{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":9,"sheets":["Overview","FinancialData","Procurement","Risk Assesment","Rating","Project Indicators","Lessons Learned","Results Tracker","Units for Indicators"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":2,"macros":0,"external_links":3,"defined_names":3,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"Overview","index":0,"n_rows":183,"n_cols":16,"rows_kept":183,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[40,1,40,2],[22,3,23,3],[15,1,15,2],[26,1,26,2],[35,1,35,2],[25,1,25,2],[18,1,18,2],[22,1,23,2],[24,1,24,2],[31,1,31,2]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,null,"Project Performance Report (PPR) - Jamaica"]
[]
[null,null,"Period of Report (Dates)","November 2, 2012 - October 31, 2013"]
[]
[null,null,"Project Title: ","ENHANCING THE RESILIENCE OF THE AGRICULTURE SECTOR AND COASTAL AREAS TO PROTECT LIVELIHOODS AND IMPROVE FOOD SECURITY"]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Project Summary: ","Jamaica is vulnerable to climate related hazards, in particular hurricanes, floods, storm surges and droughts, due largely to its geographical location and the exposure of social and economic assets in coastal areas. This situation is made worse by the country’s low adaptive capacity especially in the climate sensitive sectors of the economy. The agriculture sector and coastal resources are among those at greatest risk, given their significant contribution to the country’s GDP and to the labour force.   Vision 2030 Jamaica – National Development Plan articulates climate change adaptation as a priority for not only a healthy, natural environment, but also for achieving developed country status by 2030.\nThe activities identified in Government of Jamaica Adaptation Fund Programme (GOJ/AFP) are drawn from the adaptation priorities that were identified in the vulnerability and adaptation assessments for the agriculture and coastal resources sectors.  The programme focuses on environmental and natural resource management activities; namely, coastal rehabilitation, inland flood and erosion control, and land and water management.   \n The Overall Objective of the GOJ/AFP is to protect livelihoods and food security in vulnerable communities by:\n• improving land and water management for the agricultural sector\n• strengthening coastal protection; and \n• building institutional and local capacity for Climate Change Adaptation and Natural Resources Management\nThe Programme has 3 Components:\nComponent 1 - Increasing the climate resilience of the Negril Coastline:\nHard engineering structures (breakwaters) will be installed to control coastal erosion in the most vulnerable sections of the Negril coastline to protect the beaches from climate related hazards such as seal-level rise and intense storms."]
[null,null,null,"\nComponent 2- Enhancing climate resilience of the agricultural sector by improving water and land management in select communities\nThis component will improve adaptation measures in several vulnerable communities .  The measures include the establishment of a micro dam and implementation of small scale irrigation facilities which are intended to improve water storage and soil conservation.\nComponent 3 - Improving institutional and local level capacity for coastal and agricultural adaptation and awareness raising for behaviour modification\nActivities under this component are aimed at building community awareness on climate change adaptation and enabling beneficiaries to understand the need to adapt in order to safeguard against CC hazards and promote sustainability.",null,null,null,"Countries","Project Type:  ",null,"GEF Focal Area: ","GEF 4 Focal Areas","GEF 2 / 3 Operational Programme: ","Overall Rating of the project in the evaluation by the project evaluator: ","GEF-4 Focal Area Strategic Program: ","GEF-3 Focal Area Strategic Program: "]
[null,null,"Database Number: ","JAM/NIE/Multi/2011/1",null,null,null,"Afghanistan","FP","Yes","Biodiversity",1,1,"U","BD-SP1-PA Financing","1: Arid & semi-arid ecosystems"]
[null,"Implementing Entity (IE) [name]:",null,"Planning Institute of Jamaica (PIOJ)",null,null,null,"Albania","MSP","No","Climate Change Adaptation",2,2,"S","BD-SP2-Marine PA","2: Coastal, marine & freshwater ecosystems"]
[null,null,"Type of IE:","National Implimenting Entity",null,null,null,"Algeria","EA",null,"Climate Change Mitigation",3,3,"MU","BD-SP3-PA Networks","3: Forest ecosystems"]
[null,null,"Country(ies): ","Jamaica",null,null,null,"Angola",null,null,"International Waters",5,5,"Good","BD-SP5-Markets","13: Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biological Diversity Important to Agriculture"]
[null,"Relevant Geographic Points (i.e. cities, villages, bodies of water):",null,"Component 1 - Increasing climate resilience of the Negril coastline\nLocation: Long Bay, Negril\nComponent 2- Enhancing climate resilience of the agricultural sector by improving water and land management in select communities\nLocation: Manchester, Trelawny, St. Mary, St. Ann, St. Catherine, St. Thomas and Clarendon\nComponent 3 - Improving institutional and local level capacity for coastal and agricultural adaptation and awareness raising for behaviour modification\nLocation:  Westmoreland/Hanover; plus target communities from Component 2 ",null,null,null,"Argentina",null,null,"Multiple Focal Area",null,null,null,"BD-SP7-Invasive Alien Species(IAS)","6: Promoting the adoption of renewable energy by removing barriers and reducing implementation costs"]
[{"$nulls":12},"CC-SP2- Industrial EE","8: Waterbody based operational program"]
[null,null,"Project Milestones",{"$nulls":9},"CC-SP3-RE,CC-SP4-Biomass","9: Integrated Land and Water multiple focal area"]
[null,null,"Milestone",{"$nulls":4},"Bahamas",{"$nulls":6},"CC-SP5-Transport","10: Contaminants based operational program"]
[null,"AFB Approval Date:",null,"2012-06-29"]
[]
[null,"IE-AFB Agreement Signature Date:",null,"2012-07-23",{"$nulls":9},"CC-SP6-LULUCF","12: Integrated Ecosystem Management"]
[null,"Start of Project/Programme:",null,"2012-11-02",{"$nulls":9},"Cross cutting capacity building","14: Persistent Organic Pollutants"]
[null,"Mid-term Review Date (if planned):",null,"2014-07-31"]
[null,null,"Terminal Evaluation Date:","2016-03-01"]
[]
[{"$nulls":7},"Cyprus"]
[null,null,null,"Press Release on Inception Workshop \nInception Report\nNewspaper article (Jamaica Observer - November 5, 2012) -\"Govt. launches project to ensure food security\"       - 1) http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/Gov-t-launches-project-to-ensure-food-security\n2) http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/Project-to-save-Negril-s-famous-coastline-launched_12921046\nArticles on PIOJ website: Priority Initiatives http://www.pioj.gov.jm/PriorityDetail/tabid/88/Default.aspx?pri=1754\nPIOJ HOSTS GOJ/ADAPTATION FUND PROCUREMENT TRAINING SESSION19/07/13: http://pioj.gov.jm/PressRoom/News/tabid/117/Default.aspx\nArticle - What has Jamaica been doing under the Adaptation Fund Programme?08/07/13: http://pioj.gov.jm/PressRoom/News/tabid/117/Default.aspx\nPress Release on National Consultation(Caribseek News - October 28, 2013)\n Article (Jamaica Observer online - October 31, 2013) State minister highlights threat of climate change\nNewspaper Article (Jamaica Observer - November 4, 2013) - http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/Climate-change-said-taking-toll-on-Negril-beaches_15358213#ixzz2mS6IobKg\n",null,null,null,"Czech Republic"]
[null,"List the Website address (URL) of project.",{"$nulls":5},"Democratic People's Republic of Korea"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Democratic Republic of the Congo"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Denmark"]
[null,null,"Project contacts:  ",{"$nulls":4},"Djibouti"]
[null,"National Project Manager/Coordinator",{"$nulls":5},"Dominica"]
[null,null,"Name: ",{"$nulls":4},"Dominican Republic"]
[null,null,"Email: ",{"$nulls":4},"Ecuador"]
[null,null,"Date: ",{"$nulls":4},"Egypt"]
[]
[null,"Government DA"]
[null,null,"Name: ","Mr. Jeffrey Spooner, Meteorological Service of Jamaica"]
[null,null,"Email: ","j.spooner@metservice.gov.jm"]
[null,null,"Date: ","2013-01-01"]
[]
[null,null,"Implementing Entity",{"$nulls":4},"El Salvador"]
[null,null,"Name: ","Shelia McDonald-Miller, Programme Manager, Planning Institute of Jamaica",null,null,null,"Equatoral Guinea"]
[null,null,"Email: ","smmiller@pioj.gov.jm",null,null,null,"Eritrea"]
[null,null,"Date: ","2012-12-03",null,null,null,"Estonia"]
[null,null,"Executing Agency",{"$nulls":4},"Ethiopia"]
[null,null,"Name: ","Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries",null,null,null,"Fiji"]
[null,null,"Email: ",{"$nulls":4},"Finland"]
[null,null,"Date: ",{"$nulls":4},"France"]
[null,null,"Executing Agency",{"$nulls":4},"Gambia"]
[null,null,"Name: ","National Environment and Planning Agency",null,null,null,"Georgia"]
[null,null,"Email: ",{"$nulls":4},"Germany"]
[null,null,"Date: ",{"$nulls":4},"Ghana"]
[null,null,"Executing Agency",{"$nulls":4},"Greece"]
[null,null,"Name: ","National Works Agency",null,null,null,"Grenada"]
[null,null,"Email: ",{"$nulls":4},"Guatemala"]
[null,null,"Date: ",{"$nulls":4},"Guinea"]
[null,null,"Executing Agency",{"$nulls":4},"Guinea Bissau"]
[null,null,"Name: ","Ministry of Tourism & Entertinment",null,null,null,"Guyana"]
[null,null,"Email: ",{"$nulls":4},"Haiti"]
[null,null,"Date: ",{"$nulls":4},"Honduras"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Hungary"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Iceland"]
[{"$nulls":7},"India"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Indonesia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Iran (Islamic Republic of)"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Iraq"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Ireland"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Israel"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Italy"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Jamaica"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Japan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Jordan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Kazakhstan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Kenya"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Kiribati"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Kuwait"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Kyrgyzstan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Lao People’s Democratic Republic"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Latvia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Lebanon"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Lesotho"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Liberia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Libyan Arab Jamahiriya"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Liechtenstein"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Lithuania"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Luxembourg"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Madagascar"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Malawi"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Malaysia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Maldives"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Mali"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Malta"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Marshall Islands"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Mauritania"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Mauritius"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Mexico"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Micronesia, Federated States of"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Monaco"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Mongolia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Montenegro"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Morocco"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Mozambique"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Myanmar"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Namibia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Nauru"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Nepal"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Netherlands"]
[{"$nulls":7},"New Zealand"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Nicaragua"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Niger"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Nigeria"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Norway"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Oman"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Pakistan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Palau"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Panama"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Papua New Guinea"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Paraguay"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Peru"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Philippines"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Poland"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Portugal"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Qatar"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Republic of Korea"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Republic of Moldova"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Romania"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Russian Federation"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Rwanda"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Saint Kitts and Nevis"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Saint Lucia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Saint Vincent and the Grenadines"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Samoa"]
[{"$nulls":7},"San Marino"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Sao Tome and Principe"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Saudi Arabia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Senegal"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Serbia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Seychelles"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Sierra Leone"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Singapore"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Slovakia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Slovenia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Solomon Islands"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Somalia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"South Africa"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Spain"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Sri Lanka"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Sudan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Suriname"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Swaziland"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Sweden"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Switzerland"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Syrian Arab Republic"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Tajikistan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Thailand"]
[{"$nulls":7},"The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Timor-Leste"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Togo"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Tonga"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Trinidad and Tobago"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Tunisia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Turkey"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Turkmenistan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Tuvalu"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Uganda"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Ukraine"]
[{"$nulls":7},"United Arab Emirates"]
[{"$nulls":7},"United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland"]
[{"$nulls":7},"United Republic of Tanzania"]
[{"$nulls":7},"United States of America"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Uruguay"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Uzbekistan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Vanuatu"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Viet Nam"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Yemen"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Zambia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Zimbabwe"]

{"sheet":"FinancialData","index":1,"n_rows":67,"n_cols":8,"rows_kept":67,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[68,2,68,3],[69,2,69,3],[69,5,69,6],[66,2,66,3],[65,2,65,3],[66,5,66,6],[65,5,65,6],[76,2,76,3],[75,5,75,6],[76,5,76,6],[72,5,72,6],[71,5,71,6],[71,2,71,3],[72,2,72,3],[75,2,75,3],[74,2,74,3],[3,1,3,6],[12,2,12,3],[6,2,6,3],[8,5,8,6],[9,5,9,6],[7,2,7,6],[11,2,11,3],[62,2,62,6],[2,2,2,7],[64,2,64,6],[8,2,8,3],[9,2,9,3],[35,2,35,3],[36,2,36,3],[63,2,63,3],[63,5,63,6],[4,2,4,6],[31,4,31,5],[16,4,19,4],[13,4,14,4],[22,4,22,5],[15,4,15,5],[30,4,30,5]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,"Financial information:  cumulative from project start to [insert date]"]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"DISBURSEMENT OF AF GRANT FUNDS "]
[null,null,"How much of the total AF grant as noted in Project Document plus any project preparation grant has been spent to date?"]
[null,null,"Estimated cumulative total disbursement as of October 31, 2013",null,null,376870]
[null,null,"Add any comments on AF Grant Funds. (word limit=200)",null,null,"The figure above represents  US$353.3K of expenditure since the programme was launched plus US$23.5K of programme preparation grant"]
[]
[null,null,"EXPENDITURE DATA"]
[null,null,"List ouput and corresponding amount spent for the current reporting period",null,"Programme Component","ITEM / ACTIVITY / ACTION","AMOUNT"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Component 1: Increasing the climate resilience of the Negril coastline","Installation of breakwater structures",80666.06642710471]
[{"$nulls":5},"Project Execution",38253.96806981519]
[{"$nulls":4},"Total Component 1",null,118920.0344969199]
[{"$nulls":4},"\n\n\nComponent 2: \nEnhancing the climate resilience of the agricultural sector by improving water and land management in select communities","2.1 Establishment of Micro-dam\n\n\n",1751.3860369609856]
[{"$nulls":5},"2.2 Establishment of small scale irrigation facilities"]
[{"$nulls":5},"2.3 Implementation of rainwater harvesting and drip irrigation systems",38312.09445585215]
[{"$nulls":5},"2.4 Establishment and rehabilitation of soil conservation and land husbandry infrastructure",5910.986960985626]
[{"$nulls":5},"2.5 Establishment of Demonstration Plots",1614.188911704312]
[{"$nulls":5},"Project Execution",38700.62125256673]
[{"$nulls":4},"Total Component 2",null,86289.2776180698]
[{"$nulls":4},"Component 3:\nImproving institutional and local level capacity for sustainable management of natural resources and disaster risk reduction in the targeted vulnerable areas","Training of Local Communities in Disaster Risk Reduction and Natural Resources Management",0]
[{"$nulls":5},"Development of Climate Risk Atlas",4271.0472279260775]
[{"$nulls":5},"Development of Adaptation Plans for vulnerable areas along Negril coastline"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Establish farmer field schools to develop solutions and demonstrate good practices"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Conducting workshops and farmer training in climate smart agriculture"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Climate change awareness and education programmes developed and implemented in project communities",4140.451745379876]
[{"$nulls":5},"Project Execution",7651.7340862423]
[{"$nulls":4},"Total Component 3",null,16063.233059548253]
[{"$nulls":4},"Programme Implementation",null,132040.16687017452]
[]
[{"$nulls":5},"TOTAL",353312.71204471245]
[]
[null,null,"PLANNED EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE"]
[null,null,"List outputs planned and corresponding projected cost for the upcoming reporting period",null,null,"ITEM / ACTIVITY / ACTION","PROJECTED COST\n(US$)","Est. Completion Date"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Component 1"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Drawings, design report and modelling studies",777669]
[{"$nulls":5},"Construction of breakwaters",3000000]
[{"$nulls":5},"Environmental monitoring and project coordination",50955]
[]
[{"$nulls":5},"Total Component 1",3828624,"2014-10-01"]
[]
[{"$nulls":5},"Component 2 "]
[{"$nulls":5},"Establishment of Micro Dam",269500]
[{"$nulls":5},"Rainwater Harvesting System",32900]
[{"$nulls":5},"Climate Smart Productivity Programme ",495870]
[{"$nulls":5},"Land Husbandry Infrastructure/demonstration plots/farmer field school",279270]
[{"$nulls":5},"Total Component 2",1077540,"2014-10-01"]
[]
[{"$nulls":5},"Component 3"]
[{"$nulls":5},"  Development of Guidelines and Technical Standards for Beach Restoration ",160000]
[{"$nulls":5},"Adaptation solutions and coastline development",47500]
[{"$nulls":5},"Development of Climate Risk Atlas",38800]
[{"$nulls":5},"Communications and Awareness Building",8000]
[{"$nulls":5},"Total Component 3",254300,"2014-10-01"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Programme Implementation",250000]
[]
[]
[{"$nulls":5},"TOTAL",5410464,"2014-10-01"]
[]
[null,null,"ACTUAL CO-FINANCING (If the MTR or TE have not been undertaken this reporting period, DO NOT report on actual co-financing.) "]
[null,null,"How much of the total co-financing as committed in the Project Document has actually been realized?",null,null,"Co-financing is not applicable to this programme"]
[]
[null,null,"Estimated cumulative actual co-financing as verified during Mid-term Review (MTR) or Terminal Evaluation (TE). "]
[null,null,"Add any comments on actual co-financing in particular any issues related to the realization of in-kind, grant, credits, loans, equity, non-grant instruments and other types of co-financing. (word limit=200)"]

{"sheet":"Procurement","index":2,"n_rows":41,"n_cols":8,"rows_kept":41,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[37,8,38,8],[24,2,26,2],[32,6,33,6],[2,2,2,7],[24,8,26,8],[30,8,33,8],[34,8,36,8],[22,2,22,4],[3,1,3,7],[4,2,4,7],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,7],[5,2,5,5],[39,2,41,2],[28,6,29,6],[30,2,31,2],[30,6,31,6],[32,2,33,2],[34,2,35,2]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,"PROCUREMENT DATA"]
[]
[null,null,"Please provide information for all contracts over $2,500 USD"]
[null,null,"Please provide the number of  contracts under $2,500, signed during this reporting period:",null,null,null,4]
[]
[null,null,"LIST OF CONTRACTS"]
[null,null,"List all contracts related to the project/program with signature dates"]
[null,null,"Contract Type","Agency / Contracted party","Contract Value/Amount (USD)","Signature Date","Payment to Date","Remaining Balance"]
[null,null,"Service",null,10298.0636550308,"June 14,2013",10298.0636550308,0]
[null,null,"Service",null,23568.850102669403,"2013-09-09",3935.829363449692,19633.02073921971]
[null,null,"Service",null,268886.88819301844,"August 29,2013",80666.06642710471,188220.82176591374]
[null,null,"Service",null,12343.429158110883,"March 11,2013",12343.429158110883,96481.6]
[null,null,"Service",null,12320.328542094456,"April 2,2013",8136.978336755646,4183.35020533881]
[null,null,"Service",null,27720.739219712523,"April 30,2013",17883.971457905544,9836.76776180698]
[null,null,"Goods",null,21953.152464065704,"September 10,2013",21953.152464065704,0]
[null,null,"Good",null,7905.5441478439425,"May 16,2013",7905.5441478439425,0]
[null,null,"Good",null,3938.0106776180696,"July 2,2013",3938.0106776180696,0]
[null,null,"Service",null,12307.692307692309,"September 10,2013",12307.692307692309,12307.692307692309]
[null,null,"Service",null,22587.268993839836,"June 3,2013",7529.08932238193,15058.179671457907]
[]
[null,null,"List all bids for each contract signed with date of open call and winning bid"]
[null,null,"CONTRACT & Procurement Method","Submitted Bids","Bid Amount (USD)","Winning Bid Amount (USD)","Selection Justification for the Winner"]
[null,null,"Gravity Drip System Kits and Accessories.\nLimited Tender/ Request for Quotation\n(July 12, 2013)",null,21953,21953,"Lowest priced offer among the technically compliant offers"]
[{"$nulls":4},22615.426]
[{"$nulls":6},"Non-responsive Bid"]
[null,null,"Baseline Survey (MOAF)\nMarch 11,2013 \nDirect Contracting",null,null,12343.43,"Government to Government (Direct)  procurement using a specialized Agency "]
[null,null,"Sercvice Contract/Project Staff (MOAF)\nLocal Competitive",null,null,27720.74,"Open competition with advertisement placed in national newspaper followed by interviews"]
[null,null,"Sercvice Contract/Project Staff (MOAF)",null,null,12320.33]
[null,null,"CEAC Solutions - Design of Breakwaters/RFP\nMay 27, 2013",null,268886.89,268886.89,"Advertisement placed in national newspapers inviting expressions of interest. Following pre-qualification, RFP sent to qualified firms. Lowest priced offer among the technically compliant responses"]
[{"$nulls":4},286186.7761806981]
[null,null,"Fujitsu Ja. Ltd./ Limited Tender\nFebruary 14, 2013",null,11175.187577002052,null,"Most technically responsive bid"]
[{"$nulls":4},11597.720739219712,11597.720739219712]
[null,null,"ROTOPLASTICS\nSupply of Water Tanks/RFQ\nMarch 27, 2013",null,7700,7700,"More competitive price, fully compliant response."]
[{"$nulls":4},8646.9]
[null,null,"Service Contract/Project Staff (NEPA)",null,null,23568.85,"Open competition with advertisement placed in national newspaper followed by interviews"]
[null,null,"Design & Supervise Installation of Irrigation Systems\nRequest for Proposal\n(September 10, 2013)",null,12000,12000,"Three (3) quotations requested but only 1 response received"]
[null,null,"Office of Disaster Prepardness and Emergency Management/Project Technical Assistant\nLimited Tender",null,null,22587.27,"Review of 4 candidates; technical assignment and interviews prior to selection of Candidate with the highest score"]
[null,null,"Computer and Equipment/ Limited Tender/RFQ\nApril 11, 2013",null,2197.4248000000002]
[{"$nulls":4},3935.6223999999997,3935.6223999999997,"Most technically compliant response"]

{"sheet":"Risk Assesment","index":3,"n_rows":32,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":32,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[10,4,10,5],[11,4,11,5],[3,1,3,5],[4,2,4,5],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,5],[8,4,8,5],[9,4,9,5],[12,4,12,5],[29,2,29,5],[21,2,21,5],[22,2,22,5],[15,4,15,5],[17,4,17,5],[18,4,18,5],[19,4,19,5],[13,4,13,5],[14,4,14,5],[30,4,30,5],[44,2,44,5],[25,4,25,5],[16,4,16,5],[26,4,26,5],[24,4,24,5],[31,2,31,5],[23,4,23,5],[2,2,2,5],[54,2,54,3],[55,2,55,3],[55,4,55,5],[49,2,49,3],[49,4,49,5],[51,2,51,3],[51,4,51,5],[45,2,45,3],[30,2,30,3],[56,2,56,3],[56,4,56,5],[52,2,52,3],[52,4,52,5],[42,2,42,3],[43,2,43,3],[46,4,46,5],[48,2,48,3],[45,4,45,5],[46,2,46,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,"RISK ASSESMENT"]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"IDENTIFIED RISKS"]
[null,null,"List all Risks identified in project preparation phase and what  steps are being taken to mitigate them"]
[null,null,"Identified Risk","Current Status","Steps Taken to Mitigate Risk"]
[null,null,"Financial: budget over-runs/under-spend; mis-use of funds; inflation/ currency depreciation leading to increased costs for goods/services","Moderate","Budget planning workshops to ensure realistic assessment of projected expenditure vis-a-vis activities. \nComprehensive MOU signed with Executing Entities to establish operational modalities coupled with close financial management by way of work plans/budgets which require the prior approval of the  Programme Steering Committee.   NIE developed financial reporting templates and procedures and provided training to partners in utilising these tools.  The PMU convened regular programme review meetings to provide early indication of possible cost overruns coupled with periodic monitoring visits to verify progress reported and provide assistance in making adjustments where necessary."]
[null,null,"Environmental: natural hazards (flood, drought, storms/hurricanes); pests and diseases.","High","Contingency planning\nPartners and communities have been advised to design implementation plans and schedules to take account of the peak 'adverse clmiatic events' period; additionally there is information on how to respond in the event of such occurrences. \nOngoing pest/disease control programmes are systemmatically carried out by the Ministry of Agriculture & Fisheries/Rural Agricultural Development Authority."]
[null,null,"Stakeholder Buy-in\n","Low","The participation of stakeholders was secured during the programme development phase and continues to be a high priority during implementation.  \nThe information, sensitization and mobilization sessions that have been held with both the programme team and among target communities have been very successful.   Local community groups continue to be highly involved in relevant activities.   Additionally, there is a high level of political buy-in with general endorsement by the government and specific involvement and support of the portfolio Ministry with responsibility for Climate Change."]
[null,null,"Multiple Executing Entities\n","Moderate","The NIE has  signed a MOU with all Executing Entities (EEs) which outlines the roles and responsibilities of the respective parties; Clarification was provided during the kick-off workshop and focal points identified within each agency to facilitate a smoother implementation process.  Additionally, the PMU hosts regular team meetings with memberss of all EEs and other partner agencies involved in implementation of activities to provide a framework for collaboration and cross-fertilization of ideas among the main players.  Each entity is required to submit a deliverable-oriented decomposition of the work required to produce their respective component's outputs.   Agreements reached in meetings on programme implementation issues are documented, with emphasis by the PMU on follow-up actions and timetable for completion.  \nThe establishment of the Programme Steering Committee (PSC) by the NIE  with representation from all EEs ensures that a formal governance structure is fully operational to provide oversight and coordination of interventions at the technical level.   There were four (4) PSC meetings held in 2013.  Generally, there is growing inter-agency co-operation among the Executing Entities with the co-opting of members from other agencies on several project committees to lend their expertise and support.  "]
[null,null,"Procurement Delays","Moderate","The PMU has supported all Executing Entities in the completion, review and approval of procurement plans.  This facilitates the establishment of realistic lead times and proactive identification of special conditions such as required permits and seasonality of required materials/resources.  Importantly, the NIE has enlisted the support of a Procurement Specialist who has provided been training in the relevant (GOJ) procurement guidelines and procedures aimed at building capacity and avoiding procurement breaches.  Ongoing support will be provided in this regard throughout the period of programme execution."]
[null,null,"Implementation/ Operational: \nDelays in project implementation schedule","Moderate","A collaborative approach to work planning and ongoing support provided by the PMU.  There have been capacity building workshops in areas identified as needing this intervention (risk managment and procurement).  Several follow-up meetings and visits to Executing Entities  to assist in identifying bottlenecks and resolving challenges.  A monthly reporting system using templates developed by the NIE is used to  communicate information and assist in collecting relevant data.  Inter- and intra-agency frameworks have been incorporated into the programme to reduce competition and avoid segmentation.   The PMU/PSC consistently reviewed and updated work plans and implementation schedules based on evaluation of relevant circumstances."]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Critical Risks Affecting Progress (Not identified at project design)"]
[null,null,"Identify Risks with a 50% or > likelihood of affecting progress of project"]
[null,null,"Identified Risk","Current Status","Steps Taken to Mitigate Risk"]
[null,null,"Risks associated with the complexity of maritime works (breakwater structures)","Low to Moderate","Proper feasibility and environmental assessments to be undertaken to guide construction activities.\n international procurement has been undertaken  to garner the best available expertise for this very complex operational area.  National  agencies will provide technical inputs and environmental monitoring during construction to ensure that required standards are met without compromising the quality of the environment."]
[null,null,"Executing Entity's readiness to implement, including availability of human resources and capacity for financial management ","Moderate","Following the official launch and inception report, there was significant lag time in actual start-up among the Executing Entities.  The NIE has provided support to the Executing Entities to ensure the establishing of project bank accounts and improvements in implementation framework.  Most Entities have now confirmed the availability of physical facilities and availability of adequate and/or dedicated staff.  \nPMU established quantifiable and time bound targets for delivery of outputs. Short-term technical support has been secured, where necessary, to alleviate the issue of limited human resources available to undertake project activities. Alternative operational arrangements to be instituted whereby direct payments will be made so as to minimize risk of delays to implementation, additional expenditure via interest charges and possibility of negative impacts on stakeholder relationships.  \n\nResulting from the late effective start, the projected budget for the 1st year of implementation has been underspent. The continued assessment of capacity by the NIE will be done to ensure ongoing development of capabilities and facilitate the achievement of programme objectives."]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Risk Measures: Were there any risk mitigation measures employed during the current reporting period?  If so, were risks reduced?  If not, why were these risks not reduced?"]
[null,null,"Add any comments relevant to risk mitigation (word limit = 500)"]
[null,null," Risk mitigation meaures undertaken during the reporting period included:\n- Work plans/ budgets developed and approved prior to undertaking activities for respective components.\n- Training of partners in procurement guidelines to ensure effective organisation of contracting process.\n- Workshops for risk management held and risk management plans developed and monitored. \n- Regular meetings with programme partners\n- Reporting systems instituted and feedback provided to facilitate improvements.\n- Continuing involvement of key local and national stakeholders to enhance transparency and commitment.\n- Engagement of short-term support to reduce implementation delays and increase possibility of achieving planned outputs.\nRisk mitigation measures employed all contributed to reducing relevant risks.   The efficiency and effectiveness of risk mitigation strategies are reviewed on a consistent basis."]

{"sheet":"Rating","index":4,"n_rows":49,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":49,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[18,3,19,6],[22,3,22,6],[2,2,2,6],[3,2,3,6],[17,2,17,5],[48,5,48,7],[14,4,14,5],[15,4,15,5],[13,3,13,6],[37,4,37,5],[47,5,47,7],[40,4,40,6],[28,4,28,5],[29,4,29,5],[45,5,45,7],[46,5,46,7],[38,4,38,5],[43,5,43,7],[44,5,44,7]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,"RATING ON IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS "]
[null,null,"For rating definitions please see bottom of page."]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,"Progress on Key Milestones","Expected Progress","Progress to Date","Rating"]
[null,null,"Programme Manager/Coordinator: ","Programme Inception Phase Completed","Programme Launch and Inception Workshop\nOperating modalities finalized\n","Inception phase commenced with the recruitment of staff and establishment of the Programme Management Unit within the NIE.  Following initial delay due to extreme weather event (Tropical Storm Sandy)which adversely affected the attendance of some of the beneficiary communities, the programme was successfully launched on November 2, 2012.  Fifty-nine (59) persons were in attendance -- the Inception Report was finalized and submitted to the AFB in December 2012.\nMemoranda of Understanding (MOU) were signed with Executing Entities (EEs) in January 2013 in order to formalise the operating modalities and institutional arrangements between the NIE and the EEs.  Additionally, a kick-off workshop was held with all Executing Entities on January 30, 2013 to introduce team members to each other; help foster an appreciation the overall purpose of the programme  and clarify expectations regarding roles and responsibilities of the respective parties.  Reporting templates were also shared and explained.   Assistance was provided by the PMU to EEs in the preparation of implementation plans for all the Components and the  Programme Inception Phase was successfully completed by the end of February 2013.","HS"]
[null,null,null,"Establishment and Activation of Governance Structure; Programme Implementation ","Programme Steering Committee established\nCapacity Building initiatives undertaken\nMonitoring and Oversight activities","TORs were developed and a Programme Steering Committee (PSC) established to serve as the main mechanism for the provision of technical advice and oversight during the implementation of the programme.    The PSC is comprised of members from a cross-section of stakeholders with technical interest in and knowledge of natural hazards, risk and climate change issues, including community representatives, relevant government Ministries, Departments and Agencies, the Private Sector Organization of Jamaica, academia, and NGO partners.   The first meeting was convened in February 2013 where work plans were reviewed and budgets approved for Executing Entities, thereby paving the way for disbursements to be made by the NIE.  With a total of four (4) meetings during the reporting period, the PSC has effectively assisted with resolving strategic level issues and risks that may have adversely affected the implementation of the programme.   \nMonitoring visits were made by the PMU to all Executing Entities to verify reported expenditure and confirm that work and results conform to requirements.   Reporting templates were provided; reports reviewed and feedback provided with recommendations for improvement, where necessary.  Four (4) field visits were also undertaken by the PMU to meet with proposed beneficiaries in target communities (Manchester, Yallahs, Morant Bay, and Negril). The PMU initiated a series of regular team meetings (with 6 such meetings during the reporting period) with executing partners to support the implementation process.  The meetings provided a platform for knowledge sharing while fostering inter and intra-agency collaboration and team building by highlighting  how the different components will interact with and support each other.   This mechanism also serves as a framework for systematically identifying and helping to resolve operational bottlenecks.  The NIE, through the PMU, organized needed training, mentoring and capacity building initiatives to improve team members’ project management skills and assist the programme in achieving its outputs.  These included Risk Management Training as well as Procurement Training","HS"]
[null,null,null,"Workshops/Consultations","Stakeholders' meetings held with involvement of major players","A national stakeholders' consultation was held for the expressed objectives of (i) involving major stakeholders in creating linkages and synergies, (ii) raising awareness of the wider climate change agenda and what this programme is seeking to contribute to the country's adaptation efforts, and (iii) creating/enhancing a sense of ownership among stakeholders.  The event was very well supported with participation of beneficiaries from all the target communities and representatives of the Executing Entities/ other implementing partners, including NGOs and local government institutions.  The workshop received high-level support from the government as the keynote address was given by the State Minister in the Ministry of Water, Land, Environment and Climate Change.","HS"]
[null,null,null,"Awareness Raising & Visibility","Communitions Strategy and Action Plan Developed","A consultant was engaged by the NIE to undertake this activity.  The communications strategy and action plan was developed through a highly participatory process involving literature review, needs assessment, individual and focus group discussions, with strong input from representatives of all Executing Entities and other key stakeholders.\nThe programme received wide visibility based on the Inception Workshop and also during the budget presentation in Parliament by the portfolio Minister.  Other visibility opportunities included: \n- PIOJ's website: priority initiatives - PIOJ is the leading Government of Jamaica agency for policy advice on economic, social and sustainable development issues.   \n- Economic and Social Survey of Jamaica (publication).  \n- PIOJ's facebook page on which highlights of several activities have been posted and received multiple 'likes'.  ","S"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Overall Rating","HS"]
[]
[null,null,null,"Please Provide the Name and Contact information of person(s) reponsible for completeling the Rating section"]
[null,null,null,"Name: ","Shelia McDonald-Miller, Programme Manager, Planning Institute of Jamaica"]
[null,null,null,"Email: ","smmiller@pioj.gov.jm"]
[]
[null,null,"Please justify your rating.  Outline the positive and negative progress made by the project since it started.  Provide specific recommendations for next steps. . (word limit=500)"]
[null,null,null,"On the positive side:\nUnder the guidance of the NIE Deputy Director-General (SDRPD), the Programme Manager has provided leadership to the PMU and wider programme team to ensure overall project implementation, proper fiduciary management coupled with ongoing monitoring of activities.  Priority actions have included the finalization of MOUs with executing partners, establishment of the Programme Steering Committee (PSC) for the provision of technical oversight and other preparatory works such as development of a monitoring plan and mobilizing the programme team across agencies.  \nThe programme covers activities across several Ministries Departments and Agencies - this entails dissimilar hierarchical attitudes and conflicting decision-making styles which can aggravate implementation issues when it comes to team performance.   Therefore, open/ ongoing communication and effective collaboration have been critical for better planning and aiding/guiding the implementation process.  \nIt is widely acknowledged that two important characteristics of a successful project are documentation and accountability.   In our case, project documentation is used to properly capture and communicate important information.  Notes are taken of all meetings convened by the PMU and made available for follow-up actions.  Accountability is established by way of deliverables-based work plans so that  the project team and stakeholders understand who is responsible for the different aspects of the work to be performed and the agreed timelines.  Regular meetings are organized to facilitate communication, review implementation progress and promote networking among key stakeholders.  There are also opportunities to learn from and build on the experiences of other ongoing climate change projects. The NIE pro-actively identifies and addresses capacity gaps by providing training and other support to partners.\nImportantly, the programme has been incorporated in the GOJ/IMF  Medium-term Economic Framework Programme thereby guaranteeing priority for fiscal space and high-level stakeholder buy-in.  \n\nOn the negative side:\nThere has been a very long start-up period by the Executing Entities which inevitable led to delays in programme execution.   Specific recommendations include alternative operational arrangements to be instituted whereby direct payments will be made so as to minimize risk of payment delays; closer monitoring of some partners  to support and expedite implementation, especially in relation to the procurement process.    "]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,"Progress on Key Milestones","Expected Progress","Progress to Date","Rating"]
[null,null,"Executing Entities  ","Programme Objective: Enhanced capacity to protect livelihoods and food security in vulnerable communities by improving land and water management for the agricultural sector, strengthening coastal protection and building institutional and local capacity for climate change adaptation"]
[null,null,null,"Component 1\nIncreased climate resilience of the Negril coastline","Completion of Environmental Impact Assessment as well as verification and approval of source material.  Procurement of consultants and contractor mobilization for construction of breakwaters; environmental monitoring of licenses and permits.","Contract was signed for the pre-construction phase with and Engineering firm and inception report with work plan defined has been submitted.  The verification and approval of source materials has been completed.  The drawings, design and modelling processes are in the preliminary stages. TORs have been prepared for the engagement of enforcement officers and Project Engineer to monitor the environmental conditions of licenses and permits; the evaluation process is approximately 50% complete","MS"]
[null,null,null,"Component 2\nEnhanced climate resilience of the agricultural sector through improved water and land management in select communities","Recruitment of Team.  Completion of Baseline Survey to inform implementation of activities; site visits and consultations for site selection re the establishment of the micro dam and irrigation systems; community sensitization and validation workshops; procure consultancy services to design micro dam and procure 30 small-cale irrigation systems; develop curriculum for land husbandry and water management techniques","Procurement process was undertaken and Project Manager and Administrative Assistant employed to coordinate activities under this Component.  Equipment has also been acquired.  The Ministry of Agriculture & Fisheries developed specifications in consultation with associated Agencies - Rural Agricultural Development Agency and National Irrigation Commission.  A Consultant was engaged, field-work undertaken and the baseline survey completed with inputs from relevant stakeholders.  \nFour sites were visited and evaluated with Silent Hill (Coleyville) community in Manchester being selected for establishment of one micro-dam. Based on topographic surveys and soil profile analyses, following internal consultations by the MOAF forty-three (43) communities have been shortlisted for  rainwater harvesting, drip irrigation and small scale irrigation systems.  Seven (7) community sensitization sessions were held between May and August 2013.  \nThe procurement process for the design of the micro-dam was started but had to be annulled due to concerns relating to technical issues raised by potential bidders as well as concerns about land tenure at the proposed site. Contract valued at JM$2.185 for the supply of 30-1000 gallon water storage tanks was signed in May 2013.  Specifications were developed for distribution lines to complete installation of the systems.  Two (2) small scale irrigation systems were installed during the reporting period.  The collation of material was undertaken to enable the development of the training curriculum focusing on land husbandry and water managment techniques - curriculum was completed, procurement of training material approved and a training plan is now being developed for implementation in year 2.  ","S"]
[null,null,null,"Component 3\nImproved institutional and local capacity for sustainable management of natural resources and in disaster risk reduction in the targeted vulnerable areas.  Raising awareness for behaviour modification","Completion of KAP survey.  Development of training plan and commencement of training in Disaster Risk Reduction. Procurement of Consultant to carry out storm surge modelling.\nProcurement of consultant to develop Communications and Awareness Plan","The KAP tool was finalized after extensive dialogue and three hundred and seventy (370) survey tools were administered in Negril in keeping with the survey plan.   The project team received the necessary support from hoteliers, other business interests and the wider community in Negril who providing relevant data.  The survey was completed during the current reporting period. This facilitated the development of a training work plan which has been drafted and submitted for review.  The procurement process is underway for the recruitment of a Training Officer to enable implementation of the plan.  The TOR for guidelines and standards procurement process is underway for the consultant to carry out the storm surge/sea level rise modelling.\nThe awareness building sub-component will receive a boost in year 2 with the roll-out of the communications plan.","MS"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Overall Rating","MS"]
[null,null,null,"Please Provide the Name and Contact information of person(s) reponsible for completeling the Rating section"]
[null,null,null,"Name: ","Shelia McDonald-Miller, Programme Manager, Planning Institute of Jamaica"]
[null,null,null,"Email: ","smmiller@pioj.gov.jm"]
[]
[null,null,null,"Progress on Key Milestones","Expected Progress","Progress to Date","Rating"]
[null,null,"Other"]
[]
[]
[{"$nulls":5},"Overall Rating"]
[null,null,null,"Please Provide the Name and Contact information of person(s) reponsible for completeling the Rating section"]
[null,null,null,"Name: "]
[null,null,null,"Email: "]
[]
[null,null,null,"Please justify your rating and address the following points:\n1. Indicate trends, both positive and negative, in achievement of outcomes as per the project indicators.  \n2.  Detail critical risks that have affected progress.  \n3.  Outline response to MTR undertaken this reporting period.  \n4.  Outline action plan to address projects with a rating of HU, U or MU. Please keep your input to 1200 words","The late start of field activities has impacted implementation progress and delayed the delivery of outputs.  As a result, the year 1 implementation plan and budget have had to be adjusted to reflect the late start.  Factors affecting progress include capacity constraints, lack of dedicated resources and procurement delays.  \n Ameliorative actions included the hosting of capacity building workshops by the NIE, including risk management and procurement training.  Regular team meetings ensure the sharing of project management principles and standards to improve the management of the execution process. Additionally, progress has been made in strengthening  inter-agency coordination mechanisms.\nDespite the challenges relating to “organizational readiness” (recruitment of relevant personnel, assignment of relevant resources, timely procurement of technical assistance, etc.),  it is important to note that the pace of implementation has begun to show steady improvement  with  actions/activities planned progressing on track to achieve relevant outputs/outcomes.  \n"]
[]
[]
[{"$nulls":4},"Highly Satisfactory (HS)","Project actions/activities planned for current reporting period are progressing on track or exceeding expectations to acheive all  major outcomes/outputs for given reporting period, without major shortcomings. The project can be presented as “good practice”."]
[{"$nulls":4},"Satisfactory (S)","Project actions/activities planned for current reporting period  are progressing on track to achieve most of its major outcomes/outputs with only minor shortcomings."]
[{"$nulls":4},"Marginally Satisfactory (MS)","Project actions/activities planned for current reporting period  are progressing on track to achieve most   major relevant outcomes/outputs, but with either significant shortcomings or modest overall relevance. "]
[{"$nulls":4},"Marginally Unsatisfactory (MU)","Project actions/activities planned for current reporting period  are not progressing on track to achieve  major outcomes/outputs with major shortcomings or is expected to achieve only some of its major outcomes/outputs."]
[{"$nulls":4},"Unsatisfactory (U)","Project actions/activities planned for current reporting period  are not progressing on track to achieve most of its major outcomes/outputs."]
[{"$nulls":4},"Highly Unsatisfactory (U)","Project actions/activities planned for current reporting period  are not on track and shows that it is failing to achieve, and is not expected to achieve, any of its outcomes/outputs."]

{"sheet":"Project Indicators","index":5,"n_rows":21,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":21,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[2,2,2,6],[3,2,3,6],[4,2,4,6],[5,2,5,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,"PROJECT Indicators"]
[null,null,"Please provide all indicators being tracked for the project as outlined in the project document"]
[]
[null,null,"Type of Indicator (indicators towards Objectives, Outcomes, etc…)"]
[null,null,"Type of Indicator","Indicator","Baseline","Progress since inception","Target for Project End"]
[null,null,null,"Length (m) of breakwater installed","No breakwater","Preparatory works in progress: initial consultations with residents; consultant engaged to perform  modelling, EIA, etc.","990m of breakwater installed"]
[null,null,null,"number of micro dams constructed in North Manchester","0 water catchment facility in North Manchester ","Several sites in North Manchester visited and evaluated.  Issues of land tenure and ease of access have necessitated a review of the proposed site","One micro dam fully installed and operational "]
[null,null,null,"number of irrigation and production schemes established in: St Thomas, St Ann, Trelawny, St Catherine, Clarendon, Manchester, St Mary","0 irrigation and production schemes in the 21 targeted communities in 6 project parishes ","43 communities evaluated and shortlisted","45 schemes installed and operational in 15 communities serving over  750 male and female farmers"]
[null,null,null,"iii) number of rainwater harvesting and gravity drip irrigation systems  installed in: St Thomas, St Ann, Trelawny, St Catherine, St Mary, Clarendon","Inadequate access to irrigation facilities in selected communities in 6 project parishes","Thirty (30)  1000 gal  water storage tanks, safety gears and equipment have been procured.  • Contract to supply 30 gravity fed drip irrigation kits and distribution line executed. One system installed in St. Ann","30 rainwater harvesting; 20 ponds and springs \n60  gravity drip irrigation systems installed and operational and serving 40 male and 20 female farmers directly\n"]
[null,null,null,"iv) soil conservation and land husbandry infrastructure in Upper Rio Minho Watershed","Extensive soil erosion due to hillside farming, removal of forest cover and poor farming practices","3 stakeholder sensitization workshops conducted","App 18000m diversion /hillside ditches, 24600 individual basins, 3000m of waterway, 1200m continuous mound , 705 check dam/drop structures installed, 18000 m pineapple (vegetable barrier) and 13ha fruit forest and 15ha timber  planted impacting 5 Extension Areas"]
[null,null,null,"i) Number of climate-smart farmer field schools established in select communities","No climate-smart field schools in select communities","RADA continues collaboration with external partner ACDI /VOCA  regarding the development of this curriculum","Seven climate-smart farmer field schools established and 90% farmers (male/female) trained to adopt climate smart  agriculture  practices "]
[null,null,null,"ii) Number of demonstration plots established in the Upper Rio Minho Watershed","Targeted communities do not have demonstration plots in place","Four (4) demonstration sites evaluated  - 2 in Crooked River and 2 in Thompson Town in the parish of Clarendon\nTwo (2) Extension Areas Workshop/consultations held; Procurement plan and technical specifications reviewed and certified by technical officers","Five demonstration plots established imparting skills, knowledge and techniques to 1510 farmers (male, female) who are adopting sustainable practices"]
[null,null,null,"iii) Number of water user groups established","0 WUG in targeted communities",null,"15 WUGs established and operational towards sustainable management of water resource"]
[null,null,null,"i) Number and volume of awareness raising materials (audio visual) targeted to specific age groups, occupation groups, sex and persons with disability","No area specific public education programme","Communication Plan and Brand strategy developed.  ","Full roll out of awareness building programme; 70% of residents sensitized."]
[null,null,null,"Evidence of documentation and dissemination of best practices","No evidence of documented best practices in project areas",null,"Information made available through virtual networks, RADA, parish libraries, College of Agriculture Science and Education, Jamaica Agriculture Society, Fishermen’s Cooperative, 4H Clubs and schools "]
[null,null,null,"iii) Number of (targeted) training programmes for local entities in DRR, natural resource management","Limited training in DRR for local entities in DRR and natural resource management, except the few hotels that have green certifications.  Limited exposure to training with specific focus on climate change ","Analysis of KAP survey data underway.  Sensitization sessions held with target communities","Training programmes targeted at fishers (mostly male), male and female youth , micro and small business owners and other groups completed"]
[null,null,null,"i) Guidelines and standards for beach restoration, shoreline protection for Negril","No specific technical guidelines for  Negril ",null,"One set of guidelines  and standards finalized "]
[null,null,null,"ii) Number of climate risk atlas* for storm surge, sea level rise (specific for Negril)","0 risk atlas information  for storm surge and sea-level rise for Negril","Procurement process underway for consultant to carry out Storm Surge/Sea Level Rise Modelling","Risk Atlas completed "]
[null,null,null,"Number of adaptation plans for vulnerable sections of Negril","0 Plan",null,"One adaptation plan completed and in use "]

{"sheet":"Lessons Learned","index":6,"n_rows":28,"n_cols":4,"rows_kept":28,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[23,2,23,3],[2,2,2,3],[11,2,11,3],[13,2,13,3],[16,2,16,3],[19,2,19,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,"QUALITATIVE MEASURES and LESSONS LEARNED"]
[]
[null,null,"Please complete the following section every reporting period"]
[null,null,"Implementation and Adaptive Management","Response"]
[null,null,"What implementation issues/lessons, either positive or negative, affected progress?","POSITIVE: The programme approach is to build partnerships with key national institutions in order to facilitate progress towards delivery of outputs.\nIntegration of the Programme Management Team across different agencies via regular team sessions has allowed for strengthening relationships among government institutions as well as providing a platform for coordinated implementation and capacity development. The requirement for  prior approval of work plans and budgets by the PSC allows for transparency and good governance of the implementation process\nNEGATIVE: Lack of dedicated resources and competing priorities within Executing Entities will stymie progress of implementation"]
[null,null,"Were there any delays in implementation?  If so, include any causes of delays. What measures have been taken to reduce delays?","There was general low operative execution due to mis-understanding of effective programme start date as well as long lag in achieving 'project readiness' by Executing Entities.  There were challenges in obtaining site-specific scope of works for water harvesting infrastructure leading to a delay in design of small scale irrigation systems  (Component 2). This was addressed by the procurement of short-term technical assistance to increase pool of technical resources.  \nOther measures taken include provision of support in workplanning and capacity building and effective follow-up by the PMU; PSC involvement and engagement of senior management of these organisations to resolve identified challenges.  The pace of implementation has since increased due to these measures and continuing follw-up actions."]
[null,null,"Describe any changes undertaken to improve results on the ground or any changes made to project outputs (i.e. changes to project design)","Re-assessment of proposed sites to due to technical issues regarding land tenure and accessin the case of the micro dam; alternative sites being evaluated.\n  \nNo change has been made to programme outputs."]
[null,null,"How have gender considerations been taken into consideration during the reporting period? What have been the lessons learned as a consequence of inclusion of such considerations on project performance or impacts?","Activities such as workshops, stakeholder sensitization sessions, development of the communications strategy etc. are planned and executed on select days and during hours which guarantee the  full participation of both men and women from the target communities.  As a result, both men and women have been actively involved in programme activities.  Additionally, the composition of the PSC is an excellent example of gender equality as both men and women occupy decision-making positions.  "]
[]
[null,null,"Please complete the following section at mid-term and project completion"]
[null,null,"Lessons for Adaptation","Response"]
[null,null,"Climate Resilience Measures"]
[null,null,"What have been the lessons learned, both positive and negative, in implementing climate adaptation measures that would be relevant to the design and implementation of future projects/programmes for enhanced resilience to climate change?"]
[null,null,"What is the potential for the climate resilience measures undertaken by the project/programme to be replicated and scaled up both within and outside the project area?"]
[null,null,"Concrete Adaptation Interventions"]
[null,null,"What have been the lessons learned, both positive and negative, in implementing concrete adaptation interventions that would be relevant to the design and implementation of future projects/programmes implementing concrete adaptation interventions?"]
[null,null,"What is the potential for the concrete adaptation interventions undertaken by the project/programme to be replicated and scaled up both within and outside the project area?"]
[null,null,"Community/National Impact"]
[null,null,"What would you consider to be the most successful aspects for the target communities?"]
[null,null,"What measures are/have been put in place to ensure sustainability of the project/program results?"]
[null,null,"What measures are being/could have been put in place to improve project/program results?"]
[null,null,"Knowledge Management "]
[null,null,"How has existing information/data/knowledge been used to inform project development and implementation? What kinds of information/data/knowledge were used?"]
[null,null,"If learning objectives have been established, have they been met? Please describe."]
[null,null,"Describe any difficulties there have been in  accessing or retrieving existing information (data or knowledge) that is relevant to the project. Please provide suggestions for improving access to the relevant data."]
[null,null,"Has the identification of learning objectives contributed to the outcomes of the project? In what ways have they contributed?"]

{"sheet":"Results Tracker","index":7,"n_rows":39,"n_cols":12,"rows_kept":39,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[15,5,15,12],[16,5,16,6],[16,7,16,8],[16,9,16,10],[16,11,16,12],[17,5,17,6],[17,7,17,8],[17,9,17,10],[17,11,17,12],[1,2,1,6],[13,7,13,8],[13,9,13,10],[5,1,6,12],[7,1,7,12],[8,1,8,12],[2,2,2,5],[12,1,12,12],[13,11,13,12],[21,5,21,6],[21,7,21,8],[21,9,21,10],[21,11,21,12],[10,1,10,3],[13,5,13,6],[14,5,14,6],[14,7,14,8],[14,9,14,10],[14,11,14,12],[27,9,27,10],[27,11,27,12],[28,5,28,6],[24,5,24,6],[24,7,24,8],[24,9,24,10],[24,11,24,12],[28,7,28,8],[28,9,28,10],[28,11,28,12],[19,1,19,12],[22,5,22,12],[23,5,23,6],[23,7,23,8],[23,9,23,10],[23,11,23,12],[20,5,20,6],[20,7,20,8],[20,9,20,10],[20,11,20,12],[26,1,26,12],[27,5,27,6],[27,7,27,8],[37,5,37,6],[37,7,37,8],[37,9,37,10],[37,11,37,12],[30,9,30,10],[30,11,30,12],[31,5,31,6],[38,5,38,6],[38,7,38,8],[38,9,38,10],[38,11,38,12],[31,7,31,8],[31,9,31,10],[31,11,31,12],[34,11,34,12],[35,5,35,6],[35,7,35,8],[29,5,29,12],[30,5,30,6],[36,5,36,12],[34,5,34,6],[34,7,34,8],[34,9,34,10],[30,7,30,8],[33,1,33,12],[35,9,35,10],[35,11,35,12]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,"Results Tracker for Adaptation Fund (AF)  Projects    "]
[]
[]
[null,"Goal: Assist developing-country Parties to the Kyoto Protocol that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change in meeting the costs of concrete adaptation projects and programmes in order to implement climate-resilient measures. Impact: Increased resiliency at the community, national, and regional levels to climate variability and change. "]
[]
[null,"Important: Please read the following Results Framework and Baseline Guidance (also posted on the Adaptation Fund website) before entering your data "]
[null,"Link: http://www.adaptation-fund.org/sites/default/files/Results%20Framework%20and%20Baseline%20Guidance%20final.pdf"]
[]
[null,"Please select the relevant Fund level Outcome and Output indicators that allign with the project objectives and outcomes"]
[]
[null,"OBJECTIVE 1"]
[null,"Fund Outcome","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Fund Outcome Indicator","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Target at CEO Endorsement                    (see Units in next sheet)",null,"Baseline                 (see Units in next sheet)",null,"Mid-term Results",null,"Terminal Results"]
[null,"Outcome 1: Reduced exposure at national level to climate-related hazards and threats\nOutcome 2: Strengthened institutional capacity to reduce risks associated with climate-induced socioeconomic and environmental losses\nOutcome 3: Strengthened awareness and ownership of adaptation and climate risk reduction processes at local level\nOutcome 4: Increased adaptive capacity within relevant development and natural resource sectors\nOutcome 5: Increased ecosystem resilience in response to climate change and variability-induced stress\nOutcome 6: Diversified and strengthened livelihoods and sources of income for vulnerable people in targeted areas                                                                                                 Outcome 7: Improved policies and regulations that promote and enforce resilience measures",4,"1. Relevant threat and hazard information generated and disseminated to stakeholders on a timely basis\n2.1. No. and type of targeted institutions with increased capacity to minimize exposure to climate\nvariability risks\n2.2. Number of people with reduced risk to extreme weather events\n3.1. Percentage of targeted population aware of predicted adverse impacts of climate change, and of\nappropriate responses\n3.2. Modification in behavior of targeted population\n4.1. Development sectors' services responsive to evolving needs from changing and variable climate                                                                                            \n4.2. Physical infrastructure improved to withstand climate change and variability-induced stress                                                                                 \n5. Ecosystem services and natural assets maintained or improved under climate change and\nvariability-induced stress                                                                                                                                                          6.1. Percentage of households and communities having more secure (increased) access to livelihood\nassets                                                                                                                                                                                                6.2. Percentage of targeted population with sustained climate-resilient livelihoods                                                                                           7. Climate change priorities are integrated into national development strategy",4.2,"Reduction in rate of coastal erosion; increased accretion",null,"annual average rate of beach erosion approx 0.5-1.0m"]
[]
[null,"Fund Output","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Fund Output Indicator","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Target at CEO Endorsement                    (see Units in next sheet)",null,"Baseline                 (see Units in next sheet)",null,"Mid-term Results",null,"Terminal Results"]
[null,"Output 1: Risk and vulnerability assessments conducted and updated at a national level\nOutput 2.1: Strengthened capacity of national and regional centres and networks to respond rapidly to extreme weather events\nOutput 2.2: Targeted population groups covered by adequate risk reduction systems\nOutput 3: Targeted population groups participating in\nadaptation and risk reduction awareness activities\nOutput 4: Vulnerable physical, natural, and social assets strengthened in response to climate change impacts, including variability\nOutput 5: Vulnerable physical, natural, and social assets strengthened in response to climate change impacts, including variability                                                                                             Output 6: Targeted individual and community livelihood strategies strengthened in relation to climate change impacts, including variability                                                                            Output 7: Improved integration of climate-resilience strategies into country development plans",null,"1.1. No. and type of projects that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments                                                                                      \n1.2. Development of early warning systems\n2.1.1. No. of staff trained to respond to, and mitigate impacts of, climate-related events\n2.1.2. Capacity of staff to respond to, and mitigate impacts of, climate-related events from targeted\ninstitutions increased\n2.2.1. Percentage of population covered by adequate risk-reduction systems\n2.2.2. No. of people affected by climate variability                                                                                                          3.1 No. and type of risk reduction actions or strategies introduced at local level                                                                                                     3.2 No. of news outlets in the local press and media that have covered the topic                                                                                                    4.1. No. and type of health or social infrastructure developed or modified to respond to new conditions\nresulting from climate variability and change (by type)                                                                                                                                                            4. 2. No. of physical assets strengthened or constructed to withstand conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by asset types)                                                                                                                                   5. No. and type of natural resource assets created, maintained or improved to withstand conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by type of assets)                                                                                                                   \n6.1. No. and type of adaptation assets (physical as well as knowledge) created in support of individualor\ncommunity-livelihood strategies                                                                                                                                                   6.2. Type of income sources for households generated under climate change scenario                                                                                    \n7.1. No., type, and sector of policies introduced or adjusted to address climate change risks                                                                                 \n7.2. No. or targeted development strategies with incorporated climate change priorities enforced"]
[]
[null,"OBJECTIVE 2"]
[null,"Fund Outcome","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Fund Outcome Indicator","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Target at CEO Endorsement ",null,"Baseline",null,"Mid-term Results",null,"Terminal Results"]
[null,"Outcome 1: Reduced exposure at national level to climate-related hazards and threats\nOutcome 2: Strengthened institutional capacity to reduce risks associated with climate-induced socioeconomic and environmental losses\nOutcome 3: Strengthened awareness and ownership of adaptation and climate risk reduction processes at local level\nOutcome 4: Increased adaptive capacity within relevant development and natural resource sectors\nOutcome 5: Increased ecosystem resilience in response to climate change and variability-induced stress\nOutcome 6: Diversified and strengthened livelihoods and sources of income for vulnerable people in targeted areas                                                                                                 Outcome 7: Improved policies and regulations that promote and enforce resilience measures",4,"1. Relevant threat and hazard information generated and disseminated to stakeholders on a timely basis\n2.1. No. and type of targeted institutions with increased capacity to minimize exposure to climate\nvariability risks\n2.2. Number of people with reduced risk to extreme weather events\n3.1. Percentage of targeted population aware of predicted adverse impacts of climate change, and of\nappropriate responses\n3.2. Modification in behavior of targeted population\n4.1. Development sectors' services responsive to evolving needs from changing and variable climate                                                                                            4.2. Physical infrastructure improved to withstand climate change and variability-induced stress                                                                                 5. Ecosystem services and natural assets maintained or improved under climate change and\nvariability-induced stress                                                                                                                                                          6.1. Percentage of households and communities having more secure (increased) access to livelihood\nassets                                                                                                                                                                                                6.2. Percentage of targeted population with sustained climate-resilient livelihoods                                                                                           7. Climate change priorities are integrated into national development strategy",4.2,"990m of breakwaters installed",null,"No breakwater"]
[]
[null,"Fund Output","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Fund Output Indicator","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Target at CEO Endorsement ",null,"Baseline",null,"Mid-term Results",null,"Terminal Results"]
[null,"Output 1: Risk and vulnerability assessments conducted and updated at a national level\nOutput 2.1: Strengthened capacity of national and regional centres and networks to respond rapidly to extreme weather events\nOutput 2.2: Targeted population groups covered by adequate risk reduction systems\nOutput 3: Targeted population groups participating in\nadaptation and risk reduction awareness activities\nOutput 4: Vulnerable physical, natural, and social assets strengthened in response to climate change impacts, including variability\nOutput 5: Vulnerable physical, natural, and social assets strengthened in response to climate change impacts, including variability                                                                                             Output 6: Targeted individual and community livelihood strategies strengthened in relation to climate change impacts, including variability                                                                            Output 7: Improved integration of climate-resilience strategies into country development plans",5,"1.1. No. and type of projects that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments                                                                                      \n1.2. Development of early warning systems\n2.1.1. No. of staff trained to respond to, and mitigate impacts of, climate-related events\n2.1.2. Capacity of staff to respond to, and mitigate impacts of, climate-related events from targeted institutions increased\n2.2.1. Percentage of population covered by adequate risk-reduction systems\n2.2.2. No. of people affected by climate variability                                                                                                          3.1 No. and type of risk reduction actions or strategies introduced at local level                                                                                                     \n3.2 No. of news outlets in the local press and media that have covered the topic                                                                                                    \n4.1. No. and type of health or social infrastructure developed or modified to respond to new conditions\nresulting from climate variability and change (by type)                                                                                                                                                            4. 2. No. of physical assets strengthened or constructed to withstand conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by asset types)                                                                                                                                   5. No. and type of natural resource assets created, maintained or improved to withstand conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by type of assets)                                                                                                                   \n6.1. No. and type of adaptation assets (physical as well as knowledge) created in support of individualor community-livelihood strategies                                                                                                                                                   6.2. Type of income sources for households generated under climate change scenario                                                                                    \n7.1. No., type, and sector of policies introduced or adjusted to address climate change risks                                                                                 \n7.2. No. or targeted development strategies with incorporated climate change priorities enforced",5,"implementation of adaptation measures that combine traditional engineering with bio-engineering solutions thereby creating favorable conditions for natural sea-grass bed recolonisation",null,"degradation of coastal and marine ecosystems"]
[]
[null,"OBJECTIVE 3"]
[null,"Fund Outcome","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Fund Outcome Indicator","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Target at CEO Endorsement ",null,"Baseline",null,"Mid-term Results",null,"Terminal Results"]
[null,"Outcome 1: Reduced exposure at national level to climate-related hazards and threats\nOutcome 2: Strengthened institutional capacity to reduce risks associated with climate-induced socioeconomic and environmental losses\nOutcome 3: Strengthened awareness and ownership of adaptation and climate risk reduction processes at local level\nOutcome 4: Increased adaptive capacity within relevant development and natural resource sectors\nOutcome 5: Increased ecosystem resilience in response to climate change and variability-induced stress\nOutcome 6: Diversified and strengthened livelihoods and sources of income for vulnerable people in targeted areas                                                                                                 Outcome 7: Improved policies and regulations that promote and enforce resilience measures",6,"1. Relevant threat and hazard information generated and disseminated to stakeholders on a timely basis\n2.1. No. and type of targeted institutions with increased capacity to minimize exposure to climate variability risks\n2.2. Number of people with reduced risk to extreme weather events\n3.1. Percentage of targeted population aware of predicted adverse impacts of climate change, and of appropriate responses\n3.2. Modification in behavior of targeted population\n4.1. Development sectors' services responsive to evolving needs from changing and variable climate                                                                                            4.2. Physical infrastructure improved to withstand climate change and variability-induced stress                                                                                 \n5. Ecosystem services and natural assets maintained or improved under climate change and variability-induced stress                                                                                                                                                          6.1. Percentage of households and communities having more secure (increased) access to livelihood assets                                                                                                                                                                                                6.2. Percentage of targeted population with sustained climate-resilient livelihoods                                                                                           \n7. Climate change priorities are integrated into national development strategy",6.1,"at least 450 farmers have access to sustainable land and water management techniques",null,"small percentage of resients with water storage or distribution facilities"]
[]
[null,"Fund Output","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Fund Output Indicator","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Target at CEO Endorsement ",null,"Baseline",null,"Mid-term Results",null,"Terminal Results"]
[null,"Output 1: Risk and vulnerability assessments conducted and updated at a national level\nOutput 2.1: Strengthened capacity of national and regional centres and networks to respond rapidly to extreme weather events\nOutput 2.2: Targeted population groups covered by adequate risk reduction systems\nOutput 3: Targeted population groups participating in\nadaptation and risk reduction awareness activities\nOutput 4: Vulnerable physical, natural, and social assets strengthened in response to climate change impacts, including variability\nOutput 5: Vulnerable physical, natural, and social assets strengthened in response to climate change impacts, including variability                                                                                             Output 6: Targeted individual and community livelihood strategies strengthened in relation to climate change impacts, including variability                                                                            Output 7: Improved integration of climate-resilience strategies into country development plans",6,"1.1. No. and type of projects that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments                                                                                      \n1.2. Development of early warning systems\n2.1.1. No. of staff trained to respond to, and mitigate impacts of, climate-related events\n2.1.2. Capacity of staff to respond to, and mitigate impacts of, climate-related events from targeted\ninstitutions increased\n2.2.1. Percentage of population covered by adequate risk-reduction systems\n2.2.2. No. of people affected by climate variability                                                                                                          3.1 No. and type of risk reduction actions or strategies introduced at local level                                                                                                     \n3.2 No. of news outlets in the local press and media that have covered the topic                                                                                                    \n4.1. No. and type of health or social infrastructure developed or modified to respond to new conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by type)                                                                                                                                                            4. 2. No. of physical assets strengthened or constructed to withstand conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by asset types)                                                                                                                                   5. No. and type of natural resource assets created, maintained or improved to withstand conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by type of assets)                                                                                                                   \n6.1. No. and type of adaptation assets (physical as well as knowledge) created in support of individualor\ncommunity-livelihood strategies                                                                                                                                                   6.2. Type of income sources for households generated under climate change scenario                                                                                    \n7.1. No., type, and sector of policies introduced or adjusted to address climate change risks                                                                                 \n7.2. No. or targeted development strategies with incorporated climate change priorities enforced",6.1,"7 climate-smart farmer field school established and farmers trained to adopt climate smart methodology",null,"no climate smart field schools in select communities"]
[]
[null,"OBJECTIVE 4"]
[null,"Fund Outcome","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Fund Outcome Indicator","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Target at CEO Endorsement ",null,"Baseline",null,"Mid-term Results",null,"Terminal Results"]
[null,"Outcome 1: Reduced exposure at national level to climate-related hazards and threats\nOutcome 2: Strengthened institutional capacity to reduce risks associated with climate-induced socioeconomic and environmental losses\nOutcome 3: Strengthened awareness and ownership of adaptation and climate risk reduction processes at local level\nOutcome 4: Increased adaptive capacity within relevant development and natural resource sectors\nOutcome 5: Increased ecosystem resilience in response to climate change and variability-induced stress\nOutcome 6: Diversified and strengthened livelihoods and sources of income for vulnerable people in targeted areas                                                                                                 Outcome 7: Improved policies and regulations that promote and enforce resilience measures",7,"1. Relevant threat and hazard information generated and disseminated to stakeholders on a timely basis\n2.1. No. and type of targeted institutions with increased capacity to minimize exposure to climate variability risks\n2.2. Number of people with reduced risk to extreme weather events\n3.1. Percentage of targeted population aware of predicted adverse impacts of climate change, and of appropriate responses\n3.2. Modification in behavior of targeted population\n4.1. Development sectors' services responsive to evolving needs from changing and variable climate                                                                                            4.2. Physical infrastructure improved to withstand climate change and variability-induced stress                                                                                 5. Ecosystem services and natural assets maintained or improved under climate change and variability-induced stress                                                                                                                                                          6.1. Percentage of households and communities having more secure (increased) access to livelihood assets                                                                                                                                                                                                6.2. Percentage of targeted population with sustained climate-resilient livelihoods                                                                                           7. Climate change priorities are integrated into national development strategy",7,"Guidelines, standards and coastal adaptation plans completed for vulnerable sections of Negril",null,"no specific adaptation training tools/ guidelines"]
[]
[null,"Fund Output","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Fund Output Indicator","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Target at CEO Endorsement ",null,"Baseline",null,"Mid-term Results",null,"Terminal Results"]
[null,"Output 1: Risk and vulnerability assessments conducted and updated at a national level\nOutput 2.1: Strengthened capacity of national and regional centres and networks to respond rapidly to extreme weather events\nOutput 2.2: Targeted population groups covered by adequate risk reduction systems\nOutput 3: Targeted population groups participating in\nadaptation and risk reduction awareness activities\nOutput 4: Vulnerable physical, natural, and social assets strengthened in response to climate change impacts, including variability\nOutput 5: Vulnerable physical, natural, and social assets strengthened in response to climate change impacts, including variability                                                                                             Output 6: Targeted individual and community livelihood strategies strengthened in relation to climate change impacts, including variability                                                                            Output 7: Improved integration of climate-resilience strategies into country development plans",7,"1.1. No. and type of projects that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments                                                                                      \n1.2. Development of early warning systems\n2.1.1. No. of staff trained to respond to, and mitigate impacts of, climate-related events\n2.1.2. Capacity of staff to respond to, and mitigate impacts of, climate-related events from targeted institutions increased\n2.2.1. Percentage of population covered by adequate risk-reduction systems\n2.2.2. No. of people affected by climate variability                                                                                                          3.1 No. and type of risk reduction actions or strategies introduced at local level                                                                                                     \n3.2 No. of news outlets in the local press and media that have covered the topic                                                                                                    \n4.1. No. and type of health or social infrastructure developed or modified to respond to new conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by type)                                                                                                                                                            4. 2. No. of physical assets strengthened or constructed to withstand conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by asset types)                                                                                                                                   5. No. and type of natural resource assets created, maintained or improved to withstand conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by type of assets)                                                                                                                   \n6.1. No. and type of adaptation assets (physical as well as knowledge) created in support of individualor community-livelihood strategies                                                                                                                                                   6.2. Type of income sources for households generated under climate change scenario                                                                                    \n7.1. No., type, and sector of policies introduced or adjusted to address climate change risks                                                                                 \n7.2. No. or targeted development strategies with incorporated climate change priorities enforced",7.2,"Accurate hazard and risk maps completed and risk atlas developed",null,"Lack of /inadequate specific information"]

{"sheet":"Units for Indicators","index":8,"n_rows":4,"n_cols":2,"rows_kept":4,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null," Fund Outcome Indicator Units"]
[null,"1. Generation of relevant data, Stakeholders, and Timeliness \n2.1. Include both qualitative and quantitative measures of capacity level within targeted institutions\n2.2. Number (men and women and other vulnerable groups)\n3.1. Use scale from 1 to 5: 5: Fully aware 4: Mostly aware 3: Partially aware 2: Partially not aware 1: Aware of neither predicted adverse impacts of climate change nor of appropriate responses\n3.2. Use scale from 1 to 5:  5: All 4: Almost all 3: Half 2: Some 1: None\n4.1. Summarize in an overall scale (1-5): 5: Highly responsive (All defined elements ) 4: Mostly responsive (Most defined elements) 3: Moderately responsive (Some defined elements) 2: Partially responsive (Lacks most elements) 1: Non responsive (Lacks all elements )                                                                                                                                                                                                                    4.2.  Summarize in an overall scale (1-5):  5: Fully improved 4: Mostly Improved 3: Moderately improved 2: Somewhat improved\n1: Not improved                                                                                                                                                                                                                           5.  Depends on the targeted natural asset: \nBiological (species): measure through changes in population numbers (dynamics, structure, etc.)\nLand: measure changes in hectares. Baseline data will be necessary to estimate the change. Supporting indicators baseline and target (as well as contextual information) are needed such as the following: Farmers adopting recommended technologies, Ha. of land improved, Average deforestation rate Etc.\nUse scale from 1 to 5.  5: Very effective (All elements are present) 4: Effective (Most elements are present) 3: Moderately effective (Some elements are present) 2: Partially effective (Most elements are not present) 1: Ineffective (No elements are present)\n6.1.  Summarize in an overall scale (1-5):  5: Very high improvement 4: High improvement 3: Moderate improvement 2: Limited improvement 1: No improvement                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         6.2.  Household income by source of livelihood in project area (USD) prior and post project intervention                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      7. Summarize in an overall scale (1-5).  5: All (Fully integrated) 4: Most 3: Some 2: Most not integrated 1: None"]
[null,"Fund Output Indicator Units"]
[null,"1.1.  Number, sector(s) and level(s) of projects or interventions in separate fields of monitoring plan                                                                                  1.2. Number\n2.1.1. Number of staff (male/female) of targeted institutions: a. Obtain baseline information: total number of staff from targeted institutions b. Define target\n2.1.2. Number of staff (male/female) of targeted institutions: a. Obtain baseline information: total number of staff from targeted institutions b. Define target: needs to be defined by project proponents\n2.2.1. Quantitative: Percentage (includes women – and other vulnerable groups – and men).\nQualitative: Adequacy: include direct analysis of major areas; adequacy/effectiveness of systems or analysis of perceptions of populations and institutions.\n2.2.2. Number (broken down by gender and, if possible, by vulnerable groups defined in the area of intervention) of people                                                                                                        3.1. Number and type (in separate columns) at local level.                                                                                                                                    3.2. Number                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     4.1. Number and type                                                                                                                                                                                                               4. 2.  Number and type (entered in separate columns)                                                                                                                                                     5.  Number of interventions by type of natural asset and intervention                                                                                                                    6.1.  Number and type (in separate columns of monitoring plan)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    6.2. Income sources per household; description of income source and number of households.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     7.1.  Number/Sector                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   7.2. Number; Effectiveness (see previous indicator) through enforcement level."]