flood modelling exercise. A set of flood protection requirements is being reviewed with LTA, focusing on no -regret measures already identified in CIM Plans, aiming at conditioning existing draining and protective structures.","marginally unsatisfactory"]
[null,null,null,"1.2. Village hazard zone relocation plans formulated at least 15 villages in selected districts",null,"1. Development of selection criteria\n2. Village consultations\n3. Preparation of Village Hazard Zone Relocation Plans – Group 1 – 5 villages\n",null,"The hazard relocation plans have not been developed as expected. To review and recommend a method for this was included in the consultancy ToR to be delivered by PPCR, but did not produce the needed specifications.\nCorrective actions in current reporting period: The consultations with the Water Resources Division has created a very interesting opportunity for collaboration. the WRD is currently developing a flood modelling exercise for the Vaisigano River and the AF project will replicate and upscale this exercise in other rivers in the Apia area and other vulnerable areas in the country\nDevelopment of relocation plans will await the complete of the Village Hazard Zone Relocation Hand Book that shall document protocols and procedures as well as a system for prioritization. Initial activity will include compilation of information on specific sites and features to be relocated for the database, to be further specified by the expert team to be recruited, and informed by the flood modelling exercise.","Unsatisfactory"]
[null,null,null,"1.3. Training delivered to 300 village leaders in 139 villages on review of CIM Plans and relocation planning process integrating climate risks.",null,"1. Preliminary Sui o le Nuu briefing – Year 1",null,"No trainings have taken place during 2013, though the Inception Workshop served for some initial awareness raising.\nCorrective actions taken in current reporting period: 2 Initial Workshops held in Upolu and Savaii in February and March 2014 involved approx. 250 leaders in 139 villages - Sui o Nuu (village major), Sui Tamaitai o Nuu (Women Group Rep) and Sui Tupulaga (Youth Representatives). Further trainings will be done in 3 initial watersheds that will be used to pilot the CIM Plan review process and associated training to communities. This will use integrated watershed management frame with other planning processes integrated (including CIM Plan), and applying community based ICT tools such as the Participatory 3D Modelling introduced to Samoa through an LDCF project. The consultations with the Disaster Management Office have also identified a very interesting opportunity for collaboration on this output. These trainings will be organized in coordination with the Village Disaster Risk Management plans currently under development by Disaster Management Office and the Red Cross in Samoa. They have already developed these plans for 5 villages and they are aiming at covering the whole country by the end of 2015","Marginally satisfactory"]
[null,null,null,"Outcome 2: Increased adaptive capacity of coastal communities to adapt to coastal hazards and risks induced by climate change in 25 Districts and 139 villages"]
[null,null,null,"2.1. Climate proofing measures implemented on coastal roads and related infrastructure in at least 10 districts and 40 villages",null,"1. Review of CIM Plans Project database to specify roading projects.\n2. Procurement of design consultant.\n3. Preparation of site-specific designs and cost estimates for selected projects.\n4. Implementation Year 1 projects - 10 villages.\n",null,"The CIM plans database has undergone a partial review by a consultancy fielded  through the WB-PPCR aiming at devising a CIM Plan review method, but the results of the study (presented with huge delays) did not provide the needed specifications to initiate this output. The AF Senior Technical Advisor could only come on-board in February 2014 due to delay in government processes for recruitment, and started the review database and initiate discussions with Land and Transport Authority (LTA) to identify these measures. The  design and sizing of these climate proofing measures will be also informed by flood modelling studies being initiated currently in the 3 initial watersheds, including for the Apia catchment area (by Water Resources Division - WRD)\nCorrective actions taken in current reporting period: \nConsultations with LTA have resulted in the identification of interventions conditioning existing infrastructure (roading, culvert and protective structures) to reduce flooding risk at coastal roads. These interventions have been derived from the CIM Plan prioritization matrix, Post-disaster Risk Assessment that was done by LTA on national roads after the Cyclone in 2012 and on the Recovery Plan developed by the agency. \n","Unsatisfactory"]
[null,null,null,"2.2. Shoreline protection measures implemented in at least 10 districts and 40 villages.",null,"1. Review of CIM Plans Project database to specify shoreline protection measures projects.\n2. Procurement of design consultant.\n3. Preparation of site-specific designs and cost estimates for selected projects.\n4. Implementation Year 1 projects - 10 villages.\n",null,"An initial study was commissioned in late 2013 to analyze current coastal protection measures, esp. seawalls. The study was undertaken by a local consultant team and had limited coverage; while provided some good preliminary info, further assessments are needed. Senior Tech Advisor came on-board in February 2014 to initiate more in-depth analysis and coordination with partner agencies.\nCorrective actions taken in current reporting period: \nThe recent consultations and recently started close collaboration with LTA, DMO and WRD will allow for the identification of priority areas for shoreline protection measures. \nAlso collaboration with the GEF-LDCF UNDP implemented project on tourism in Samoa has resulted in the identification of one priority area in the island of Savaii where coastal adaptation interventions are urgent. The AF technical advisor is coordinating the process to bring together a team of experts for the identification of existing alternatives and the undertaking of necessary technical assessments before implementation (including on flood modelling and lagoon sediment transport)","Marginally unsatisfactory"]
[null,null,null,"2.3 Water supply enhanced in least 5 districts and 15 villages.",null,"1. Review of CIM Plans Project database to specify Water supply enhancement projects.\n2. Procurement of design consultant.\n3. Preparation of site-specific and cost estimates for selected projects.\n4. Implementation Year 1 projects – 3villages.\n",null,"Interventions have not started in this component:\nCorrective actions taken in current reporting period: \nConsultations have taken place with the Samoa Water Supply agency and with the independent water scheme association to identify priority areas and interventions to enhance access to water supply ","Unsatisfactory"]
[null,null,null,"2.4 Flood protection measures are implemented in at least 5 districts and 15 villages",null,"1. Review of CIM Plans Project database to identify candidate flood protection measures projects.\n2. Procurement of design consultant.\n3. Preparation of preliminary designs and cost estimates for selected projects.\n4. Implementation Year 1 projects –3 villages.\n",null,"Not progressed.\nCorrective actions taken in current reporting period: \nThis is being considered currently in line with 2.1. actions ( see above), and being prioritized for the protection of key assists, including clinics and schools.","Unsatisfactory"]
[null,null,null,"Outcome 3: Strengthened institutional capacity of government sectors to integrate climate and disaster risk and resilience into coastal management-related policy frameworks, processes and responses."]
[null,null,null,"3.1. Revised national organization and institutional structures for CIM Plans implementation.",null,"1. Review current organizations and structures.\n2. Develop revised arrangements and suggested method of implementation.\n3. Prepare MOU’s for agreement between key partners.\n",null,"Institutional aspects have been addressed through he PPCR-funded methodological study, and iterative discussions between national stakeholders, but has not resulted in pragmatic recommendations and actions in the reporting period. There have been progressive discussions on this within the Tech Advisory Group, involving key Ministries and divisions, and considering experience from various frameworks. Both national and subnational (watershed, district and village committees and local constituencies) are being considered, and the ToR currently being formulated ","Marginally unsatisfactory"]
[null,null,null,"3.2 Village relocation handbook prepared to guide further relocation planning activities.",null,"1. Preparation of draft Village Relocation Handbook.\n2. Consultation with key stakeholders and Sui o le Nuu briefings.\n3. Finalized Village Hazard Zone Relocation Handbook\n",null,"No significant progress has been achieved in this component.\nThe Village relocation plans should be based on an initial identification of hazard zones and settlements in those areas, identification of possibilities and consultations with communities.\nCorrective actions taken in current reporting period:\nThe consultations with the Water Resources Division has created a very interesting opportunity for collaboration. the WRD is currently developing a flood modelling exercise for the Vaisigano River and the AF project will replicate and upscale this exercise in other rivers in the Apia area and other vulnerable areas in the country. The  procurement of a consultant to develop the handbook is planned for May 2014, which will use the flood modelling information, amongst others.","Unsatisfactory"]
[null,null,null,"3.3 Regulatory procedures for physical works implementation revised with climate change risks integrated. ",null,"1. Review of contracts and procurement procedures.\n2. Preparation of revised procurement manual and design guidelines for adaptation works incorporating CCA and DRM components.\n",null,"There has been no progress on this output. \nCorrective actions taken in current reporting period:\nThe plan for 2014 is to liaise with MWTI and LTA for this particular task. \nMWTI has already done some initial work of revision of the building code to incorporate climate change considerations and this example is to be followed by LTA to modify their technical specifications for roads and ways of communication and their construction procedures including coordination with other agencies, mainly MNRE. ","Unsatisfactory"]
[null,null,null,"3.4 Policymakers and technical officers in the relevant Ministries and Authorities are trained on climate risk assessment and planning processes for coastal adaptation.",null,"1. Conduct introductory workshop and training needs analysis.\n2. Develop training plan and materials.\n3. Training Workshops – Year 1.\n",null,"40 gov. officers were trained during the PACCSAP-Australian Gov. supported LiDAR training, as wells the USAID-ADAPT supported V&A training aligned with AF programme.  ","satisfactory"]
[null,null,null,"3.5  Adaptation lessons learned and best practices generated through the adaptation implementation and related policy processes are captured and disseminated nationally and globally through appropriate mechanisms",null,"1. Develop programme communications strategy and plan.\n2. Prepare and operationalize web site material.\n3. Prepare and publish programme communications. \n4. Prepare material for Environment Week – Year 1.\n",null,"Website has been prepared through UNDP assistance, project information has been disseminated at Environment week, and at village leader's workshops.","satisfactory"]
[{"$nulls":8},"unsatisfactory"]
[null,null,null,"Please Provide the Name and Contact information of person(s) responsible for completing the Rating section"]
[null,null,null,"Name: ","Marta Moneo, Gabor Vereczi"]
[null,null,null,"Email: ","marta.moneo@undp.org; gabor.vereczi@undp.org"]
[]
[null,null,null,"Progress on Key Milestones",null,"Expected Progress",null,"Progress to Date","Rating"]
[null,null,"Other"]
[]
[]
[{"$nulls":7},"Overall Rating"]
[null,null,null,"Please Provide the Name and Contact information of person(s) responsible for completing the Rating section"]
[null,null,null,"Name: "]
[null,null,null,"Email: "]
[]
[null,null,null,"Please justify your rating and address the following points:\n1. Indicate trends, both positive and negative, in achievement of outcomes as per the project indicators.  \n2.  Detail critical risks that have affected progress.  \n3.  Outline response to MTR undertaken this reporting period.  \n4.  Outline action plan to address projects with a rating of HU, U or MU. Please keep your input to 1200 words",null,"The project has suffered significant delays in implementation mainly due to challenges in aligning with the WB-funded PPCR project as specified in AF project document, in order to ensure a whole of a country integrated process. While UNDP supported this through advising government and liaising with WB representatives at various levels, since early stages of the AF project in 2012, it did not bring satisfactory results, due to the following reasons:\na) Differing timeline of PPCR/WB project formulation and implementing procedures for the relevant investment component, as well as delays in PPCR deliverables (including the consultancy on setting the CIM-Plan review method and overall project formulation).  The Project Operational Manual (basically the prodoc) for this initiative was finalized in late 2013, but UNDP only received documentation in February 2014. \n\nb) Setting up of joint project implementation structure and arrangements. This is the first time for the Government to create a single PMU for both projects and to also utilize the same steering committee. The process has suffered significant institutional challenges of coordination between ministries involved. PPCR is executed by the Ministry of Finance (MoF) and the AF programme by Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (MNRE) and its Planning and Urban Management Authority (PUMA).  UNDP has been advocating for setting up a joint Programme Board and Programme Management Unit as envisaged originally, but it has not been streamlined and fully agreed between the PPCR and AF executing agencies. Initial position was to operate 2 separate steering committees (existing PPCR Steering Committee chaired by MoF and the AF Steering Committee to be chaired by AF). This has evolved towards MoF and MNRE converging to operate a joint SC, but to date a joint meeting has not been convened. Similarly, there has been differing views on the set up of PMU, with a confusing situation created as AF started to recruit a PMU (involving a PM and an assistant) and a senior tech advisor (with both MoF and MNRE represented on the selection panel),  but it was altered, as later it was requested by MoF and suggested by WB to recruit fully fledged PMU team through PPCR resources. This is taking place currently, and PMU expected to come on-board in May, while AF recruited an assistant (to work with PUMA)  and a tech advisor. The need to streamline implementation arrangements has been reiterated on several occasions and channels by UNDP.\n\nc) Cyclone Evan in December 2012 affected significantly the normal activity of the Government and shifted their priorities, including the reassignment of the Apia catchment area to AF (previously to be covered by PPCR)\n\nd) The departure of the PUMA ACEO caused a gap of leadership in the division that also stalled the project. The unfortunate passing away of MNRE CEO has further impacted the process. With a new MNRE CEO and PUMA ACEO appointed in March, leadership of the organization has been restored with renewed commitment on programme implementation. New MNRE CEO has been previously the ACEO of the Water Resources Division leading the integrated watershed management process, which is also advantageous towards the R2R approach being taken. \n\nThe above challenges have been discussed by UNDP and the government on several occasions and have been addressed progressively. Therefore, the current trend is positive for the programme, considering the following actions already undertaken and planned for 2014 to speed up implementation:\na) A Senior technical advisor has been appointed for the project. This STA is a Samoan national with extensive experience on climate change adaptation; he was also one of the main contributors to the original development of the CIM plans and has worked with the Government for many years. The STA is also in charge of linking support to the tourism LDCF project addressing similar issues targeting community tourism operators in AF-supported areas of the country.\n\nb) The PPCR project document has been approved and the procurement process for the single PMU is planned to be finalized in April 2014. The PMU will be operational by mid May 2014.\n\nc) A new MNRE CEO and ACEO for PUMA have also been appointed recently\n\nd) The  Joint AF/PPCR Programme Steering Committee meeting met for the first time on 3 March 2014. A Technical Advisory Group (TAG) has been created and is very active incorporating representatives from a wide range of relevant stakeholders such as: DMO, WRD, PUMA, LTA, MWCSD, MWTI, CSSP. Initial meetings of the TAG have already derived into the identification of joint actions and interventions to move the project forward.\nMNRE PUMA Institutional Review is currently taking place, and the AF-supported staffing arrangements will be fully integrated in that with a view of longer-term institutional capacity building and sustainability considerations.\n\ne) Recruitment of expert team. A team of experts is being recruited to support the process of revision of the CIM plans starting in the pilot 3 watersheds. This team will include 5 experts: 1) ecosystems expert, 2) Coastal geo-morphologist, 3) climate change specialist, 4) Engineer, and 5) GIS specialist\n\nf) Piloting new planning frame and CIM Plan review: The TAG is already working on the final definition of the process for revision of the CIM plans that will include a more Ridge to Reef approach. This will imply the undertaking of integrated watershed management plan that will also include a flood control action plan for the most vulnerable and populated watersheds. The new planning frame is termed as Community Integrated Management Plans, and will build on existing Coastal Infrastructure management Plans, DRM Plans, IWRM plans, Sustainable Village Plans, Tourism Development Area (TDA) Plans\n\ng) Flood modeling. Consultations with the Water Resources Division have created a very interesting opportunity for collaboration. The WRD is currently developing a flood modelling exercise for the Vaisigano River supported by an Australian expert. The AF project will replicate and upscale this exercise in other rivers in the Apia area and other vulnerable areas in the country. These consultations have only started recently, but they seem to be on a positive track to coordinate their work with that of the project\n\nh) Disaster Risk management trainings. The consultations with the Disaster Management Office have also identified a very interesting opportunity for collaboration on this output. These trainings will be organized in coordination with the Village Disaster Risk Management plans currently under development by Disaster Management Office and the Red Cross in Samoa. They have already developed these plans for 5 villages and they are aiming at covering the whole country by the end of 2015\n\nif) Coastal roads climate proofing. Consultations with Land Transport Authority (LTA) have resulted in the identification of initial interventions already indicated in CIM Plans, to minimize flooding on coastal roads. These interventions have been derived from the Post Disaster Assessment that was done by LTA on national roads after the Cyclone in 2012 and on the Recovery plan developed by the agency. Close collaboration with LTA will allow to determine roading, culvert and sea wall conditioning options for prioritization. The detailed design of these interventions will also be informed by the flood risk assessments to be carried out.\n\nj) Shoreline protection. The recent consultations and recently started close collaboration with LTA, DMO and WRD will work on the identification of priority areas for shoreline protection measures. Also collaboration with the GEF project on climate change and tourism has resulted in the identification of one priority area on the island of Savaii (Manase) where coastal adaptation interventions are urgent. The AF technical advisor is supporting bringing together a team of experts for the identification of existing alternatives and the undertaking of necessary technical assessments before implementation\n\nk) Water supply. Consultations have also taken place with the Samoa Water Authority and with the Independent Water Scheme Association to identify priority areas and interventions to enhance access to water supply for the most vulnerable communities.\n\nl) Based on a pilot survey and initial training on the LiDAR topography survey technique, supported by the Australian Government (PACCSAP) programme, this survey will be expanded to the whole country, co-financed by the WB/PPCR and the AF resources. This will not only allow precision topography and vegetation coverage data, but also near-shore bathymetry data, currently non-existent in the country and crucial for coastal infrastructure planning and climate-proofing, as this is the zone where most climate-induced effects, such as storm surges occur.\n\nm) Based on the successful experience developed in an LDCF-funded forestry adaptation project, the AF programme is also aiming at introducing the Participatory 3D Modelling technique, a visual tool for engaging and informing local communities, while creating ownership on the process.\n\nAbove all, it is expected that programme implementation will be streamlined and speed up during the 2014 -2015 reporting period. \n\n"]
[]
[{"$nulls":6},"Rating Definitions"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Highly Satisfactory (HS)","Project actions/activities planned for current reporting period are progressing on track or exceeding expectations to achieve all  major outcomes/outputs for given reporting period, without major shortcomings. The project can be presented as “good practice”."]
[{"$nulls":5},"Satisfactory (S)","Project actions/activities planned for current reporting period  are progressing on track to achieve most of its major outcomes/outputs with only minor shortcomings."]
[{"$nulls":5},"Marginally Satisfactory (MS)","Project actions/activities planned for current reporting period  are progressing on track to achieve most   major relevant outcomes/outputs, but with either significant shortcomings or modest overall relevance. "]
[{"$nulls":5},"Marginally Unsatisfactory (MU)","Project actions/activities planned for current reporting period  are not progressing on track to achieve  major outcomes/outputs with major shortcomings or is expected to achieve only some of its major outcomes/outputs."]
[{"$nulls":5},"Unsatisfactory (U)","Project actions/activities planned for current reporting period  are not progressing on track to achieve most of its major outcomes/outputs."]
[{"$nulls":5},"Highly Unsatisfactory (U)","Project actions/activities planned for current reporting period  are not on track and shows that it is failing to achieve, and is not expected to achieve, any of its outcomes/outputs."]

{"sheet":"Project Indicators","index":5,"n_rows":21,"n_cols":8,"rows_kept":21,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[14,2,15,2],[8,2,9,2],[11,2,12,2],[16,2,18,2],[16,3,16,4],[17,3,17,4],[15,3,15,4],[20,3,20,4],[19,3,19,4],[8,3,8,4],[9,3,9,4],[18,3,18,4],[12,3,12,4],[10,3,10,4],[11,3,11,4],[13,3,13,4],[14,3,14,4],[2,2,2,7],[3,2,3,7],[4,2,4,7],[6,3,6,4],[7,3,7,4],[5,2,5,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,"PROJECT Indicators"]
[null,null,"Please provide all indicators being tracked for the project as outlined in the project document"]
[]
[null,null,"Type of Indicator (indicators towards Objectives, Outcomes, etc…)"]
[null,null,"Type of Indicator","Indicator",null,"Baseline","Progress since inception","Target for Project End"]
[null,null,"Objective: Strengthened ability of coastal communities to  make informed decisions about climate-change induced hazards and undertake concrete  adaptation actions","Number of risk-exposed  coastal communities protected through coastal adaptation measures based on climate-sensitive Coastal Infrastructure Management Plans (CIMP)\n\n",null,"In the lack of systematic implementation of CIM Plans, the target villages and districts are highly exposed to climate-induced hazards ","Leaders from all target villages and districts were involved in initial workshops held in Upolu and Savaii in February and March 2014. 7 Districts involving 64 villages were identified to pilot the CIM Plan revision method exercise towards integrated watershed management or Ride-to-Reef approach.","By the end of the programme 139 villages in 25 districts are protected from climate-induced risks as a result of coastal adaptation measures implemented guided by revised CIM Plans"]
[null,null,"Outcome 1: Strengthened awareness and ownership of coastal adaptation and climate risk reduction processes at community and national levels in 25 Districts and 139 villages through gender-sensitive processes\n\n","No. of Districts covered by reviewed and updated CIM Plans  with climate change risks fully integrated",null,"The 6 CIM Plans prepared under IAMP1 have no DRM component.\nThe 19 CIM Plans prepared under SIAM2 require review.","0 districts completed so far. Review initiated in 7 Districts (Safata, Vaimauga East and West - Apia Catchment,   Gagaemauga 1-2-3 - Vaipuli Catchment) identified to pilot the CIM Plan revision method exercise towards integrated watershed management approach. It was suggested to rename CIM Plan as Community Integrated Management Plan. This methodological approach requires a thorough consultative process with all relevant agencies: PUMA, Water Resources Division, NDMO, LTA, MWCSD, community representatives, to ensure a comprehensive Ridge to Reef approach.","By the end of year one at least 8, year two 18 and by the completion of the programme at least 25 districts will have their CIM Plans reviewed and updated with climate change risks fully integrated, through balanced involvement of man, women and youth population"]
[null,null,null,"No. of Districts with village hazard zone relocation plans completed",null,"There are currently no village relocation plans available to guide relocation activities for households to move out from coastal hazard zones.","0 districts completed so far, but process has been initiated in 7 District (as above): In collaboration with the Water Resources Division, a flood modelling and forecasting system is currently under development. This system will be used for the identification of flood hazard zones under different climate change scenarios. This information will also be the basis for the identification of areas where relocation is necessary and to develop the relocation plans per village.","By the end of year one 5, year two 10 and by the completion of the programme at least 15 districts will have at least one village hazard zone relocation plan completed through balanced involvement of man, women and youth population.\nTrainees to disperse this knowledge to wider community for greater awareness\n"]
[null,null,null,"No. of community representatives trained on coastal risk assessment and adaptation and numbers of individuals engaged in those sessions",null,"Currently there has been no training for village leaders in coastal adaptation and climate risk reduction processes including village relocation planning.","2 Initial Workshops held in Upolu and Savaii in February and March 2014 involved approx. 250 village leaders from 25 districts - Sui o Nuu (village major), Sui Tamaitai o Nuu (Women Group Rep). Further training program /schedule to be developed by the Project Management Unit. These trainings will be organized in coordination with the Village Disaster Risk Management plans currently under development by Disaster Management Office and the Red Cross in Samoa.","By the end of the project at least 300 village representatives (including matais, women and youth groups) trained (year 1- 50, year 2- 100, year 3-200), involving traditional leaders, women and youth group representatives"]
[null,null,"Outcome 2: Increased adaptive capacity of coastal communities to adapt to coastal hazards and risks induced by climate change in 25 Districts and 139 villages\n","Km of coastal roads and related infrastructure improved to  withstand climate change and variability-induced stress",null,"There has been road reconstructions and upgrading undertaken in response to past hazards, such as the 2009 tsunami, but without integrating systematically climate change related risks in the process","0 KM so far. Consultations with LTA have resulted in the identification of interventions conditioning existing infrastructure (roading, culvert and protective structures) to reduce flooding risk at coastal roads. These interventions have been derived from the CIM Plan prioritization matrix, Post-disaster Risk Assessment that was done by LTA on national roads after the Cyclone in 2012 and on the Recovery Plan developed by the agency. ","By the end of the programme at least 80km of coastal roads and related infrastructure is improved to  withstand climate change and variability-induced stress"]
[null,null,null,"Km of coastline with climate resilient shoreline and flood protection measures introduced, including  vegetation planting along the coast and riparian streams  and beach replenishment ",null,"There are only a few villages, where shoreline adaptation measures have been introduced through the PACC and CBDAMPIC projects, but only in a pilot fashion","0 KM so far. Consultations have taken place with Land Transport Authority, the agency responsible for construction of roads, to identify initial interventions to minimize flooding of coastal roads. LTA also developed a damage assessment and  maintenance and recovery plan after Cyclone Evan in December 2012. The recommendations from this plan will be used increase resilience of coastal roads in the 25 districts. In addition to the LTA maintenance program, consolations have also taken place with NGOs who are undertaking coastal revegatation projects and agroforestry activities upland. A flood-modelling exercise is being prepared, that will inform the detailed design of adaptation measures.","By the completion of the programme  climate resilient shoreline and flood protection measures  are introduced in at least 140km coastline and riparian streams, including  vegetation planting in at least 60 km coast and 50 km of riparian streams, and beach replenishment techniques applied in at least 2 sites and 10 Km coastline "]
[null,null,null,"N. of population and communities accessing improved water sector services and infrastructure to manage  impacts on water supply induced by climate change and variability",null,"The target villages lack robust water supply system to withstand climate-induced impacts in water supply","0 n. of population so far. Consultations have taken place with the Samoa Water Authority and with the Independent Water Scheme Association to identify priority areas and interventions to enhance access to water supply ","By the end of the programme at least 9,000 inhabitants in 15 villages have their water supply and associated infrastructure improved (in compliance with the Ministry of Health standards) to manage climate-induced impacts on water supply "]
[null,null,null,"Perception of coastal communities on changes in  climate-induced risks as a result of interventions",null,"Baseline to be set at the beginning of the project","Detailed community consultations have not started yet. The methodology for revision of the CIM plans will include an initial survey to capture perceptions of risk of the communities. This will serve as the baseline and changes will be monitored along the project.","By the end of the project at least 80% of the coastal communities involved perceive risk reduction to climate-induced hazards"]
[null,null,null,"Number of watersheds with integrated flood risk management measures implemented",null,"Improved drainage and reduced flooding by the end of programme.","Consultations have taken place with the Water Resources Division who has been responsible for the development of 7 watershed management plans up to now. The WRD is currently undertaking a flood modelling exercise for the Vaisigano river and the AF project will replicate and upscale the modeling exercise to another 4 rivers in the Apia area. This will serve as the basis to generate flood protection interventions in the most populated and vulnerable area of the country","Integrated flood-risk management plans/measures implemented in at least 10 watersheds/ 80 Km of waterways, involving at least 15 of villages."]
[null,null,"Outcome 3: Strengthened institutional capacity of government sectors to integrate climate and disaster risk and resilience into coastal management-related policy frameworks, processes and responses\n","Revised national organization and institutional structures to implement CIM Plans",null,"There is currently no organization specifically identified to co-ordinate the implementation of CIM Plan recommended works at the village and district level.","Has been initiated through the PPCR supported methodological assessment, and will be furthered through the collaborative exercise initiated between MNRE (various divisions), NDMO, MWCSD, LTA, SWA, using 3 watersheds as pilots.","A revised CIM Plan management institutional structure is set up by end of year one of the project"]
[null,null,null,"A blueprint established and tested for Village relocation processes",null,"There are currently no guidelines or procedures in place as to how to undertake village relocations in Samoa.","The development of village relocation plans has yet to commence\nIn collaboration with the Water Resources Division, a flood forecasting system is currently under development. This system will be used for the identification of flood hazard zones under different climate change scenarios. This information will also be the basis for the identification of areas where relocation is necessary and to develop the relocation plans per villages.","A completed and operationally tested village relocation handbook  is developed by the end of the project to guide future relocation planning exercises "]
[null,null,null,"Improved regulatory procedures for physical works implementation with climate change and disaster risk considerations incorporated.",null,"Current regulatory procedures for physical works are incomplete and do not have consistent references to either climate change or disaster risk considerations.","This will be part of the assignment for the expert team being recruited, will be assessing and recommending on current frames and processes, such as the Development Consent, or EIA.","Revised regulatory procedures for CIM Plan works is prepared by the end of year 3 of the programme"]
[null,null,null,"Number of policy makers and technical officers trained on climate risk assessment and planning processes for coastal adaptation.",null,"Policymakers and technical officers have low to moderate levels of understanding of climate risk assessment and planning processes for coastal adaptation.","Approx. 40 gov. officers were trained during the PACCSAP-Australian Gov. supported LiDAR training, as wells the USAID-ADAPT supported V&A training aligned with AF programme.  ","By the end of the programme at least 100 policymakers and technical officers exhibit improved levels of understanding of climate risk assessment and planning processes for coastal adaptation."]
[null,null,null,"Number of knowledge management products and South-South exchange events carried out ",null,"Absence of a communication strategy and lack of information management system to support adaptation of coastal villages and districts to climate change risks.","Website established. Project information has been disseminated at Environment week, and at village leader's workshops.","By the end of the programme a communication strategy is developed and information and lessons learnt are compiled and disseminated to local, regional and international stakeholders through at least 4 different mediums\nBy the end of Year 1 the project web site is operational and not fewer than 5 project communications have been published.\nBy the end of Year 2 not fewer than 10 further project communications have been published \n"]

{"sheet":"Lessons Learned","index":6,"n_rows":28,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":28,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[23,2,23,3],[2,2,2,3],[11,2,11,3],[13,2,13,3],[16,2,16,3],[19,2,19,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,"QUALITATIVE MEASURES and LESSONS LEARNED"]
[]
[null,null,"Please complete the following section every reporting period"]
[null,null,"Implementation and Adaptive Management","Response"]
[null,null,"What implementation issues/lessons, either positive or negative, affected progress?","The main issue has been the coordination and alignment with the WB-funded PPCR process. A key lesson is that with the best intent to coordinate and providing thorough input from AF side, results of activities managed through the PPCR process and expected to feed to AF might not bring the anticipated results. These co-programming processes are also rather difficult to influence, even if it is the same gov. executing entity in charge (MNRE PUMA). Example is a consultancy by a comprehensive expert team carried out through PPCR in order to define a method and process to review the CIM Plans, a key initial output in the AF project. UNDP and government provided detailed comments through various rounds and direct coordination with WB colleagues to the ToR of this consultancy back in 2011, to ensure it is fully aligned with and referencing AF frame and deliverables. The consultant team was recruited with huge delays, and only until 2013 produced the expected reports The study findings and proposed institutional structures and processes were rather out of context out of context, not anchored fully in reality and non-practical to implement (this view was also shared by Gov - MNRE PUMA). While WB aimed to use this study for the detailed design of the PPCR implementation plan (and did to some extent), this consultancy did not provide the needed input at all to the AF project. A lesson is that while it is key to align institutional and technical processes as much as possible to avoid duplications, the AF project needs to make parallel arrangements in order not to depend fully on such processes with very little control over. For this reason the AF project recruited a Senior Tech Advisor, and went ahead to set up a Technical Advisory Group, while a comprehensive expert team's recruitment is being initiated. There can be also risks with parallel arrangements, e.g. it can be confusing and time-consuming to stakeholders if various expert teams undertake gov. and community consultations on overlapping subjects and processes in similar timeframes, nevertheless alternative or backup arrangements should be prepared to be ready to launch when processes managed by co-funding/co-programming arrangements (like PPCR) get delayed or fall short to produce the expected inputs.",null,null,"this is not good enough. Fill in the cell with a response specific to the question"]
[null,null,"Were there any delays in implementation?  If so, include any causes of delays. What measures have been taken to reduce delays?","The project has suffered significant delays in implementation mainly due to challenges in aligning with the WB-funded PPCR project as specified in AF project document, in order to ensure a whole of a country integrated process. While UNDP supported this through advising government and liaising with WB representatives at various levels, since early stages of the AF project in 2012, it did not bring satisfactory results, due to the following reasons:\na) Differing timeline of PPCR/WB project formulation and implementing procedures for the relevant investment component, as well as delays in PPCR deliverables (including the consultancy on setting the CIM-Plan review method and overall project formulation).  The Project Operational Manual (basically the prodoc) for this initiative was finalized in late 2013, but UNDP only received documentation in February 2014. \n\nb) Setting up of joint project implementation structure and arrangements. This is the first time for the Government to create a single PMU for both projects and to also utilize the same steering committee. The process has suffered significant institutional challenges of coordination between ministries involved. PPCR is executed by the Ministry of Finance (MoF) and the AF programme by Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (MNRE) and its Planning and Urban Management Authority (PUMA).  UNDP has been advocating for setting up a joint Programme Board and Programme Management Unit as envisaged originally, but it has not been streamlined and fully agreed between the PPCR and AF executing agencies. Initial position was to operate 2 separate steering committees (existing PPCR Steering Committee chaired by MoF and the AF Steering Committee to be chaired by AF). This has evolved towards MoF and MNRE converging to operate a joint SC, but to date a joint meeting has not been convened. Similarly, there has been differing views on the set up of PMU, with a confusing situation created as AF started to recruit a PMU (involving a PM and an assistant) and a senior tech advisor (with both MoF and MNRE represented on the selection panel),  but it was altered, as later it was requested by MoF and suggested by WB to recruit fully fledged PMU team through PPCR resources. This is taking place currently, and PMU expected to come on-board in May, while AF recruited an assistant (to work with PUMA)  and a tech advisor. The need to streamline implementation arrangements has been reiterated on several occasions and channels by UNDP.\n\nc) Cyclone Evan in December 2012 affected significantly the normal activity of the Government and shifted their priorities, including the reassignment of the Apia catchment area to AF (previously to be covered by PPCR)\n\nd) The departure of the PUMA ACEO caused a gap of leadership in the division that also stalled the project. The unfortunate passing away of MNRE CEO has further impacted the process. With a new MNRE CEO and PUMA ACEO appointed in March, leadership of the organization has been restored with renewed commitment on programme implementation. New MNRE CEO has been previously the ACEO of the Water Resources Division leading the integrated watershed management process, which is also advantageous towards the R2R approach being taken. \n\nThe above challenges have been discussed by UNDP and the government on several occasions and have been addressed progressively. Therefore, the current trend is positive for the programme, considering the following actions already undertaken and planned for 2014 to speed up implementation:\na) A Senior technical advisor has been appointed for the project. This STA is a Samoan national with extensive experience on climate change adaptation; he was also one of the main contributors to the original development of the CIM plans and has worked with the Government for many years. The STA is also in charge of linking support to the tourism LDCF project addressing similar issues targeting community tourism operators in AF-supported areas of the country.\n\nb) The PPCR project document has been approved and the procurement process for the single PMU is planned to be finalized in April 2014. The PMU will be operational by mid May 2014.\n\nc) A new MNRE CEO and ACEO for PUMA have also been appointed recently\n\nd) The  Joint AF/PPCR Programme Steering Committee meeting met for the first time on 3 March 2014. A Technical Advisory Group (TAG) has been created and is very active incorporating representatives from a wide range of relevant stakeholders such as: DMO, WRD, PUMA, LTA, MWCSD, MWTI, CSSP. Initial meetings of the TAG have already derived into the identification of joint actions and interventions to move the project forward.\nMNRE PUMA Institutional Review is currently taking place, and the AF-supported staffing arrangements will be fully integrated in that with a view of longer-term institutional capacity building and sustainability considerations.\n\ne) Recruitment of expert team. A team of experts is being recruited to support the process of revision of the CIM plans starting in the pilot 3 watersheds. This team will include 5 experts: 1) ecosystems expert, 2) Coastal geo-morphologist, 3) climate change specialist, 4) Engineer, and 5) GIS specialist\n\nf) Piloting new planning frame and CIM Plan review: The TAG is already working on the final definition of the process for revision of the CIM plans that will include a more Ridge to Reef approach. This will imply the undertaking of integrated watershed management plan that will also include a flood control action plan for the most vulnerable and populated watersheds. The new planning frame is termed as Community Integrated Management Plans, and will build on existing Coastal Infrastructure management Plans, DRM Plans, IWRM plans, Sustainable Village Plans, Tourism Development Area (TDA) Plans\n\ng) Flood modeling. Consultations with the Water Resources Division have created a very interesting opportunity for collaboration. The WRD is currently developing a flood modelling exercise for the Vaisigano River supported by an Australian expert. The AF project will replicate and upscale this exercise in other rivers in the Apia area and other vulnerable areas in the country. These consultations have only started recently, but they seem to be on a positive track to coordinate their work with that of the project\n\nh) Disaster Risk management trainings. The consultations with the Disaster Management Office have also identified a very interesting opportunity for collaboration on this output. These trainings will be organized in coordination with the Village Disaster Risk Management plans currently under development by Disaster Management Office and the Red Cross in Samoa. They have already developed these plans for 5 villages and they are aiming at covering the whole country by the end of 2015\n\nif) Coastal roads climate proofing. Consultations with Land Transport Authority (LTA) have resulted in the identification of initial interventions already indicated in CIM Plans, to minimize flooding on coastal roads. These interventions have been derived from the Post Disaster Assessment that was done by LTA on national roads after the Cyclone in 2012 and on the Recovery plan developed by the agency. Close collaboration with LTA will allow to determine roading, culvert and sea wall conditioning options for prioritization. The detailed design of these interventions will also be informed by the flood risk assessments to be carried out.\n\nj) Shoreline protection. The recent consultations and recently started close collaboration with LTA, DMO and WRD will work on the identification of priority areas for shoreline protection measures. Also collaboration with the GEF project on climate change and tourism has resulted in the identification of one priority area on the island of Savaii (Manase) where coastal adaptation interventions are urgent. The AF technical advisor is supporting bringing together a team of experts for the identification of existing alternatives and the undertaking of necessary technical assessments before implementation\n\nk) Water supply. Consultations have also taken place with the Samoa Water Authority and with the Independent Water Scheme Association to identify priority areas and interventions to enhance access to water supply for the most vulnerable communities.\n\nl) Based on a pilot survey and initial training on the LiDAR topography survey technique, supported by the Australian Government (PACCSAP) programme, this survey will be expanded to the whole country, co-financed by the WB/PPCR and the AF resources. This will not only allow precision topography and vegetation coverage data, but also near-shore bathymetry data, currently non-existent in the country and crucial for coastal infrastructure planning and climate-proofing, as this is the zone where most climate-induced effects, such as storm surges occur.\n\nm) Based on the successful experience developed in an LDCF-funded forestry adaptation project, the AF programme is also aiming at introducing the Participatory 3D Modelling technique, a visual tool for engaging and informing local communities, while creating ownership on the process.\n\nAbove all, it is expected that programme implementation will be streamlined and speed up during the 2014 -2015 reporting period. \n\n"]
[null,null,"Describe any changes undertaken to improve results on the ground or any changes made to project outputs (i.e. changes to project design)","Based on a pilot survey and initial training on the LiDAR topography survey technique, supported by the Australian Government (PACCSAP) programme, this survey will be expanded to the whole country, co-financed by the WB/PPCR and the AF resources. This will not only allow precision topography and vegetation coverage data, but also near-shore bathymetry data, currently non-existent in the country and crucial for coastal infrastructure planning and climate-proofing, as this is the zone where most climate-induced effects, such as storm surges occur.\n\nBased on the successful experience developed in an LDCF-funded forestry adaptation project, the AF programme is also aiming at introducing the Participatory 3D Modelling technique, a visual tool for engaging and informing local communities, while creating ownership on the process."]
[null,null,"How have gender considerations been taken into consideration during the reporting period? What have been the lessons learned as a consequence of inclusion of such considerations on project performance or impacts?","In engaging the communities for project consultations, the typical avenue is through the village mayors and 'Sui tamaitai o Nuu' or female representatives of women's groups. There is also a recent addition to this group and that is the inclusion of a youth representative in all meetings pertaining to developments and other matters in the communities. The involvement of all the said representatives ensures that there is a contribution and representation of all these groups in all matters concerning their community. This was the case at the initial community workshops held in February and March 2014.",null,null,"not good enough. Please answer the question directly"]
[]
[null,null,"Please complete the following section at mid-term and project completion"]
[null,null,"Lessons for Adaptation","Response"]
[null,null,"Climate Resilience Measures"]
[null,null,"What have been the lessons learned, both positive and negative, in implementing climate adaptation measures that would be relevant to the design and implementation of future projects/programmes for enhanced resilience to climate change?"]
[null,null,"What is the potential for the climate resilience measures undertaken by the project/programme to be replicated and scaled up both within and outside the project area?"]
[null,null,"Concrete Adaptation Interventions"]
[null,null,"What have been the lessons learned, both positive and negative, in implementing concrete adaptation interventions that would be relevant to the design and implementation of future projects/programmes implementing concrete adaptation interventions?"]
[null,null,"What is the potential for the concrete adaptation interventions undertaken by the project/programme to be replicated and scaled up both within and outside the project area?"]
[null,null,"Community/National Impact"]
[null,null,"What would you consider to be the most successful aspects for the target communities?"]
[null,null,"What measures are/have been put in place to ensure sustainability of the project/program results?"]
[null,null,"What measures are being/could have been put in place to improve project/program results?"]
[null,null,"Knowledge Management "]
[null,null,"How has existing information/data/knowledge been used to inform project development and implementation? What kinds of information/data/knowledge were used?"]
[null,null,"If learning objectives have been established, have they been met? Please describe."]
[null,null,"Describe any difficulties there have been in  accessing or retrieving existing information (data or knowledge) that is relevant to the project. Please provide suggestions for improving access to the relevant data."]
[null,null,"Has the identification of learning objectives contributed to the outcomes of the project? In what ways have they contributed?"]

{"sheet":"Results Tracker","index":7,"n_rows":39,"n_cols":12,"rows_kept":39,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[1,2,1,6],[13,7,13,8],[13,9,13,10],[5,1,6,12],[7,1,7,12],[8,1,8,12],[2,2,2,5],[12,1,12,12],[13,11,13,12],[10,1,10,3],[13,5,13,6],[21,5,21,6],[21,7,21,8],[21,9,21,10],[21,11,21,12],[16,11,16,12],[17,7,17,8],[17,9,17,10],[17,11,17,12],[16,5,16,6],[14,5,14,6],[14,7,14,8],[14,9,14,10],[14,11,14,12],[19,1,19,12],[17,5,17,6],[16,9,16,10],[15,5,15,12],[16,7,16,8],[27,9,27,10],[27,11,27,12],[24,5,24,6],[24,7,24,8],[24,9,24,10],[24,11,24,12],[27,7,27,8],[20,5,20,6],[20,7,20,8],[20,9,20,10],[20,11,20,12],[38,5,38,6],[38,7,38,8],[38,9,38,10],[38,11,38,12],[31,7,31,8],[31,5,31,6],[22,5,22,12],[23,5,23,6],[23,7,23,8],[23,9,23,10],[23,11,23,12],[28,7,28,8],[28,9,28,10],[28,11,28,12],[26,1,26,12],[27,5,27,6],[28,5,28,6],[35,7,35,8],[37,5,37,6],[37,7,37,8],[37,9,37,10],[37,11,37,12],[30,9,30,10],[30,11,30,12],[29,5,29,12],[30,5,30,6],[30,7,30,8],[33,1,33,12],[35,9,35,10],[35,11,35,12],[31,9,31,10],[31,11,31,12],[34,11,34,12],[35,5,35,6],[36,5,36,12],[34,5,34,6],[34,7,34,8],[34,9,34,10]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,"Results Tracker for Adaptation Fund (AF)  Projects    "]
[]
[]
[null,"Goal: Assist developing-country Parties to the Kyoto Protocol that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change in meeting the costs of concrete adaptation projects and programmes in order to implement climate-resilient measures. Impact: Increased resiliency at the community, national, and regional levels to climate variability and change. "]
[]
[null,"Important: Please read the following Results Framework and Baseline Guidance (also posted on the Adaptation Fund website) before entering your data "]
[null,"Link: http://www.adaptation-fund.org/sites/default/files/Results%20Framework%20and%20Baseline%20Guidance%20final.pdf"]
[]
[null,"Please select the relevant Fund level Outcome and Output indicators that allign with the project objectives and outcomes"]
[]
[null,"OBJECTIVE 1"]
[null,"Fund Outcome","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Fund Outcome Indicator","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Target at CEO Endorsement                    (see Units in next sheet)",null,"Baseline                 (see Units in next sheet)",null,"Mid-term Results",null,"Terminal Results"]
[null,"Outcome 1: Reduced exposure at national level to climate-related hazards and threats\nOutcome 2: Strengthened institutional capacity to reduce risks associated with climate-induced socioeconomic and environmental losses\nOutcome 3: Strengthened awareness and ownership of adaptation and climate risk reduction processes at local level\nOutcome 4: Increased adaptive capacity within relevant development and natural resource sectors\nOutcome 5: Increased ecosystem resilience in response to climate change and variability-induced stress\nOutcome 6: Diversified and strengthened livelihoods and sources of income for vulnerable people in targeted areas                                                                                                 Outcome 7: Improved policies and regulations that promote and enforce resilience measures",null,"1. Relevant threat and hazard information generated and disseminated to stakeholders on a timely basis\n2.1. No. and type of targeted institutions with increased capacity to minimize exposure to climate\nvariability risks\n2.2. Number of people with reduced risk to extreme weather events\n3.1. Percentage of targeted population aware of predicted adverse impacts of climate change, and of\nappropriate responses\n3.2. Modification in behavior of targeted population\n4.1. Development sectors' services responsive to evolving needs from changing and variable climate                                                                                            \n4.2. Physical infrastructure improved to withstand climate change and variability-induced stress                                                                                 \n5. Ecosystem services and natural assets maintained or improved under climate change and\nvariability-induced stress                                                                                                                                                          6.1. Percentage of households and communities having more secure (increased) access to livelihood\nassets                                                                                                                                                                                                6.2. Percentage of targeted population with sustained climate-resilient livelihoods                                                                                           7. Climate change priorities are integrated into national development strategy",2.2,"By the end of the programme 139 villages in 25 districts are protected from climate-induced risks as a result of coastal adaptation measures implemented guided by revised CIM Plans",null,"In the lack of systematic implementation of CIM Plans, the target villages and districts are highly exposed to climate-induced hazards "]
[]
[null,"Fund Output","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Fund Output Indicator","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Target at CEO Endorsement                    (see Units in next sheet)",null,"Baseline                 (see Units in next sheet)",null,"Mid-term Results",null,"Terminal Results"]
[null,"Output 1: Risk and vulnerability assessments conducted and updated at a national level\nOutput 2.1: Strengthened capacity of national and regional centres and networks to respond rapidly to extreme weather events\nOutput 2.2: Targeted population groups covered by adequate risk reduction systems\nOutput 3: Targeted population groups participating in\nadaptation and risk reduction awareness activities\nOutput 4: Vulnerable physical, natural, and social assets strengthened in response to climate change impacts, including variability\nOutput 5: Vulnerable physical, natural, and social assets strengthened in response to climate change impacts, including variability                                                                                             Output 6: Targeted individual and community livelihood strategies strengthened in relation to climate change impacts, including variability                                                                            Output 7: Improved integration of climate-resilience strategies into country development plans",null,"1.1. No. and type of projects that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments                                                                                      \n1.2. Development of early warning systems\n2.1.1. No. of staff trained to respond to, and mitigate impacts of, climate-related events\n2.1.2. Capacity of staff to respond to, and mitigate impacts of, climate-related events from targeted\ninstitutions increased\n2.2.1. Percentage of population covered by adequate risk-reduction systems\n2.2.2. No. of people affected by climate variability                                                                                                          3.1 No. and type of risk reduction actions or strategies introduced at local level                                                                                                     3.2 No. of news outlets in the local press and media that have covered the topic                                                                                                    4.1. No. and type of health or social infrastructure developed or modified to respond to new conditions\nresulting from climate variability and change (by type)                                                                                                                                                            4. 2. No. of physical assets strengthened or constructed to withstand conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by asset types)                                                                                                                                   5. No. and type of natural resource assets created, maintained or improved to withstand conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by type of assets)                                                                                                                   \n6.1. No. and type of adaptation assets (physical as well as knowledge) created in support of individualor\ncommunity-livelihood strategies                                                                                                                                                   6.2. Type of income sources for households generated under climate change scenario                                                                                    \n7.1. No., type, and sector of policies introduced or adjusted to address climate change risks                                                                                 \n7.2. No. or targeted development strategies with incorporated climate change priorities enforced",3.1,"By the end of  the programme at least 25 districts will have their CIM Plans reviewed and updated with climate change risks fully integrated, through balanced involvement of man, women and youth population",null,"The 6 CIM Plans prepared under IAMP1 have no DRM component.\nThe 19 CIM Plans prepared under SIAM2 require review.\n"]
[]
[null,"OBJECTIVE 2"]
[null,"Fund Outcome","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Fund Outcome Indicator"," ","Target at CEO Endorsement ",null,"Baseline",null,"Mid-term Results",null,"Terminal Results"]
[null,"Outcome 1: Reduced exposure at national level to climate-related hazards and threats\nOutcome 2: Strengthened institutional capacity to reduce risks associated with climate-induced socioeconomic and environmental losses\nOutcome 3: Strengthened awareness and ownership of adaptation and climate risk reduction processes at local level\nOutcome 4: Increased adaptive capacity within relevant development and natural resource sectors\nOutcome 5: Increased ecosystem resilience in response to climate change and variability-induced stress\nOutcome 6: Diversified and strengthened livelihoods and sources of income for vulnerable people in targeted areas                                                                                                 Outcome 7: Improved policies and regulations that promote and enforce resilience measures",null,"1. Relevant threat and hazard information generated and disseminated to stakeholders on a timely basis\n2.1. No. and type of targeted institutions with increased capacity to minimize exposure to climate\nvariability risks\n2.2. Number of people with reduced risk to extreme weather events\n3.1. Percentage of targeted population aware of predicted adverse impacts of climate change, and of\nappropriate responses\n3.2. Modification in behavior of targeted population\n4.1. Development sectors' services responsive to evolving needs from changing and variable climate                                                                                            4.2. Physical infrastructure improved to withstand climate change and variability-induced stress                                                                                 5. Ecosystem services and natural assets maintained or improved under climate change and\nvariability-induced stress                                                                                                                                                          6.1. Percentage of households and communities having more secure (increased) access to livelihood\nassets                                                                                                                                                                                                6.2. Percentage of targeted population with sustained climate-resilient livelihoods                                                                                           7. Climate change priorities are integrated into national development strategy",3.1,"By the end of the project at least 300 village representatives (including matais, women and youth groups) trained (year 1- 50, year 2- 100, year 3-200), involving traditional leaders, women and youth group representatives",null,"Currently there has been no training for village leaders in coastal adaptation and climate risk reduction processes including village relocation planning."]
[]
[null,"Fund Output","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Fund Output Indicator","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Target at CEO Endorsement ",null,"Baseline",null,"Mid-term Results",null,"Terminal Results"]
[null,"Output 1: Risk and vulnerability assessments conducted and updated at a national level\nOutput 2.1: Strengthened capacity of national and regional centres and networks to respond rapidly to extreme weather events\nOutput 2.2: Targeted population groups covered by adequate risk reduction systems\nOutput 3: Targeted population groups participating in\nadaptation and risk reduction awareness activities\nOutput 4: Vulnerable physical, natural, and social assets strengthened in response to climate change impacts, including variability\nOutput 5: Vulnerable physical, natural, and social assets strengthened in response to climate change impacts, including variability                                                                                             Output 6: Targeted individual and community livelihood strategies strengthened in relation to climate change impacts, including variability                                                                            Output 7: Improved integration of climate-resilience strategies into country development plans",null,"1.1. No. and type of projects that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments                                                                                      \n1.2. Development of early warning systems\n2.1.1. No. of staff trained to respond to, and mitigate impacts of, climate-related events\n2.1.2. Capacity of staff to respond to, and mitigate impacts of, climate-related events from targeted institutions increased\n2.2.1. Percentage of population covered by adequate risk-reduction systems\n2.2.2. No. of people affected by climate variability                                                                                                          3.1 No. and type of risk reduction actions or strategies introduced at local level                                                                                                     \n3.2 No. of news outlets in the local press and media that have covered the topic                                                                                                    \n4.1. No. and type of health or social infrastructure developed or modified to respond to new conditions\nresulting from climate variability and change (by type)                                                                                                                                                            4. 2. No. of physical assets strengthened or constructed to withstand conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by asset types)                                                                                                                                   5. No. and type of natural resource assets created, maintained or improved to withstand conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by type of assets)                                                                                                                   \n6.1. No. and type of adaptation assets (physical as well as knowledge) created in support of individualor community-livelihood strategies                                                                                                                                                   6.2. Type of income sources for households generated under climate change scenario                                                                                    \n7.1. No., type, and sector of policies introduced or adjusted to address climate change risks                                                                                 \n7.2. No. or targeted development strategies with incorporated climate change priorities enforced",3.1,"By the end of  the programme at least 25 districts will have their CIM Plans reviewed and updated with climate change risks fully integrated, through balanced involvement of man, women and youth population\n\n",null,"The 6 CIM Plans prepared under IAMP1 have no DRM component.\nThe 19 CIM Plans prepared under SIAM2 require review.\n"]
[]
[null,"OBJECTIVE 3"]
[null,"Fund Outcome","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Fund Outcome Indicator","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Target at CEO Endorsement ",null,"Baseline",null,"Mid-term Results",null,"Terminal Results"]
[null,"Outcome 1: Reduced exposure at national level to climate-related hazards and threats\nOutcome 2: Strengthened institutional capacity to reduce risks associated with climate-induced socioeconomic and environmental losses\nOutcome 3: Strengthened awareness and ownership of adaptation and climate risk reduction processes at local level\nOutcome 4: Increased adaptive capacity within relevant development and natural resource sectors\nOutcome 5: Increased ecosystem resilience in response to climate change and variability-induced stress\nOutcome 6: Diversified and strengthened livelihoods and sources of income for vulnerable people in targeted areas                                                                                                 Outcome 7: Improved policies and regulations that promote and enforce resilience measures",null,"1. Relevant threat and hazard information generated and disseminated to stakeholders on a timely basis\n2.1. No. and type of targeted institutions with increased capacity to minimize exposure to climate variability risks\n2.2. Number of people with reduced risk to extreme weather events\n3.1. Percentage of targeted population aware of predicted adverse impacts of climate change, and of appropriate responses\n3.2. Modification in behavior of targeted population\n4.1. Development sectors' services responsive to evolving needs from changing and variable climate                                                                                            4.2. Physical infrastructure improved to withstand climate change and variability-induced stress                                                                                 \n5. Ecosystem services and natural assets maintained or improved under climate change and variability-induced stress                                                                                                                                                          6.1. Percentage of households and communities having more secure (increased) access to livelihood assets                                                                                                                                                                                                6.2. Percentage of targeted population with sustained climate-resilient livelihoods                                                                                           \n7. Climate change priorities are integrated into national development strategy",7,"\n\nRevised regulatory procedures for CIM Plan works is prepared by the end of year 3 of the programme\n\n",null,"Current regulatory procedures for physical works are incomplete and do not have consistent references to either climate change or disaster risk considerations."]
[]
[null,"Fund Output","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Fund Output Indicator","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Target at CEO Endorsement ",null,"Baseline",null,"Mid-term Results",null,"Terminal Results"]
[null,"Output 1: Risk and vulnerability assessments conducted and updated at a national level\nOutput 2.1: Strengthened capacity of national and regional centres and networks to respond rapidly to extreme weather events\nOutput 2.2: Targeted population groups covered by adequate risk reduction systems\nOutput 3: Targeted population groups participating in\nadaptation and risk reduction awareness activities\nOutput 4: Vulnerable physical, natural, and social assets strengthened in response to climate change impacts, including variability\nOutput 5: Vulnerable physical, natural, and social assets strengthened in response to climate change impacts, including variability                                                                                             Output 6: Targeted individual and community livelihood strategies strengthened in relation to climate change impacts, including variability                                                                            Output 7: Improved integration of climate-resilience strategies into country development plans",null,"1.1. No. and type of projects that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments                                                                                      \n1.2. Development of early warning systems\n2.1.1. No. of staff trained to respond to, and mitigate impacts of, climate-related events\n2.1.2. Capacity of staff to respond to, and mitigate impacts of, climate-related events from targeted\ninstitutions increased\n2.2.1. Percentage of population covered by adequate risk-reduction systems\n2.2.2. No. of people affected by climate variability                                                                                                          3.1 No. and type of risk reduction actions or strategies introduced at local level                                                                                                     \n3.2 No. of news outlets in the local press and media that have covered the topic                                                                                                    \n4.1. No. and type of health or social infrastructure developed or modified to respond to new conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by type)                                                                                                                                                            4. 2. No. of physical assets strengthened or constructed to withstand conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by asset types)                                                                                                                                   5. No. and type of natural resource assets created, maintained or improved to withstand conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by type of assets)                                                                                                                   \n6.1. No. and type of adaptation assets (physical as well as knowledge) created in support of individualor\ncommunity-livelihood strategies                                                                                                                                                   6.2. Type of income sources for households generated under climate change scenario                                                                                    \n7.1. No., type, and sector of policies introduced or adjusted to address climate change risks                                                                                 \n7.2. No. or targeted development strategies with incorporated climate change priorities enforced",7.1,"A revised CIM Plan management institutional structure is set up by end of the project\n\n\n\n\n\n\nA completed and operationally tested village relocation handbook  is developed by the end of the project to guide future relocation planning exercises \n\n\n",null,"There is currently no organization specifically identified to co-ordinate the implementation of CIM Plan recommended works at the village and district level.\n\n\nThere are currently no guidelines or procedures in place as to how to undertake village relocations in Samoa.\n"]
[]
[null,"OBJECTIVE 4"]
[null,"Fund Outcome","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Fund Outcome Indicator","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Target at CEO Endorsement ",null,"Baseline",null,"Mid-term Results",null,"Terminal Results"]
[null,"Outcome 1: Reduced exposure at national level to climate-related hazards and threats\nOutcome 2: Strengthened institutional capacity to reduce risks associated with climate-induced socioeconomic and environmental losses\nOutcome 3: Strengthened awareness and ownership of adaptation and climate risk reduction processes at local level\nOutcome 4: Increased adaptive capacity within relevant development and natural resource sectors\nOutcome 5: Increased ecosystem resilience in response to climate change and variability-induced stress\nOutcome 6: Diversified and strengthened livelihoods and sources of income for vulnerable people in targeted areas                                                                                                 Outcome 7: Improved policies and regulations that promote and enforce resilience measures",null,"1. Relevant threat and hazard information generated and disseminated to stakeholders on a timely basis\n2.1. No. and type of targeted institutions with increased capacity to minimize exposure to climate variability risks\n2.2. Number of people with reduced risk to extreme weather events\n3.1. Percentage of targeted population aware of predicted adverse impacts of climate change, and of appropriate responses\n3.2. Modification in behavior of targeted population\n4.1. Development sectors' services responsive to evolving needs from changing and variable climate                                                                                            4.2. Physical infrastructure improved to withstand climate change and variability-induced stress                                                                                 5. Ecosystem services and natural assets maintained or improved under climate change and variability-induced stress                                                                                                                                                          6.1. Percentage of households and communities having more secure (increased) access to livelihood assets                                                                                                                                                                                                6.2. Percentage of targeted population with sustained climate-resilient livelihoods                                                                                           7. Climate change priorities are integrated into national development strategy",2.2,"By the end of the programme 139 villages in 25 districts are protected from climate-induced risks as a result of coastal adaptation measures implemented guided by revised CIM Plans",null,"In the lack of systematic implementation of CIM Plans, the target villages and districts are highly exposed to climate-induced hazards"]
[]
[null,"Fund Output","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Fund Output Indicator","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Target at CEO Endorsement ",null,"Baseline",null,"Mid-term Results",null,"Terminal Results"]
[null,"Output 1: Risk and vulnerability assessments conducted and updated at a national level\nOutput 2.1: Strengthened capacity of national and regional centres and networks to respond rapidly to extreme weather events\nOutput 2.2: Targeted population groups covered by adequate risk reduction systems\nOutput 3: Targeted population groups participating in\nadaptation and risk reduction awareness activities\nOutput 4: Vulnerable physical, natural, and social assets strengthened in response to climate change impacts, including variability\nOutput 5: Vulnerable physical, natural, and social assets strengthened in response to climate change impacts, including variability                                                                                             Output 6: Targeted individual and community livelihood strategies strengthened in relation to climate change impacts, including variability                                                                            Output 7: Improved integration of climate-resilience strategies into country development plans",null,"1.1. No. and type of projects that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments                                                                                      \n1.2. Development of early warning systems\n2.1.1. No. of staff trained to respond to, and mitigate impacts of, climate-related events\n2.1.2. Capacity of staff to respond to, and mitigate impacts of, climate-related events from targeted institutions increased\n2.2.1. Percentage of population covered by adequate risk-reduction systems\n2.2.2. No. of people affected by climate variability                                                                                                          3.1 No. and type of risk reduction actions or strategies introduced at local level                                                                                                     \n3.2 No. of news outlets in the local press and media that have covered the topic                                                                                                    \n4.1. No. and type of health or social infrastructure developed or modified to respond to new conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by type)                                                                                                                                                            4. 4.2. No. of physical assets strengthened or constructed to withstand conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by asset types)                                                                                                                                   5. No. and type of natural resource assets created, maintained or improved to withstand conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by type of assets)                                                                                                                   \n6.1. No. and type of adaptation assets (physical as well as knowledge) created in support of individualor community-livelihood strategies                                                                                                                                                   6.2. Type of income sources for households generated under climate change scenario                                                                                    \n7.1. No., type, and sector of policies introduced or adjusted to address climate change risks                                                                                 \n7.2. No. or targeted development strategies with incorporated climate change priorities enforced",4.2,"By the end of the programme at least 80km of coastal roads and related infrastructure is  improved to  withstand climate change and variability-induced stress",null,"There has been road reconstructions and upgrading undertaken in response to past hazards, such as the 2009 tsunami, but without integrating systematically climate change related risks in the process"]

{"sheet":"Units for Indicators","index":8,"n_rows":4,"n_cols":2,"rows_kept":4,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null," Fund Outcome Indicator Units"]
[null,"1. Generation of relevant data, Stakeholders, and Timeliness \n2.1. Include both qualitative and quantitative measures of capacity level within targeted institutions\n2.2. Number (men and women and other vulnerable groups)\n3.1. Use scale from 1 to 5: 5: Fully aware 4: Mostly aware 3: Partially aware 2: Partially not aware 1: Aware of neither predicted adverse impacts of climate change nor of appropriate responses\n3.2. Use scale from 1 to 5:  5: All 4: Almost all 3: Half 2: Some 1: None\n4.1. Summarize in an overall scale (1-5): 5: Highly responsive (All defined elements ) 4: Mostly responsive (Most defined elements) 3: Moderately responsive (Some defined elements) 2: Partially responsive (Lacks most elements) 1: Non responsive (Lacks all elements )                                                                                                                                                                                                                    4.2.  Summarize in an overall scale (1-5):  5: Fully improved 4: Mostly Improved 3: Moderately improved 2: Somewhat improved\n1: Not improved                                                                                                                                                                                                                           5.  Depends on the targeted natural asset: \nBiological (species): measure through changes in population numbers (dynamics, structure, etc.)\nLand: measure changes in hectares. Baseline data will be necessary to estimate the change. Supporting indicators baseline and target (as well as contextual information) are needed such as the following: Farmers adopting recommended technologies, Ha. of land improved, Average deforestation rate Etc.\nUse scale from 1 to 5.  5: Very effective (All elements are present) 4: Effective (Most elements are present) 3: Moderately effective (Some elements are present) 2: Partially effective (Most elements are not present) 1: Ineffective (No elements are present)\n6.1.  Summarize in an overall scale (1-5):  5: Very high improvement 4: High improvement 3: Moderate improvement 2: Limited improvement 1: No improvement                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         6.2.  Household income by source of livelihood in project area (USD) prior and post project intervention                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      7. Summarize in an overall scale (1-5).  5: All (Fully integrated) 4: Most 3: Some 2: Most not integrated 1: None"]
[null,"Fund Output Indicator Units"]
[null,"1.1.  Number, sector(s) and level(s) of projects or interventions in separate fields of monitoring plan                                                                                  1.2. Number\n2.1.1. Number of staff (male/female) of targeted institutions: a. Obtain baseline information: total number of staff from targeted institutions b. Define target\n2.1.2. Number of staff (male/female) of targeted institutions: a. Obtain baseline information: total number of staff from targeted institutions b. Define target: needs to be defined by project proponents\n2.2.1. Quantitative: Percentage (includes women – and other vulnerable groups – and men).\nQualitative: Adequacy: include direct analysis of major areas; adequacy/effectiveness of systems or analysis of perceptions of populations and institutions.\n2.2.2. Number (broken down by gender and, if possible, by vulnerable groups defined in the area of intervention) of people                                                                                                        3.1. Number and type (in separate columns) at local level.                                                                                                                                    3.2. Number                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     4.1. Number and type                                                                                                                                                                                                               4. 2.  Number and type (entered in separate columns)                                                                                                                                                     5.  Number of interventions by type of natural asset and intervention                                                                                                                    6.1.  Number and type (in separate columns of monitoring plan)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    6.2. Income sources per household; description of income source and number of households.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     7.1.  Number/Sector                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   7.2. Number; Effectiveness (see previous indicator) through enforcement level."]