{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":11,"sheets":["Overview","Lessons Learned"," Financial information"," Project Indicators","Risk Assesment","Rating","Results Tracker","Units for Indicators","Financial Annex","Sheet10","Sheet1"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":2,"macros":0,"external_links":6,"defined_names":34,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"Overview","index":0,"n_rows":177,"n_cols":16,"rows_kept":177,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[22,3,23,3],[24,1,24,2],[25,1,25,2],[26,1,26,2],[31,1,31,2],[35,1,35,2],[15,1,15,2],[18,1,18,2],[22,1,23,2]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,null,"Project Performance Report (PPR)"]
[]
[null,null,"Period of Report (Dates)","01/04/15 - 31/03/16"]
[]
[null,null,"Project Title: ","Building Resilient Food Security Systems to Benefit the Southern Egypt Region ."]
[null,null,null,"Southern Egypt Region” Project in Egypt"]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Project Summary: ","The World Food Programme estimates that Southern Egypt, a region that is already economically stressed and whose food supplies are under constant threat of disruption, stands to lose a minimum of 30 percent of its food production by 2050 as a result of climate change impacts. These impacts include reduced crop and livestock productivity, increasing crop-water demand and reduced water use efficiency, and increases in pest and disease infestations.\n \nIn response, the Government has proposed a project that aims to 1) improve the adaptive capacity of the Southern zone of Egypt in the face of anticipated climate-induced reduction in food production through the introduction and use of water saving irrigation and other adaptation techniques; the establishment of agro-forestry greenhouses and plots with sub-surface irrigation, including nurseries for growing trees and new varieties; and the development of livestock and poultry hubs for selection and breeding of new heat resistant varieties. 2) build institutional capacity at the national, regional, and local levels to enable sustainability and replication throughout the zone and the country to understand climate trends and impacts; replicate adaptation interventions through the training of government technical staff; document and share lessons learned and best practices; share project results; mainstream new approaches in local and regional planning; and target universities through including these lessons in the curriculum. The two objectives are cornerstones of Egypt's National Adaptation Strategy.  "]
[{"$nulls":7},"Countries","Project Type:  ",null,"GEF Focal Area: ","GEF 4 Focal Areas","GEF 2 / 3 Operational Programme: ","Overall Rating of the project in the evaluation by the project evaluator: ","GEF-4 Focal Area Strategic Program: ","GEF-3 Focal Area Strategic Program: "]
[null,null,"Database Number: ",{"$nulls":4},"Afghanistan","FP","Yes","Biodiversity",1,1,"U","BD-SP1-PA Financing","1: Arid & semi-arid ecosystems"]
[null,"Implementing Entity (IE) [name]:",null,"United Nations World Food Programme",null,null,null,"Albania","MSP","No","Climate Change Adaptation",2,2,"S","BD-SP2-Marine PA","2: Coastal, marine & freshwater ecosystems"]
[null,null,"Type of IE:","MULTILATERAL IMPLEMENTING ENTITY",null,null,null,"Algeria","EA",null,"Climate Change Mitigation",3,3,"MU","BD-SP3-PA Networks","3: Forest ecosystems"]
[null,null,"Country(ies): ","Egypt ",null,null,null,"Angola",null,null,"International Waters",5,5,"Good","BD-SP5-Markets","13: Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biological Diversity Important to Agriculture"]
[null,"Relevant Geographic Points (i.e. cities, villages, bodies of water):",null,"Assuit, Sohag , Qena, Luxor, Asswan ",null,null,null,"Argentina",null,null,"Multiple Focal Area",null,null,null,"BD-SP7-Invasive Alien Species(IAS)","6: Promoting the adoption of renewable energy by removing barriers and reducing implementation costs"]
[{"$nulls":12},"CC-SP2- Industrial EE","8: Water body based operational program"]
[null,null,"Project Milestones",{"$nulls":9},"CC-SP3-RE,CC-SP4-Biomass","9: Integrated Land and Water multiple focal area"]
[null,null,"Milestone",{"$nulls":4},"Bahamas",{"$nulls":6},"CC-SP5-Transport","10: Contaminants based operational program"]
[null,"AFB Approval Date:",null,"29 June, 2012."]
[]
[null,"IE-AFB Agreement Signature Date:",null,"23 July, 2012.",{"$nulls":9},"CC-SP6-LULUCF","12: Integrated Ecosystem Management"]
[null,"Start of Project/Programme:",null,"March 31, 2013",{"$nulls":9},"Cross cutting capacity building","14: Persistent Organic Pollutants"]
[null,"Mid-term Review Date (if planned):",null,"September, 2015"]
[null,null,"Terminal Evaluation Date:","June, 2018"]
[]
[null,null,null,"List documents/ reports/ brochures / articles that have been prepared about the project.",null,null,null,"Cyprus"]
[null,null,null,"Audio-visual material:                                                                                                                                              - Aswan harvesting days broadcast on Tiba satellite TV channel   \n- General Supervisor interview on  Misr Elzeraea (Egyptian Agricultural Satellite) channel \n- project manager  interview  on   Tiba satellite Channel   \n-  Minister of Agriculture during field trip in Sohag and visit to canals lined by the project \n- T.V. interview with the Minister of Agriculture during the inauguration of the project PMU\n- Programme on the training on sorghum production and project interventions-shown on Tiba channel  \n- Project wheat production expert  interview- Tiba channel                                                                                  -3 Interviews with the project manager on South Valley local radio channel                                                              -1 interview with the project manager on the General Program national radio channel\n- Project documentary (20 Minutes)                                                                                                                            \nOn-line material:                                                                                                                                                      - Project website                                                                                                                                                         -Project YouTube channel (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSwyykkhNwFgvZTL0mCFP4Q)\nFacebook groups ( one for each governorate ) aimed to create a link between volunteers and  project experts:\nAssuit group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/1391044347832895/\nSouhag group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/1391044347832895/\nQena group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/1428651090707357/\nLuxor group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/485776041523036/\nAswan group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/1403712143226253/                                                                -'Tackling Climate Change in Upper Egypt' Story on project published on WFP Egypt Country page and WFP Arabic website                                                                                                                                          -WFP MENA Tweeted about the story adding a link to the WFP Egypt Country page. Retweeted 53 times, received 29 favourites and 15,000 impressions. The story was discussed as a model for successful social media outreach during annual WFP regional communications workshop                                                                                       \nPrinted material:\n• 2 flyers on interventions towards  decreasing the negative effect of extreme weather events in  newly reclaimed and old lands  \n-  2 brochures on climate adaptation in  wheat production                                                                                • Interview with Prof. Hani Elkateb (Scientific consultant of President Abdel Fattah El SiSi): Climate Change project is one of the most profitable projects in Upper Egypt (newspaper article in Ahram El Ektidadi newspaper)                                                                                                                                                                                                         -148 articles in national governmental newspapers and magazines (Ahram, Akhbar, Gomhoreia, El Mesaa, Roz al Yousef, Ahram Weekly, and El Ahram El Mesaaei), independent newspapers (El Watan, Watani, El Youm El Sabee, Masr El Youm, and El Fagr) and local newspapers (Sout Luxor, Sout Sohag and Sout Aswan)",null,null,null,"Czech Republic"]
[null,"List the Website address (URL) of project.",{"$nulls":5},"Democratic People's Republic of Korea"]
[null,null,null,"http://climatechange-eg.org/\n\n",null,null,null,"Democratic Republic of the Congo"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Denmark"]
[null,null,"Project contacts:  ",{"$nulls":4},"Djibouti"]
[null,"National Project Manager/Coordinator",{"$nulls":5},"Dominica"]
[null,null,"Name: ","Eng. Othman El Shaikh",null,null,null,"Dominican Republic"]
[null,null,"Email: ","othmanelshiakh@gmail.com",null,null,null,"Ecuador"]
[null,null,"Date: ",{"$nulls":4},"Egypt"]
[null,null,"Government DA",{"$nulls":4},"El Salvador"]
[null,null,"Name: ","Mr. Hesham Essa   Head of Central Department of Climate Change  \nEgyptian Environmental Affairs Agency (EEAA)",null,null,null,"Equatorial Guinea"]
[null,null,"Email: ","hesham27963@windowslive.com",null,null,null,"Eritrea"]
[null,null,"Date: ",{"$nulls":4},"Estonia"]
[null,null,"Implementing Entity",{"$nulls":4},"Ethiopia"]
[null,null,"Name: ","Dr. Ithar Khalil, WFP Egypt Country Office ",null,null,null,"Fiji"]
[null,null,"Email: ","ithar.khalil@wfp.org",null,null,null,"Finland"]
[null,null,"Date: ",{"$nulls":4},"France"]
[null,null,"Executing Agency",{"$nulls":4},"Gambia"]
[null,null,"Name: ","Dr. Sayed Khalifa-Executive Agency for Comprehensive Development Projects (EACDP)- Ministry of Agriculture",null,null,null,"Georgia"]
[null,null,"Email: ","alikhalefa18@yahoo.com",null,null,null,"Germany"]
[null,null,"Date: ",{"$nulls":4},"Ghana"]
[null,null,"Executing Agency",{"$nulls":4},"Greece"]
[null,null,"Name: ",{"$nulls":4},"Grenada"]
[null,null,"Email: ",{"$nulls":4},"Guatemala"]
[null,null,"Date: ",{"$nulls":4},"Guinea"]
[null,null,"Executing Agency",{"$nulls":4},"Guinea Bissau"]
[null,null,"Name: ",{"$nulls":4},"Guyana"]
[null,null,"Email: ",{"$nulls":4},"Haiti"]
[null,null,"Date: ",{"$nulls":4},"Honduras"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Hungary"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Iceland"]
[{"$nulls":7},"India"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Indonesia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Iran (Islamic Republic of)"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Iraq"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Ireland"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Israel"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Italy"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Jamaica"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Japan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Jordan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Kazakhstan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Kenya"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Kiribati"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Kuwait"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Kyrgyzstan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Lao People’s Democratic Republic"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Latvia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Lebanon"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Lesotho"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Liberia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Libyan Arab Jamahiriya"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Liechtenstein"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Lithuania"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Luxembourg"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Madagascar"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Malawi"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Malaysia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Maldives"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Mali"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Malta"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Marshall Islands"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Mauritania"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Mauritius"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Mexico"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Micronesia, Federated States of"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Monaco"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Mongolia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Montenegro"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Morocco"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Mozambique"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Myanmar"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Namibia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Nauru"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Nepal"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Netherlands"]
[{"$nulls":7},"New Zealand"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Nicaragua"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Niger"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Nigeria"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Norway"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Oman"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Pakistan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Palau"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Panama"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Papua New Guinea"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Paraguay"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Peru"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Philippines"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Poland"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Portugal"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Qatar"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Republic of Korea"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Republic of Moldova"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Romania"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Russian Federation"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Rwanda"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Saint Kitts and Nevis"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Saint Lucia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Saint Vincent and the Grenadines"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Samoa"]
[{"$nulls":7},"San Marino"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Sao Tome and Principe"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Saudi Arabia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Senegal"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Serbia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Seychelles"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Sierra Leone"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Singapore"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Slovakia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Slovenia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Solomon Islands"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Somalia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"South Africa"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Spain"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Sri Lanka"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Sudan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Suriname"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Swaziland"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Sweden"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Switzerland"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Syrian Arab Republic"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Tajikistan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Thailand"]
[{"$nulls":7},"The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Timor-Leste"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Togo"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Tonga"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Trinidad and Tobago"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Tunisia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Turkey"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Turkmenistan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Tuvalu"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Uganda"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Ukraine"]
[{"$nulls":7},"United Arab Emirates"]
[{"$nulls":7},"United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland"]
[{"$nulls":7},"United Republic of Tanzania"]
[{"$nulls":7},"United States of America"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Uruguay"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Uzbekistan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Vanuatu"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Viet Nam"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Yemen"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Zambia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Zimbabwe"]

{"sheet":"Lessons Learned","index":1,"n_rows":28,"n_cols":4,"rows_kept":28,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[2,2,2,3],[11,2,11,3],[13,2,13,3],[16,2,16,3],[19,2,19,3],[23,2,23,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,"QUALITATIVE MEASURES and LESSONS LEARNED"]
[]
[null,null,"Please complete the following section every reporting period"]
[null,null,"Implementation and Adaptive Management","Response"]
[null,null,"What implementation issues/lessons, either positive or negative, affected progress?","The project has adopted several means to enhance sustainability of its activities. Examples of those included building the capacity of the partner NGOs to host the WUAs and manage the irrigation activities. Although this was a time-consuming approach, it proved effective in building ownership and potentials for sustainability on the longer term. Likewise, the provision of small agricultural machinery to be rented out by the local NGOs to smallholders would provide an income that would allow the NGO to sustain its climate adaptation services while localizing farmer’s access to these kind of machines that support their adaptation efforts. The project also seeks means to maximize impacts even if they take longer than others to achieve results. An example is the live performances of the comic play that are done instead of recorded replays. Whereas replays are easier to organize and would reach much larger audiences in shorter periods, the project in consultation with the partner NGOs opted for live performances owing to their bigger impact on farmers."]
[null,null,"Were there any delays in implementation?  If so, include any causes of delays. What measures have been taken to reduce delays?","\n Due to late project start-up, and although the current reporting period is referred to as YEAR 2, it technically and financially refers to the targets of the first year in the project document. For synchronization, the annual work plan and forecast expenditures of the reporting year were developed in relation to the actual start date of the project.  \n"]
[null,null,"Describe any changes undertaken to improve results on the ground or any changes made to project outputs (i.e. changes to project design)","No material changes have been made to the project document since the start of implementation.                                                                                                          "]
[null,null,"How have gender considerations been taken into consideration during the reporting period? What have been the lessons learned as a consequence of inclusion of such considerations on project performance or impacts?"," As is normally the practice for any WFP projects, gender equality is encouraged at all levels, such as membership of WUAs, project staff, loans beneficiaries and other activities. In a very traditional and conservative area, one of the most successful and committed partner NGOs of the project is the “Rural Women Development Association” founded and headed by a woman. The NGO which had previously targeted women with social services turned into an active development organization implementing the full spectrum of project interventions: water saving, agricultural and animal production, an online climate change application as well as awareness activities. Throughout those activities, the NGO deals with men e.g., experts, beneficiaries and service providers. The main lesson learned is the following: Social and cultural norms that hinder the empowerment and participation of women should not be taken for granted. Efforts spent to identify opportunities for overcoming such obstacles and increasingly integrate women in the activities, even if time-consuming and difficult, are rewarded."]
[]
[null,null,"Please complete the following section at mid-term and project completion"]
[null,null,"Lessons for Adaptation","Response"]
[null,null,"Climate Resilience Measures"]
[null,null,"What have been the lessons learned, both positive and negative, in implementing climate adaptation measures that would be relevant to the design and implementation of future projects/programmes for enhanced resilience to climate change?","Building climate resilience is a multidimensional issue in which several stakeholders have different, yet complementary roles to play. To effectively achieve its objectives, such measures thus involve cooperation among numerous stakeholders, at the central, regional and local levels.  Innately, each of these stakeholder groups had its own needs, priorities, governance and/or governing regulations as well as way of doing things.   Thus measures and tools are needed to integrate inputs, create synergies and facilitate cooperation among these diversified players, towards the successful rand sustained realization of the project objectives. Many lessons can be drawn from the consultative approach used by the project to enhance stakeholder engagement and building ownership and how this has affected efficiency, effectiveness and potentials for sustainability after its lifetime. In particular: \n*Intensive consultations with the different stakeholders at the early phases of the project cycle was a good means for their engagement.  Likewise, their involvement in different committees had benefits on several fronts. Firstly, and as each stakeholder group provided input from its own perspective, these consultations provided a good platform for integrating and complementing these multi-dimensional inputs in a way that enriched the design.  \nSecondly, it created a sense of involvement that gradually evolved into ownership of the different activities, and triggered their support in the different phases of the project. It has also initiated a team-spirit that smoothened effective collaboration towards one goal. \n*Deployment of local volunteers has been effective in many aspects. Being from the same villages, they substantially facilitated the project outreach and community mobilization activities. The deployment of female volunteers has been very effective as it supported activities that would have otherwise been difficult e.g. the household visits, and thereafter women’s participation in project activities. Entrusting volunteers with management of outputs such as the climate information centers after the project lifetime will also effectively enhance sustainability of such outputs. \n*The involvement of stakeholders at the different local, sub-national and national levels has supported the project in several ways. The support of the local committees enhanced the daily management of the activities. Higher-level committees, on the other hand, gave longer-term support and guidance. Engaging senior-level officials, they were effective tools in addressing major challenges faced by the project.   They were also effective in the duplication and upscaling of project activities on a wider geographical coverage. \n*Brining representatives from all the project villages together with senior governmental officials as well the technical experts of the interventions they are implementing annually was very effective.  It created a heterogeneous network of practitioners that shares experiences across the governorates, discusses challenges and highlights success stories, provides technical and managerial support as needed and shapes the project interventions in the upcoming year. Equally important, it creates sustainable working relationships that would help these key players maintain and even further develop the activities in the future.  \n"]
[null,null,"What is the potential for the climate resilience measures undertaken by the project/programme to be replicated and scaled up both within and outside the project area?","Replication and upscaling of many of the project interventions is already done by farmers in the project villages. Local units and NGOs from other villages have also approached the project to expand its activities to their villages.  "]
[null,null,"Concrete Adaptation Interventions"]
[null,null,"What have been the lessons learned, both positive and negative, in implementing concrete adaptation interventions that would be relevant to the design and implementation of future projects/programmes implementing concrete adaptation interventions?","* There are several ways to implement climate adaptation interventions. Generally, approaches that empower partners, engage stakeholders or seek more profound impact take longer to implement than others. However, on the longer term such activities are more sustainable and are more effective in implementation of concrete adaptation interventions.  For example, building the capacity of local partners and then entrusting them with hosting and operating assets such as climate information centers is more sustainable than directly offering climate information to farmers through the project, as it would cease after its life time. \n*the use of domestic varieties, national experts and low-cost techniques is a good means for enhancing sustainability of adaptation interventions. It is supports upscaling and replication.  \n*As climate impacts household’s livelihoods and food security in several ways, an integrated approach that deploys several interventions such as enhancing crop tolerance, increasing productivity, improving natural resources usage efficiency, diversification of income sources, etc is needed to effectively build resilience.\n\n "]
[null,null,"What is the potential for the concrete adaptation interventions undertaken by the project/programme to be replicated and scaled up both within and outside the project area?","Many of the project intervensions are already being replicated both in the project villages as\n well as in new villages. The project intervensions in wheat have already been adopted by the\n National Wheat campaign for ntaional upscaling. "]
[null,null,"Community/National Impact"]
[null,null,"What would you consider to be the most successful aspects for the target communities?","The project's positive results achieved in building the communities resilience to climate impacts on their food security and livelihoods. In particular, the project's ability to safeguard production against weather spells, enhance efficiency of natural resources usage and diversify incomes are among the most successful aspects that have profoundly impacted the project communities."]
[null,null,"What measures are/have been put in place to ensure sustainability of the project/program results?"," The Ministry is an essential partner in the project and a main beneficiary of its results. aS SUCH, AND WITNESSING THE POSITIVE RESULTS, IT WOULD BE IN ITS BEST INTEREST TO SUSTAIN THE ACTVITIES. \n The project’s unprecedented reliance on the full participation of the target groupsand their organizations at community level in all stages.\n The project’s coordinating committees, from the central level to the grassroots level, includes representatives from many ministries and governmental authorities, and the project succeeded in creating strong linkages with these.\nThe project’s alignment, not just with the national strategies and priorities, but also its alignment with and direct participation in the technical aspects of the Ministry of Agriculture’s action plans. This was represented in the project’s adoption of the varieties that the ministry targets spreading as part of its strategy. It was also seen in the adoption of raised bed farming, and the rehabilitation of Mesqas, both of which are part of the Ministry of Agriculture’s nationwide aims. Furthermore, the project makes a major contribution to the National Wheat Campaign through applying and spreading the general recommendations issued by the Crop Research Institute (affiliated to the Ministry of Agriculture), especially Upper Egypt. All these factors create a direct benefit for state organizations in supporting the project’s sustainability on an institutional level and merging its components within its structure.\n The inclusion of the project’s offices, whether the headquarters or the governorate offices, inside governmental directorates, and through official decisions. Further, in order to protect the project’s headquarters in light of the repeated changes in leadership, the existence of an institutional governmental party that takes responsibility for, and participates or takes complete ownership of all the project’s activities\n The project’s reliance in its technical aspects on permanent official research bodies, some of which are affiliated with regional universities, while other are affiliated to governmental research centers (most of them are affiliated with the agricultural research centers affiliated to the Ministry of Agriculture). Even the experts who cooperated with the project on an individual basis belong to the same authorities, which created organic ties and mutual concerns in the project with the related research institutes\n The project’s reliance in its agricultural components on domestic varieties, which were recommended by Egyptian research institutes, rather than imported crops. This increases the chances of sustaining execution through the existing mechanisms, whereby it would have been much more complicated and difficult had the project relied on imported seeds, especially as the seeds used are breeding (fundamental) seeds, which means they can be used for replanting for 4-5 years\n The existence of a simplified plan and explicit or implicit agreements for the handover after the completion of the project\n The office space of the Headquarters is additionally secured through an open-ended legal lease contract, so long as the project continues the formalization of relations with the partner authorities, and documenting in different ways through cooperation agreements that define current and future responsibilities\n- The project capacity building of and reliance on local stakeholders, namely local NGOs for the management of the different activities/ outputs  \n"]
[null,null,"What measures are being/could have been put in place to improve project/program results?","Several measures have been adopted to improve results. Examples of this include use of innovative techniques such as theatre performances to mobilize the communities. Likewise, the use of live performances rather than recorded replays for stronger results is another example. The different activities undertaken to build the capacity of the partner NGOs for example to enhance their management and communication skills has improved their abilities to engage with community members and effectively manage the different activities. The capacity building of the WUAs has improved their abilities to undertake the different water management activities. The change of the goats’ supplier has also improved the types and physical conditions of the goats received. Likewise, the extension of the goats’ loan cycle to be 12 instead of 6 months is also to improve the results from this lending mechanism."]
[null,null,"Knowledge Management "]
[null,null,"How has existing information/data/knowledge been used to inform project development and implementation? What kinds of information/data/knowledge were used?","Several studies on climate effects on agriculture and associated economic impacts in Egypt have been consulted during the development of the project. Information and data from several studies, reports and publications on the socio-economic status of the Southern Egypt area has also been key in the design of the project. As mentioned in the project document, intensive consultations with the various stakeholders of the project has also generated a wealth of information that has effectively influenced the design of the different interventions and implementation mechanisms of the project.  During implementation, the project generates reports that are shared with the different stakeholders for dissemination of information. The Steering Committee convenes regularly to review project technical reports.  \nThe project also produces several knowledge products such as flyers, brochures, visibility printed materials as well as on-line materials that the different project stakeholders and local governments have access to. In addition, the project stakeholders had the opportunity to visit project activities in the field and compare studies with local scenarios. Feedback received from the various stakeholders engaged in the different activities/ committees informs the implementation.  \n"]
[null,null,"If learning objectives have been established, have they been met? Please describe.","Yes, as indicated in the project annual reports issued so far, several governmental focal points and officials, volunteers, community members and farmers have been trained on several aspects such as communication skills, climate-mart agriculture, strategic planning, computer skills, and animal keeping among others. NGO members have been capacitated in the domains of financial and project management as well as loans management. Through its engagement with academia, the project has supported the learning of university and secondary agriculture of climate adaptation techniques in agriculture."]
[null,null,"Describe any difficulties there have been in  accessing or retrieving existing information (data or knowledge) that is relevant to the project. Please provide suggestions for improving access to the relevant data.","NA"]
[null,null,"Has the identification of learning objectives contributed to the outcomes of the project? In what ways have they contributed?","The project design and implementation has given ample learning opportunities, not only from the results, but also from the different processes. Its participatory approach engaged the different stakeholders in a way by which they learned about climate change, its impacts on agriculture, different adaptation techniques as well as how such techniques could be deployed to safeguard livelihoods against climate impacts. This on-the job training, along with the different course trainings, technical support, exchange visits, and other forms of  learning has enabled the different stakeholder groups to realize how they can effectively contribute to building resilience and has substantially enhanced their capacities to actually assume responsibilities in this regards, contributing to the different project outcomes. "]

{"sheet":" Financial information","index":2,"n_rows":48,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":48,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[55,2,55,3],[56,2,56,3],[56,4,56,5],[57,2,57,3],[57,4,57,5],[50,2,50,3],[50,4,50,5],[52,2,52,3],[52,4,52,5],[53,2,53,3],[53,4,53,5],[45,2,45,5],[46,2,46,3],[46,4,46,5],[47,2,47,3],[47,4,47,5],[49,2,49,3],[15,2,15,3],[28,2,28,3],[29,2,29,3],[43,2,43,5],[44,2,44,3],[44,4,44,5],[9,2,9,3],[9,4,9,5],[11,2,11,3],[11,4,11,5],[12,2,12,5],[14,2,14,3],[2,2,2,6],[3,1,3,5],[4,2,4,5],[7,2,7,5],[8,2,8,3],[8,4,8,5],[6,2,6,4]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,"Financial information:  cumulative from project start to 31 March 2016"]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"DISBURSEMENT OF AF GRANT FUNDS "]
[null,null,"How much of the total AF grant as noted in Project Document plus any project preparation grant has been spent to date?"]
[null,null,"Estimated cumulative total disbursement as of [enter Date]",null,2349898]
[null,null,"Add any comments on AF Grant Funds. (word limit=200)"]
[]
[null,null,"INVESTMENT INCOME ",null,1206.7897727272725]
[null,null,"Amount of annual investment income generated from the Adaptation Fund’s grant"]
[]
[null,null,"EXPENDITURE DATA"]
[null,null,"List ouput and corresponding amount spent for the current reporting period",null,"ITEM / ACTIVITY / ACTION","AMOUNT"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 1.1. Community Mobilization",24410.67]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 2.2. Documentation of lessons learned",30017.07]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 1.4 Building Resilience in Agricultural Production ",373665.52]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 1.5 Building Resilience through livestock and Poultry Production",246222.59]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 2.1. Training of Gov. Officials",62611.1]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 1.3 Introduction and use of Water Saving Irrigation ",359247.93]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 1.2 ",19086.42]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 2.3",55915.64]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 2.4",13672.42]
[{"$nulls":4},"Project Execution Costs ",66633.87]
[{"$nulls":4},"TOTAL",1251483.2299999995]
[]
[null,null,"PLANNED EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE"]
[null,null,"List outputs planned and corresponding projected cost for the upcoming reporting period",null,"ITEM / ACTIVITY / ACTION","PROJECTED COST","Est. Completion Date"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 1.1",43078.9473684211,"30.4.2017"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 1.2",70000,"30.4.2017"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 1.3",634000,"30.4.2017"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 1.4",502000,"30.4.2017"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 1.5",500000,"30.4.2017"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 2.1",65131.57894736843,"30.4.2017"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 2.2",52631.5789473684,"30.4.2017"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output 2.3",75684.21052631579,"30.4.2017"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Output2.4",40925,"30.4.2017"]
[{"$nulls":4},"TOTAL",1983451.3157894737]
[{"$nulls":4},"Project Execution Costs",79338.05263157895,"30.4.2017"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Project\nManagement Fee",79338.05263157895,"30.4.2017"]
[{"$nulls":4},"TOTAL",2142127.4210526315]
[null,null,"ACTUAL CO-FINANCING (If the MTR or TE have not been undertaken this reporting period, DO NOT report on actual co-financing.) "]
[null,null,"How much of the total co-financing as committed in the Project Document has actually been realized?",null,"NA"]
[]
[null,null,"Estimated cumulative actual co-financing as verified during Mid-term Review (MTR) or Terminal Evaluation (TE). ",null,"NA"]
[null,null,"Add any comments on actual co-financing in particular any issues related to the realization of in-kind, grant, credits, loans, equity, non-grant instruments and other types of co-financing. (word limit=200)",null,"Government in-kind contributions were as follows:\n- Space was provided in the directorates of different governorates for project sub-offices and the PMU.\n- Government facilitated access to subsidized inputs\n- Use of media including radio and TV to cover achievements of project activities.\n- Important events related to the project were recorded by government provided cameraman as well as broadcast nationally.\n- Programmes demonstrating project activities were broadcast for farmers through the national tv channel on agriculture.\n"]

{"sheet":" Project Indicators","index":3,"n_rows":28,"n_cols":8,"rows_kept":28,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[10,3,10,4],[10,6,11,6],[27,3,27,4],[28,2,28,7],[21,3,21,4],[22,3,22,4],[23,3,23,4],[24,3,24,4],[25,3,25,4],[26,3,26,4],[16,3,16,4],[17,3,17,4],[18,3,18,4],[19,3,19,4],[20,3,20,4],[11,3,11,4],[15,3,15,4],[12,2,13,2],[12,3,12,4],[13,3,13,4],[14,3,14,4],[6,2,8,2],[6,3,6,4],[7,3,7,4],[8,3,8,4],[9,3,9,4],[10,2,11,2],[0,2,0,7],[1,2,1,7],[2,2,2,7],[3,2,3,7],[4,3,4,4],[5,3,5,4]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,null,"PROJECT Indicators"]
[null,null,"Please provide all indicators being tracked for the project as outlined in the project document"]
[]
[null,null,"Type of Indicator (indicators towards Objectives, Outcomes, etc…)"]
[null,null,"Type of Indicator","Indicator",null,"Baseline","Progress since inception","Target for Project End"]
[null,null,"Objective ","Proportion of Southern Egypt farming communities that are more climate resilient through adoption of water efficient irrigation, risk reduction measures in agriculture and livestock, diversified income sources, and access to early warning systems and adaptation guidance ",null,"Over 90% of southern Egypt rural inhabitants are vulnerable to climate change and variability and demonstrate low level of knowledge of risk reduction measures","Although it is coming to our attention that increasing numbers of farmers from neighbouring villages and districts are interested in replicating project interventions, an in-depth assessment is needed to quantify the percentage of people replicating throughout the Southern zone.   ","Over 50% of southern Egypt farming communities practice risk reduction measures "]
[null,null,"Outcome 1","Percentage of target population in Southern Egypt demonstrating knowledge of climate change and variability and means to reduce risk to their livelihoods",null," 30% of sample\ninterviewed as part of\nthe baseline\nassessment knew\nabout climate change\nwith varied levels of\nunderstanding"," An  estimated70% of target population understand climate change phenomenon, risks to livelihoods, and adaptation solutions"," Over 90% of target\npopulation understand\nclimate change\nphenomenon, risks to\nlivelihoods, and\nadaptation solutions"]
[null,null,null,"Number of people adopting optimal efficiency in irrigation using low-cost technologies Such as; \n• Canal lining and other surface irrigation low-cost solutions\n• Water user associations established and active in effective management of water resources and waterways",null,"More than 90% of\npeople reported doing\nclearing of canals.\nLess than 1% reported\nadopting any other\nmeasures to conserve\nwater.\nNo water associations\navailable","\n• 5 water user associations have been established.                 • 14000  direct beneficiaries started adopting improved efficiency in irrigation using low cost technologies where canal lining activities have been finished  in 3 of the project villages. Canals to be lined were selected  in partnership with local communities and the engineering designs and cost estimates have been prepared by local experts . Further, 13 MOUs between the project and partner NGOs were signed to determine the roles and responsibilities where the NGOs are to manage the labour, identify material suppliers from the local markets and liaise between the engineers and the water users associations.  \n• Procurement procedures of  the canal lining construction materials are  ongoing"," Over 20,000 direct and\n28000 indirect people\nadopting optimal\nefficiency in irrigation\nusing low-cost\ntechnologies\nA minimum of 12 water\nuser associations\nestablished and actively\noperating"]
[null,null,null,"Number of people adopting at least one climate risk reduction measure in agriculture and livestock",null,"1,800 people reported\nadopting at least one\nrisk reduction\nmeasure in agriculture\nand livestock.","22,000 direct farmers and extension workers are adopting some climate risk reduction measures in agriculture and livestock . In addition of 40,000 indirect beneficiaries.\n","38,000 direct and over\n100,000 indirect people\nadopting at least one\nclimate risk reduction\nmeasures in agriculture\nand livestock"]
[null,null,"output 1.1","\nNumber of people participating in awareness sessions and mobilized to participate in project activities\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n",null,"Baseline value are\nthose people who\nparticipated in the\nbaseline survey\nconducted as part of\nproject preparation,\nwhich are over 1500\npeople","90, 519 people  participated  in awareness sessions and mobilized to participate in project activities","Over 130,000 people over the project life"]
[null,null,"output 1.2","Number of people using the system",null,"Zero, because no such\nsystem is in place at\nthe moment","17, 000 have direct access to the  software. It is estimated that 40,000 indirect beneficiaries are reached. In addition, the software now generates early warning messages for wheat maize sorghum and sugar cane .","Over 100 direct participants in Cairo and participating governorates trained to use the system"]
[null,null,null,"Number of people benefiting from the system with climate information, early warning and adaptation guidance",null,"Zero, because no such\nsystem is in place at\nthe moment",null,"Over 130,000 direct beneficiaries from the system and over one million indirect beneficiaries from the potential scale-up of system use."]
[null,null,"Output 1.3","Number of acres benefiting from optimal irrigation efficiency using low-cost solutions.",null,"Less than 1% at the\nbaseline","2,926 acres directly benefited from 5 water users associations established and activated","Over 4000 acres directly benefiting"]
[null,null,null,"Proportion of target communities benefiting from adequate services of water users associations.",null,"Zero at the baseline\nbecause no water\nusers associations\nwere established in\nthe target zone.","To date,  all canals undergoing efficiency improvement benefited from water users associations. ","All canals undergoing improved irrigation efficiency will also benefit from water user associations established and strengthened under the project."]
[null,null,"output 1.4","\nNumber of people from among the target population benefiting from demonstration farms, extension services, and farm-to-farm visits to enhance their resilience and reduce climate risks.\n",null,"None of the population\nare currently\nbenefiting from any\ninterventions for this\npurpose.","To date, 27,122 people benefited directly from the project activities that provided access to heat resistant strategic plants  (wheat and sorghum , sugar cane ), as well as how to change sowing dates, and other soft techniques to reduce climate risks. In addition, some 30,000 people benefited indirectly through seeing the achieved results and adopting the introduced practices in their own fields. ","Over 37,000 people benefit directly and over 100,000 indirectly benefiting from access to heat resistant strategic plants, as well as learn how to change sowing dates, and other soft techniques to reduce climate risks."]
[null,null,"output 1.4","Number of people engaged in income diversification strategies to reduce risks and vulnerability of food security to climate.",null,"Less than 5% of\npeople are engaged in\nincome diversification\nstrategies.","1,565 farmers were engaged in intercropping activities to date. Preparations for intercropping in the 2015 summer season started. In, addition the establishment of the animals loans scheme started and lending will start in April 2015 with 700 participants.","The above figure includes about 10,000 beneficiaries are engaged in income diversification schemes (intercropping, high value crops, and/or organic farming"]
[null,null,"Output 1.5","No. of women trained on risk reduction in raising large ruminants, small ruminants and poultry; animal nutrition and alternative fodder. ",null,"Zero women \ntrained on climate risk\nreduction to livestock","2,170  beneficiaries from the training ","Over 36,000 women will be trained on reduction techniques of climate risk to livestock"]
[null,null,"Output 1.5","Proportion of women accessing adequate vet services in their villages as it relates to climate related risks and diseases.",null,"About 98% of\nrespondents to the\nbaseline survey\nindicated inadequacy\nof vet services in their\nvillages.","50 % borrowers engaged in raising livestock will have access to proper vet services equipped to reduce climate risk","Over 90% of women engaged in raising livestock will have access to proper vet services equipped to reduce climate risk"]
[null,null,"Output 1.5","Number of women benefiting from small loans to acquire heat tolerant livestock varieties.",null,"No access to\nspecialized livestock\nfinancing schemes is\ncurrently available in\ntarget communities.","1,200 women benefiting from small loans to acquire heat tolerant livestock varieties","18,200 women will have access to specialized livestock revolving schemes during project life."]
[null,null,"Outcome 2\n","% increase in \nbudget allocated to\nadaptation in local,\nregional and\nnational plans.",null,"Zero","Senior governmental officials indicated that the interventions introduced by the project will be added to the National Campaign to increase the productivity of wheat as of next year.  \n\n*requests from local authorities and MALR seniors to scale up the project interventions in different  directs ","A positive trend sufficient to sustain and scale-up\ninterventions of this project"]
[null,null,"Outcome 2\n","Key institutions needed capacity development to deliver services for climate risk reduction in rural communities.",null,"There are no programs or staff\ndedicated to adaptation services in key local governmental and non-governmental institutions.","14 Climate information centres have been established in partner NGOs to deliver services for climate risk reduction. In addition to  establishment of 5 similar centres in the agricultural directorates  of the 5 project governorates. The NGO centres have 300 dedicated volunteers while there are 2 staff members in each government center. in addition to MOU signed between BMU  and extension sector in the ministry of agriculture aimed to  host the early warning units in the MALR organogram .","Government programs developed to deliver:\n• Climate information hubs to scale up use of systems\ndeveloped under output 1.2\n• Adaptation knowledge and services embedded in government extension services \n• Revolving funds extending beyond the project areas to benefit other communities in Southern Egypt aiming to spread water conservation technologies and heat tolerant varieties in agriculture and livestock"]
[null,null,"Output 2.1","\nNumber of people trained; % of trainees that are able to properly retain message from training. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n",null,"Training programmes for government on climate risk management to benefit rural\ncommunities will still be developed. Number of people\ntrained is zero at the baseline.","*180 governmental focal points have been trained on managment of agro- meteorological data, comunication skills, utilization of the system developed under output 1.2 and means of desemination information.                             *1458 extention workers recived on-farm training and theoretical training in the project interventions under component 1 for governemintal focal point. ","Software developed and launched nationally to link climate stations belonging to different government agencies together, and developing adaptation guidance for each climate scenario for use by online users nationwide. "]
[null,null,"Output 2.1","Number of advocacy meetings",null,"Zero","350 extension fields were established in 3 faculties of agriculture  (Aswan, South Valley, and Sohag Universities) to enhance their capacity to integrate the project interventions in their practical curicula","300 officials at local and central government, as well as parliament, aware of climate proofing agriculture and water management"]
[null,null,"Output 2.2","Number of awareness materials printed\n\n\n\n",null,"No materials are produced on climate risk reduction in agriculture","*four brochures, 56 press releases issued, 3 visibility materials (desk calendar and blocknote, desk organiser) were designed, printed and disseminated and more than (50) articles wewe written about the project.          \n*A 20 minute documentary film was produced on the project interventions and disseminated to concerned stakeholders.","\n• At least five different printed products\n• At least 4 different press releases issued\n"]
[null,null,"output 2.2","Number of online messages",null,"Zero","5 Facebook groups, one for each governorate, were maintained with an average number of 3000 participants in each. In addition, aYoutube channel with 1000 views is effectively used. As well as the project website was kept updated.","At least 10"]
[null,null,"output 2.2","Number of TV spots and programmes aired.",null,"Zero","*22 Tv spots was produced and aired.                                  *15 radio interviews were conducted with project stakeholders about the different intervensions and success in their villages ","• At least 10 TV spots produced and aired\n• At least 10 radio spots produced and aired\n"]
[null,null,"output 2.3","Number of awareness and advocacy events held for new parliamentarians and policy makers. \n\n\n\n",null,"Zero","*80 advocacy events have been held for policy makers (presentations, site visits, events).                                       * Annual workshop to discuss opportunities and constraints has been held for all active actors with the participation 70 participants. In addition, preparations to the annual workshop to be held in May.\n* Project mid-term evaluation was conducted in 2015.","At least 10"]
[null,null,"Output 2.4","Number of students benefiting from lessons learned from project interventions",null,"Zero","*2574 students from agricutural technical schools participated in project activities ( trainings in the project demonstration fields in their scools).                                   *561 university students from three universities participated in project interventions in climate adaptation and have been trained on compute skills.","300 yearly from the 3 key universities in Southern Egypt"]

{"sheet":"Risk Assesment","index":4,"n_rows":30,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":30,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[53,2,53,3],[53,4,53,5],[48,2,48,3],[48,4,48,5],[49,2,49,3],[49,4,49,5],[51,2,51,3],[52,2,52,3],[52,4,52,5],[42,2,42,3],[42,4,42,5],[43,2,43,3],[43,4,43,5],[45,2,45,3],[46,2,46,3],[46,4,46,5],[29,2,29,3],[29,4,29,5],[30,2,30,5],[39,2,39,3],[40,2,40,3],[41,2,41,5],[21,4,21,5],[22,4,22,5],[24,4,24,5],[25,4,25,5],[26,4,26,5],[28,2,28,5],[15,2,15,5],[16,4,16,5],[17,4,17,5],[18,4,18,5],[19,4,19,5],[20,4,20,5],[8,4,8,5],[9,4,9,5],[10,4,10,5],[11,4,11,5],[12,4,12,5],[14,2,14,5],[2,2,2,5],[3,1,3,5],[4,2,4,3],[5,2,5,5],[6,4,6,5],[7,4,7,5]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,"RISK ASSESMENT"]
[]
[null,null,"IDENTIFIED RISKS"]
[null,null,"List all Risks identified in project preparation phase and what  steps are being taken to mitigate them"]
[null,null,"Identified Risk","Current Status","Steps Taken to Mitigate Risk"]
[null,null,"Unforeseen changes in poverty, hunger, nutrition, and other socio-economic variables due to external factors such as Triple F crisis, pandemics, climate change.","Medium","Food prices have been closely monitored to identify significant changes in prices and inform activities accordingly. 2 new wheat varieties, one sorghum hybrid, one sugarcane variety and improved agricultural practices were introduced, contributing to the strengthening of community resilience to extreme weather events and increasing temperatures. The development of an early warning system to relay information on upcoming extreme weather events  to farmers has been started.  "]
[null,null,"Potential conflict between farmers engaged in adaptation and applying new techniques and traditional farmers who are not.","Low "," This risk has not materialized in the reporting period."]
[null,null,"Lack of trust in the government honouring its commitments to offer the announced benefits to the beneficiaries. ","low ","The project used a participatory approach that involved communities in the identification of priorities, activity planning and implementation, building the basis for local trust and ownership. The Government's honouring of its commitments in the project implementation was also shared widely in festive harvest days that acknowledged the government's role and the positive achievements that resulted accordingly. Bringing concerned government officials from the Ministries of Agriculture, Irrigation, Education, Social Solidarity and the Governorates together with community members, media, and civil society, these events effectively promoted the trust in the Government's active role in supporting the project and realising its announced objectives.  The project's follow-up with the concerned government officials has also resulted in the official adoption of climate adaptation interventions by the National Wheat Campaign and the Central Authority of Extension Services.  "]
[null,null,"Non-sustainability of the project due to institutional or financial factors ","low ","The substantially positive results achieved so far have well demonstrated the economic feasibility of the project interventions. Increasing numbers of farmers are now replicating and up scaling in their lands, mostly at their own expenses. The Ministry of Agriculture is already adopting the interventions in its programmes- wheat cultivation so far. Through trainings as well as on- the- job support, the project is also building technical and institutional capacities of partner NGOs to anchor the project at the local level. It also started enhancing capacities of loans beneficiaries through specialized trainings to help them sustainably manage their projects. At the governorate level, the project is using the established climate centres in the agricultural directorates for replication and up scaling. Training of extension officers on climate-related adaptation started and one officer was assigned as the focal point for climate-related information exchange."]
[null,null,"Security risk: Egypt in general has witnessed an increase in crime compared to the past, which poses a risk to property ","Low ","No crimes of this nature have been recorded during the reporting period and, in general, security improved since the project preparation phase making the likelihood of this risk even lower. For further assurance, animal heads supplied during the reporting period for loans were insured. "]
[null,null,"Political Risk i.e. non-smooth transition from the interim to the elected Government, leading to changes which impact project implementation. \n\n- Finally, all political parties of all ideological backgrounds already indicated they would honour Egypt’s commitments towards international agreements, UNFCCC included  \n","Low "," This risk has not materialised in the reporting period."]
[]
[null,null,"Critical Risks Affecting Progress (Not identified at project design)"]
[null,null,"Identify Risks with a 50% or > likelihood of affecting progress of project"]
[null,null,"Identified Risk","Current Status","Steps Taken to Mitigate Risk"]
[null,null,"Late start-up of the project ","Medium"," Due to late project start-up, and although the current reporting period is referred to as YEAR 3, it technically and financially refers to the targets of the YEAR 2 in the project document. For synchronization, the annual work plan and forecast expenditures of the reporting year were developed in relation to the actual start date of the project and an official request for a no-cost extension shall be submitted to the AF for approval as recommended by the mid-term evaluation.  "]
[null,null,"Weak capacity hindering the South Valley University's ability to train the target number of beneficiaries for bee keeping as well as provide the needed number of hives at the agreed upon costs ","high"," The project intends to sign MOUs with other Universities and extend the training to be in the villages, using the bee hives that the project has provided to the first batch of the loans beneficiaries.  "]
[null,null,"Lack of a sustainable mechanism for the maintenance of the solar irrigation pumps","high","The project studied alternative means to provide maintenance services of the solar systems. These included having the private sector provide such a service at a cost or connecting to the National grid to have the National Renewable Energy Authority (NREA) maintain the units as well as provide technical support to the beneficiaries as needed free of charge. For longer-term sustainability, the project decided to sign an MOU with NREA, under the On-grid law that was issued in March 2016. Although this approach resulted delaying the introduction of the solar units to the next project year, it is expected to be more beneficial on the longer term. "]
[null,null,"Technical problems were faced with the first batches of goats received. \n","Medium","Alternative suppliers for the goats were sought. These included the Animal Production Research Institute, with whom an MOU was signed and supply started. The new batches of goats received are now reported to be satisfactory. "]
[null,null," Upon the recommendation of the goats experts that was later supported by the mid-term evaluation, the project extended the 6-months loan cycle to 13 months. This, along with the long period it has taken to procure the goats, is expected to reduce the number of beneficiaries of the animal loans during the project lifetime. ","Medium","The project is to expedite the loans of the other animals whose cycle would be shorter and, would be more in numbers owning to their smaller costs (bees, ducks and rabbits) in the upcoming years. "]
[null,null,"Water sources for irrigation of demonstration fields in 2 partner universities were found insufficient ","high","To mitigate this risk, the project drilled two water wells for use of groundwater in irrigating the demonstration fields. An Environmental Impact Assessment has been carried out by each university for its well. "]
[]
[null,null,"The receipt and programming of the second tranche of the AF funding took longer than expected, creating a funding shortfall. ","Medium","The funding shortfall created a slowing of implementation in August- October 2015. To overcome this, the project expedited implementation in the period November 2015- March 2016. "]
[null,null," Due to lack of transportation for agricultural extension workers of agriculture directories in the target areas, it is difficult to disseminate project interventions through them.","high ","    Providing motorcycles during next year for agricultural extension workers as means of transportation,  provided that the Ministry of Agriculture undertakes to provide operation and maintenance."]
[null,null,"In spite of the different capacity building and support provided to partner NGOS, the performance of some of them is below expected due to several reasons beyond the project's control.","low ","To mitigate this risk, the project is entrusting its other more active partner NGOs with some of the delayed activities. "]
[]
[null,null,"Risk Measures: Were there any risk mitigation measures employed during the current reporting period?  If so, were risks reduced?  If not, why were these risks not reduced?"]
[null,null,"Add any comments relevant to risk mitigation (word limit = 500)"]

{"sheet":"Rating","index":5,"n_rows":66,"n_cols":10,"rows_kept":66,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[42,3,42,9],[50,3,50,4],[51,3,51,4],[52,3,52,4],[53,3,53,4],[59,3,59,4],[37,5,37,7],[38,3,38,4],[38,5,38,7],[39,3,39,4],[39,5,39,7],[40,3,40,4],[34,3,34,4],[34,5,34,7],[35,3,35,4],[35,5,35,7],[36,3,36,4],[36,5,36,7],[31,3,31,4],[31,5,31,7],[32,3,32,4],[32,5,32,7],[33,3,33,4],[33,5,33,7],[14,5,14,7],[15,3,15,4],[15,5,15,7],[19,2,19,8],[23,3,26,9],[29,3,29,4],[11,3,11,4],[11,5,11,7],[12,3,12,4],[12,5,12,7],[13,3,13,4],[13,5,13,7],[8,3,8,4],[8,5,8,7],[9,3,9,4],[9,5,9,7],[10,3,10,4],[10,5,10,7],[2,2,2,9],[3,2,3,9],[6,3,6,4],[6,5,6,7],[7,3,7,4],[7,5,7,7]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,"RATING ON IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS "]
[null,null,"For rating definitions please see bottom of page."]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,"Progress on Key Milestones",null,"Expected Progress",null,null,"Progress to Date","Rating"]
[null,null,"Project Manager/Coordinator: ","1.1. Community\nlevel mobilization\nand climate\nadaptation\nplanning\n(including\nawareness)",null,"Community mobilization activities and training of volunteers to raise awareness about climate change, weather variability, and impacts on agriculture, and potential preparedness techniques in agriculture and livestock to reach 37,300  beneficiaries in the old villages .  \n\nReplication of activities started in new neighboring villages through different mobilzation activities to reach  of 9000  beneficiaries.\n\nStakeholders mobilized to participate in planning and management of project actvities. \n ",null,null,"*40210 beneficiaries were reached through different mobilization events as follows:  \n* Some 9500 beneficiaries reached through the services offered by the 14 climate information centers established last year. These included addressing farmers’ requests for further information about the project and its interventions, technical backstopping, creating linkages to technical experts, provision of printed materials such as flyers, brochures, etc. \n*5 Local steering committees, one in each governorate, headed by the Governorate Secretary General and comprised of the Agricultural Director, Director of Social Solidarity and Irrigation director have been actively involved in activity planning and monitoring \n*20 village-level project support committees operationalized and actively involving 150 community members in facilitation of project activities in 20 villages.\n *495 local focal points and volunteers were trained on general computer skills and communication skills to operate climate information centers.                                                                                  * 200 awareness sessions on climate change, its impacts and how to identify vulnerable groups were undertaken with a total number of 22565 participants (75 % farmers from old villages - 25% farmers from neighbor villages for replication)\n* A comic play was developed by local actors as a tool to raise awareness on climate impacts and adaptation techniques. 26 live on-farm performances were made to 7500 farmers in 14 old and 6 new villages.  \n                                                                  \n               ","HS"]
[null,null,null,"1.2. Establishment\nof a climate\nchange and food\nsecurity\nmonitoring system",null,"  * Second version of software for providing early warning messages developed \n * Under the agreement signed between MALR, EEAA and EMA the design of  an automatic unit in EMA to provide 5 days prediction data completed.\n* Five governmental focal points trained to be in charge of obtaining climate information and adaptation guidance on a daily basis in the 5 climate centers established in the directorates    \n* Early warming messages relayed directly to 20,000 farmers.\n",null,null,"*Second version of the software for providing early warning messages was developed and operationalized. The software now provides early warning massages and recommendation for three crops (wheat, sugar cane and sorghum). \n *under the protocols between MALR, EMA and EEAA the design of an automatic unit in EMA to provide 5 days prediction data was completed. This includes hosting of a server for increased infrastructure capacity. \n*75 local extension workers trained to use the early warning software system \n* 12240 usages of the online early warning system recorded  \n* 20,053 farmers benefiting directly from the early warning system through the extension workers and 9 local radio stations established by the project and hosted in the local NGOs.   \n                                                                                                                      \n","HS"]
[null,null,null,"1.3. Introduction\nand use of water\nsaving irrigation\nand other\nadaptation\ntechniques",null,"* 1500 acres benefeting from water saving techniques  \n* introduce solar panels as a source of electricity for pumping.\n*7500 farmers benefiting from the diffent water saving techniques introduced\n ",null,null,"* two water saving techniques  introduced to new farmers (surface canal lining, and laser levelling of land)                             \n*1926 acres benefeting from the 2 water saving techniques introduced \n*9630 farmers benefiting from application of canal lining and soil leveling solutions in their fields \n *700 NGO members engaged in farm to farm visits to strengthen NGO capacity to operate WUAs\n *200 farmers were trained in 10 workshops on soft skills on water saving technologies such as irrigation scheduling and water requirements estimations \n \n ","S"]
[null,null,null,"1.4. Building\nresilience in\nagricultural\nproduction ",null,"* 700 extension fields implemented for introduction of heat tolerant varieties of common crops such as wheat, maize, sorghum and water-saving sugar cane varieties & dissemination of changing of sowing dates and intercropping practices and high value crops technical visits.\n* 500 extension field implemented for introduction of heat tolerant varieties and techniques of cash crops introduced.  \n* 12000 farmers to benefit from on-farm trainings and experts visits to introduce heat tolerant varieties and land consolidation techniques as well as provide technical support.\n* implement 50 training sessions and provide 4 simple post-harvest units to introduce simple post harvesting techniques \n * 2100 acres consolidated for enhanced production and reduced portion costs \n* 5 Farm-to-farm visits organized for 250 farmers.\n*14 small agricultural machines supplied to local NGOs to support localization of climate adaptation solutions. Rented out by the NGO to farmers, these machines support the farmers in implementing the introduced solutions while providing a sustainable source of income for the NGO to continue providing its different climate services to the community.   \n  \n",null,null,"\n * 3 new wheat varieties introduced for improved heat tolerance and increased productivity\n*Two types of aromatic plants (black seed and fennel) were introduced as heat tolerant cash crops to enhance farmers’ income       \n* 2403 extension fields implemented for introduction of heat tolerant varieties of common crops (1100 wheat, 1253 sorghum and 50 water-saving sugar cane varieties). This included introduction of improved agricultural practices such as changing of sowing dates and raised bed cultivation for enhanced resilience and land and water usage efficiency. \n* Planting of fava beans was introduced to sugar cane cultivations as an intercropping model to diversify farmers’ incomes and optimize land use. \n * 485 extension fields implemented for introduction of heat tolerant varieties of cash crops benefiting 2425 farmers.\n* 5035 farmers benefited from on-farm trainings and expert visits to introduce heat tolerant varieties of wheat, sugar cane and sorghum, and land holding techniques as well as provision of technical support.\n  * 2100 acres consolidated for enhanced production and reduced production costs.\n* 5 Farm-to-farm visits organized for benefiting 259 farmers.\n* 14 small machines were provided and operationalized by the local partner NGOs, generating an average income of L.E. 5000 per season for each NGO. \n\n\n\n\n\n","HS"]
[null,null,null,"1.5. Building\nresilience through\nlivestock and\npoultry\nproduction'",null,"* providing goats loan to 600 beneficiaries.  \n* 4200 beneficiaries trained on specifics of raising/keeping goats including nutrition.\n*6000 beneficiaries having access to enhanced vet services \n* start preparation for bee keeping loans programme in collaboration with partners NGOs.\n* 500 farmers engaged in trainings of alternative fodder preparation .\n",null,null,"* Goats loan provided to 613 beneficiaries.  \n*   1170 beneficiaries were trained on specifics of raising/keeping goats including nutrition.\n* 6482 beneficiaries having access to vet services\n*   25 local veterinarians were trained on using ultrasonic devices and other Vet care equipment for small ruminants.\n* 370 potential beneficiaries were trained on bee keeping. MoU for supply of bee hives was signed with South Valley University, however as mentioned in the risks section, supply of requested amounts failed due to an increase in the prices. \n * 1 model for use of agriculture (sorghum) waste introduced to 464 farmers for alternative livestock fodder production through 20 demonstration pilots\n\n     \n","S"]
[null,null,null," 2.1. Training of\ngovernment\ntechnical staff",null,"* Training of 150 governmental  focal points on managment of agro- meteorological data, communication skills and the utilization of the system developed under  outbut 1.2 and means of desemination information .\n*on-farm training and theoretical training for 660 extention workers  in the project interventions under component 1 for governemintal  focal point\n*  Enhance the capacity of local faculties of agriculture and agricultural schools to teach the project intervention under  component 1\n",null,null,"*180 governemintal  focal points trained on managment of agro- meteorological data, comunication skills, utilization of the system developed under output 1.2 and means of desemination information .\n*652 extention workers recived on-farm training and theoretical training in the project interventions under component 1 for governemintal  focal point\n*  25 extension fields were established in 3 faculties of agriculture in Aswan, South Valley, and Sohag Universities to enhance their capacity to integrate the project interventions in their practical curicula \n\n","HS"]
[null,null,null,"Output 2.2 Documentation of lessons learned and best practice",null," * 2500 users engage in the  local practitioners network through facebook groups.\n* one specialised TV channel adopting the project intervensions\n*one documentary produced to document a success story \n*YouTube channel updated  \n",null,null,"* 3 visibility materials (desk calendar and blocknote, desk organiser) were designed , printed and used for dissemination among partner agencies, and national local authorities, including local and national political representatives.\n* project website was kept updated\n* 5 Facebook groups were maintained with 2500 participants, the groups are successfully linking project experts, local youth and volunteers\n* A 20 minute documentary film was produced on the project interventions for climate-resilient wheat production. The CD is disseminated to concerned stakeholders including the governorates, NGOs and the Ministry of Agriculture. \n* YouTube channel effectively used by beneficiaries    \n* 6 press releases issued and published in 7 local newspapers  \n*5 radio interviews were conducted with project stakeholders about the different intervensions and success in their villages                                                                      ","HS"]
[null,null,null,"2.3Sharing project results and lessons learned and mainstreaming new approaches in \nlocal and national planning",null,"* Presentations to Ministers and senior government officials\n* 60 Site visits by 300 relevant officials \n* 15 events organised for 300 beneficiaries to present their experiences\n to other potential beneficiaries \n* Annual workshop that joins project actors from community, department, regional and national levels organised\n to discuss opportunities and constraints, and share  experience and learning. \n*15 meetings convened for local steering, Project steering and technical committees \n* mid-term evaluation conducted .\n\n\n\n",null,null,"*5 Presentations made to Ministers and senior government officials\n*30 Site visits organized bringing 155 relevant officials to visit the project fields and see the achievements \n*20 events were organized for beneficiaries to present their experiences to other potential beneficiaries, with 420 average number of participants in each\n* A total of 25 meetings were convened for local steering, Project steering and technical committees \n* Preparations for the annual workshop, to be   held in May 2016 held.\n* Annual workshop that joins project actors from community, department, regional and national levels organized to discuss opportunities and constraints, and share experience and learning with 70 participants.\n * The mid-term evaluation of the project was conducted and its report was issued in October 2015 .\n","HS"]
[null,null,null,"Output 2.4. Integration of climate adaptation solutions into University curriculum",null,"\n* 1750 universities and secondary schools students benefiting from trainings, field visits and practical interventions in experimental fields.\n\n",null,null,"\n* 461 students from three universities participated in trainings and field visits to the project sites to get exposed to project interventions in climate adaptation and 863 secondary agricultural   students were engaged in applied trainings in experimental field established within the school campus \n* 100 university students were trained on computer skills\n","HS"]
[{"$nulls":8},"Overall Rating","HS"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Please Provide the Name and Contact information of person(s) responsible for completing the Rating section"]
[null,null,null,"Name: ",null,"Othman Elshaikh ",null,"Project manager "]
[null,null,null,"Email: ",null,"othmanelshaikh@gmail.com"]
[]
[null,null,"Please justify your rating.  Outline the positive and negative progress made by the project since it started.  Provide specific recommendations for next steps. . (word limit=500)","Regarding the outcome objective: “Improve the adaptive capacity of the Southern region of the country in the face of anticipated climate-induced reduction in food production”, the project succeeded in building the resilience to climate change for direct beneficiaries and some of the non-beneficiaries who adopted project’s practices. This is clear in the increase in agricultural productivity  which has recorded 35%, the income diversification, the increased capacity of partner NGOs, water saving figures that recorded 20-25%, and increased community’s awareness of climate change issues. The wide-scale, long-term results have been successfully achieved through the project’s outreach, dissemination, and up-scaling strategy, as well as on the cooperation and capacity of the partner NGOs’ along with other stakeholders, most of which are affiliated to the Ministry of Agriculture. \nThe project was specifically distinguished in applying a participatory approach at all levels, beginning at the grassroots level, to the central level in Cairo, as well as and in all phases, beginning with project design and planning phase and  on to implementation of activities based on community ownership and responsibility. While most components achieved more than the planned, output 1.5 underachieved due to reasons highlighted in the risks section. Some remedial actions have already been taken, while others are yet to be implemented to enhance the performance of this output, the overall impact of which is expected to be seen in the upcoming year. "]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[{"$nulls":8},"Progress to Date","Rating"]
[null,null,null,"Progress on Key Milestones",null,"Expected Progress"]
[]
[null,null,"Implementing Agency  ","1.1. Community\nlevel mobilization\nand climate\nadaptation\nplanning\n(including\nawareness)",null,"Community mobilization activities and training of volunteers to raise awareness about climate change, weather variability, and impacts on agriculture, and potential preparedness techniques in agriculture and livestock to reach 37,300 beneficiaries in the old villages.  \n\nReplication of activities started in new neighboring villages through different mobilization activities to reach of 9000 beneficiaries.\n\nStakeholders mobilized to participate in planning and management of project activities. \n\n",null,null,"The project has effectively continued to mobilize communities, inform local stakeholders about climate change and its impacts on their livelihoods and engage volunteers to expand outreach and sustain services. The use of innovative tools, particularly the on-field live theatre performances, has been very successful in raising awareness and encouraging participation in the different project activities. The project's participatory approach to empower and engage the local NGOs and stakeholders, while time consuming, was very effective in creating a sense of ownership and an interest in actively participating in the planning, facilitation and monitoring of activities. Building on the project successes in its 14 villages, the project received and responded to requests from the local authorities and NGOs to expand to 6 other villages. Overall, some 40,000 beneficiaries were mobilized. Comparing against the work plan, the project has achieved the planned level of this output.","HS"]
[null,null,null,"1.2. Establishment\nof a climate\nchange and food\nsecurity\nmonitoring system",null,"  * Second version of software for providing early warning massages developed \n * Under the agreement signed between MALR, EEAA and EMA the design of an automatic unit in EMA   to provide 5 days prediction data completed.\n* Five governmental focal points trained to be in charge of obtaining climate information and adaptation guidance on a daily basis in the 5 climate centers established in the directorates    \n* Early warming messages relayed directly to 20,000 farmers.\n\n",null,null,"The second version of the software was successfully developed and published online. This version has expanded the software to include recommendations for safeguarding three crops - wheat, sorghum and sugar cane- against extreme weather events. Training of extension officers on the use of this version continued. Some 12,000 usages of the system have been recorded while some 20,000 farmers have been effectively receiving early warning messages. It is to be recorded that in May 2015, the system gave recommendations to reduce sorghum losses during a forecasted heat wave. Farmers that followed the recommendations recorded losses that are 80% less than those that didn't.","HS"]
[null,null,null,"1.3. Introduction\nand use of water\nsaving irrigation\nand other\nadaptation\ntechniques",null,"* 1500 acres benefiting from water saving techniques  \n* introduce solar panels as a source of electricity for pumping.\n*7500 farmers benefiting from the different water saving techniques introduced\n\n ",null,null,"Introduction of canal lining, soil laser leveling and other soft irrigation management techniques was successfully expanded to the 5 project governorates. The project's approach to build capacities of the local NGOs to host the WUAs and manage the different water saving techniques was very effective in institutionalizing these techniques and enhancing their sustainability. While most of the planned activities of this output were successfully implemented, the project's plan to start the use of solar energy did not materialize as planned due to reasons highlighted in the risks section.","S"]
[null,null,null,"1.4. Building\nresilience in\nagricultural\nproduction ",null,"* 700 extension fields implemented for introduction of heat tolerant varieties of common crops such as wheat, maize, sorghum and water-saving sugar cane varieties & dissemination of changing of sowing dates and intercropping practices and high value crops technical visits.\n* 500 extension field implemented for introduction of heat tolerant varieties and techniques of cash crops introduced.  \n* 12000 farmers to benefit from on-farm trainings and experts visits to introduce heat tolerant varieties and land consolidation techniques as well as provide technical support.\n* implement 50 training sessions and provide 4 simple post-harvest units to introduce simple post harvesting techniques \n * 2100 acres consolidated for enhanced production and reduced portion costs \n* 5 Farm-to-farm visits organized for 250 farmers.\n*14 small agricultural machines supplied to local NGOs to support localization of climate adaptation solutions. Rented out by the NGO to farmers, these machines support the farmers in implementing the introduced solutions while providing a sustainable source of income for the NGO to continue providing its different climate services to the community.\n  \n",null,null,"3 new wheat varieties were introduced for improved weather shock tolerance and reduced water consumption. Improved agricultural practices including raised bed cultivation, change of sowing dates and modified stem spacing continued. Intercropping of fava beans and sugar cane was effectively demonstrated. Very positive results were recorded- including 35% increases in productivity and 20-25% savings in water. Festive harvest days were organised, bringing together the different  stakeholders including villagers, NGOs, governmental staff and, covered by the local television and the Egyptian Satellite Agriculture channel, were very effective in case-showing the achieved results for up scaling and replication throughout the villages. In response to the increasing demands, almost three times the planned number of extension fields were implemented. Other planned targets under this output were successfully achieved.  ","HS"]
[null,null,null,"1.5. Building resilience through livestock and poultry production'",null,"* providing goats loan to 600 beneficiaries.  \n* 4200 beneficiaries trained on specifics of raising/keeping goats including nutrition.\n*6000 beneficiaries visiting the vet units for enhanced vet services; 15,000 having access to these services \n* start preparation for bee keeping loans programme in collaboration with partners NGOs.\n* 500 farmers engaged in trainings of alternative fodder preparation .\n\n",null,null,"The animal loans schemes were successfully started in the 5 governorates. 613 beneficiaries received their goats. Although preparations for the bee loans were successfully started, this type of lending has not actually started as planned in March 2016 due an unforeseen sudden request from the supplier (University of South Valley) to increase its supplying prices. The new prices were not accepted by the farmers and as this type of activity is tied to a very short season, the project was not able to secure another supplier for a timely start of this activity. The project is currently finding new suppliers so as to start this activity in the upcoming season (March-April 2017). The project- supported vet units are successfully serving the beneficiaries of the animal loans as well as other animal keepers in the villages. As the provided equipment are not available in other units, these units are now attracting animal keepers from other villages. Partner NGOs have successfully assumed the responsibility of managing the loans and the on-farm breading programme for the goats under the revolving fund scheme. The first batch of refund is expected to start in April 2016.  Trainings of beneficiaries for bee keeping has started in South Valley University for the effective management of their loan projects. However, due to the limited capacity of the University, the plan was to extend the training to the villages in the hives of the first batch of loan recipients. This was suspended for resumption when the first loans are issued. Thus the number of beneficiaries trained is less than the planned.  One alternative fodder model has been introduced, utilizing sorghum wastes. The rating of this output was decided because the activities planned for current reporting period progressed on track to achieve the outputs results, but with significant shortcomings- namely an underachievement in the planned figures of loans and training beneficiaries.\n","MS"]
[null,null,null," 2.1. Training of\ngovernment\ntechnical staff",null,"* Training of 150 governmental focal points on management of agro- meteorological data, communication skills and the utilization of the system developed under output 1.2 and means of dissemination information.\n*on-farm training and theoretical training for 660 extension workers in the project interventions under component 1 for governmental focal point\n* Enhance the capacity of local faculties of agriculture and agricultural schools to teach the project intervention under component 1\n",null,null,"Capacity building packages were effectively used to enhance capacities of 832 extension workers in several domains including use of agro-met data, communication and utilization of the early warning system developed by the project. An MOU was signed with the Extension Sector of the Ministry of Agriculture to institutionalize the Climate Change units established within the directorates in the Ministry's Organorgam. The planned results of the output were well achieved - in some instances, the achievement was higher than the target.","HS"]
[null,null,null,"Output 2.2 Documentation of lessons learned and best practice",null,"* 2500 users engage in the local practitioner’s network through Facebook groups.\n* One specialized TV channel adopting the project interventions\n*one documentary produced to document a success story \n*YouTube channel updated  \n",null,null,"Several knowledge and visibility products have been developed and used including a documentary. The On-line tools including the You-tube channel and Facebook groups have effectively increased the project visibility and outreach.  The planned activities were achieved on track, achieving the planned results of the output.  ","HS"]
[null,null,null,"Output 2.3 Sharing project results and lessons learned and mainstreaming new approaches in local and national planning",null,"* Presentations to Ministers and senior government officials\n* 60 Site visits by 300 relevant officials \n* 15 events organized for 300 beneficiaries to present their experiences to other potential beneficiaries \n* Annual workshop that joins project actors from community, department, regional and national levels organized to discuss opportunities and constraints, and share experience and learning. \n*15 meetings convened for local steering, Project steering and technical committees \n* Mid-term evaluation conducted.\n\n\n\n",null,null,"The project has been made visible at several levels through presentations to the minister of Agriculture and other senior officials. Site visits have also been effective in this regards. Information was effectively exchanged through 20 events in which some 420 farmers were involved in presenting their experiences in each. The annual workshop of the project implemented, successfully bring the different stakeholders together for experience sharing and team building.     ","HS"]
[null,null,null,"Output 2.4. Integration of climate adaptation solutions into University curriculum",null,"\n* 1750 universities and secondary schools students benefiting from trainings, field visits and practical interventions in experimental fields.\n \n",null,null,"The project successfully engaged 461 university and 863 secondary agricultural students, which is around 4 times the PD annual target. The project now collaborates with 3 Universities and 5 secondary schools","HS"]
[{"$nulls":8},"Overall Rating","S"]
[]
[null,null,"Please justify your rating.  Outline the positive and negative progress made by the project since it started.  Provide specific recommendations for next steps. . (word limit=500)","There has been an underachievement in the animal loans activities for several reasons that, as mentioned in the risks section, the project has and/or will address. Choosing a longer yet more sustainable approach to solar energy systems, the project was not able to introduce solar energy in irrigation as planned this year. Apart from that, a comparison of actual verses planned progress of all the outputs, concludes that the project has progressed very well. Several substantially positive results have been recorded including productivity increases of 35% reduced water consumption and thus fertilizer and production costs by 20-25%. Recorded reduction in losses in extreme weather events was a particular success. It was recorded that 25% of the extension fields for wheat cultivation implemented nationally were those of the project. Equally important, the different means mentioned in the lessons learned section and adopted by the project to engage and capacitate stakeholders were very successful in building ownership and enhancing potentials for sustainability after the project lifetime. Because of these results, the project is witnessing an increase in the numbers of farmers wishing to participate. Other farmers are now adopting some of the interventions at their own cost. Local units and NGOs from other villages are requesting expansion of the project activities in their villages."]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,"Please Provide the Name and Contact information of person(s) responsible for completing the Rating section",null,"Ithar Khalil "]
[null,null,null,"Name: ",null,"ithar.khalil@wfp.org"]
[null,null,null,"Email: "]
[{"$nulls":5},"Expected Progress",null,null,"Progress to Date","Rating"]
[null,null,null,"Progress on Key Milestones"]
[null,null,"Other"]
[]
[{"$nulls":8},"Overall Rating"]
[]
[null,null,null,"Please Provide the Name and Contact information of person(s) responsible for completing the Rating section"]
[null,null,null,"Name: "]
[null,null,null,"Email: "]
[]
[null,null,null,"Please justify your rating and address the following points:\n1. Indicate trends, both positive and negative, in achievement of outcomes as per the project indicators.  \n2.  Detail critical risks that have affected progress.  \n3.  Outline response to MTR undertaken this reporting period.  \n4.  Outline action plan to address projects with a rating of HU, U or MU. Please keep your input to 1200 words",null,null,null,"Rating Definitions"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Highly Satisfactory (HS)",null,"Project actions/activities planned for current reporting period are progressing on track or exceeding expectations to achieve all  major outcomes/outputs for given reporting period, without major shortcomings. The project can be presented as “good practice”."]
[{"$nulls":5},"Satisfactory (S)",null,"Project actions/activities planned for current reporting period  are progressing on track to achieve most of its major outcomes/outputs with only minor shortcomings."]
[{"$nulls":5},"Marginally Satisfactory (MS)",null,"Project actions/activities planned for current reporting period  are progressing on track to achieve most   major relevant outcomes/outputs, but with either significant shortcomings or modest overall relevance. "]
[{"$nulls":5},"Marginally Unsatisfactory (MU)",null,"Project actions/activities planned for current reporting period  are not progressing on track to achieve  major outcomes/outputs with major shortcomings or is expected to achieve only some of its major outcomes/outputs."]
[{"$nulls":5},"Unsatisfactory (U)",null,"Project actions/activities planned for current reporting period  are not progressing on track to achieve most of its major outcomes/outputs."]
[{"$nulls":5},"Highly Unsatisfactory (U)",null,"Project actions/activities planned for current reporting period  are not on track and shows that it is failing to achieve, and is not expected to achieve, any of its outcomes/outputs."]

{"sheet":"Results Tracker","index":6,"n_rows":323,"n_cols":19,"rows_kept":323,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[9,1,9,2],[18,3,18,6],[18,7,18,10],[18,11,18,14],[18,15,18,18],[19,1,22,1],[19,2,22,2],[24,3,24,6],[24,7,24,10],[24,11,24,14],[24,15,24,18],[25,11,25,12],[25,15,25,16],[26,17,27,17],[26,18,27,18],[28,1,37,1],[28,2,37,2],[26,10,27,10],[26,13,27,13],[26,14,27,14],[26,5,27,5],[26,6,27,6],[26,9,27,9],[39,7,40,7],[39,8,40,8],[45,3,46,3],[45,4,46,4],[45,7,46,7],[45,8,46,8],[25,1,27,1],[25,2,27,2],[25,3,25,4],[25,7,25,8],[39,11,40,11],[39,12,40,12],[38,1,49,1],[38,2,49,2],[39,3,40,3],[39,4,40,4],[39,15,40,15],[39,16,40,16],[42,3,43,3],[42,4,43,4],[42,7,43,7],[42,8,43,8],[42,11,43,11],[42,12,43,12],[42,15,43,15],[42,16,43,16],[45,11,46,11],[45,12,46,12],[45,15,46,15],[45,16,46,16],[48,15,49,15],[48,16,49,16],[51,3,51,6],[51,7,51,10],[51,11,51,14],[51,15,51,18],[48,3,49,3],[48,4,49,4],[48,7,49,7],[48,8,49,8],[48,11,49,11],[48,12,49,12],[53,13,54,13],[53,14,54,14],[53,17,54,17],[53,18,54,18],[55,1,58,1],[55,2,56,2],[55,5,55,6],[55,9,55,10],[55,13,55,14],[55,17,55,18],[52,1,54,1],[52,2,54,2],[52,3,52,4],[52,7,52,8],[52,11,52,12],[52,15,52,16],[53,5,54,5],[53,6,54,6],[53,9,54,9],[53,10,54,10],[56,5,56,6],[56,9,56,10],[56,13,56,14],[56,17,56,18],[61,3,61,4],[61,5,61,6],[61,7,61,8],[61,9,61,10],[57,2,58,2],[60,3,60,6],[60,7,60,10],[60,11,60,14],[60,15,60,18],[61,11,61,12],[61,13,61,14],[61,15,61,16],[61,17,61,18],[64,13,64,14],[64,17,64,18],[66,3,66,6],[66,7,66,10],[66,11,66,14],[66,15,66,18],[62,15,62,16],[62,17,62,18],[63,1,64,1],[63,2,64,2],[63,5,63,6],[63,9,63,10],[63,13,63,14],[63,17,63,18],[64,5,64,6],[64,9,64,10],[61,1,62,1],[61,2,62,2],[62,3,62,4],[62,5,62,6],[62,7,62,8],[62,9,62,10],[62,11,62,12],[62,13,62,14],[69,9,69,10],[69,13,69,14],[69,17,69,18],[70,5,70,6],[70,9,70,10],[70,13,70,14],[70,17,70,18],[67,17,67,18],[67,1,75,1],[67,2,68,2],[67,5,67,6],[68,5,68,6],[69,2,75,2],[69,5,69,6],[71,5,71,6],[73,5,73,6],[75,5,75,6],[73,9,73,10],[73,13,73,14],[73,17,73,18],[74,5,74,6],[74,9,74,10],[74,13,74,14],[74,17,74,18],[71,9,71,10],[71,13,71,14],[71,17,71,18],[72,5,72,6],[72,9,72,10],[72,13,72,14],[72,17,72,18],[75,9,75,10],[75,13,75,14],[75,17,75,18],[79,8,79,9],[79,12,79,13],[79,16,79,17],[78,16,78,17],[80,4,80,5],[80,8,80,9],[80,12,80,13],[80,16,80,17],[77,8,77,9],[77,12,77,13],[77,16,77,17],[78,4,78,5],[78,8,78,9],[78,12,78,13],[84,15,84,18],[85,1,86,1],[85,2,86,2],[85,3,85,4],[85,7,85,8],[85,11,85,12],[85,15,85,16],[86,3,86,4],[84,7,84,10],[84,11,84,14],[81,12,81,13],[81,16,81,17],[82,4,82,5],[82,8,82,9],[82,12,82,13],[82,16,82,17],[76,1,82,1],[76,2,82,2],[76,4,76,5],[76,8,76,9],[76,12,76,13],[76,16,76,17],[77,4,77,5],[79,4,79,5],[81,4,81,5],[81,8,81,9],[87,1,98,1],[87,2,98,2],[88,3,89,3],[88,4,89,4],[88,5,89,5],[84,3,84,6],[88,6,89,6],[94,3,95,3],[94,4,95,4],[94,5,95,5],[88,18,89,18],[91,3,92,3],[91,4,92,4],[91,5,92,5],[91,6,92,6],[91,7,92,7],[91,8,92,8],[91,9,92,9],[91,10,92,10],[91,11,92,11],[88,12,89,12],[88,13,89,13],[88,14,89,14],[88,15,89,15],[88,16,89,16],[88,17,89,17],[88,7,89,7],[88,8,89,8],[88,9,89,9],[88,10,89,10],[88,11,89,11],[91,18,92,18],[91,12,92,12],[91,13,92,13],[91,14,92,14],[91,15,92,15],[94,6,95,6],[94,7,95,7],[94,8,95,8],[94,9,95,9],[94,10,95,10],[94,11,95,11],[91,16,92,16],[91,17,92,17],[94,18,95,18],[94,12,95,12],[101,1,110,1],[101,2,102,2],[101,5,101,6],[101,9,101,10],[101,13,101,14],[97,12,98,12],[97,14,98,14],[97,15,98,15],[102,5,102,6],[102,9,102,10],[102,13,102,14],[97,9,98,9],[97,10,98,10],[103,2,110,2],[100,3,100,6],[100,7,100,10],[100,11,100,14],[97,3,98,3],[97,4,98,4],[97,5,98,5],[97,6,98,6],[97,7,98,7],[97,8,98,8],[125,15,125,18],[121,12,121,13],[122,12,122,13],[123,12,123,13],[118,17,118,18],[119,17,119,18],[120,17,120,18],[121,17,121,18],[122,17,122,18],[126,7,126,10],[126,11,126,14],[111,1,123,1],[111,2,112,2],[116,2,123,2],[116,4,116,5],[117,4,117,5],[118,4,118,5],[119,4,119,5],[125,11,125,14],[118,8,118,9],[119,8,119,9],[120,8,120,9],[121,8,121,9],[122,8,122,9],[123,17,123,18],[123,8,123,9],[118,12,118,13],[119,12,119,13],[120,12,120,13],[123,4,123,5],[125,3,125,6],[125,7,125,10],[120,4,120,5],[121,4,121,5],[122,4,122,5],[1,2,1,6],[5,1,5,6],[6,1,6,6],[7,1,7,6],[2,2,2,6],[131,12,131,13],[67,9,67,10],[68,9,68,10],[67,13,67,14],[68,13,68,14],[131,16,131,17],[130,2,131,2],[130,4,130,5],[130,8,130,9],[130,12,130,13],[130,16,130,17],[131,4,131,5],[131,8,131,9],[126,15,126,18],[127,3,127,6],[127,7,127,10],[127,11,127,14],[127,15,127,18],[128,1,131,1],[128,2,129,2],[126,1,127,1],[126,2,127,2],[126,3,126,6],[68,17,68,18],[116,8,116,9],[117,8,117,9],[116,12,116,13],[117,12,117,13],[117,17,117,18],[116,17,116,18],[100,15,100,18],[97,16,98,16],[97,17,98,17],[102,17,102,18],[97,18,98,18],[97,11,98,11],[94,13,95,13],[94,14,95,14],[94,15,95,15],[94,16,95,16],[94,17,95,17],[101,17,101,18],[97,13,98,13]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,"Results Tracker for Adaptation Fund (AF)  Projects    "]
[]
[]
[null,"Goal: Assist developing-country Parties to the Kyoto Protocol that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change in meeting the costs of concrete adaptation projects and programmes in order to implement climate-resilient measures. \nImpact: Increased resiliency at the community, national, and regional levels to climate variability and change. "]
[null,"Important: Please read the following guidance document (also posted on the Adaptation Fund website) before entering your data "]
[null,"Link: http://www.adaptation-fund.org/sites/default/files/Results%20Framework%20and%20Baseline%20Guidance%20final.pdf"]
[]
[null,"Adaptation Fund Strategic Results Framework"]
[]
[null,"Project ID"]
[null,"Implementing Entity","WFP"]
[null,"Type of implementing entity","MIE"]
[null,"Country","Egypt"]
[null,"Region","Africa"]
[null,"Sector","Agriculture"]
[]
[null,null,null,"Baseline information",null,null,null,"Target performance at completion",null,null,null,"Performance at mid-term",null,null,null,"Performance at completion"]
[null,"Impact: Increased resiliency at the community, national, and regional levels to climate variability and change","Core Indicator: No. of beneficiaries",null,"Total (direct + indirect beneficiaries)","Direct beneficiaries supported by the project","Indirect beneficiaries supported by the project",null,"Total (direct + indirect beneficiaries)","Direct beneficiaries supported by the project","Indirect beneficiaries supported by the project",null,"Total (direct + indirect beneficiaries)","Direct beneficiaries supported by the project","Indirect beneficiaries supported by the project",null,"Total (direct + indirect beneficiaries)","Direct beneficiaries supported by the project","Indirect beneficiaries supported by the project"]
[null,null,null,"Total",0,0,0,"Total",48000,20000,28000,"Total",26000,14000,12000,"Total"]
[null,null,null,"% of female beneficiaries",0,0,0,"% of female beneficiaries",0.4,0.4,0.4,"% of female beneficiaries",0.25,0.25,0.25,"% of female beneficiaries"]
[null,null,null,"% of Youth beneficiaries",0,0,0,"% of Youth beneficiaries",0.2,0.2,0.2,"% of Youth beneficiaries",0.11,0.11,0.11,"% of Youth beneficiaries"]
[]
[null,null,null,"Baseline information",null,null,null,"Target performance at completion",null,null,null,"Performance at mid-term",null,null,null,"Performance at completion"]
[null,"Outcome 1: Reduced exposure to climate-related hazards and threats","Indicator 1: Relevant threat and hazard information generated and disseminated to stakeholders on a timely basis","Number of targeted stakeholders",null,"Hazards information generated and disseminated","Overall effectiveness","Number of targeted stakeholders",null,"Hazards information generated and disseminated","Overall effectiveness","Number of targeted stakeholders",null,"Hazards information generated and disseminated","Overall effectiveness","Number of targeted stakeholders",null,"Hazards information generated and disseminated","Overall effectiveness"]
[null,null,null,"Total",0,"Drought","4: Effective",100,null,"Drought","4: Effective","Total",65,"Drought","4: Effective","Total"]
[null,null,null,"% of female targeted",0,null,null,20,null,null,null,"% of female targeted",0.12,null,null,"% of female targeted"]
[null,"Output 1.1 Risk and vulnerability assessments conducted and updated","Indicator 1.1: No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status","No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status","No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status","No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status"]
[]
[null,null,null,"No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status","No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status","No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status","No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status"]
[]
[null,null,null,"No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status","No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status","No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status","No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status"]
[]
[null,null,null,"No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status","No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status","No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status","No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status"]
[]
[null,null,null,"No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status","No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status","No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status","No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status"]
[]
[null,"Output 1.2 Targeted population groups covered by adequate risk reduction systems","Core Indicator 1.2: No. of Early Warning Systems","No. of adopted Early Warning Systems","Category targeted","Hazard",null,"No. of adopted Early Warning Systems","Category targeted","Hazard",null,"No. of adopted Early Warning Systems","Category targeted","Hazard",null,"No. of adopted Early Warning Systems","Category targeted","Hazard"]
[null,null,null,0,"2: Monitoring and warning service","Geographical coverage","Local",4,"2: Monitoring and warning service","Geographical coverage","Local",null,null,"Geographical coverage",null,null,null,"Geographical coverage"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Number of municipalities",0,null,null,"Number of municipalities",null,null,null,"Number of municipalities",20,null,null,"Number of municipalities"]
[null,null,null,"No. of adopted Early Warning Systems","Category targeted","Hazard",null,"No. of adopted Early Warning Systems","Category targeted","Hazard",null,"No. of adopted Early Warning Systems","Category targeted","Hazard",null,"No. of adopted Early Warning Systems","Category targeted","Hazard"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Geographical coverage",null,null,null,"Geographical coverage",null,null,null,"Geographical coverage",null,null,null,"Geographical coverage"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Number of municipalities",null,null,null,"Number of municipalities",null,null,null,"Number of municipalities",null,null,null,"Number of municipalities"]
[null,null,null,"No. of adopted Early Warning Systems","Category targeted","Hazard",null,"No. of adopted Early Warning Systems","Category targeted","Hazard",null,"No. of adopted Early Warning Systems","Category targeted","Hazard",null,"No. of adopted Early Warning Systems","Category targeted","Hazard"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Geographical coverage",null,null,null,"Geographical coverage",null,null,null,"Geographical coverage",null,null,null,"Geographical coverage"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Number of municipalities",null,null,null,"Number of municipalities",null,null,null,"Number of municipalities",null,null,null,"Number of municipalities"]
[null,null,null,"No. of adopted Early Warning Systems","Category targeted","Hazard",null,"No. of adopted Early Warning Systems","Category targeted","Hazard",null,"No. of adopted Early Warning Systems","Category targeted","Hazard",null,"No. of adopted Early Warning Systems","Category targeted","Hazard"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Geographical coverage",null,null,null,"Geographical coverage",null,null,null,"Geographical coverage",null,null,null,"Geographical coverage"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Number of municipalities",null,null,null,"Number of municipalities",null,null,null,"Number of municipalities",null,null,null,"Number of municipalities"]
[]
[null,null,null,"Baseline information",null,null,null,"Target performance at completion",null,null,null,"Performance at mid-term",null,null,null,"Performance at completion"]
[null,"Outcome 2: Strengthened institutional capacity to reduce risks associated with climate-induced socioeconomic and environmental losses","Indicator 2: Capacity of staff to respond to, and mitigate impacts of, climate-related events from targeted institutions increased","Number of staff targeted",null,"Sector","Capacity level","Number of staff targeted",null,"Sector","Capacity level","Number of staff targeted",null,"Sector","Capacity level","Number of staff targeted",null,"Sector","Capacity level"]
[null,null,null,"Total",0,null,null,"Total",300,"Agriculture","4: High capacity","Total",180,"Agriculture","4: High capacity","Total"]
[null,null,null,"% of female targeted",0,null,null,"% of female targeted",0.4,null,null,"% of female targeted",0.35,null,null,"% of female targeted"]
[null,"Output 2.1 Strengthened capacity of national and sub-national centres and networks to respond rapidly to extreme weather events","Indicator 2.1.1: No. of staff trained to respond to, and mitigate impacts of, climate-related events","Total staff trained","% of female staff trained","Type",null,"Total staff trained","% of female staff trained","Type",null,"Total staff trained","% of female staff trained","Type",null,"Total staff trained","% of female staff trained","Type"]
[]
[null,null,"Indicator 2.1.2: No. of targeted institutions with increased capacity to minimize exposure to climate variability risks","Type","Scale","Sector","Capacity level","Type","Scale","Sector","Capacity level","Type","Scale","Sector","Capacity level","Type","Scale","Sector","Capacity level"]
[null,null,null,"NGO","Local","Agriculture","1: No capacity","NGO","Local","Agriculture","3: Medium capacity"]
[]
[null,null,null,"Baseline information",null,null,null,"Target performance at completion",null,null,null,"Performance at mid-term",null,null,null,"Performance at completion"]
[null,"Outcome 3: Strengthened awareness and owernship of adaptation and climate risk reduction processes","Indicator 3.1: Increase in application of appropriate adaptation responses","Percentage of targeted population applying adaptation measures",null,"Sector",null,"Percentage of targeted population applying adaptation measures",null,"Sector",null,"Percentage of targeted population applying adaptation measures",null,"Sector",null,"Percentage of targeted population applying adaptation measures",null,"Sector"]
[]
[null,"Output 3: Targeted population groups participating in adaptation and risk reduction awareness activities ","Indicator 3.1.1: Percentage in targeted population awareness of predicted adverse impacts of climate change, and of appropriate responses","No. of targeted beneficiaries","% of female participants targeted","Level of awareness",null,"No. of targeted beneficiaries","% of female participants targeted","Level of awareness",null,"No. of targeted beneficiaries","% of female participants targeted","Level of awareness",null,"No. of targeted beneficiaries","% of female participants targeted","Level of awareness"]
[null,null,null,0,0,"1: Aware of neither",null,130000,0.4,"5: Fully aware",null,90000,40,"5: Fully aware"]
[]
[null,null,null,"Baseline information",null,null,null,"Target performance at completion",null,null,null,"Target performance at completion",null,null,null,"Target performance at completion"]
[null,"Outcome 4: Increased adaptive capacity within relevant development sector services and infrastructure assets","Indicator 4.1: Increased responsiveness of development sector services to evolving needs from changing and variable climate","Project/programme sector","Geographical scale","Response level",null,"Project/programme sector","Geographical scale","Response level",null,"Project/programme sector","Geographical scale","Response level",null,"Project/programme sector","Geographical scale","Response level"]
[]
[null,null,"Core Indicator 4.2: Assets produced, developed, improved or strengthened","Sector","Targeted asset","Changes in asset (quantitative or qualitative)",null,"Sector","Targeted asset","Changes in asset (quantitative or qualitative)",null,"Sector","Targeted asset","Changes in asset (quantitative or qualitative)",null,"Sector","Targeted asset","Changes in asset (quantitative or qualitative)"]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,"Output 4: Vulnerable development sector services and infrastructure assets strengthened in response to climate change impacts, including variability","Indicator 4.1.1: No. and type of development sector services to respond to new conditions resulting from climate variability and change","Number of services","Type",null,"Sector","Number of services","Type",null,"Sector","Number of services","Type",null,"Sector","Number of services","Type",null,"Sector"]
{"$rows_empty":7}
[null,null,null,"Baseline information",null,null,null,"Baseline information",null,null,null,"Baseline information",null,null,null,"Baseline information"]
[null,"Outcome 5: Increased ecosystem resilience in response to climate change and variability-induced stress","Indicator 5: Ecosystem services and natural resource assets maintained or improved under climate change and variability-induced stress","Natural resource improvement level",null,"Sector","Type","Natural resource improvement level",null,"Sector","Type","Natural resource improvement level",null,"Sector","Type","Natural resource improvement level",null,"Sector","Type"]
[]
[null,"Output 5: Vulnerable ecosystem services and natural resource assets strengthned in response to climate change impacts, including variability","Core Indicator 5.1: Natural Assets protected or rehabilitated","Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)","Total number of natural assets or ecosystems protected/rehabilitated","Unit","Effectiveness of protection/rehabilitation","Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)","Total number of natural assets or ecosystems protected/rehabilitated","Unit","Effectiveness of protection/rehabilitation","Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)","Total number of natural assets or ecosystems protected/rehabilitated","Unit","Effectiveness of protection/rehabilitation","Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)","Total number of natural assets or ecosystems protected/rehabilitated","Unit","Effectiveness of protection/rehabilitation"]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,"Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)","Total number of natural assets or ecosystems protected/rehabilitated","Unit","Effectiveness of protection/rehabilitation","Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)","Total number of natural assets or ecosystems protected/rehabilitated","Unit","Effectiveness of protection/rehabilitation","Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)","Total number of natural assets or ecosystems protected/rehabilitated","Unit","Effectiveness of protection/rehabilitation","Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)","Total number of natural assets or ecosystems protected/rehabilitated","Unit","Effectiveness of protection/rehabilitation"]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,"Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)","Total number of natural assets or ecosystems protected/rehabilitated","Unit","Effectiveness of protection/rehabilitation","Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)","Total number of natural assets or ecosystems protected/rehabilitated","Unit","Effectiveness of protection/rehabilitation","Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)","Total number of natural assets or ecosystems protected/rehabilitated","Unit","Effectiveness of protection/rehabilitation","Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)","Total number of natural assets or ecosystems protected/rehabilitated","Unit","Effectiveness of protection/rehabilitation"]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,"Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)","Total number of natural assets or ecosystems protected/rehabilitated","Unit","Effectiveness of protection/rehabilitation","Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)","Total number of natural assets or ecosystems protected/rehabilitated","Unit","Effectiveness of protection/rehabilitation","Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)","Total number of natural assets or ecosystems protected/rehabilitated","Unit","Effectiveness of protection/rehabilitation","Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)","Total number of natural assets or ecosystems protected/rehabilitated","Unit","Effectiveness of protection/rehabilitation"]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,"Baseline information",null,null,null,"Targeted performance at completion",null,null,null,"Performance at mid-term",null,null,null,"Performance at completion"]
[null,"Outcome 6: Diversified and strengthened livelihoods and sources of income for vulnerable people in targeted areas","Indicator 6.1: Increase in households and communities having more secure access to livelihood assets","No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","Improvement level",null,"No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","Improvement level",null,"No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","Improvement level",null,"No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","Improvement level"]
[]
[null,null,"Indicator 6.2: Increase in targeted population's sustained climate-resilient alternative livelihoods","No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","% increase in income level vis-à-vis baseline","Alternate Source","No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","% increase in income level vis-à-vis baseline","Alternate Source","No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","% increase in income level vis-à-vis baseline","Alternate Source","No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","% increase in income level vis-à-vis baseline","Alternate Source"]
[null,null,null,0,0,"From 0 to 0.5%","Agricultural-related"]
[null,null,null,"No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","% increase in income level vis-à-vis baseline","Alternate Source","No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","% increase in income level vis-à-vis baseline","Alternate Source","No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","% increase in income level vis-à-vis baseline","Alternate Source","No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","% increase in income level vis-à-vis baseline","Alternate Source"]
[]
[null,null,null,"No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","% increase in income level vis-à-vis baseline","Alternate Source","No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","% increase in income level vis-à-vis baseline","Alternate Source","No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","% increase in income level vis-à-vis baseline","Alternate Source","No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","% increase in income level vis-à-vis baseline","Alternate Source"]
[]
[null,null,null,"No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","% increase in income level vis-à-vis baseline","Alternate Source","No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","% increase in income level vis-à-vis baseline","Alternate Source","No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","% increase in income level vis-à-vis baseline","Alternate Source","No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","% increase in income level vis-à-vis baseline","Alternate Source"]
[]
[null,"Output 6 Targeted individual and community livelihood strategies strengthened in relation to climate change impacts, including variability","Indicator 6.1.1: No. and type of adaptation assets created or strengthened in support of individual or community livelihood strategies","Number of Assets","Type of Assets","Sector","Adaptation strategy","Number of Assets","Type of Assets","Sector","Adaptation strategy","Number of Assets","Type of Assets","Sector","Adaptation strategy","Number of Assets","Type of Assets","Sector","Adaptation strategy"]
[null,null,null,0,null,null,null,6,"Physical capital","Water management","Irrigation system"]
[null,null,null,0,null,null,null,14,"Human capital","Multi-sector","Community-based adaptation"]
[null,null,null,0,null,null,null,14,"Financial capital","Food security","Microfinance"]
[null,null,0,0,null,null,null,20,"Financial capital","Agriculture","ICT and information dissemination"]
[null,null,"Core Indicator 6.1.2: Increased income, or avoided decrease in income","Number of households (total number in the project area)","Income source",null,"Income level (USD)","Number of households (total number in the project area)","Income source",null,"Income level (USD)","Number of households (total number in the project area)","Income source",null,"Income level (USD)","Number of households (total number in the project area)","Income source","Income source"]
[null,null,null,28000,"Agriculture",null,1,28000,"Agriculture",null,1.2]
[null,null,null,"Number of households (total number in the project area)","Income source",null,"Income level (USD)","Number of households (total number in the project area)","Income source",null,"Income level (USD)","Number of households (total number in the project area)","Income source",null,"Income level (USD)","Number of households (total number in the project area)","Income source","Income source"]
[]
[null,null,null,"Number of households (total number in the project area)","Income source",null,"Income level (USD)","Number of households (total number in the project area)","Income source",null,"Income level (USD)","Number of households (total number in the project area)","Income source",null,"Income level (USD)","Number of households (total number in the project area)","Income source","Income source"]
[]
[null,null,null,"Number of households (total number in the project area)","Income source",null,"Income level (USD)","Number of households (total number in the project area)","Income source",null,"Income level (USD)","Number of households (total number in the project area)","Income source",null,"Income level (USD)","Number of households (total number in the project area)","Income source","Income source"]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,"Baseline information",null,null,null,"Target performance at completion",null,null,null,"Performance at mid-term",null,null,null,"Performance at completion"]
[null,"Outcome 7: Improved policies and regulations that promote and enforce resilience measures","Indicator 7: Climate change priorities are integrated into national development strategy","Integration level",null,null,null,"Integration level",null,null,null,"Integration level",null,null,null,"Integration level"]
[]
[null,"Output 7:Improved integration of climate-resilience strategies into country development plans","Indicator 7.1: No. of policies introduced or adjusted to address climate change risks","No. of Policies introduced or adjusted","Sector","Scale","Type","No. of Policies introduced or adjusted","Sector","Scale","Type","No. of Policies introduced or adjusted","Sector","Scale","Type","No. of Policies introduced or adjusted","Sector","Scale","Type"]
[]
[null,null,"Indicator 7.2: No. of targeted development strategies with incorporated climate change priorities enforced","No. of Development strategies","Regulation",null,"Effectiveness","No. of Development strategies","Regulation",null,"Effectiveness","No. of Development strategies","Regulation",null,"Effectiveness","No. of Development strategies","Regulation",null,"Effectiveness"]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,"Glacier lake outburst flood"]
[null,null,null,"Inland flooding","fr","biological assets",null,"Company policy","5: Fully enforced (All elements implemented)"]
[null,null,null,"Salinization","Decrease","land",null,"Communication & Information policy","4: Enforced (Most elements implemented)"]
[null,null,null,"Drought","Same","water areas",null,"Defense policy","3: Partially enforced (Some elements implemented)"]
[null,null,null,"Wind",null,"subsoil assets","increased adpative capacity","Domestic policy","2: Partially not enforced (Most elements not implemented)",null,"Agribusiness"]
[null,null,null,"Coastal flooding",null,"air","achieved","Economic policy","1: Not enforced (No elements implemented)",null,"Agricultural-related","Financial capital"]
[null,null,null,"Storm surge","Please choose",null,"enhanced level of protection","Education policy",null,null,"Agriculture","Human capital"]
[null,null,null,"Hurricane","Selected",{"$nulls":5},"Aquaculture","Physical capital"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Not relevant",null,null,"5: All (Fully integrated)",null,null,"Construction/repairing business","Social capital"]
[{"$nulls":7},"4: Most",null,null,"Cultivation","Natural capital"]
[{"$nulls":7},"3: Some",null,null,"Fishing","Personal capital"]
[null,"Select","5: All","Select",null,null,"Community","2: Most not integrated",null,"Other","Forestry","Adaptation strategies"]
[null,1,"4: Almost all","Private","Type","Yes","Multi-community","1: None",null,"Agriculture","Handicrafts"]
[null,2,"3: Half","Public","Scale","No","Departmental",null,null,"Coastal management","Livestock production"]
[null,3,"2: Some","NGO","Sector",null,"National",null,null,"Disaster risk reduction","Manufacturing"]
[null,4,"1: None",{"$nulls":4},"5: Very high improvement","Established","Food security","other"]
[null,null,null,"National",null,null,null,"4: High improvement","Maintained","Health ","Services"]
[null,null,null,"Regional",null,null,null,"3: Moderate improvement","Improved","Urban development","Tourism-related"]
[null,null,null,"Local",null,null,null,"2: Limited improvement",null,"Water management","Trading"]
[{"$nulls":7},"1: No improvement",null,"Multi-sector"]
[null,null,null,"1 -generated information is irrelevant, and neither the stakeholders reached nor the timeframe managed were achieved","1: No info transferred on time","4: High capacity","5: Fully aware","5: Highly responsive (All defined elements )","5: Fully improved","Roads","5: Very effective"]
[null,"Asia-Pacific","NIE","2 -the existence of some challenge in any of the three aspects of the indicator (generation of dissemination, stakeholders reached or timeframe managed)","2: Somewhat info transferred","3: Medium capacity","4: Mostly aware","4: Mostly responsive (Most defined elements)","4: Mostly Improved","Gov Buildings","4: Effective"]
[null,"Latin America and Caribbean","RIE","3 -relevant information is generated and disseminated to all identified stakeholders on timely basis","3: Info transferred on time","2: Low capacity","3: Partially aware","3: Moderately responsive (Some defined elements)","3: Moderately improved","Causeways","3: Moderately effective"]
[null,"Africa","MIE",null,null,"1: No capacity","2: Partially not aware","2: Partially responsive (Lacks most elements)","2: Somewhat improved","Airports","2: Partially effective"]
[null,"Eastern Europe",{"$nulls":4},"1: Aware of neither","1: Non responsive (Lacks all elements )","1: Not improved","Schools","1: Ineffective"]
[null,null,"ha protected",{"$nulls":6},"Training Centres"]
[null,null,"ha rehabilitated",{"$nulls":5},"Monitoring/Forecasting capacity","Hospitals"]
[null,"Afghanistan, Islamic Rep. of","km protected",{"$nulls":5},"Policy/regulatory reform","Drinking water systems"]
[null,"Angola","km rehabilitated","1: Risk knowledge","1: No plans conducted or updated",null,null,null,"Capacity development","Other"]
[null,"Albania",null,"2: Monitoring and warning service","2: Undertaking or updating of assessments in progress",null,null,"Communication & Information policy","Sustainable forest management"]
[null,"Argentina",null,"3: Dissemination and communication","3: Risk and vulnterability assessments completed or updated",null,null,"Domestic policy","Strengthening infrastructure","1: Health and Social Infrastructure (developed/improved)"]
[null,"Armenia","Forests","4: Response capability",null,null,null,"Economic policy","Supporting livelihoods","2: Physical asset (produced/improved/strenghtened)"]
[null,"Antigua and Barbuda","Mangroves",{"$nulls":4},"Education policy","Mangrove reforestation"]
[null,"Azerbaijan","Coasts",null,"From 0 to 0.5%",null,null,"Energy policy","Coastal drainage and infrastructure"]
[null,"Burundi","Rangelands",null,"From 0.5 to 1%",null,null,"Environmental policy","Irrigation system"]
[null,"Benin","Cultivated land/Agricultural land",null,"From 1% to 5%",null,null,"Foreign policy","Community-based adaptation"]
[null,"Burkina Faso","Catchment area/Watershed/Aquifer",null,"From 5% to 10%",null,null,"Health policy","Erosion control"]
[null,"Bangladesh","Protected areas/National parks",null,"From 10% to 20%",null,null,"Housing policy","Soil water conservation"]
[null,"Bulgaria","Other",null,"From 20% to 30%",null,null,"Human resource policies","Microfinance"]
[null,"Bahrain",null,null,"From 30% to 40%",null,null,"Information policy","Special Program for women"]
[null,"Bahamas, The",null,null,"From 40% to 50%",null,null,"Macroeconomic policy","Livelihoods"]
[null,"Bosnia and Herzegovina",null,null,"Above 50%",null,null,"Monetary policy","Water storage"]
[null,"Belarus",{"$nulls":5},"Population policy","ICT and information dissemination"]
[null,"Belize",{"$nulls":5},"Private policy"]
[null,"Bolivia",{"$nulls":5},"Public policy"]
[null,"Brazil",{"$nulls":5},"Science policy"]
[null,"Barbados",{"$nulls":5},"Social policy"]
[null,"Bhutan",null,"3- relevant information is generated and disseminated to all identified stakeholders on timely basis",null,null,null,"Transportation policy"]
[null,"Botswana",null,"describe",null,null,null,"Urban policy"]
[null,"Central African Republic",null,"2- the existence of some challenge in any of the three aspects of the indicator",null,null,null,"Water policy"]
[null,"Chile",null,"describe",null,null,null,"Other policy"]
[null,"China, People's Republic of",null,"1- generated information is irrelevant and neither the stakeholders reached nor the timeframe managed were achieved"]
[null,"Cote d'Ivoire",null,"describe"]
[null,"Cameroon"]
[null,"Congo, Dem. Rep. of"]
[null,"Congo, Republic of"]
[null,"Cook Islands"]
[null,"Colombia"]
[null,"Comoros"]
[null,"Cape Verde"]
[null,"Costa Rica"]
[null,"Cuba"]
[null,"Czech Republic"]
[null,"Djibouti"]
[null,"Dominica"]
[null,"Dominican Republic"]
[null,"Algeria"]
[null,"Ecuador"]
[null,"Egypt"]
[null,"Eritrea"]
[null,"Estonia"]
[null,"Ethiopia"]
[null,"Fiji"]
[null,"Micronesia, Fed. States of"]
[null,"Gabon"]
[null,"Georgia"]
[null,"Ghana"]
[null,"Guinea"]
[null,"Gambia, The"]
[null,"Guinea-Bissau"]
[null,"Equatorial Guinea"]
[null,"Grenada"]
[null,"Guatemala"]
[null,"Guyana"]
[null,"Honduras"]
[null,"Croatia"]
[null,"Haiti"]
[null,"Hungary"]
[null,"Indonesia"]
[null,"India"]
[null,"Iran, Islamic Republic of"]
[null,"Jamaica"]
[null,"Jordan"]
[null,"Kazakhstan"]
[null,"Kenya"]
[null,"Kyrgyz Republic"]
[null,"Cambodia"]
[null,"Kiribati"]
[null,"Saint Kitts and Nevis"]
[null,"Korea, Republic of"]
[null,"Lao People's Democratic Republic"]
[null,"Lebanon"]
[null,"Liberia"]
[null,"Libya"]
[null,"Saint Lucia"]
[null,"Sri Lanka"]
[null,"Lesotho"]
[null,"Lithuania"]
[null,"Latvia"]
[null,"Morocco"]
[null,"Moldova"]
[null,"Madagascar"]
[null,"Maldives"]
[null,"Mexico"]
[null,"Marshall Islands"]
[null,"Macedonia, former Yugoslav Republic of"]
[null,"Mali"]
[null,"Malta"]
[null,"Myanmar"]
[null,"Montenegro"]
[null,"Mongolia"]
[null,"Mozambique"]
[null,"Mauritania"]
[null,"Mauritius"]
[null,"Malawi"]
[null,"Malaysia"]
[null,"Namibia"]
[null,"Niger"]
[null,"Nigeria"]
[null,"Nicaragua"]
[null,"Niue"]
[null,"Nepal"]
[null,"Nauru"]
[null,"Oman"]
[null,"Pakistan"]
[null,"Panama"]
[null,"Peru"]
[null,"Philippines"]
[null,"Palau"]
[null,"Papua New Guinea"]
[null,"Poland"]
[null,"Korea, Dem. People's Rep. of"]
[null,"Paraguay"]
[null,"Romania"]
[null,"Russian Federation"]
[null,"Rwanda"]
[null,"Saudi Arabia"]
[null,"Sudan"]
[null,"Senegal"]
[null,"Solomon Islands"]
[null,"Sierra Leone"]
[null,"El Salvador"]
[null,"San Marino"]
[null,"Serbia"]
[null,"Sao Tome and Principe"]
[null,"Suriname"]
[null,"Slovak Republic"]
[null,"Slovenia"]
[null,"Swaziland"]
[null,"Seychelles"]
[null,"Syrian Arab Republic"]
[null,"Chad"]
[null,"Togo"]
[null,"Thailand"]
[null,"Tajikistan"]
[null,"Turkmenistan"]
[null,"Tonga"]
[null,"Trinidad and Tobago"]
[null,"Tunisia"]
[null,"Turkey"]
[null,"Tuvalu"]
[null,"Tanzania"]
[null,"Uganda"]
[null,"Ukraine"]
[null,"Uruguay"]
[null,"Uzbekistan"]
[null,"Saint Vincent and the Grenadines"]
[null,"Venezuela"]
[null,"Vietnam"]
[null,"Vanuatu"]
[null,"Samoa"]
[null,"Yemen, Republic of"]
[null,"South Africa"]
[null,"Zambia"]
[null,"Zimbabwe"]
[null,"Timor-Leste"]

{"sheet":"Units for Indicators","index":7,"n_rows":4,"n_cols":2,"rows_kept":4,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null," Fund Outcome Indicator Units"]
[null,"1. Generation of relevant data, Stakeholders, and Timeliness \n2.1. Include both qualitative and quantitative measures of capacity level within targeted institutions\n2.2. Number (men and women and other vulnerable groups)\n3.1. Use scale from 1 to 5: 5: Fully aware 4: Mostly aware 3: Partially aware 2: Partially not aware 1: Aware of neither predicted adverse impacts of climate change nor of appropriate responses\n3.2. Use scale from 1 to 5:  5: All 4: Almost all 3: Half 2: Some 1: None\n4.1. Summarize in an overall scale (1-5): 5: Highly responsive (All defined elements ) 4: Mostly responsive (Most defined elements) 3: Moderately responsive (Some defined elements) 2: Partially responsive (Lacks most elements) 1: Non responsive (Lacks all elements )                                                                                                                                                                                                                    4.2.  Summarize in an overall scale (1-5):  5: Fully improved 4: Mostly Improved 3: Moderately improved 2: Somewhat improved\n1: Not improved                                                                                                                                                                                                                           5.  Depends on the targeted natural asset: \nBiological (species): measure through changes in population numbers (dynamics, structure, etc.)\nLand: measure changes in hectares. Baseline data will be necessary to estimate the change. Supporting indicators baseline and target (as well as contextual information) are needed such as the following: Farmers adopting recommended technologies, Ha. of land improved, Average deforestation rate Etc.\nUse scale from 1 to 5.  5: Very effective (All elements are present) 4: Effective (Most elements are present) 3: Moderately effective (Some elements are present) 2: Partially effective (Most elements are not present) 1: Ineffective (No elements are present)\n6.1.  Summarize in an overall scale (1-5):  5: Very high improvement 4: High improvement 3: Moderate improvement 2: Limited improvement 1: No improvement                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         6.2.  Household income by source of livelihood in project area (USD) prior and post project intervention                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      7. Summarize in an overall scale (1-5).  5: All (Fully integrated) 4: Most 3: Some 2: Most not integrated 1: None"]
[null,"Fund Output Indicator Units"]
[null,"1.1.  Number, sector(s) and level(s) of projects or interventions in separate fields of monitoring plan                                                                                  1.2. Number\n2.1.1. Number of staff (male/female) of targeted institutions: a. Obtain baseline information: total number of staff from targeted institutions b. Define target\n2.1.2. Number of staff (male/female) of targeted institutions: a. Obtain baseline information: total number of staff from targeted institutions b. Define target: needs to be defined by project proponents\n2.2.1. Quantitative: Percentage (includes women – and other vulnerable groups – and men).\nQualitative: Adequacy: include direct analysis of major areas; adequacy/effectiveness of systems or analysis of perceptions of populations and institutions.\n2.2.2. Number (broken down by gender and, if possible, by vulnerable groups defined in the area of intervention) of people                                                                                                        3.1. Number and type (in separate columns) at local level.                                                                                                                                    3.2. Number                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     4.1. Number and type                                                                                                                                                                                                               4. 2.  Number and type (entered in separate columns)                                                                                                                                                     5.  Number of interventions by type of natural asset and intervention                                                                                                                    6.1.  Number and type (in separate columns of monitoring plan)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    6.2. Income sources per household; description of income source and number of households.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     7.1.  Number/Sector                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   7.2. Number; Effectiveness (see previous indicator) through enforcement level."]

{"sheet":"Financial Annex","index":8,"n_rows":12,"n_cols":8,"rows_kept":12,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,1,0,6]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"Explanatory notes on variance between planned and actual expenditures of outputs during the reporting period  "]
[]
[null,"ITEM / ACTIVITY / ACTION","AMOUNT spent US$","Projected in PPR 2 (US$)","Difference (positive amount indicates amount overspent)","Reason for over or underspending"]
[null,"Output 1.1. Community Mobilization",24410.67,23078.9473684211,1331.7226315788976,null,null,0.05455493976932619]
[null,"Output 2.2. Documentation of lessons learned",30017.07,42631.5789473684,-12614.508947368398,"The project was able to use facilities from the local television channels to document some of the best practices. This was done free of charge, and thus costs of the activities were less than planned",null,-0.4202445124513618]
[null,"Output 1.4 Building Resilience in Agricultural Production ",373665.52,482894.736842105,-109229.21684210497,"The project was able to access some subsidized agricultural inputs from the Ministry of Agriculture, thus reducing the costs of the demostration fields ",null,-0.29231815887670065]
[null,"Output 1.5 Building Resilience through livestock and Poultry Production",246222.59,334210.526315789,-87987.93631578897,"The project started its animal loans with the goats and several factors were faced, slowing implementation during the reporting period, thus the underspending. These include the extension of the goats loan cycle from 6 to 13 months as recommended by the mid-term evaluation, the need to change the supplier due to the poor physical tolerance of goats supplied and other factors. In spite having being successfully overcome  before the end of the reporting period, these factors have slowed the overall achievements of the output this year.   ",null,-0.35735119314514957]
[null,"Output 2.1. Training of Gov. Officials",62611.1,65131.5789473684,-2520.4789473683995,null,null,-0.04025610390758826]
[null,"Output 1.3 Introduction and use of Water Saving Irrigation ",359247.93,334868.421052632,24379.508947368013,null,null,0.06786262887407038]
[null,"Output 1.2 ",19086.42,26315.7894736842,-7229.369473684201,"Technical problems within the Egyptian Meteorology Authority prevented the supply of a server as planned during the reporting period. Thus the funding for the server was not utlized.  ",null,-0.3787703232813802]
[null,"Output 2.3",55915.64,75684.2105263158,-19768.5705263158,"The project was able to use facilities from  the Ministry of Agriculture free of charge- thus the underspending.",null,-0.3535427749072675]
[null,"Output 2.4",13672.42,12500,1172.42,null,null,0.08575073030231664]

{"sheet":"Sheet10","index":9,"n_rows":0,"n_cols":0,"rows_kept":0,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}

{"sheet":"Sheet1","index":10,"n_rows":0,"n_cols":0,"rows_kept":0,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}