{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":9,"sheets":["Overview ","FinancialData","Procurement","Risk Assesment ","Rating ","Project Indicators ","Lessons Learned ","Results Tracker","Units for Indicators"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":2,"macros":0,"external_links":2,"defined_names":18,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"Overview ","index":0,"n_rows":177,"n_cols":16,"rows_kept":177,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[22,3,23,3],[15,1,15,2],[26,1,26,2],[35,1,35,2],[25,1,25,2],[18,1,18,2],[22,1,23,2],[24,1,24,2],[31,1,31,2]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,null,"Project Performance Report (PPR)"]
[]
[null,null,"Period of Report (Dates)","October 2012 - October 2013"]
[]
[null,null,"Project Title: ","Promoting climate resilience in the rice sector through pilot investments in Alaotra Mangoro Region"]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Project Summary: ","In the framework of the implementation of its NAPA, the Government of the Republic of Madagascar has recieved support from the Adaptation Fund for the implementation of the project  « PROMOTING CLIMATE RESILIENCE IN THE RICE SECTOR THROUGH PILOT INVESTMENTS IN ALAOTRA-MANGORO REGION », which seeks to transform the rice sub-sector towards resilience to the impacts of climate change.  The project is comprised of three components 1) strengthening of technical and scientific capacities, 2) implementation of a rice production cycle that is resilient and adapted and 3)leveraging policy change in the rice sector.  The project is implemented in the Alaotra-Mangoro region, the primary rice production area in Madagascar, in  three pilot districts.  The project is implemented through the Ministry of Environment and Forests and works at the local level with producers and local partners, along with decentralised ministries and regional technical partners.\n"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Countries","Project Type:  ",null,"GEF Focal Area: ","GEF 4 Focal Areas","GEF 2 / 3 Operational Programme: ","Overall Rating of the project in the evaluation by the project evaluator: ","GEF-4 Focal Area Strategic Program: ","GEF-3 Focal Area Strategic Program: "]
[null,null,"Database Number: ","AFB-5060-1111-2G49",null,null,null,"Afghanistan","FP","Yes","Biodiversity",1,1,"U","BD-SP1-PA Financing","1: Arid & semi-arid ecosystems"]
[null,"Implementing Entity (IE) [name]:",null,"UNEP",null,null,null,"Albania","MSP","No","Climate Change Adaptation",2,2,"S","BD-SP2-Marine PA","2: Coastal, marine & freshwater ecosystems"]
[null,null,"Type of IE:","MIE",null,null,null,"Algeria","EA",null,"Climate Change Mitigation",3,3,"MU","BD-SP3-PA Networks","3: Forest ecosystems"]
[null,null,"Country(ies): ","MADAGASCAR",null,null,null,"Angola",null,null,"International Waters",5,5,"Good","BD-SP5-Markets","13: Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biological Diversity Important to Agriculture"]
[null,"Relevant Geographic Points (i.e. cities, villages, bodies of water):",null,"The Alaotra Mangoro region is located in the center-East of  Madagascar.  The region covers 33 054 Km². and is comprised of (05) Districts themselves sub-divided into79 communes. The regional capital is t Ambatondrazaka, approximately 250 Km from Antananarivo.  The project is working in the three districts of Andilamena (8 communes), Amparafaravola (20 communes), and Ambatondrazaka (20 communes).  \nThe Alaotra Mangoro contains many bodies of water and rivers, Lake Alaotra being the most important lake in the region, with an area of 20 000 ha.\n",null,null,null,"Argentina",null,null,"Multiple Focal Area",null,null,null,"BD-SP7-Invasive Alien Species(IAS)","6: Promoting the adoption of renewable energy by removing barriers and reducing implementation costs"]
[{"$nulls":12},"CC-SP2- Industrial EE","8: Waterbody based operational program"]
[null,null,"Project Milestones",{"$nulls":9},"CC-SP3-RE,CC-SP4-Biomass","9: Integrated Land and Water multiple focal area"]
[null,null,"Milestone",{"$nulls":4},"Bahamas",{"$nulls":6},"CC-SP5-Transport","10: Contaminants based operational program"]
[null,"AFB Approval Date:",null,"2011-12-14"]
[]
[null,"IE-AFB Agreement Signature Date:",null,"Feb 29 2012",{"$nulls":9},"CC-SP6-LULUCF","12: Integrated Ecosystem Management"]
[null,"Start of Project/Programme:",null,"2012-10-01",{"$nulls":9},"Cross cutting capacity building","14: Persistent Organic Pollutants"]
[null,"Mid-term Review Date (if planned):",null,"2015-07-01"]
[null,null,"Terminal Evaluation Date:","April-May 2017"]
[]
[null,null,null,"List documents/ reports/ brochures / articles that have been prepared about the project.",null,null,null,"Cyprus"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Czech Republic"]
[null,"List the Website address (URL) of project.",{"$nulls":5},"Democratic People's Republic of Korea"]
[null,null,null,"www.mef.gov.mg",null,null,null,"Democratic Republic of the Congo"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Denmark"]
[null,null,"Project contacts:  ",{"$nulls":4},"Djibouti"]
[null,"National Project Manager/Coordinator",{"$nulls":5},"Dominica"]
[null,null,"Name: ","RAZANAMIHARISOA Jane Alice",null,null,null,"Dominican Republic"]
[null,null,"Email: ","jrazanamiharisoa@ymail.com",null,null,null,"Ecuador"]
[null,null,"Date: ","2013-12-10",null,null,null,"Egypt"]
[null,null,"Government DA",{"$nulls":4},"El Salvador"]
[null,null,"Name: ","Germain Randiasandratana, Ministry of Environment and Forests - Directorate of Climate Change",null,null,null,"Equatoral Guinea"]
[null,null,"Email: ","randriasandratana@yahoo.fr",null,null,null,"Eritrea"]
[null,null,"Date: ","2013-12-10",null,null,null,"Estonia"]
[null,null,"Implementing Entity",{"$nulls":4},"Ethiopia"]
[null,null,"Name: ","Lars Christiansen, UNEP Task Manager",null,null,null,"Fiji"]
[null,null,"Email: ","lachr@dtu.dk",null,null,null,"Finland"]
[null,null,"Date: ","2013-12-16",null,null,null,"France"]
[null,null,"Executing Agency",{"$nulls":4},"Gambia"]
[null,null,"Name: ",{"$nulls":4},"Georgia"]
[null,null,"Email: ",{"$nulls":4},"Germany"]
[null,null,"Date: ",{"$nulls":4},"Ghana"]
[null,null,"Executing Agency",{"$nulls":4},"Greece"]
[null,null,"Name: ",{"$nulls":4},"Grenada"]
[null,null,"Email: ",{"$nulls":4},"Guatemala"]
[null,null,"Date: ",{"$nulls":4},"Guinea"]
[null,null,"Executing Agency",{"$nulls":4},"Guinea Bissau"]
[null,null,"Name: ",{"$nulls":4},"Guyana"]
[null,null,"Email: ",{"$nulls":4},"Haiti"]
[null,null,"Date: ",{"$nulls":4},"Honduras"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Hungary"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Iceland"]
[{"$nulls":7},"India"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Indonesia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Iran (Islamic Republic of)"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Iraq"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Ireland"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Israel"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Italy"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Jamaica"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Japan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Jordan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Kazakhstan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Kenya"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Kiribati"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Kuwait"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Kyrgyzstan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Lao People’s Democratic Republic"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Latvia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Lebanon"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Lesotho"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Liberia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Libyan Arab Jamahiriya"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Liechtenstein"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Lithuania"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Luxembourg"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Madagascar"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Malawi"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Malaysia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Maldives"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Mali"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Malta"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Marshall Islands"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Mauritania"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Mauritius"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Mexico"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Micronesia, Federated States of"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Monaco"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Mongolia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Montenegro"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Morocco"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Mozambique"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Myanmar"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Namibia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Nauru"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Nepal"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Netherlands"]
[{"$nulls":7},"New Zealand"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Nicaragua"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Niger"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Nigeria"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Norway"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Oman"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Pakistan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Palau"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Panama"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Papua New Guinea"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Paraguay"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Peru"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Philippines"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Poland"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Portugal"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Qatar"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Republic of Korea"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Republic of Moldova"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Romania"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Russian Federation"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Rwanda"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Saint Kitts and Nevis"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Saint Lucia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Saint Vincent and the Grenadines"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Samoa"]
[{"$nulls":7},"San Marino"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Sao Tome and Principe"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Saudi Arabia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Senegal"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Serbia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Seychelles"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Sierra Leone"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Singapore"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Slovakia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Slovenia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Solomon Islands"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Somalia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"South Africa"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Spain"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Sri Lanka"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Sudan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Suriname"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Swaziland"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Sweden"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Switzerland"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Syrian Arab Republic"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Tajikistan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Thailand"]
[{"$nulls":7},"The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Timor-Leste"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Togo"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Tonga"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Trinidad and Tobago"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Tunisia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Turkey"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Turkmenistan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Tuvalu"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Uganda"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Ukraine"]
[{"$nulls":7},"United Arab Emirates"]
[{"$nulls":7},"United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland"]
[{"$nulls":7},"United Republic of Tanzania"]
[{"$nulls":7},"United States of America"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Uruguay"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Uzbekistan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Vanuatu"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Viet Nam"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Yemen"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Zambia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Zimbabwe"]

{"sheet":"FinancialData","index":1,"n_rows":105,"n_cols":8,"rows_kept":105,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[114,2,114,3],[113,5,113,6],[114,5,114,6],[110,5,110,6],[109,5,109,6],[109,2,109,3],[110,2,110,3],[113,2,113,3],[112,2,112,3],[106,2,106,3],[107,2,107,3],[107,5,107,6],[104,2,104,3],[103,2,103,3],[104,5,104,6],[103,5,103,6],[100,2,100,6],[2,2,2,7],[102,2,102,6],[8,2,8,3],[9,2,9,3],[18,2,18,3],[19,2,19,3],[101,2,101,3],[101,5,101,6],[4,2,4,6],[3,1,3,6],[12,2,12,3],[6,2,6,3],[8,5,8,6],[9,5,9,6],[7,2,7,6],[11,2,11,3],[40,4,43,4],[40,7,44,7],[46,7,48,7],[20,4,21,4],[22,4,24,4],[25,4,27,4],[25,7,27,7],[22,7,24,7],[20,7,21,7],[58,4,59,4],[58,7,59,7],[60,4,61,4],[28,4,30,4],[32,4,33,4],[28,7,33,7],[35,7,38,7],[35,4,37,4],[55,4,57,4],[55,7,57,7],[21,2,29,3],[80,7,87,7],[90,4,91,4],[89,7,91,7],[62,4,63,4],[64,4,65,4],[49,4,50,4],[52,4,54,4],[52,7,54,7],[70,4,72,4],[80,4,87,4],[70,7,72,7],[60,7,61,7],[66,4,67,4],[65,7,68,7],[73,4,75,4],[73,7,75,7],[76,4,79,4],[76,7,79,7]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,"Financial information:  cumulative from project start to 15 Oct 2013"]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"DISBURSEMENT OF AF GRANT FUNDS "]
[null,null,"How much of the total AF grant as noted in Project Document plus any project preparation grant has been spent to date?"]
[null,null,"Estimated cumulative total disbursement as of October 15 2013",null,null,123785]
[null,null,"Add any comments on AF Grant Funds. (word limit=200)",null,null,"awaiting second cash advance for additional expenditures in 2013. Estimated expenditures for Q4-2013 = 270,000"]
[]
[null,null,"EXPENDITURE DATA"]
[null,null,"List ouput and corresponding amount spent for the current reporting period",null,null,"Output","AMOUNT"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Output 1.1.1 Best Available Technologies and Integrated Resilient Rice Model (Modèle Intégré de Riziculture Résiliente - MIRR) selected and publicized ",24000]
[{"$nulls":5},"Output 2.1.1  climate resilient rice varieties selected through participatory field testing",20000]
[{"$nulls":5},"Project operations/Execution costs",79785]
[{"$nulls":5},"TOTAL",123785]
[]
[null,null,"PLANNED EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE"]
[null,null,"List outputs planned and corresponding projected cost for the upcoming reporting period ",null,"Output","ITEM","PROJECTED COST","Est. Completion Date"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1.1.1 Best Available Technologies and Integrated Resilient Rice Model (Modèle Intégré de Riziculture Résiliente - MIRR) selected and publicized ","national agriculture and rice experts"," -  ","2013-12-01"]
[null,null,"NOTE: Activities for which expenditures are planned between October 2013 and 30 September 2014 reported here only",null,null,"international rice expert",20000]
[{"$nulls":5},"national agriculture and rice experts",30000,"2013-12-01"]
[{"$nulls":5},"international rice expert",15000]
[{"$nulls":5},"publication services",10000]
[{"$nulls":5},"MIRR selection and validation symposium",35000,"2014-03-01"]
[{"$nulls":5},"International rice expert",5000]
[{"$nulls":5},"national agriculture and rice experts"," "]
[{"$nulls":4},"1.2.1 Crop models are available for rice vulnerability mapping ","software and hardware acquisition",5000,"2013-12-01"]
[{"$nulls":5},"national agriculture and rice experts",6000]
[{"$nulls":5},"Training workshop on rice modelling",5000]
[{"$nulls":5},"Data acquisition costs",1000]
[{"$nulls":5},"national agriculture and rice experts",5000]
[{"$nulls":5},"Sub-contract mapping services ",10000]
[{"$nulls":5},"National hydrology experts",25000,"2014-03-01"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1.2.2 Updated, dynamic agricultural calendars and climate early warnings taking into account current and projected variability disseminated to local population","National agriculture and rice experts",16000,"2014-03-01"]
[{"$nulls":5},"group training (updated calendars and rice models)",20000]
[{"$nulls":5},"international crm expert",20000]
[{"$nulls":5},"synoptic weather stations (2)",75000]
[{"$nulls":5},"sub-contract with Rural Radio Network",15000,"2014-12-01"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1.2.3 Agricultural extension staff trained on climate risk management in an agro-ecosystem context","international crm expert",12500,"2014-09-01"]
[{"$nulls":5},"national extension specialists",20000]
[{"$nulls":5},"Climate Risk Management workshop",40000]
[{"$nulls":5},"national agro-forestry experts",28000]
[{"$nulls":4},"Cross-cutting Component 1 costs","Travel for Consultants",61350]
[{"$nulls":4},"2.1.1  climate resilient rice varieties selected through participatory field testing","national agriculture researchers",30000,"2013-03-01"]
[{"$nulls":5},"agricultural inputs (seeds, fertilizers, land and tools)",100000,"2014-09-01"]
[{"$nulls":5},"sub-contract with FOFIFA",30000]
[{"$nulls":5},"national agriculture researchers",30000]
[{"$nulls":4},"2.1.2 An operational multiplication and dissemination scheme for adapted seed varieties","agricultural inputs",100000,"2015-03-01"]
[{"$nulls":5},"sub-contract with CALA (pre-base seeds)",30000]
[{"$nulls":5},"Farmer labour",0]
[{"$nulls":4},"2.1.3 Updated fertilisation guidelines according to best available standards and taking climate conditions into consideration","national agriculture/fertilisation experts",20000,"2014-03-01"]
[{"$nulls":5},"National soil science experts",6000]
[{"$nulls":5},"Sub-contract with CALA for soil quality analysis",20000]
[{"$nulls":5},"sub-contract with BIOTECH Madagascar (for Taroka)",60000,"2015-03-01"]
[{"$nulls":5},"sub-contract with GUANOMAD (for Guano)",60000]
[{"$nulls":5},"national agriculture/fertilisation expert",5000]
[{"$nulls":4},"2.1.4 Integrated pest management is implemented","IPM training workshops",30000,"2014-09-01"]
[{"$nulls":5},"international IPM expert",25000]
[{"$nulls":4},"2.1.5 Water efficiency, management and conservation technologies and infrastructures are implemented","sub-contract with water engineering firm",70000,"2015-06-01"]
[{"$nulls":5},"water management and infrastructure specialist",28000]
[{"$nulls":5},"sub-contract with civil engineering firm",70000,"2015-06-01"]
[{"$nulls":5},"water management and infrastructure specialist",28000,"2015-06-01"]
[{"$nulls":4},"2.2.1 Best available land preparation, production and harvesting techniques disseminated to reduce deforestation, maintain soil fertility and integrity, and to provide adequate growing conditions","Local MIRR training",36000,"2014-12-01"]
[{"$nulls":5},"national riziculture experts (2)",12000,"2016-12-01"]
[{"$nulls":5},"national riziculture experts (4)",10000]
[{"$nulls":5},"national agro-forestry expert",5000]
[{"$nulls":5},"sub-contract for extension services",3000]
[{"$nulls":4},"2.2.2  Watershed rehabilitation in productive landscapes introduced, including through reforestation and adaptation of agroforestry practices","sub-contract Ministry of forests",53000,"2016-12-01"]
[{"$nulls":5},"trees and seedlings",20000,"2017-06-01"]
[{"$nulls":5},"equipment rental",105000]
[{"$nulls":5},"Sub-contract for SLM Community Training",95000]
[{"$nulls":4},"2.2.5 Water quality assessments","Sub-contract Ministry of water",10000,"2017-12-01"]
[{"$nulls":5},"national water quality expert",3000]
[{"$nulls":5},"laboratory and expendable equipment",3000]
[{"$nulls":4},"2.4.2 Post-harvest storage facilities with phytosanitary control, serving as trading points and markets","economist",14000,"2014-12-01"]
[{"$nulls":5},"equipment and construction material ",45000]
[{"$nulls":5},"sub-contract private sector firm",45000]
[{"$nulls":5},"training on community-managed reserves",10000]
[{"$nulls":4},"Cross-cutting component costs (Component 2)","Chief Technical Advisor (CTA)",36000,"2017-12-01"]
[{"$nulls":5},"CTA travel",9048]
[{"$nulls":5},"Local Technicians (3)",6540]
[{"$nulls":5},"Office supplies for Local Technicians (3)",700]
[{"$nulls":5},"Travel costs for regional directorates",20000]
[{"$nulls":5},"Operating costs for regional directorates (fuel and expendables)",8000]
[{"$nulls":5},"Travel for consultants",41400]
[{"$nulls":5},"Vehicle and maintenance",80000]
[]
[{"$nulls":4},"3.2.2 A strategy for communicating information on adaptation techniques to farmers is implemented","National Rural communication specialist",3000,"2017-09-01"]
[{"$nulls":5},"National Rural communication specialist",2000]
[{"$nulls":5},"awareness raising Meetings and workshops",4000]
[{"$nulls":4},"Cross-cutting component 3 costs","Travel for consultants",1500,"3017-12-01"]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[{"$nulls":5},"TOTAL",1903038]
[]
[null,null,"ACTUAL CO-FINANCING (If the MTR or TE have not been undertaken this reporting period, DO NOT report on actual co-financing.) "]
[null,null,"How much of the total co-financing as committed in the Project Document has actually been realized?"]
[]
[null,null,"Estimated cumulative actual co-financing as verified during Mid-term Review (MTR) or Terminal Evaluation (TE). "]
[null,null,"Add any comments on actual co-financing in particular any issues related to the realization of in-kind, grant, credits, loans, equity, non-grant instruments and other types of co-financing. (word limit=200)"]

{"sheet":"Procurement","index":2,"n_rows":10,"n_cols":8,"rows_kept":10,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[2,2,2,7],[20,8,27,8],[28,8,31,8],[32,8,34,8],[18,2,18,4],[17,2,17,3],[3,1,3,7],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,7],[5,2,5,5],[20,6,27,6],[28,6,31,6],[4,2,4,7],[20,2,27,2],[35,6,38,6],[40,6,43,6],[35,8,38,8],[41,8,44,8],[32,2,34,2],[28,2,31,2],[35,2,38,2],[39,2,43,2],[32,6,34,6]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,"PROCUREMENT DATA"]
[]
[null,null,"Please provide information for all contracts over $2,500 USD"]
[null,null,"Please provide the number of  contracts under $2,500, signed during this reporting period:"]
[]
[null,null,"LIST OF CONTRACTS"]
[null,null,"List all contracts related to the project/program with signature dates"]
[null,null,"Contract Type","Agency / Contracted party","Contract Value/Amount (USD)","Signature Date","Payment to Date","Remaining Balance"]

{"sheet":"Risk Assesment ","index":3,"n_rows":32,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":32,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[57,2,57,3],[57,4,57,5],[53,2,53,3],[53,4,53,5],[43,2,43,3],[44,2,44,3],[47,4,47,5],[49,2,49,3],[32,2,32,5],[31,2,31,3],[45,2,45,5],[46,2,46,3],[46,4,46,5],[47,2,47,3],[31,4,31,5],[21,2,21,5],[22,2,22,5],[2,2,2,5],[55,2,55,3],[56,2,56,3],[56,4,56,5],[50,2,50,3],[50,4,50,5],[52,2,52,3],[52,4,52,5],[23,4,23,5],[24,4,24,5],[25,4,25,5],[26,4,26,5],[27,4,27,5],[30,2,30,5],[3,1,3,5],[4,2,4,5],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,5],[8,4,8,5],[19,4,19,5],[17,4,17,5],[18,4,18,5],[15,4,15,5],[16,4,16,5],[14,4,14,5],[9,4,9,5],[10,4,10,5],[11,4,11,5],[12,4,12,5],[13,4,13,5]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,"RISK ASSESMENT"]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"IDENTIFIED RISKS"]
[null,null,"List all Risks identified in project preparation phase and what  steps are being taken to mitigate them"]
[null,null,"Identified Risk","Current Status","Steps Taken to Mitigate Risk"]
[null,null,"Slow administration functionning due to lack of human and financial ressources","Low","As per recommendation of the Baseline Study and the Steering Committee of June 2013, the project is appointing local technicians in each district to support project activity supervision, technical assistance and day-to-day coordination. "]
[null,null,"Frequent political change, with elections now foreseen to be completed in December 2013.  This creates a degree of uncertainty","Medium","Central administration Staff concerned by this project as well the regional counterparts will produce report about their achievements and output of the project so as to facilitate transition in case of Staff change. The project works with multiple partners (minimizing the impact of changes within single ministry) as well as with para-governmental partners such as FOFIFA and CALA who can continue to deliver activities at the operational level the project coordination unit will not change during the project implementation period,that may mitigate in some way the risk associated with political change; many activties involve partnership with private/semi private entities, independent experts and consultants wich are less affected by political insatabilities(FOFIFA, Local cooperatives, water user associations)                                                             "]
[null,null,"Accesibility of sites during cyclonic/rainy/ flooding  period (december-april) could affect inter regional transport and cause delays in performing required field visits and inputs delivery from other regions or from capital","Medium","Local technicians supporting the PCU will be recruited during the next couple of months so as to ensure local coordination and organisation, supervision and technical support.  local coordination will be entrusted to decentralized ministerial staff; and regular communications between the central level PCU and local-level stakeholders will be maintained using telecommunications infrastructure."]
[null,null,"Lack of population buy-in on project activities ","Low","Intensive consultations are being undertaken throughout the project sites, to ensure approrpiate levels of awareness and understanding of the project intended acfivities and results.  These will be supplemented by the efforts of the local technicians who will act as a local liaison for the project.  There is continued high level interest in the region for this project, political support as well as local buy-in and expectations"]
[null,null,"there is a risk that the upscaling and replication strategy developed for this project might be insufficient in ensuring uptake of the approach to the rest of the country. Political instability in the country may delay or prevent the adoption of policy recommendations adopted by the project. ","Low","While it is too early to determine whether the replication strategy will be efficient, the political situtation in the country and in the project region is becoming more stable.  There is a relatively stable political leadership at the regional level that strongly supports the project"]
{"$rows_empty":7}
[null,null,"Critical Risks Affecting Progress (Not identified at project design)"]
[null,null,"Identify Risks with a 50% or > likelihood of affecting progress of project"]
[null,null,"Identified Risk","Current Status","Steps Taken to Mitigate Risk"]
[null,null,"There could be project delays due to delays in processing cash advance requests with UNEP, as well as due to change in financial procedures in UNEP or in GoM","Low","Changes in UNEP financial management procedures mid 2013 through the implementation of the IPSAS system (among other things implying that cash transfers will now be processed through UNON) resulted in slightly increased processing times for cash advances end of 2013, leading to a temporary interruption in availability of funds for the project (about two weeks). The problem, was primarily one of lack of awareness from all sides on the actual time needed to process cash transfers in the new system. To prevent cash shortages from happening in the future UNEP has agreed with the MOEF to start cash advance requests well ahead of planned project expenditures. It is expected that such measures will practically eliminate this risk going forward. "]
[null,null,null," "]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Risk Measures: Were there any risk mitigation measures employed during the current reporting period?  If so, were risks reduced?  If not, why were these risks not reduced?"]
[null,null,"Add any comments relevant to risk mitigation (word limit = 500)"]

{"sheet":"Rating ","index":4,"n_rows":62,"n_cols":12,"rows_kept":62,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[6,5,6,6],[9,5,9,6],[60,6,60,8],[53,3,53,4],[44,5,44,6],[59,6,59,8],[17,4,17,7],[10,5,10,6],[2,2,2,8],[3,2,3,8],[19,2,19,7],[7,3,7,4],[8,5,8,6],[34,4,34,7],[8,3,8,4],[7,5,7,6],[16,4,16,7],[6,3,6,4],[61,6,61,8],[45,5,45,6],[56,6,56,8],[57,6,57,8],[58,6,58,8],[15,3,15,8],[35,4,35,7],[25,3,25,4],[11,5,11,6],[12,5,12,6],[53,5,53,8],[51,4,51,7],[41,5,41,6],[20,3,23,8],[50,4,50,7],[41,3,41,4],[25,5,25,6]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,"RATING ON IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS ",{"$nulls":8},"Evaluation ny progrer mise en œuvre"]
[null,null,"For rating definitions please see bottom of page."]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,"Progress on Key Milestones",null,"Expected Progress",null,"Progress to Date","Rating"]
[null,null,"Project Manager/Coordinator: ","Stakeholder Consultation at all levels",null,"Confirmation of activities and of the project objectives, and development of project oversight and management structures as per project document ",null,"identification of new activities and of the terms of reference for the project supervision structures ","Satisfactory"]
[null,null,null,"Development of project management tools",null,"Elaboration of annual work plans, terms of reference, procurement plan, budget revisions and establishment of project management structures at central and decentralized level ",null,"Annual workplan approved, budget revised and approved, procurement plan developed ","Satisfactory"]
[null,null,null,"Baseline Study",null,"Revision of project indicators and provision of baseline data",null,"Baseline study completed.  Recommendations from the study taken into consideration in development of project structure, project indicators and targets","Satisfactory"]
[null,null,null,"Component 1 Milestones","Development of the MIRR                                             Development of rice guidelines, technologies, models and knowledge products","Development of the MIRR expected by end 2013.  Guidelines and other MIRR-related products expected early 2014, trainings delivered in early 2014",null,"Intermediate report on MIRR submitted, recruitment of consultants underway for trainings and development of guidelines.  MIRR validation workshop expected in 2014","Satisfactory"]
[null,null,null,"Component 2 Milestones","Rice varieties selected and produced                      Water technologies deployed                                   Ecosystems rehabilitated and productive                    Post harvest losses reduced                      ","Expected delivery for 2014 and 2015",null,"Terms of reference for consultants and MOUs with cooperating organizations are being developed","N-A"]
[null,null,null,"Component 3 Milestones","Norms, standards and policies revised","Expected delivery for 2016 and 2017",null,"N-A","N-A"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Overall Rating","Satisfactory"]
[]
[null,null,null,"Please Provide the Name and Contact information of person(s) reponsible for completeling the Rating section"]
[null,null,null,"Name: ","RAZANAMIHARISOA Jane Alice Laurette"]
[null,null,null,"Email: ","jrazanamiharisoa@ymail.com"]
[]
[null,null,"Please justify your rating.  Outline the positive and negative progress made by the project since it started.  Provide specific recommendations for next steps. . (word limit=500)"]
[null,null,null,"The project has been slightly delayed in achievement of milestones due to a number of factors, the primary one being the low number of applicants submitting applications for tenders posted (in particular international) - this has necessitated reposting of positions in several cases. Measures such as establishment of partnership with IRRI for technical rice consultancies are now being pursued and expected to improve the situation. Overall project is progressing satisfactorily, however."]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,"Progress on Key Milestones",null,"Expected Progress",null,"Progress to Date","Rating"]
[null,null,"Implementing Agency  ","Stakeholder Consultation at all levels",null,"Confirmation of activities and of the project objectives, and development of project oversight and management structures as per project document ",null,"identification of new activities and of the terms of reference for the project supervision structures ","Satisfactory"]
[null,null,null,"Development of project management tools",null,"Elaboration of annual work plans, terms of reference, procurement plan, budget revisions and establishment of project management structures at central and decentralized level ",null,"Annual workplan approved, budget revised and approved, procurement plan developed ","Moderately satisfactory"]
[null,null,null,"Baseline Study",null,"Revision of project indicators and provision of baseline data",null,"Baseline study completed.  Recommendations from the study taken into consideration in development of project structure, project indicators and targets","Satisfactory"]
[null,null,null,"Component 1 Milestones","Development of the MIRR                                             Development of rice guidelines, technologies, models and knowledge products","Development of the MIRR expected by end 2013.  Guidelines and other MIRR-related products expected early 2014, trainings delivered in early 2014",null,"Intermediate report on MIRR submitted, recruitment of consultants underway for trainings and development of guidelines.  MIRR validation workshop expected in 2014","Moderately satisfactory"]
[null,null,null,"Component 2 Milestones","Rice varieties selected and produced                      Water technologies deployed                                   Ecosystems rehabilitated and productive                    Post harvest losses reduced                      ","Expected delivery for 2014 and 2015",null,"Terms of reference for consultants and MOUs with cooperating organizations are being developed","N/A"]
[null,null,null,"Component 3 Milestones","Norms, standards and policies revised","Expected delivery for 2016 and 2017",null,"N-A","N/A"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Overall rating","Moderately satisfactory"]
[null,null,null,"Please Provide the Name and Contact information of person(s) reponsible for completeling the Rating section"]
[null,null,null,"Name: ","Lars Christiansen"]
[null,null,null,"Email: ","lachr@dtu.dk"]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,"Progress on Key Milestones",null,"Expected Progress",null,"Progress to Date","Rating"]
[null,null,"Chief Technical Advisor","Stakeholder Consultation at all levels",null,"Confirmation of activities and of the project objectives, and development of project oversight and management structures as per project document ",null,"identification of new activities and of the terms of reference for the project supervision structures ","Satisfactory"]
[null,null,null,"Development of project management tools",null,"Elaboration of annual work plans, terms of reference, procurement plan, budget revisions and establishment of project management structures at central and decentralized level ",null,"Annual workplan approved, budget revised and approved, procurement plan developed ","Moderately Satisfactory"]
[null,null,null,"Baseline Study",null,"Revision of project indicators and provision of baseline data",null,"Baseline study completed.  Recommendations from the study taken into consideration in development of project structure, project indicators and targets","N-A"]
[null,null,null,"Component 1 Milestones","Development of the MIRR                                             Development of rice guidelines, technologies, models and knowledge products","Development of the MIRR expected by end 2013.  Guidelines and other MIRR-related products expected early 2014, trainings delivered in early 2014",null,"Intermediate report on MIRR submitted, recruitement of consultants underway for trainings and development of guidelines.  MIRR validation workshop expected in 2014","N-A"]
[null,null,null,"Component 2 Milestones","Rice varieties selected and produced                      Water technologies deployed                                   Ecosystems rehabilitated and productive                    Post harvest losses reduced                      ","Expected delivery for 2014 and 2015",null,"Terms of reference for consultants and MOUs with cooperating organizations are being developed"]
[null,null,null,"Component 3 Milestones","Norms, standards and policies revised","Expected delivery for 2016 and 2017",null,"N-A"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Overall Rating","Moderaly Satisfactory"]
[null,null,null,"Please Provide the Name and Contact information of person(s) reponsible for completeling the Rating section"]
[null,null,null,"Name: ","Joana Talafre, Chief Technical Advisor"]
[null,null,null,"Email: ","joana.talafre@okapiconsulting.ca"]
[]
[null,null,null,"Please justify your rating and address the following points:\n1. Indicate trends, both positive and negative, in achievement of outcomes as per the project indicators.  \n2.  Detail critical risks that have affected progress.  \n3.  Outline response to MTR undertaken this reporting period.  \n4.  Outline action plan to address projects with a rating of HU, U or MU. Please keep your input to 1200 words",null,"The project has been delayed during its first year, but efforts are underway to accelerate the rate of delivery in 2014 towards achievement of all planned targets and milestones.  "]
[]
[{"$nulls":6},"Rating Definitions"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Highly Satisfactory (HS)","Project actions/activities planned for current reporting period are progressing on track or exceeding expectations to acheive all  major outcomes/outputs for given reporting period, without major shortcomings. The project can be presented as “good practice”.",{"$nulls":4},"Manana anle pta izy any, vita daolo ve sa mihoatra mihitsy"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Satisfactory (S)","Project actions/activities planned for current reporting period  are progressing on track to achieve most of its major outcomes/outputs with only minor shortcomings.",{"$nulls":4},"Ny ankamaroany dia tratra tsara daolo"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Marginally Satisfactory (MS)","Project actions/activities planned for current reporting period  are progressing on track to achieve most   major relevant outcomes/outputs, but with either significant shortcomings or modest overall relevance. "]
[{"$nulls":5},"Marginally Unsatisfactory (MU)","Project actions/activities planned for current reporting period  are not progressing on track to achieve  major outcomes/outputs with major shortcomings or is expected to achieve only some of its major outcomes/outputs."]
[{"$nulls":5},"Unsatisfactory (U)","Project actions/activities planned for current reporting period  are not progressing on track to achieve most of its major outcomes/outputs."]
[{"$nulls":5},"Highly Unsatisfactory (U)","Project actions/activities planned for current reporting period  are not on track and shows that it is failing to achieve, and is not expected to achieve, any of its outcomes/outputs."]

{"sheet":"Project Indicators ","index":5,"n_rows":37,"n_cols":8,"rows_kept":37,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[35,3,35,4],[30,3,30,4],[31,3,31,4],[32,3,32,4],[24,3,24,4],[14,3,14,4],[16,3,16,4],[18,3,18,4],[19,3,19,4],[21,3,21,4],[25,3,25,4],[26,3,26,4],[10,3,10,4],[11,3,11,4],[17,3,17,4],[34,3,34,4],[22,3,22,4],[13,3,13,4],[36,3,36,4],[20,3,20,4],[27,3,27,4],[28,3,28,4],[29,3,29,4],[8,3,8,4],[9,3,9,4],[15,3,15,4],[33,3,33,4],[23,3,23,4],[2,2,2,7],[3,2,3,7],[4,2,4,7],[6,3,6,4],[7,3,7,4],[5,2,5,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,"PROJECT Indicators (*as revised following baseline study)"]
[null,null,"Please provide all indicators being tracked for the project as outlined in the project document"]
[]
[null,null,"Type of Indicator (indicators towards Objectives, Outcomes, etc…)"]
[null,null,"Type of Indicator","Indicator",null,"Baseline","Progress since inception","Target for Project End"]
[null,null,"Outcome 1.1 Knowledge base on best practices for climate resilience in rice, based on existing local knowledge and international research","Percentage of farmers with access to selected and publicized MIRR ",null,"There is currently no MIRR available although various ameliorated techniques have been developed in recent decades","Consultants have been recruited and work is in progress (50% completed)","Based on ameliorated techniques and new research, 1 MIRR is selected"]
[null,null,"Output 1.1.1 Best Available Technologies and Integrated Resilient Rice Model (Modèle Intégré de Riziculture Résiliente - MIRR) selected and publicized ","# and type of technical guidelines for MIRR developed and publicized based on best available technologies and technique",null,"A series of guidelines for rice cultivation techniques, technical guidelines for direct seeding and system of rice intensification, are available from regional directorate of rural development but not yet widely disseminated","Consultants have been recruited and work is underway (30% completed)","1 recommended Integrated Resilient Rice Model developed and published including at least1 technical guidelines on seeding, planting, harvest, post-harvest, fertilization, IPM, water management"]
[null,null,"Outcome 1.2 Malagasy government, research institutions and local communities have the tools and methods to assess, monitor, and understand climate change impacts on rice.","Level of use of the tools and methods made available to Malagasy government, research institutions and local communities to assess, monitor and understand climate change impacts on rice production",null,"Current tools to address, monitor, and understand climate change impacts on rice are hampered by a lack of data and weak potential to convey information to farmers.                                            Data on observed climate patterns is not being systematically collected at an appropriately local level making it difficult to create models and planting calendars.                            Dissemination of what information exists is also weak given the limited number of extension staff. While these staff appear to already be trained in climate issues, the information is not being disseminated to farmers.","Terms of reference have been developed for consultants to deliver the activities","All regional extension services, research institutions including CALA, and at least 90% of targeted farmers are aware of climate change trends and impacts through awareness raising and information sessions, have access to regular climate forecasts through local communication channels (radio, newspapers), and have been trained and implement MIRR and its technical guidelines, including vulnerability maps."]
[null,null,"Output 1.2 Malagasy government, research institutions and local communities have the tools and methods to assess, monitor, and understand climate change impacts on rice.","Number of rice cropping system models based on expected climate change scenarios, including vulnerability maps of future rice production, and hydrological models developed",null,"Currently, there is no rice cropping system model that includes vulnerability maps of future rice production under potential climate change impacts and hydrological models developed.","The consultants recruitment is launched","Detailed available downscaled data on expected climate change risks and impacts on rice sector at the local level compiled; identified gaps on available data are filled in; and all data are disseminated to relevant stakeholders at the regional and local levels.                                                             4 rice cropping system models with vulnerability maps developed according to 4 different expected climate change scenarios (driest, low dry, low humid, and most humid scenarios) and 1 hydrological model developed based on available downscaled data on expected climate change risks and impacts."]
[null,null,"Output 1.2.1 Crop models are available for rice vulnerability mapping  ","# of rice cropping system models based on expected climate change scenarios including vulnerability maps of future rice production and hydrological models developed",null,"there is currently no rice model for madagascar due to lack of data, although there are 2 staff members trained for Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT)","Activities foreseen for 2014","4 rice models/maps by end of project; 1 hydrological model available at mid-term"]
[]
[null,null,"Output  1.2.2 Updated, dynamic agricultural calendars and climate early warnings taking into account current and projected variability disseminated to local population","Frequency of dissemination of updated dynamic agricultural calendars and climate information, including flood early warnings in the three projected sites",null,"Agricultural calendars under current climate conditions are well defined for all seed varieties developed, yet farmers do not necessarily apply them. The challenge resides in distributing and encouraging the application of established calendars amongst farmers through training and diffusion.\nFurthermore, new agricultural calendars will need to be developed on the\nbasis of projected future climate trends.\nWith respect to the diffusion of climate information, networks for analyzing and disseminating climate data are also insufficient:\n Manakambahiny – In Ambalavato, farmers have access to daily meteorological forecasts in the newspaper and on the Radio Nationale Malgache. In Ambaibo, farmers also have access to daily forecasts. This information, however, is not very useful as it cannot provide longer forecasts that would aid in, for instance, determining seedling date or predicting potential floods.\n Bemaintso and Ambohijanahary – Farmers have access to daily forecasts, but the forecasts do not help them adapt their growing calendar with enough forewarning or to choose which seed variety to use.","Activities foreseen for 2014","Climate information and 3- 4 day forecasts, including flood early warnings, made available to farmers through local communication systems. Dynamic agricultural calendars updated and disseminated to at least 80% of targeted farmers."]
[null,null,"Output 1.2.3 Agricultural extension staff trained on climate risk management in an agro– ecosystem context","Number of agricultural extension staff in the three districts trained on climate risk management in agro– ecosystem context (gender and district disaggregated)",null,"Extension workers were trained in climate change issues through the BV Lac project, and they do not necessarily lack training. The challenge is disseminating information from extension workers to farmers given how little contact they have with farmers.\nThe presence of extension workers in the project sites is the following:\n Manakambahiny – The municipality contains the city Ambatondrazaka, which is the capital of the Alaotra-Mangoro Region. There are 15 to 20 agriculture staff, of which 9 to 11 extension workers cover the 5 districts of the region. Their presence in the field is weak.\n Bemaintso – The municipality is part of the Andilamena district where 2 extension workers for rural engineering are located. They use radio to broadcast information to farmers.\n Ambohijanahary – The municipality is part of the Amparafaravola district, for which there are 4 extension workers (2 for agriculture and 2 for engineering).","Activities foreseen for 2014","100 % of staff trained on climate change aspects and how to disseminate new knowledge to farmers, including women."]
[null,null,"Outcome 2.1. Sustainable increase in rice yields (using MIRR)","Percentage of change in rice yields in all three project sites",null,"Rice yields in 2012-2013 for irrigated rice in the project areas were:\n Manakambahiny – 3.41 tons/ha average (roughly 3 tons/ha for Mk34 and 3.5 tons/ha for Dista and Tsemaka)    Bemaintso – 0.7 tons/ha for MK34 and 1.5 tons/ha for Dista (the low yields observed in Bemaintso are due to floods – care should therefore be taken while analyzing these data)\n Ambohijanahary – 2 tons/ha for MK34 and 3 tons for Tsemaka                               Tsemaka – Farmers use the variety to increase yields under challenging water conditions; however, farmers report that it does not sell as well at market as MK34.\n MKx – Variety developed and distributed by CALA.\n Dista – Farmers use the variety in cases where the planting rains start late.\n SEBOTA – The variety was developed for the BV Lac project in partnership with CALA and with help from CIRAD. It is designed to tolerate poor water management conditions, but the seed has not been distributed to many farmers due to limited reproduction of the seed and to patent issues.\n FOFIFA – This is a group of early maturing varieties that can be produced in the rainy and dry seasons. They are developed by CALA. The last variety developed under this group is FOFIFA 174.","Activities foreseen for 2014","Individual rice yields for targeted producers increase by 25% in relation to current averages in each project area."]
[null,null,"Output 2.1.1 Climate resilient rice varieties selected through participatory field testing ","Number and types of climate resilient rice varieties tested and selected within the three project sites (Municipalities of Manakambahiny, Ambohijanahary and Bemaintso)",null,"Current rice farming is dominated by the seed variety MK34, though it is not necessarily resilient. The next most prominent varieties are Dista and Tsemaka.\n","Work is underway with an intermediary report submitted ","CALA facilities and capacities are strengthened to develop at least 5 varieties that are tested and proven resilient in both laboratory and field settings in the three"]
[null,null,"Output 2.1.2 An operational multiplication and dissemination scheme for adapted seed varieties","Annual quantity and quality of adapted certified seeds produced and distributed in each of the project sites",null,"Seed multiplication appears to be dominated by four main facilities. Challenges include production capacity for CALA and the publication and dissemination of seed-specific planting guidelines.","Activities foreseen for  2014","At least 5 tons total of seeds for all 5 varieties that were tested and proven resilient are produced annually and distributed in the 3 project sites."]
[null,null,"Output 2.1.3 Updated fertilisation guidelines according to best available standards and taking climate conditions into consideration","Number of farmers who apply updated fertilisation guidelines in all three project sites (Municipalities of Manakambahiny, Ambohijanahary and Bemaintso)",null,"Farmers do not appear to follow any specific guidelines for fertilizer application. Farmers vary on how and when they use compost, manure, urea, NPK, and/or DAP. Many farmers do not use any chemical fertilizer practices.fertilisers are not commonly used ","Terms of reference are being developed for the recruitment of consultants for this activity","90% of targeted farmers have been trained and/or received technical support and apply fertilisation guidelines updated as part of the development of the MIRR."]
[null,null,"Output 2.1.4 Integrated pest management is implemented","Number of farmers trained in integrated pest management in all three project sites (gender and age disaggregated)",null,"In general, farmers had no information or training about the appropriate protocols for using pesticide in pest control. While some used commercial pesticides, they applied them with little knowledge of best practices.","Activities foreseen for 2014","400 farmers trained in integrated pest management, gender and age disaggregated (and among them 50% women and young)"]
[null,null,"Output￼\n2.1.5 Water efficiency, management and conservation technologies and infrastructures are implemented","Number of Km of rehabilitated irrigation canals and number of reservoirs dredged in all three project sites",null,"Infrastructure in the 3 municipalities was in a state of significant disrepair with damaging siltation and reduced irrigation capacities throughout. There is a large need for rehabilitating canals and dam infrastructure.","Activities foreseen for 2014","Manakambahiny: 35 km of primary canals cured, dredged, and maintained with norms that take expected climate change impacts into account (future precipitation regimes, drainage and run-off); 4 water intake points along the Ilakana River rehabilitated, strengthened and made more resilient to expected climate change impacts.\nBemaintso: The dam is drained and dredged; 14 km of primary canals and 21 km of secondary canals are cured, dredged, and maintained all with norms that take expected climate change impacts into account.\nAmbohijanahary: The dam at Anony is rehabilitated, primary water control valves are repaired; 13 km of primary canal are drained, dredged, and repaired; and primary canal is extended to irrigate 600 ha of additional rice fields all with norms that take expected climate change impacts into account. "]
[null,null,"Output￼\n2.1.5 Water efficiency, management and conservation technologies and infrastructures are implemented","Percentage of change in water availability and in water use efficiency in all seasons to water users associations in all three project sites",null,"There is a decrease in water availability during the dry season in all 3 Districts, and water losses reach up to 50 %.","Activities foreseen for 2014","35 % increase in water availability in all seasons in all 3 districts.                                                      Water loss estimation decrease from 50% to 25%."]
[null,null,"Outcome 2.2. Ecosystem services maintained ","Percentage change in land covered by biomass and in overall productivity (rice, vegetables and livestock) in project sites",null,"There is no evidence of activities to increase land covered by biomass such as agro forestry practices, reforestation, or vegetable crop rotations. No farmers use soil quality or water quality improvement techniques.","Activities foreseen for 2014","Change in overall land area covered by forests (i.e. net reforestation) of at least 50km2 across the combined 3 municipalities.Data on vegetables and livestock productivity/yields collected by extension services, and increase in overall productivity of rice, vegetables and livestock of 5 % throughout the life of the project and across the project sites."]
[null,null,"Output 2.2.1 Best available land preparation, production and harvesting techniques disseminated to reduce deforestation, maintain soil fertility and integrity, and to provide adequate growing conditions ","Percentage application of resilient rice model, including rice–vegetables rotation systems, in all three project sites (gender disaggregated)",null,"Rice/vegetable crop rotations are used on only very small pieces of rice fields. Guidelines for rice/vegetable rotation practices were developed under the BV Lac project, but their dissemination was somewhat limited.","Activities foreseen for 2014","At least 75% of targeted farmers practice rice/vegetable crop rotation on an area larger than 0.1 ha and for commercial purposes (and among them at least 50%of women and young)."]
[null,null,"Output 2.2.2 Watershed rehabilitation in productive landscapes introduced, including through reforestation and adaptation of agro forestry practices ","# of ha reforested; # of farmers and land/forest users trained on sustainable agro-forestry and land management in all three project sites (gender and age disaggregated)",null,"some reforestation underway in the broader basin but not in project sites; currently there are no people trained on SLM and agroforestry in the project sites","Activities foreseen for 2014","8500 ha reforested around project sites; 300 farmers and land/forest users trained (50% women)"]
[null,null,"Output Indicator 2.2.2.a"," Number of ha reforested in all three project sites",null,"Rice/vegetable crop rotations are used on only very small pieces of rice fields. Data on vegetables and livestock productivity/yields are currently not collected by extension services.",null,"Data on vegetables and livestock productivity/yields collected by extension services, and increase in overall productivity of rice, vegetables and livestock of 5 % throughout the life of the project and across the project sites."]
[null,null,"Output Indicator 2.2.2.b ","Number of farmers and land/forest users trained on sustainable agro forestry and land management in all three project sites (gender and age disaggregated)",null,"Farmers have currently not been trained in sustainable agro forestry and land management practices.","activités prévus pour l'année 2"]
[null,null,"Output 2.2.3 Soil conservation and livestock management techniques adapted to topography and landscape in light of future climate conditions","% change in erosion rate",null,"The project PRODAIRE has been training workers for the DREF in monitoring erosion rates. The DREF has therefore the in-house capacities to monitor erosion rates in the project sites.  Average erosion rate in the region is 12 mm.yr.1, according to Cox, R. et.al, 2009 “ Erosion Rates and Sediment Contributions in Madagascar Inferred from 10 Analysis of Lavaka, Slope, and River Sediment”","Activities foreseen for 2014","50 % reduction in erosion rates."]
[null,null,"Output 2.2.4 Revitalization of producer’s cooperatives and water user associations for collaborative natural resources allocations (e.g. land and water) and management ","Number of members of farmer’s cooperatives and water user associations trained on water management and administrative management within the three project sites",null,"Water user cooperatives exist in the three project areas; however, in all areas members expressed a need for training in administrative management as well as training in water management.","Activities to begin in 2015","75 % of the members of water user cooperatives in the project area have been trained on water management and administrative management."]
[null,null,"Output 2.2.5 Water quality assessments","Percentage change in water quality (e.g. reduction in turbidity, pollutant content, microbial content, sediment content) in all three project sites",null,"There is currently no water quality analysis conducted in any of the three municipalities","Selection process for consultants are being launched.","Water quality assessment is conducted in all 3 project sites by the DIREAU with technical support provided by the project if needed."]
[null,null,"Outcome 2.3. Post Harvest losses reduced ","Percentage change in post harvest losses",null,"Post–harvest losses are estimated to be between 5 and 10% of total harvest.","Activities foreseen for 2014","Post-harvest losses are reduced to less than 4%."]
[null,null,"Output 2.3.1 Increased utilization of rice by–product especially rice straw"," Percentage change in use of rice straws in animal feeding and for briquetting",null,"There are regional variations in the degree to which farmers exploit rice stalks for other uses. In some municipalities, residues are simply burned in the field.","Activities foreseen for 2014","75% of farmers use or commercialize rice straws."]
[null,null,"Output 2.3.2 Post–harvest storage facilities with phytosanitary control, serving as trading points and markets","Number of renovated storage facilities in all three project sites",null,"Storage facilities in the project sites exist, but they are not in adequate condition","Consultants selection and recruitment has been launched","75% of existing facilities have been renovated."]
[null,null,"Outcome 3.1 Technical norms and standards in rice cultivation reviewed and where necessary modified to take climate change into account","Number and types of technical norms and standards in rice cultivation reviewed and modified at the national level to take climate change into account",null,"No recommendation or revision has currently been made to technical norms and standards in rice cultivation.","Activities to begin in 2015","At least one national strategy on rice cultivation and at least one technical guideline for the following rice cultivation stages/techniques are revised and updated at the national level:\n• Seeding\n• Planting\n• Harvest\n• Post–harvest\n• Fertilization\n• Integrated pest management\n• Water management"]
[null,null,"Output 3 .1.1a Gaps and possible maladaptations in the current rice policy are identified and recommendations on rice policy reform are made","Number and types of activities identified and implemented for up scaling and replication from MIRR application in broader Alaotra basin and in other regions",null,"While there is an Agricultural Development Strategy at the national level, it does not have a true application at the regional level due to financing. There is no specific policy for growing rice.","Activities to begin in 2015","1 replication strategy and action plan developed, including at least 5 to 10 operational activities for up scaling and replication of MIRR practices in the broader Alaotra basin and beyond."]
[null,null,"Output 3.1.1b Gaps and possible maladaptations in the current rice policy are identified and recommendations on rice policy reform are made ","Number and types of recommendations on rice policy reforms made",null,"The National Strategy on Rural Development (SNDR) was completed; however, this strategy has not been published or disseminated.","Activities foreseen for 2017","The SNDR is revised with measures to increase climate change resilience of rice production, and then the strategy is published and disseminated."]
[null,null,"Outcome indicator 3.2 Conditions in place for a full adaptation of the rice sub–sector","Number and type of stakeholders to which the report on best practices and lessons learned is distributed",null,"Lessons learned and best practices will be identified and collected during project implementation","Activities foreseen for 2017","1 report at end of project."]

{"sheet":"Lessons Learned ","index":6,"n_rows":28,"n_cols":4,"rows_kept":28,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[23,2,23,3],[2,2,2,3],[11,2,11,3],[13,2,13,3],[16,2,16,3],[19,2,19,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,"QUALITATIVE MEASURES and LESSONS LEARNED"]
[]
[null,null,"Please complete the following section every reporting period"]
[null,null,"Implementation and Adaptive Management","Response"]
[null,null,"What implementation issues/lessons, either positive or negative, affected progress?","*The inception workshop was attended by His Excellency Mr. Jean Omer BERIZIKY, Prime Minister. His presence honoured and mobilised many participants (farmers, leaders, policy makers, donors, etc) and his commitment to the project is expected to facilitate the involvement of stakeholders at all levels.                                                                  *Consortiums of consultants (as opposed to individual consultants) to carry out studies has proved beneficial in this project so far. International and national consultants can  work together for providing a better results than an international consultant alone - as was the case e.g. for the baseline assessment study conducted in this reporting period.                                    "]
[null,null,"Were there any delays in implementation?  If so, include any causes of delays. What measures have been taken to reduce delays?","There was some delay due to the need to revise the project delivery strategy following the baseline assessment and due to slowness of administrative processes and delays in the processing of cash advances.  However the project has succeeded in developing effective strategies to implement the project going forward and avoid additional delays."]
[null,null,"Describe any changes undertaken to improve results on the ground or any changes made to project outputs (i.e. changes to project design)","No significant changes in project delivery strategy or outputs. The results framework have been revised in reponse to recommendations of the baseline assessment study conducted during the reporting period. The Annual work plan and an updated procurement plan were approved by the steering committee in July. "]
[null,null,"How have gender considerations been taken into consideration during the reporting period? What have been the lessons learned as a consequence of inclusion of such considerations on project performance or impacts?","Gender considerations have been taken into account during the reporting primarily thorugh appointment of women to key project positions such as:                                         * The coordinator of the project,                    *The  researchers for the activities of the preselection of the varieties adapted rice and non rice,                                   * The chairwoman of the steering commitee,                              * The Senior Technical Adviser.                                                                      In terms of impacts on the ground, it is still too early in project implementation to be measurable, however, a number of indicators in the revised log-frame will measure gender disaggregated impacts and gender aspects are explicitly taken into consideration in the formulation and implementation of project activities. "]
[]
[null,null,"Please complete the following section at mid-term and project completion"]
[null,null,"Lessons for Adaptation","Response"]
[null,null,"Climate Resilience Measures"]
[null,null,"What have been the lessons learned, both positive and negative, in implementing climate adaptation measures that would be relevant to the design and implementation of future projects/programmes for enhanced resilience to climate change?"]
[null,null,"What is the potential for the climate resilience measures undertaken by the project/programme to be replicated and scaled up both within and outside the project area?"]
[null,null,"Concrete Adaptation Interventions"]
[null,null,"What have been the lessons learned, both positive and negative, in implementing concrete adaptation interventions that would be relevant to the design and implementation of future projects/programmes implementing concrete adaptation interventions?"]
[null,null,"What is the potential for the concrete adaptation interventions undertaken by the project/programme to be replicated and scaled up both within and outside the project area?"]
[null,null,"Community/National Impact"]
[null,null,"What would you consider to be the most successful aspects for the target communities?"]
[null,null,"What measures are/have been put in place to ensure sustainability of the project/program results?"]
[null,null,"What measures are being/could have been put in place to improve project/program results?"]
[null,null,"Knowledge Management "]
[null,null,"How has existing information/data/knowledge been used to inform project development and implementation? What kinds of information/data/knowledge were used?"]
[null,null,"If learning objectives have been established, have they been met? Please describe."]
[null,null,"Describe any difficulties there have been in  accessing or retrieving existing information (data or knowledge) that is relevant to the project. Please provide suggestions for improving access to the relevant data."]
[null,null,"Has the identification of learning objectives contributed to the outcomes of the project? In what ways have they contributed?"]

{"sheet":"Results Tracker","index":7,"n_rows":39,"n_cols":12,"rows_kept":39,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[16,5,16,6],[16,7,16,8],[16,9,16,10],[16,11,16,12],[17,5,17,6],[17,7,17,8],[17,9,17,10],[17,11,17,12],[14,5,14,6],[14,7,14,8],[14,9,14,10],[14,11,14,12],[15,5,15,12],[10,1,10,3],[13,5,13,6],[1,2,1,6],[13,7,13,8],[13,9,13,10],[5,1,6,12],[7,1,7,12],[8,1,8,12],[2,2,2,5],[12,1,12,12],[13,11,13,12],[20,7,20,8],[20,9,20,10],[20,11,20,12],[21,5,21,6],[21,7,21,8],[21,9,21,10],[21,11,21,12],[28,11,28,12],[19,1,19,12],[22,5,22,12],[23,5,23,6],[23,7,23,8],[23,9,23,10],[23,11,23,12],[26,1,26,12],[27,5,27,6],[20,5,20,6],[27,7,27,8],[27,9,27,10],[27,11,27,12],[28,5,28,6],[24,5,24,6],[24,7,24,8],[24,9,24,10],[24,11,24,12],[28,7,28,8],[28,9,28,10],[30,9,30,10],[30,11,30,12],[31,5,31,6],[31,7,31,8],[31,9,31,10],[31,11,31,12],[30,7,30,8],[33,1,33,12],[37,5,37,6],[37,7,37,8],[37,9,37,10],[37,11,37,12],[38,5,38,6],[38,7,38,8],[38,9,38,10],[38,11,38,12],[35,11,35,12],[29,5,29,12],[30,5,30,6],[36,5,36,12],[34,5,34,6],[34,7,34,8],[34,9,34,10],[34,11,34,12],[35,5,35,6],[35,7,35,8],[35,9,35,10]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,"Results Tracker for Adaptation Fund (AF)  Projects    "]
[]
[]
[null,"Goal: Assist developing-country Parties to the Kyoto Protocol that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change in meeting the costs of concrete adaptation projects and programmes in order to implement climate-resilient measures. Impact: Increased resiliency at the community, national, and regional levels to climate variability and change. "]
[]
[null,"Important: Please read the following Results Framework and Baseline Guidance (also posted on the Adaptation Fund website) before entering your data "]
[null,"Link: http://www.adaptation-fund.org/sites/default/files/Results%20Framework%20and%20Baseline%20Guidance%20final.pdf"]
[]
[null,"Please select the relevant Fund level Outcome and Output indicators that allign with the project objectives and outcomes"]
[]
[null,"OBJECTIVE 1"]
[null,"Fund Outcome","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Fund Outcome Indicator","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Target at CEO Endorsement                    (see Units in next sheet)",null,"Baseline                 (see Units in next sheet)",null,"Mid-term Results",null,"Terminal Results"]
[null,"Outcome 1: Reduced exposure at national level to climate-related hazards and threats\nOutcome 2: Strengthened institutional capacity to reduce risks associated with climate-induced socioeconomic and environmental losses\nOutcome 3: Strengthened awareness and ownership of adaptation and climate risk reduction processes at local level\nOutcome 4: Increased adaptive capacity within relevant development and natural resource sectors\nOutcome 5: Increased ecosystem resilience in response to climate change and variability-induced stress\nOutcome 6: Diversified and strengthened livelihoods and sources of income for vulnerable people in targeted areas                                                                                                 Outcome 7: Improved policies and regulations that promote and enforce resilience measures",4,"1. Relevant threat and hazard information generated and disseminated to stakeholders on a timely basis\n2.1. No. and type of targeted institutions with increased capacity to minimize exposure to climate\nvariability risks\n2.2. Number of people with reduced risk to extreme weather events\n3.1. Percentage of targeted population aware of predicted adverse impacts of climate change, and of\nappropriate responses\n3.2. Modification in behavior of targeted population\n4.1. Development sectors' services responsive to evolving needs from changing and variable climate                                                                                            \n4.2. Physical infrastructure improved to withstand climate change and variability-induced stress                                                                                 \n5. Ecosystem services and natural assets maintained or improved under climate change and\nvariability-induced stress                                                                                                                                                          6.1. Percentage of households and communities having more secure (increased) access to livelihood\nassets                                                                                                                                                                                                6.2. Percentage of targeted population with sustained climate-resilient livelihoods                                                                                           7. Climate change priorities are integrated into national development strategy",4.2,4,null,2]
[]
[null,"Fund Output","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Fund Output Indicator","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Target at CEO Endorsement                    (see Units in next sheet)",null,"Baseline                 (see Units in next sheet)",null,"Mid-term Results",null,"Terminal Results"]
[null,"Output 1: Risk and vulnerability assessments conducted and updated at a national level\nOutput 2.1: Strengthened capacity of national and regional centres and networks to respond rapidly to extreme weather events\nOutput 2.2: Targeted population groups covered by adequate risk reduction systems\nOutput 3: Targeted population groups participating in\nadaptation and risk reduction awareness activities\nOutput 4: Vulnerable physical, natural, and social assets strengthened in response to climate change impacts, including variability\nOutput 5: Vulnerable physical, natural, and social assets strengthened in response to climate change impacts, including variability                                                                                             Output 6: Targeted individual and community livelihood strategies strengthened in relation to climate change impacts, including variability                                                                            Output 7: Improved integration of climate-resilience strategies into country development plans",4,"1.1. No. and type of projects that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments                                                                                      \n1.2. Development of early warning systems\n2.1.1. No. of staff trained to respond to, and mitigate impacts of, climate-related events\n2.1.2. Capacity of staff to respond to, and mitigate impacts of, climate-related events from targeted\ninstitutions increased\n2.2.1. Percentage of population covered by adequate risk-reduction systems\n2.2.2. No. of people affected by climate variability                                                                                                          3.1 No. and type of risk reduction actions or strategies introduced at local level                                                                                                     3.2 No. of news outlets in the local press and media that have covered the topic                                                                                                    4.1. No. and type of health or social infrastructure developed or modified to respond to new conditions\nresulting from climate variability and change (by type)                                                                                                                                                            4. 2. No. of physical assets strengthened or constructed to withstand conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by asset types)                                                                                                                                   5. No. and type of natural resource assets created, maintained or improved to withstand conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by type of assets)                                                                                                                   \n6.1. No. and type of adaptation assets (physical as well as knowledge) created in support of individualor\ncommunity-livelihood strategies                                                                                                                                                   6.2. Type of income sources for households generated under climate change scenario                                                                                    \n7.1. No., type, and sector of policies introduced or adjusted to address climate change risks                                                                                 \n7.2. No. or targeted development strategies with incorporated climate change priorities enforced",4.2,"Irrigation and drainage infrastructure is improved in 3 sites as follows: Manakambahiny: 35 km of primary canals cured, dredged, and maintained,; Bemaintso: The dam is drained and dredged; 14 km of primary canals and 21 km of secondary canals are cured, dredged, and maintained; Ambohijanahary: The dam at Anony is rehabilitated, primary water control valves are repaired; 13 km of primary canal are drained, dredged, and repaired; and primary canal is extended to irrigate 600 ha of additional rice fields. ",null,"0 physical assets are made resilient to impacts of climate change"]
[]
[null,"OBJECTIVE 2"]
[null,"Fund Outcome","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Fund Outcome Indicator","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Target at CEO Endorsement ",null,"Baseline",null,"Mid-term Results",null,"Terminal Results"]
[null,"Outcome 1: Reduced exposure at national level to climate-related hazards and threats\nOutcome 2: Strengthened institutional capacity to reduce risks associated with climate-induced socioeconomic and environmental losses\nOutcome 3: Strengthened awareness and ownership of adaptation and climate risk reduction processes at local level\nOutcome 4: Increased adaptive capacity within relevant development and natural resource sectors\nOutcome 5: Increased ecosystem resilience in response to climate change and variability-induced stress\nOutcome 6: Diversified and strengthened livelihoods and sources of income for vulnerable people in targeted areas                                                                                                 Outcome 7: Improved policies and regulations that promote and enforce resilience measures",5,"1. Relevant threat and hazard information generated and disseminated to stakeholders on a timely basis\n2.1. No. and type of targeted institutions with increased capacity to minimize exposure to climate\nvariability risks\n2.2. Number of people with reduced risk to extreme weather events\n3.1. Percentage of targeted population aware of predicted adverse impacts of climate change, and of\nappropriate responses\n3.2. Modification in behavior of targeted population\n4.1. Development sectors' services responsive to evolving needs from changing and variable climate                                                                                            4.2. Physical infrastructure improved to withstand climate change and variability-induced stress                                                                                 5. Ecosystem services and natural assets maintained or improved under climate change and\nvariability-induced stress                                                                                                                                                          6.1. Percentage of households and communities having more secure (increased) access to livelihood\nassets                                                                                                                                                                                                6.2. Percentage of targeted population with sustained climate-resilient livelihoods                                                                                           7. Climate change priorities are integrated into national development strategy",5,"4 - Mostly Effective. Change in overall land area covered by forests (i.e. net reforestation) of at least 50km2 across the combined 3 municipalities.",null,2]
[]
[null,"Fund Output","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Fund Output Indicator","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Target at CEO Endorsement ",null,"Baseline",null,"Mid-term Results",null,"Terminal Results"]
[null,"Output 1: Risk and vulnerability assessments conducted and updated at a national level\nOutput 2.1: Strengthened capacity of national and regional centres and networks to respond rapidly to extreme weather events\nOutput 2.2: Targeted population groups covered by adequate risk reduction systems\nOutput 3: Targeted population groups participating in\nadaptation and risk reduction awareness activities\nOutput 4: Vulnerable physical, natural, and social assets strengthened in response to climate change impacts, including variability\nOutput 5: Vulnerable physical, natural, and social assets strengthened in response to climate change impacts, including variability                                                                                             Output 6: Targeted individual and community livelihood strategies strengthened in relation to climate change impacts, including variability                                                                            Output 7: Improved integration of climate-resilience strategies into country development plans",5,"1. Relevant threat and hazard information generated and disseminated to stakeholders on a timely basis\n2.1. No. and type of targeted institutions with increased capacity to minimize exposure to climate\nvariability risks\n2.2. Number of people with reduced risk to extreme weather events\n3.1. Percentage of targeted population aware of predicted adverse impacts of climate change, and of\nappropriate responses\n3.2. Modification in behavior of targeted population\n4.1. Development sectors' services responsive to evolving needs from changing and variable climate                                                                                            4.2. Physical infrastructure improved to withstand climate change and variability-induced stress                                                                                 5. Ecosystem services and natural assets maintained or improved under climate change and\nvariability-induced stress                                                                                                                                                          6.1. Percentage of households and communities having more secure (increased) access to livelihood\nassets                                                                                                                                                                                                6.2. Percentage of targeted population with sustained climate-resilient livelihoods                                                                                           7. Climate change priorities are integrated into national development strategy",5,"At least 5000 ha reforested across 3 districts",null,"Limited or no reforestation activities in target areas"]
[]
[null,"OBJECTIVE 3"]
[null,"Fund Outcome","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Fund Outcome Indicator","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Target at CEO Endorsement ",null,"Baseline",null,"Mid-term Results",null,"Terminal Results"]
[null,"Outcome 1: Reduced exposure at national level to climate-related hazards and threats\nOutcome 2: Strengthened institutional capacity to reduce risks associated with climate-induced socioeconomic and environmental losses\nOutcome 3: Strengthened awareness and ownership of adaptation and climate risk reduction processes at local level\nOutcome 4: Increased adaptive capacity within relevant development and natural resource sectors\nOutcome 5: Increased ecosystem resilience in response to climate change and variability-induced stress\nOutcome 6: Diversified and strengthened livelihoods and sources of income for vulnerable people in targeted areas                                                                                                 Outcome 7: Improved policies and regulations that promote and enforce resilience measures",null,"1. Relevant threat and hazard information generated and disseminated to stakeholders on a timely basis\n2.1. No. and type of targeted institutions with increased capacity to minimize exposure to climate variability risks\n2.2. Number of people with reduced risk to extreme weather events\n3.1. Percentage of targeted population aware of predicted adverse impacts of climate change, and of appropriate responses\n3.2. Modification in behavior of targeted population\n4.1. Development sectors' services responsive to evolving needs from changing and variable climate                                                                                            4.2. Physical infrastructure improved to withstand climate change and variability-induced stress                                                                                 \n5. Ecosystem services and natural assets maintained or improved under climate change and variability-induced stress                                                                                                                                                          6.1. Percentage of households and communities having more secure (increased) access to livelihood assets                                                                                                                                                                                                6.2. Percentage of targeted population with sustained climate-resilient livelihoods                                                                                           \n7. Climate change priorities are integrated into national development strategy"]
[]
[null,"Fund Output","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Fund Output Indicator","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Target at CEO Endorsement ",null,"Baseline",null,"Mid-term Results",null,"Terminal Results"]
[null,"Output 1: Risk and vulnerability assessments conducted and updated at a national level\nOutput 2.1: Strengthened capacity of national and regional centres and networks to respond rapidly to extreme weather events\nOutput 2.2: Targeted population groups covered by adequate risk reduction systems\nOutput 3: Targeted population groups participating in\nadaptation and risk reduction awareness activities\nOutput 4: Vulnerable physical, natural, and social assets strengthened in response to climate change impacts, including variability\nOutput 5: Vulnerable physical, natural, and social assets strengthened in response to climate change impacts, including variability                                                                                             Output 6: Targeted individual and community livelihood strategies strengthened in relation to climate change impacts, including variability                                                                            Output 7: Improved integration of climate-resilience strategies into country development plans",null,"1.1. No. and type of projects that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments                                                                                      \n1.2. Development of early warning systems\n2.1.1. No. of staff trained to respond to, and mitigate impacts of, climate-related events\n2.1.2. Capacity of staff to respond to, and mitigate impacts of, climate-related events from targeted\ninstitutions increased\n2.2.1. Percentage of population covered by adequate risk-reduction systems\n2.2.2. No. of people affected by climate variability                                                                                                          3.1 No. and type of risk reduction actions or strategies introduced at local level                                                                                                     \n3.2 No. of news outlets in the local press and media that have covered the topic                                                                                                    \n4.1. No. and type of health or social infrastructure developed or modified to respond to new conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by type)                                                                                                                                                            4. 2. No. of physical assets strengthened or constructed to withstand conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by asset types)                                                                                                                                   5. No. and type of natural resource assets created, maintained or improved to withstand conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by type of assets)                                                                                                                   \n6.1. No. and type of adaptation assets (physical as well as knowledge) created in support of individualor\ncommunity-livelihood strategies                                                                                                                                                   6.2. Type of income sources for households generated under climate change scenario                                                                                    \n7.1. No., type, and sector of policies introduced or adjusted to address climate change risks                                                                                 \n7.2. No. or targeted development strategies with incorporated climate change priorities enforced"]
[]
[null,"OBJECTIVE 4"]
[null,"Fund Outcome","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Fund Outcome Indicator","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Target at CEO Endorsement ",null,"Baseline",null,"Mid-term Results",null,"Terminal Results"]
[null,"Outcome 1: Reduced exposure at national level to climate-related hazards and threats\nOutcome 2: Strengthened institutional capacity to reduce risks associated with climate-induced socioeconomic and environmental losses\nOutcome 3: Strengthened awareness and ownership of adaptation and climate risk reduction processes at local level\nOutcome 4: Increased adaptive capacity within relevant development and natural resource sectors\nOutcome 5: Increased ecosystem resilience in response to climate change and variability-induced stress\nOutcome 6: Diversified and strengthened livelihoods and sources of income for vulnerable people in targeted areas                                                                                                 Outcome 7: Improved policies and regulations that promote and enforce resilience measures",null,"1. Relevant threat and hazard information generated and disseminated to stakeholders on a timely basis\n2.1. No. and type of targeted institutions with increased capacity to minimize exposure to climate variability risks\n2.2. Number of people with reduced risk to extreme weather events\n3.1. Percentage of targeted population aware of predicted adverse impacts of climate change, and of appropriate responses\n3.2. Modification in behavior of targeted population\n4.1. Development sectors' services responsive to evolving needs from changing and variable climate                                                                                            4.2. Physical infrastructure improved to withstand climate change and variability-induced stress                                                                                 5. Ecosystem services and natural assets maintained or improved under climate change and variability-induced stress                                                                                                                                                          6.1. Percentage of households and communities having more secure (increased) access to livelihood assets                                                                                                                                                                                                6.2. Percentage of targeted population with sustained climate-resilient livelihoods                                                                                           7. Climate change priorities are integrated into national development strategy"]
[]
[null,"Fund Output","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Fund Output Indicator","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Target at CEO Endorsement ",null,"Baseline",null,"Mid-term Results",null,"Terminal Results"]
[null,"Output 1: Risk and vulnerability assessments conducted and updated at a national level\nOutput 2.1: Strengthened capacity of national and regional centres and networks to respond rapidly to extreme weather events\nOutput 2.2: Targeted population groups covered by adequate risk reduction systems\nOutput 3: Targeted population groups participating in\nadaptation and risk reduction awareness activities\nOutput 4: Vulnerable physical, natural, and social assets strengthened in response to climate change impacts, including variability\nOutput 5: Vulnerable physical, natural, and social assets strengthened in response to climate change impacts, including variability                                                                                             Output 6: Targeted individual and community livelihood strategies strengthened in relation to climate change impacts, including variability                                                                            Output 7: Improved integration of climate-resilience strategies into country development plans",null,"1.1. No. and type of projects that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments                                                                                      \n1.2. Development of early warning systems\n2.1.1. No. of staff trained to respond to, and mitigate impacts of, climate-related events\n2.1.2. Capacity of staff to respond to, and mitigate impacts of, climate-related events from targeted institutions increased\n2.2.1. Percentage of population covered by adequate risk-reduction systems\n2.2.2. No. of people affected by climate variability                                                                                                          3.1 No. and type of risk reduction actions or strategies introduced at local level                                                                                                     \n3.2 No. of news outlets in the local press and media that have covered the topic                                                                                                    \n4.1. No. and type of health or social infrastructure developed or modified to respond to new conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by type)                                                                                                                                                            4. 2. No. of physical assets strengthened or constructed to withstand conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by asset types)                                                                                                                                   5. No. and type of natural resource assets created, maintained or improved to withstand conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by type of assets)                                                                                                                   \n6.1. No. and type of adaptation assets (physical as well as knowledge) created in support of individualor community-livelihood strategies                                                                                                                                                   6.2. Type of income sources for households generated under climate change scenario                                                                                    \n7.1. No., type, and sector of policies introduced or adjusted to address climate change risks                                                                                 \n7.2. No. or targeted development strategies with incorporated climate change priorities enforced"]

{"sheet":"Units for Indicators","index":8,"n_rows":4,"n_cols":2,"rows_kept":4,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null," Fund Outcome Indicator Units"]
[null,"1. Generation of relevant data, Stakeholders, and Timeliness \n2.1. Include both qualitative and quantitative measures of capacity level within targeted institutions\n2.2. Number (men and women and other vulnerable groups)\n3.1. Use scale from 1 to 5: 5: Fully aware 4: Mostly aware 3: Partially aware 2: Partially not aware 1: Aware of neither predicted adverse impacts of climate change nor of appropriate responses\n3.2. Use scale from 1 to 5:  5: All 4: Almost all 3: Half 2: Some 1: None\n4.1. Summarize in an overall scale (1-5): 5: Highly responsive (All defined elements ) 4: Mostly responsive (Most defined elements) 3: Moderately responsive (Some defined elements) 2: Partially responsive (Lacks most elements) 1: Non responsive (Lacks all elements )                                                                                                                                                                                                                    4.2.  Summarize in an overall scale (1-5):  5: Fully improved 4: Mostly Improved 3: Moderately improved 2: Somewhat improved\n1: Not improved                                                                                                                                                                                                                           5.  Depends on the targeted natural asset: \nBiological (species): measure through changes in population numbers (dynamics, structure, etc.)\nLand: measure changes in hectares. Baseline data will be necessary to estimate the change. Supporting indicators baseline and target (as well as contextual information) are needed such as the following: Farmers adopting recommended technologies, Ha. of land improved, Average deforestation rate Etc.\nUse scale from 1 to 5.  5: Very effective (All elements are present) 4: Effective (Most elements are present) 3: Moderately effective (Some elements are present) 2: Partially effective (Most elements are not present) 1: Ineffective (No elements are present)\n6.1.  Summarize in an overall scale (1-5):  5: Very high improvement 4: High improvement 3: Moderate improvement 2: Limited improvement 1: No improvement                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         6.2.  Household income by source of livelihood in project area (USD) prior and post project intervention                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      7. Summarize in an overall scale (1-5).  5: All (Fully integrated) 4: Most 3: Some 2: Most not integrated 1: None"]
[null,"Fund Output Indicator Units"]
[null,"1.1.  Number, sector(s) and level(s) of projects or interventions in separate fields of monitoring plan                                                                                  1.2. Number\n2.1.1. Number of staff (male/female) of targeted institutions: a. Obtain baseline information: total number of staff from targeted institutions b. Define target\n2.1.2. Number of staff (male/female) of targeted institutions: a. Obtain baseline information: total number of staff from targeted institutions b. Define target: needs to be defined by project proponents\n2.2.1. Quantitative: Percentage (includes women – and other vulnerable groups – and men).\nQualitative: Adequacy: include direct analysis of major areas; adequacy/effectiveness of systems or analysis of perceptions of populations and institutions.\n2.2.2. Number (broken down by gender and, if possible, by vulnerable groups defined in the area of intervention) of people                                                                                                        3.1. Number and type (in separate columns) at local level.                                                                                                                                    3.2. Number                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     4.1. Number and type                                                                                                                                                                                                               4. 2.  Number and type (entered in separate columns)                                                                                                                                                     5.  Number of interventions by type of natural asset and intervention                                                                                                                    6.1.  Number and type (in separate columns of monitoring plan)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    6.2. Income sources per household; description of income source and number of households.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     7.1.  Number/Sector                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   7.2. Number; Effectiveness (see previous indicator) through enforcement level."]