{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":10,"sheets":["Overview ","FinancialData","Procurement","Risk Assesment ","Rating ","Project Indicators ","Lessons Learned ","New Results Tracker","Old Results Tracker","Old Units for Indicators"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":2,"macros":0,"external_links":2,"defined_names":30,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"Overview ","index":0,"n_rows":177,"n_cols":16,"rows_kept":177,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[22,3,23,3],[15,1,15,2],[26,1,26,2],[35,1,35,2],[25,1,25,2],[18,1,18,2],[22,1,23,2],[24,1,24,2],[31,1,31,2]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,null,"Project Performance Report (PPR)"]
[]
[null,null,"Period of Report (Dates)","October 2014-October 2015"]
[]
[null,null,"Project Title: ","Promoting climate resilience in the rice sector through pilot investments in Alaotra Mangoro Region"]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Project Summary: ","In the framework of the implementation of its NAPA, the Government of the Republic of Madagascar has recieved support from the Adaptation Fund for the implementation of the project  \" PROMOTING CLIMATE RESILIENCE IN THE RICE SECTOR THROUGH PILOT INVESTMENTS IN ALAOTRA-MANGORO REGION \", which seeks to transform the rice sub-sector towards building resilience to impacts of climate change.  The project is comprised of three components 1) strengthening of technical and scientific capacities, 2) implementation of a rice production cycle that is resilient and adapted and 3)leveraging policy change in the rice sector.  The project is implemented in the Alaotra-Mangoro region, the primary rice production area in Madagascar, in  three pilot districts.  The project is implemented through the Ministry of Environment and Forests and works at the local level with producers and local partners, along with decentralised ministries and regional technical partners.\n"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Countries","Project Type:  ",null,"GEF Focal Area: ","GEF 4 Focal Areas","GEF 2 / 3 Operational Programme: ","Overall Rating of the project in the evaluation by the project evaluator: ","GEF-4 Focal Area Strategic Program: ","GEF-3 Focal Area Strategic Program: "]
[null,null,"Database Number: ","AFB-5060-1111-2G49",null,null,null,"Afghanistan","FP","Yes","Biodiversity",1,1,"U","BD-SP1-PA Financing","1: Arid & semi-arid ecosystems"]
[null,"Implementing Entity (IE) [name]:",null,"UNEP",null,null,null,"Albania","MSP","No","Climate Change Adaptation",2,2,"S","BD-SP2-Marine PA","2: Coastal, marine & freshwater ecosystems"]
[null,null,"Type of IE:","MIE",null,null,null,"Algeria","EA",null,"Climate Change Mitigation",3,3,"MU","BD-SP3-PA Networks","3: Forest ecosystems"]
[null,null,"Country(ies): ","MADAGASCAR",null,null,null,"Angola",null,null,"International Waters",5,5,"Good","BD-SP5-Markets","13: Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biological Diversity Important to Agriculture"]
[null,"Relevant Geographic Points (i.e. cities, villages, bodies of water):",null,"The Alaotra Mangoro region is located in the center-East of  Madagascar.  The region covers 33 054 Km². and is comprised of (05) Districts themselves sub-divided into 79 communes. The regional capital is Ambatondrazaka, approximately 250 Km from Antananarivo.  The project is working in the three districts of Andilamena (8 communes), Amparafaravola (20 communes), and Ambatondrazaka (20 communes).  \nThe Alaotra Mangoro contains many bodies of water and rivers, Lake Alaotra being the most important lake in the region, with an area of 20 000 ha.\n",null,null,null,"Argentina",null,null,"Multiple Focal Area",null,null,null,"BD-SP7-Invasive Alien Species(IAS)","6: Promoting the adoption of renewable energy by removing barriers and reducing implementation costs"]
[{"$nulls":12},"CC-SP2- Industrial EE","8: Waterbody based operational program"]
[null,null,"Project Milestones",{"$nulls":9},"CC-SP3-RE,CC-SP4-Biomass","9: Integrated Land and Water multiple focal area"]
[null,null,"Milestone",{"$nulls":4},"Bahamas",{"$nulls":6},"CC-SP5-Transport","10: Contaminants based operational program"]
[null,"AFB Approval Date:",null,"2011-12-14"]
[]
[null,"IE-AFB Agreement Signature Date:",null,"2012-03-01",{"$nulls":9},"CC-SP6-LULUCF","12: Integrated Ecosystem Management"]
[null,"Start of Project/Programme:",null,"2012-10-01",{"$nulls":9},"Cross cutting capacity building","14: Persistent Organic Pollutants"]
[null,"Mid-term Review Date (if planned):",null,"November 2015-January 2016 (ongoing)"]
[null,null,"Terminal Evaluation Date:","April-May 2017"]
[]
[null,null,null,"List documents/ reports/ brochures / articles that have been prepared about the project.",null,null,null,"Cyprus"]
[null,null,null,"Emission Radio (AMOMIX et RDB) et Emission Télé (TVM Alaotra Mangoro) ;o Supports de      -1film documentaire sur la rotation de culture Riz et légume avec les experts du CALA;                 -1film documentaire sur la sensibilisation des paysans lors de la démonstration sur la formation du compost par l\"expert STOI-MIN;                                                                                                           -Diffusion des émissions TV et Radio locales (AMOMIX,RDB)à Ambatondrazaka tous les dimanches (10mn );                                                                                                                        -  Affiches, flyers, bouche à oreille, lettre:sensibilisation;                                                                  -Panneaux et affichages montrant les objectifs généraux, Objectifs spécifique et Méthode de travail du PROJET AF RICE);                                                                                                         -Création de site web et Forum;\n-Mailing.\n\n",null,null,null,"Czech Republic"]
[null,"List the Website address (URL) of project.",{"$nulls":5},"Democratic People's Republic of Korea"]
[null,null,null,"www.mef.gov.mg",null,null,null,"Democratic Republic of the Congo"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Denmark"]
[null,null,"Project contacts:  ",{"$nulls":4},"Djibouti"]
[null,"National Project Manager/Coordinator",{"$nulls":5},"Dominica"]
[null,null,"Name: ","RAZANAMIHARISOA Jane Alice",null,null,null,"Dominican Republic"]
[null,null,"Email: ","jrazanamiharisoa@ymail.com",null,null,null,"Ecuador"]
[null,null,"Date: ","2013-12-10",null,null,null,"Egypt"]
[null,null,"Government DA",{"$nulls":4},"El Salvador"]
[null,null,"Name: ","Hery Rakotondravony",null,null,null,"Equatoral Guinea"]
[null,null,"Email: ","hery.rado@aol.com",null,null,null,"Eritrea"]
[null,null,"Date: ","2013-12-10",null,null,null,"Estonia"]
[null,null,"Implementing Entity",{"$nulls":4},"Ethiopia"]
[null,null,"Name: ","Lars Christiansen, UNEP Task Manager",null,null,null,"Fiji"]
[null,null,"Email: ","lachr@dtu.dk",null,null,null,"Finland"]
[null,null,"Date: ","2013-12-16",null,null,null,"France"]
[null,null,"Executing Agency",{"$nulls":4},"Gambia"]
[null,null,"Name: ",{"$nulls":4},"Georgia"]
[null,null,"Email: ",{"$nulls":4},"Germany"]
[null,null,"Date: ",{"$nulls":4},"Ghana"]
[null,null,"Executing Agency",{"$nulls":4},"Greece"]
[null,null,"Name: ",{"$nulls":4},"Grenada"]
[null,null,"Email: ",{"$nulls":4},"Guatemala"]
[null,null,"Date: ",{"$nulls":4},"Guinea"]
[null,null,"Executing Agency",{"$nulls":4},"Guinea Bissau"]
[null,null,"Name: ",{"$nulls":4},"Guyana"]
[null,null,"Email: ",{"$nulls":4},"Haiti"]
[null,null,"Date: ",{"$nulls":4},"Honduras"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Hungary"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Iceland"]
[{"$nulls":7},"India"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Indonesia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Iran (Islamic Republic of)"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Iraq"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Ireland"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Israel"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Italy"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Jamaica"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Japan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Jordan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Kazakhstan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Kenya"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Kiribati"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Kuwait"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Kyrgyzstan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Lao People’s Democratic Republic"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Latvia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Lebanon"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Lesotho"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Liberia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Libyan Arab Jamahiriya"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Liechtenstein"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Lithuania"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Luxembourg"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Madagascar"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Malawi"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Malaysia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Maldives"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Mali"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Malta"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Marshall Islands"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Mauritania"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Mauritius"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Mexico"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Micronesia, Federated States of"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Monaco"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Mongolia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Montenegro"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Morocco"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Mozambique"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Myanmar"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Namibia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Nauru"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Nepal"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Netherlands"]
[{"$nulls":7},"New Zealand"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Nicaragua"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Niger"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Nigeria"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Norway"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Oman"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Pakistan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Palau"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Panama"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Papua New Guinea"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Paraguay"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Peru"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Philippines"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Poland"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Portugal"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Qatar"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Republic of Korea"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Republic of Moldova"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Romania"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Russian Federation"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Rwanda"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Saint Kitts and Nevis"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Saint Lucia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Saint Vincent and the Grenadines"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Samoa"]
[{"$nulls":7},"San Marino"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Sao Tome and Principe"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Saudi Arabia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Senegal"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Serbia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Seychelles"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Sierra Leone"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Singapore"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Slovakia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Slovenia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Solomon Islands"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Somalia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"South Africa"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Spain"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Sri Lanka"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Sudan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Suriname"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Swaziland"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Sweden"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Switzerland"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Syrian Arab Republic"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Tajikistan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Thailand"]
[{"$nulls":7},"The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Timor-Leste"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Togo"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Tonga"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Trinidad and Tobago"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Tunisia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Turkey"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Turkmenistan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Tuvalu"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Uganda"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Ukraine"]
[{"$nulls":7},"United Arab Emirates"]
[{"$nulls":7},"United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland"]
[{"$nulls":7},"United Republic of Tanzania"]
[{"$nulls":7},"United States of America"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Uruguay"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Uzbekistan"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Vanuatu"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Viet Nam"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Yemen"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Zambia"]
[{"$nulls":7},"Zimbabwe"]

{"sheet":"FinancialData","index":1,"n_rows":138,"n_cols":11,"rows_kept":138,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[147,5,147,6],[146,5,146,6],[143,5,143,6],[142,5,142,6],[140,5,140,6],[137,5,137,6],[3,1,3,6],[12,2,12,3],[6,2,6,3],[8,5,8,6],[9,5,9,6],[7,2,7,6],[11,2,11,3],[133,2,133,6],[2,2,2,7],[135,2,135,6],[8,2,8,3],[9,2,9,3],[39,2,39,3],[40,2,40,3],[134,2,134,3],[134,5,134,6],[4,2,4,6],[136,5,136,6],[147,2,147,3],[142,2,142,3],[143,2,143,3],[146,2,146,3],[145,2,145,3],[139,2,139,3],[140,2,140,3],[137,2,137,3],[136,2,136,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,"Financial information:  cumulative from project start to OCTOBER 2014-OCT 2015",{"$nulls":7},"J"]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"DISBURSEMENT OF AF GRANT FUNDS "]
[null,null,"How much of the total AF grant as noted in Project Document plus any project preparation grant has been spent to date?"]
[null,null,"Estimated cumulative total disbursement as of 30 Septembre 2015",null,null,1102237]
[null,null,"Add any comments on AF Grant Funds. (word limit=200)"]
[]
[null,null,"EXPENDITURE DATA"]
[null,null,"List ouput and corresponding amount spent for the current reporting period (Oct 2014 - 30 sept 2015)",null,null,"Output","AMOUNT"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Output 1.1.1 Best Available Technologies and Integrated Resilient Rice Model (Modèle Intégré de Riziculture Résiliente - MIRR) selected and publicized ",39675]
[{"$nulls":5},"1.2.1 Crop models are available for rice vulnerability mapping ",20500]
[{"$nulls":5},"1.2.2 Updated, dynamic agricultural calendars and climate early warnings taking into account current and projected variability disseminated to local population",14400]
[{"$nulls":5},"1.2.3 Agricultural extension staff trained on climate risk management in an agro-ecosystem context",37800]
[{"$nulls":5},"2.1.1  climate resilient rice varieties selected through participatory field testing",16562]
[{"$nulls":5},"2.1.2 An operational multiplication and dissemination scheme for adapted seed varieties",108000]
[{"$nulls":5},"2.1.3 Updated fertilisation guidelines according to best available standards and taking climate conditions into consideration",99513]
[{"$nulls":5},"2.1.4 Integrated pest management is implemented",0]
[{"$nulls":5},"2.1.5 Water efficiency, management and conservation technologies and infrastructures are implemented",0]
[{"$nulls":5},"2.2.1 Best available land preparation, production and harvesting techniques disseminated to reduce deforestation, maintain soil fertility and integrity, and to provide adequate growing conditions",22200]
[{"$nulls":5},"2.2.2  Watershed rehabilitation in productive landscapes introduced, including through reforestation and adaptation of agroforestry practices",0]
[{"$nulls":5},"2.2.3 Soil conservation and livestock management techniques adapted to topography and landscape in light of future climate conditions",0]
[{"$nulls":5},"2.2.4 Revitalization of producer’s cooperatives and water user associations for collaborative natural resources allocations (e.g. land and water) and management",9000]
[{"$nulls":5},"2.2.5 Water quality assessments",0]
[{"$nulls":5},"2.3.1 Increased utilization of rice by-product especially rice straw",27000]
[{"$nulls":5},"2.3.2 Post-harvest storage facilities with phytosanitary control, serving as trading points and markets",49367]
[{"$nulls":5},"3.1.1  gaps and possible maladaptations in the current rice policy are identifed and recommendations on upscaling project outcomes towards rice policy reform are made",0]
[{"$nulls":5},"3.2.1 a report on best practices and lessons learned for rice adaptation in madagascar",0]
[{"$nulls":5},"3.2.2 A strategy for communicating information on adaptation techniques to farmers is implemented",23620]
[]
[{"$nulls":5},"Cross-cutting costs Component 1"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Cross-cutting costs Component 2"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Cross-cutting costs Component 3"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Project operations/Execution costs",57737]
[{"$nulls":5},"TOTAL",525374]
[]
[null,null,"PLANNED EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE"]
[null,null,"List outputs planned and corresponding projected cost for the upcoming reporting period ",null,"Output","ITEM","PROJECTED COST","Est. Completion Date"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1.1.1 Best Available Technologies and Integrated Resilient Rice Model (Modèle Intégré de Riziculture Résiliente - MIRR) selected and publicized "]
[{"$nulls":5},"Publication services",15000,"Q1 2016"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1.2.1 Crop models are available for rice vulnerability mapping "]
[{"$nulls":5},"National agriculture modelling expert ",3380,"Q1 2016"]
[{"$nulls":5},"NC expert SIG",3000,"Q2 2016"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1.2.2 Updated, dynamic agricultural calendars and climate early warnings taking into account current and projected variability disseminated to local population"]
[{"$nulls":5},"National agriculture modelling expert ",35000,"Q1 2016"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Weather stations",3500,"Q1 2016"]
[{"$nulls":5},"National Consultant meteorologist",14000,"Q4 2017"]
[{"$nulls":5},"sub-contract with National Radio",3000,"Q4 2017"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1.2.3 Agricultural extension staff trained on climate risk management in an agro-ecosystem context"]
[{"$nulls":5},"international crm expert",30000,"Q3 2016"]
[{"$nulls":5},"National extension specialist",35000,"Q2 2016"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Climate risque management workshop",20000,"Q2 2016"]
[{"$nulls":5},"National agroforestery expert",13800,"Q2 2016"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Cross-cutting Component costs",null,3600,"Q3 2017"]
[{"$nulls":4},"2.1.1  climate resilient rice varieties selected through participatory field testing"]
[]
[]
[{"$nulls":4},"2.1.2 An operational multiplication and dissemination scheme for adapted seed varieties"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Agriculture imput",35000,"Q3 2017"]
[{"$nulls":5},"sub-contract with CALA (pre-base seeds)",72000,"Q3 2017"]
[{"$nulls":4},"2.1.3 Updated fertilisation guidelines according to best available standards and taking climate conditions into consideration"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Sub-contract with CALA for soil quality analysis",8000,"Q3 2017"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Sub-contract with STOI Madagascar",180850,"Q3 2017"]
[{"$nulls":4},"2.1.4 Integrated pest management is implemented"]
[{"$nulls":5},"IPM training workshop",15000,"Q3 2016"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Aquisition of IPM and phytosanitary equipment",5000,"Q3 2016"]
[{"$nulls":5},"IPM Expert",15000,"Q3 2017"]
[{"$nulls":4},"2.1.5 Water efficiency, management and conservation technologies and infrastructures are implemented"]
[{"$nulls":4},"21. Rehabilitation of damaged gravitational irrigation infrastructure and canals","sub-contract with water engineering firm",500000,"Q4 2016"]
[{"$nulls":5},"water management and infrastructure specialist",52700,"Q4 2016"]
[{"$nulls":4},"24. Implementation of irrigation and water conservation (including water harvesting) practices adapted to new climate trends and conditions with related training of water users ","water management training workshops ",33750,"Q4 2016"]
[{"$nulls":4},"2.2.1 Best available land preparation, production and harvesting techniques disseminated to reduce deforestation, maintain soil fertility and integrity, and to provide adequate growing conditions"]
[{"$nulls":4},"25. Implement and disseminate Integrated Resilient Rice Model (MIRR) for production through training and extension","Local MIRR training",36000,"Q1 2016"]
[{"$nulls":5},"national riziculture experts",51800,"Q3 2016"]
[{"$nulls":5},"national agro-forestry expert",15000,"Q3 2017"]
[{"$nulls":5},"sub-contractMin Agri vulgarisation agricole",6000,"Q3 2016"]
[{"$nulls":4},"2.2.2  Watershed rehabilitation in productive landscapes introduced, including through reforestation and adaptation of agroforestry practices"]
[{"$nulls":5},"sub-contract Ministry of forests (SNGF)",12594,"Q1 2016"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Sub-contract with the ONGs",58254,"Q3 2017"]
[{"$nulls":5},"SLM Community training",35000,"Q1 2017"]
[{"$nulls":4},"2.2.3 Soil conservation and livestock management techniques adapted to topography and landscape in light of future climate conditions"]
[{"$nulls":4},"30. Adaptation and reintroduction of soil conservation methods for erosion control (tillage, sediment barriers, mulching) in upland and lowland uses","sub-contract Ministry of Agriculture",50000,"Q4 2017"]
[{"$nulls":4},"32. Assessment of resilience in livestock management within rice cultivation systems and adaptation of practices for resilience, erosion control, and increased productivity","Livestock expert",20000,"Q3 2016"]
[{"$nulls":4},"2.2.4 Revitalization of producer’s cooperatives and water user associations for collaborative natural resources allocations (e.g. land and water) and management"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Water user Association training workshop",40000,"Q3 2016"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Community Based Natural Resources management expert",21000,"Q3 2016"]
[{"$nulls":5},"equipment and office supplies for WUG",12000,"Q3 2016"]
[{"$nulls":4},"2.2.5 Water quality assessments"]
[{"$nulls":5},"national water quality expert",4000,"Q4 2017"]
[{"$nulls":5},"laboratory ",4000,"Q4 2017"]
[{"$nulls":4},"2.3.1 Increased utilization of rice by-product especially rice straw"]
[{"$nulls":4},"35. Introduction of techniques and technologies for the utilization of rice straws in animal feed and for energy production (training and extension)","national rice straw expert",14000,"Q3 2016"]
[{"$nulls":5},"socio-economist",14000,"Q3 2016"]
[{"$nulls":5},"livestock experts",15000,"Q3 2016"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Workshops on rice by-products",30000,"Q4 2016"]
[{"$nulls":4},"2.3.2 Post-harvest storage facilities with phytosanitary control, serving as trading points and markets"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Civil Engineer",12000,"Q4 2016"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Sub-contract private sector firm",100000,"Q4 2016"]
[{"$nulls":5},"training on community-managed reserves",10000,"Q2 2016"]
[{"$nulls":5},"National Consultant - Community managed storage",20000,"Q2 2016"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Cross-cutting component costs","Chief Technical Advisor (CTA)",23200,"Q4 2017"]
[{"$nulls":5},"CTA travel",12000,"Q4 2017"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Local Technicians (3)",7200,"Q4 2017"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Office supplies for Local Technicians (3)",6598,"Q4 2017"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Travel costs for regional directorates",4500,"Q4 2017"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Operating costs for regional directorates (fuel and expendables)",4500,"Q4 2017"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Driver",3300,"Q4 2017"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Project Coordinator",3600,"Q4 2017"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Vehicles (incl. 3 motorcycles) and maintenance",3000,"Q4 2017"]
[{"$nulls":4},"3.1.1  gaps and possible maladaptations in the current rice policy are identifed and recommendations on upscaling project outcomes towards rice policy reform are made"]
[{"$nulls":5},"national agriculture task force consultant",3000,"Q4 2017"]
[{"$nulls":5},"national market analysis consultant",30000,"Q4 2017"]
[{"$nulls":4},"3.2.1 a report on best practices and lessons learned for rice adaptation in madagascar"]
[{"$nulls":4},"3.2.2 A strategy for communicating information on adaptation techniques to farmers is implemented","National Rural communication specialist",13380,"Q4 2017"]
[{"$nulls":5},"awareness raising Meetings and workshops",12000,"Q4 2017"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Cross-cutting component costs","Project Coordinator",3600,"Q4 2017"]
[{"$nulls":4},"4. Project/Programme Execution cost"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Project Coordinator",7200,"Q4 2017"]
[{"$nulls":5},"National financial manager",15000,"Q4 2017"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Administrative support",9996,"Q4 2017"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Travel for PM",12000,"Q4 2017",null,null,"="]
[{"$nulls":5},"Office equipment and expendables (PCU)",5000,"Q4 2017"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Communication, translation and printing costs",3875,"Q4 2017"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Baseline study"]
[{"$nulls":5},"mid-term evaluation",35000,"Q4 2017"]
[{"$nulls":5},"final evaluation"]
[{"$nulls":5},"audit",4000,"Q4 2017"]
[{"$nulls":5},"inception and steering meetings",3000,"Q4 2017"]
[{"$nulls":5},"TOTAL",1902177,null,null,null," "]
[]
[null,null,"ACTUAL CO-FINANCING (If the MTR or TE have not been undertaken this reporting period, DO NOT report on actual co-financing.) "]
[null,null,"How much of the total co-financing as committed in the Project Document has actually been realized?"]
[]
[null,null,"Estimated cumulative actual co-financing as verified during Mid-term Review (MTR) or Terminal Evaluation (TE). "]
[null,null,"Add any comments on actual co-financing in particular any issues related to the realization of in-kind, grant, credits, loans, equity, non-grant instruments and other types of co-financing. (word limit=200)"]

{"sheet":"Procurement","index":2,"n_rows":0,"n_cols":0,"rows_kept":0,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[49,6,49,8],[50,2,52,2],[50,6,52,8],[53,2,55,2],[53,6,55,8],[56,2,58,2],[56,6,58,8],[59,2,62,2],[59,6,62,8],[63,2,70,2],[63,6,70,8],[71,2,73,2],[71,6,73,8],[74,2,79,2],[74,6,79,8],[80,6,80,8],[81,2,84,2],[81,6,84,8],[85,2,88,2],[85,6,88,8],[89,2,91,2],[89,6,91,8],[92,6,92,8],[93,2,95,2],[93,6,95,8],[96,2,97,2],[96,6,97,8],[139,6,139,8],[142,6,142,8],[98,2,100,2],[98,6,100,8],[101,2,103,2],[101,6,103,8],[104,2,106,2],[104,6,110,8]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}

{"sheet":"Risk Assesment ","index":3,"n_rows":28,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":28,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[11,4,11,5],[12,4,12,5],[13,4,13,5],[3,1,3,5],[4,2,4,5],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,5],[8,4,8,5],[10,4,10,5],[25,2,25,5],[16,2,16,5],[17,2,17,5],[20,4,20,5],[2,2,2,5],[14,4,14,5],[9,4,9,5],[21,4,21,5],[18,4,18,5],[19,4,19,5],[51,2,51,3],[51,4,51,5],[45,2,45,3],[45,4,45,5],[47,2,47,3],[47,4,47,5],[26,2,26,3],[26,4,26,5],[52,2,52,3],[52,4,52,5],[48,2,48,3],[48,4,48,5],[38,2,38,3],[39,2,39,3],[42,4,42,5],[50,2,50,3],[44,2,44,3],[40,2,40,5],[41,2,41,3],[41,4,41,5],[42,2,42,3],[27,2,27,5]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,"RISK ASSESMENT"]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"IDENTIFIED RISKS"]
[null,null,"List all Risks identified in project preparation phase and what  steps are being taken to mitigate them"]
[null,null,"Identified Risk","Current Status","Steps Taken to Mitigate Risk"]
[null,null,"Slow administration functionning due to lack of human and financial ressources","H","Clarification of roles and responsibilities of members of the PCU and planning of the steps in each task for each person, with specific deadlines in order to maintain delivery plans. It is anticipated that this risk will be lowered as mitigation strategies are implemented.  "]
[null,null,"Frequent political change, with elections now foreseen to be completed in December 2013.  This creates a degree of uncertainty","M","Inform simultaneously the technical staff (regional development director, technicians for agriculture, water, environment and forests) as well as Heads of Region and PSC chair, during the 6-weekly monitoring missions. "]
[null,null,"Accesibility of sites during cyclonic/rainy/ flooding  period (december-april) could affect inter regional transport and cause delays in performing required field visits and inputs delivery from other regions or from capital","L-M","Local technical staff as local project representatives are aware of ongoing activities, despite inaccessibility of sites around december.  The PCU recieves regular reports from the local technicials, every month, and monitoring missions are organized every 6 weeks by the PCU, in order to keep abreast and minimize delays in information transmission. "]
[null,null,"Lack of population buy-in on project activities ","M","The PCU will develop a communication plan and a targeting strategy along with its specialist on rural communication.  Awareness raising will be intensified through training for extension services and village chiefs, and it is expected that the increase of project beneficiaries will also increase local buyin for technologies proposed.  Focus group meetings are also planned during the 6 weekly monitoring meetings to ensure regular feedback and ownership of project beneficiaries. "]
[null,null,"there is a risk that the upscaling and replication strategy developed for this project might be insufficient in ensuring uptake of the approach to the rest of the country. Political instability in the country may delay or prevent the adoption of policy recommendations adopted by the project. ","M","There is already some interest by the local producers as regards the MIRR technologies, this can be seen through the local associations that have emerged locally and their commitment to the project formally.  In addition, there has been an increase in farmers volunteering for MIRR training.  Since the rice platform is already existing and will be strengthened during the project, beginning in 2016, the project will be able to build on these and other results during Component 3 activities. "]
[null,null,null,"M"]
[]
[null,null,"Critical Risks Affecting Progress (Not identified at project design)"]
[null,null,"Identify Risks with a 50% or > likelihood of affecting progress of project"]
[null,null,"Identified Risk","Current Status","Steps Taken to Mitigate Risk"]
[]
[null,null,"There could be project delays due to delays in processing cash advance requests with UNEP, as well as due to change in financial procedures in UNEP or in GoM","Medium","Communication processes will be improved and with a clear division and clarification of roles in the PCU,  it is anticipated that the finance officer of the project will have more time to complete this task.  A schedule has been put in place to process cash advances regularly. "]
[null,null,"Procurement delays","High","There have been some delays in procurement owing to the delegation of purchasing authorities from the project to various partners, who have sometimes refused or been unable to discharge their responsibilities in adequate time.  Negotiations with other ministries and institutional partners have been lenghty, and there is a lack of clarity on the procurement responsibilities between various project partners. There have been delays in signing MOUs and inter-institutional agreements (namely with min Water, Min Agri, and DRDA) following changes in senior personnel.  Furthermore, the intent and function of such agreements (MOUs) was not clear; it was therefore decided to raise the issue during the PSC, and to explain the purpose of agreements.  Follow-up on MOUs is now being made at the PSC level.   The project also encountered delays in launching the calls for proposals for various consultancies because of an error in procedure, which led to the calls having to be relaunched.  In addition, a few calls for proposals have remained unanswered.  It was decided that if international expertise could not be identified, the project would transfer the calls for proposals to national or regional expertise. Additional efforts at publicising project offers will be made by the CTA and UNEP.   Finally the project encountered delays owing to the illness of the national project director. Recently a procurement plan with dates and timelines, as well as tasks attributed to each member of the PCU with timelines according to responsibilities was also developed and agreed with the PCU. This will further help in mitigating this risk."]
[null,null,"Lack of financial bids and lack of clarity regarding procurement","High","In the past, documentation related to the submission of tenders was centralized outside of the project's files.  Procurement rules were not always clear and not always respected.  This has now been corrected, and a procurement procedure note will be prepared for all future procurements.  This may lead to some modifications in the budget as some budget lines may need to be reinterpreted.  A more thorough documentation of bids and offers recieved will be instated within the project management team and monitored by UNEP"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Risk Measures: Were there any risk mitigation measures employed during the current reporting period?  If so, were risks reduced?  If not, why were these risks not reduced?"]
[null,null,"Add any comments relevant to risk mitigation (word limit = 500)"]
[null,null," Communication between the CTP and the PCU has been strengthened through regular skype calls for problem solving, techncial support and addressing issues related ot the day to day management of the project.  PLanning tools have also been developed by the CTP and the PCU to avoid delays.  For example, a procurement plan with dates and timelines, as well as tasks attributed to each member of the PCU with timelines according to responsibilities, the use of a shared dropbox drive for easy communication or the use of smartsheet for ongoing planning and monitoring of activities with an automatic update.  A clarification of roles and responsibilities among the PCU members has also been conducted so that each is aware of their tasks and responsibilities, as well as timelines relevant to each task.  Activities that were no longer relevant and had been overly delayed were removed from the workplan and the budget was reassigned.  A specific process for monitoring consultants delivery of expected outputs was also instittuted to ensure quality control and timeliness of delivery. Future risk mitigation measures will take into account recommendations provided by the Midterm Review (MTR). A draft version of recommendations was reviewed by the Project Team and strategies are planned to address: public awareness and mainstreaming, by training community elders and leaders and targeting associations rather than just individual volunteer farmers; improving institutional relations and coordination through multisectoral coordination, clarifying roles and responsibilities; and reviewing role of project partners in delivering activities. The final MTR is expected around end of February, after which it will be shared with AFsecretariat for information. Formal management response and implementation plan for MTR recommendations will be presented to the Project Steering Committee in January and also forwarded to AF secretariat along with the final MTR."]

{"sheet":"Rating ","index":4,"n_rows":63,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":63,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[52,4,52,5],[62,5,62,6],[57,5,57,6],[58,5,58,6],[59,5,59,6],[54,4,54,6],[61,5,61,6],[60,5,60,6],[51,4,51,5],[16,3,16,6],[2,2,2,6],[3,2,3,6],[20,2,20,5],[21,3,24,6],[18,4,18,5],[17,4,17,5],[35,4,35,5],[36,4,36,5]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,"RATING ON IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS "]
[null,null,"For rating definitions please see bottom of page."]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,"Progress on Key Milestones","Expected Progress","Progress to Date","Rating"]
[null,null,"Project Manager/Coordinator: ","Outcome 1.1 Knowledge base on best practices for climate resilience in rice, based on existing local knowledge and international research","This outcome should be completed by the end of 2015.","The comparative study of rice production techniques was completed in collaboration with IRRI.  A MIRR seminar was organized in september 2014 with IRRI support, which allowed for the consultation of stakeholders from the region (producers, water user associations, ministries, NGOs, organizations and private sector) and the subsequent approval of MIRR guidelines.  A report of the workshop and the draft MIRR guidelines were produced, the publication of the guidelines is still pending, as some new data has emerged from local testing that need to be integrated in the final guidelines. This is expected to be completed in Q1 of 2016. ","S"]
[null,null,null,"Outcome 1.2 Malagasy government, research institutions and local communities have the tools and methods to assess, monitor, and understand climate change impacts on rice.","This outcome should be underway in 2015, with the development of technical capacity for stakeholders at all levels. Estimated completion Q4 2016. ","The project acquired materials and equipment for the different project activities, such as computers and rice modelling software, training on DSSAT and ORYZA was completed, however the data required for running the models has not yet been acquired.  The update of agricultural calendars is underway and the training will be completed thereafter. Training on agro-forestry and CRM will also be completed during 2016 A hydrological model for 2050 has been completed. ","MU"]
[null,null,null,"Outcome 2.1. Sustainable increase in rice yields (using MIRR)","This outcome should be halfway completed in 2015 and completed by the end of the project.  ","The pre-selection of rice and non-rice varieties was completed in 2014-2015, followed by some local testing to determine feasibility and adaptability.  The CALA is currently working on the production of base seeds for the 2015-2016 season.  The soil and water analyses have been completed and will be ongoing through the end of the project.  The update of fertilization guidelines was also completed and the project successfully tested a local compost productions scheme. The rehabilitation of water infrastructure has yet to be initatiated however, and so have the activities on integrated pest management. These activities are expected to begin in the first half of 2016 and to continue until the end of the project","MS"]
[null,null,null,"Outcome 2.2. Ecosystem services maintained ","Reforestation targets were designed to be 70% achieved by 2015 (approximately 6000 ha).  Other activities under the outcome were intended to begin in 2015 and to continue until the end of the project","Although reforestation work has begun, the project has not been able to achieve with a satisfactory level the reforestation targets, owing to the bad performance of the contracted party (SNGF).  Only approximately 15% of expected targets were achieved so far. Other activities are underway, including for example the revitalization of WUAs, training on crop rotation.  Other trainings are foreseen for 2016 (SLM, erosion control, etc).  Three activities have not begun, namely those that are to be delivered through MoA assitance (rehabilitation of Lavakas, extension and technolgical packet dissemination).  ","U"]
[null,null,null,"Outcome 2.3. Post Harvest losses reduced ","The outcome was designed to have been completed in 2015","Work has begun with the socio-economic analysis of post harvest losses and rehabilitation options for storage.  The sites have been identified and procurement for construction will be initiated in 2016, along with training for community-management of storage facilities.  Activities on the use of rice by products such as straws, have also been initiated with the support of livestock experts. ","MU"]
[null,null,null,"Outcome 3.1 Technical norms and standards in rice cultivation reviewed and where necessary modified to take climate change into account","This outcome was designed to be initiated towards the end of the project, once sufficient lessons have been achieved from local activities.  It was designed to be finalized in 2017.","The project developed a rural communication strategy and it is being implemented through the production of awareness raising tools and events.  Improvements are however necessary to improve community awareness and ownership of the project, therefore the project will develop a more thorough targeting and communication strategy.  Furthermore, new activities have been added, including on the analysis of economic perpsectives and market analysis for the regional rice production. Other activities will be based on lessons learned from the dissemination of MIRR practices and will be initiated in late 2016.","MS"]
[]
[{"$nulls":5},"Overall rating","MS"]
[]
[null,null,null,"Please Provide the Name and Contact information of person(s) reponsible for completeling the Rating section"]
[null,null,null,"Name: ","Jane Razamiharisoa"]
[null,null,null,"Email: ","jrazanamiharisoa@ymail.com"]
[]
[null,null,"Please justify your rating.  Outline the positive and negative progress made by the project since it started.  Provide specific recommendations for next steps. . (word limit=500)"]
[null,null,null,"The project has encountered delays.  However the MTR, which is to be finalized in January 2016, has already helped identify problems and improvements have been recommended by the Task manager and CTA.  Improvement in management practices and tools were implemented and will continue to be rolled-out, including TOR for PCU team members, planning of activities using project monitoring tools (Smartsheet, MS Project), more active monitoring of activities and delivery of outputs and collaboration with other teams working on rice production.   Additional tools are being considered including for example a template for consultants' reports, training on TEMPRO software for the financial and administrative assistant, and training on project management, procurement procedures.. "]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,"Progress on Key Milestones","Expected Progress","Progress to Date","Rating"]
[null,null,"Implementing Agency  ","Outcome 1.1 Knowledge base on best practices for climate resilience in rice, based on existing local knowledge and international research","This outcome should be completed by the end of 2015.","The comparative study of rice production techniques was completed in collaboration with IRRI.  A MIRR seminar was organized in september 2014 with IRRI support, which allowewd for the consultation of stakeholders from the region (producers, water user associations, ministries, NGOs, organizations and private sector) and the subsequent approval of MIRR guidelines.  A report of the workshop and the draft MIRR guidelines were produced, the publication of the guidelines is still pending, as some new data has emerged from local testing that need to be integrated in the final guidelines. This is expected to be completed in Q1 of 2016. ","MS"]
[null,null,null,"Outcome 1.2 Malagasy government, research institutions and local communities have the tools and methods to assess, monitor, and understand climate change impacts on rice.","This outcome should be underway in 2015, with the development of technical capacity for stakeholders at all levels. Estimated completion Q4 2016. ","The project acquired materials and equipment for the different project activities, such as computers and rice modelling software, training on DSSAT and ORYZA was completed, however the data required for running the models has not yet been acquired.  The update of agricultural calendars is underway and the training will be completed thereafter. Training on agro-forestry and CRM will also be completed during 2016 A hydrological model for 2050 has bee completed. ","MS"]
[null,null,null,"Outcome 2.1. Sustainable increase in rice yields (using MIRR)","This outcome should be halfway completed in 2015 and completed by the end of the project.  ","The pre-selection of rice and non-rice varieties was completed in 2014-2015, followed by some local testing to determine feasibility and adaptability.  The CALA is currently working on the production of base seeds for the 2015-2016 season.  The soil and water analyses have been completed and will be ongoing through the end of the project.  The update of fertilization guidelines was also completed and the project successfully tested a local compost productions scheme. The rehabilitation of water infrastructure has yet to be initatiated however, and so have the activities on integrated pest management. These activities are expected to begin in the first half of 2016 and to continue until the end of the project","MU"]
[null,null,null,"Outcome 2.2. Ecosystem services maintained ","Reforestation targets were designed to be 70% achieved by 2015 (approximately 6000 ha).  Other activities udner the outcome were intended to begin in 2015 and to continue until the end of the project","Although reforestation work has begun, the project has not been able to achieve with a satisfactory level the reforestation targets, owing to the bad performance of the contracted party (SNGF).  Only approximately 15% of expected targets were achieved so far. Other activities are underway, including for example the revitalization of WUAs, training on crop rotation.  Other trainings are foreseen for 2016 (SLM, erosion control, etc).  Three activities have not begun, namely those that are to be delivered through MoA assitance (rehabilitation of Lavakas, extension and technolgical packet dissemination).  ","U"]
[null,null,null,"Outcome 2.3. Post Harvest losses reduced ","The outcome was designed to have been completed in 2015","Work has begun with the socio-economic analysis of post harvest losses and rehabilitation options for storage.  The sites have been identified and procurement for construction will be initiated in 2016, along with training for community-management of storage facilities.  Activities on the use of rice by products such as straws, have also been initiated with the support of livestock experts. ","MU"]
[null,null,null,"Outcome 3.1 Technical norms and standards in rice cultivation reviewed and where necessary modified to take climate change into account","This outcome was designe to be initiated towards the end of the project, once sufficient lessons have been achieved from local activities.  It was designed to be finalized in 2017.","The project developed a rural communication strategy and it is being implemented through the production of awareness raising tools and events.  Improvements are however necessary to improve community awareness and ownership of the project, therefore the project will develop a more thorough targeting and communication strategy.  Furthermore, new activities have been added, including on the analysis of economic perpsectives and market analysis for the regional rice production. Other activities will be based on lessons learned from the dissemination of MIRR practices and will be initiated in late 2016.","MS"]
[{"$nulls":6},"MU"]
[null,null,null,"Please Provide the Name and Contact information of person(s) reponsible for completeling the Rating section"]
[null,null,null,"Name: ","Lars Christiansen"]
[null,null,null,"Email: ","lachr@dtu.dk"]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,"Progress on Key Milestones","Expected Progress","Progress to Date","Rating"]
[null,null,"Chief Technical Advisor","Outcome 1.1 Knowledge base on best practices for climate resilience in rice, based on existing local knowledge and international research","This outcome should be completed by the end of 2015.","The comparative study of rice production techniques was completed in collaboration with IRRI.  A MIRR seminar was organized in september 2014 with IRRI support, which allowewd for the consultation of stakeholders from the region (producers, water user associations, ministries, NGOs, organizations and private sector) and the subsequent approval of MIRR guidelines.  A report of the workshop and the draft MIRR guidelines were produced, the publication of the guidelines is still pending, as some new data has emerged from local testing that need to be integrated in the final guidelines. This is expected to be completed in Q1 of 2016. ","MS"]
[null,null,null,"Outcome 1.2 Malagasy government, research institutions and local communities have the tools and methods to assess, monitor, and understand climate change impacts on rice.","This outcome should be underway in 2015, with the development of technical capacity for stakeholders at all levels. Estimated completion Q4 2016. ","The project acquired materials and equipment for the different project activities, such as computers and rice modelling software, training on DSSAT and ORYZA was completed, however the data required for running the models has not yet been acquired.  The update of agricultural calendars is underway and the training will be completed thereafter. Training on agro-forestry and CRM will also be completed during 2016 A hydrological model for 2050 has bee completed. ","MU"]
[null,null,null,"Outcome 2.1. Sustainable increase in rice yields (using MIRR)","This outcome should be halfway completed in 2015 and completed by the end of the project.  ","The pre-selection of rice and non-rice varieties was completed in 2014-2015, followed by some local testing to determine feasibility and adaptability.  The CALA is currently working on the production of base seeds for the 2015-2016 season.  The soil and water analyses have been completed and will be ongoing through the end of the project.  The update of fertilization guidelines was also completed and the project successfully tested a local compost productions scheme. The rehabilitation of water infrastructure has yet to be initatiated however, and so have the activities on integrated pest management. These activities are expected to begin in the first half of 2016 and to continue until the end of the project","MU"]
[null,null,null,"Outcome 2.2. Ecosystem services maintained ","Reforestation targets were designed to be 70% achieved by 2015 (approximately 6000 ha).  Other activities udner the outcome were intended to begin in 2015 and to continue until the end of the project","Although reforestation work has begun, the project has not been able to achieve with a satisfactory level the reforestation targets, owing to the bad performance of the contracted party (SNGF).  Only approximately 15% of expected targets were achieved so far. Other activities are underway, including for example the revitalization of WUAs, training on crop rotation.  Other trainings are foreseen for 2016 (SLM, erosion control, etc).  Three activities have not begun, namely those that are to be delivered through MoA assitance (rehabilitation of Lavakas, extension and technolgical packet dissemination).  ","MU"]
[null,null,null,"Outcome 2.3. Post Harvest losses reduced ","The outcome was designed to have been completed in 2015","Work has begun with the socio-economic analysis of post harvest losses and rehabilitation options for storage.  The sites have been identified and procurement for construction will be initiated in 2016, along with training for community-management of storage facilities.  Activities on the use of rice by products such as straws, have also been initiated with the support of livestock experts. ","MS"]
[null,null,null,"Outcome 3.1 Technical norms and standards in rice cultivation reviewed and where necessary modified to take climate change into account","This outcome was designe to be initiated towards the end of the project, once sufficient lessons have been achieved from local activities.  It was designed to be finalized in 2017.","The project developed a rural communication strategy and it is being implemented through the production of awareness raising tools and events.  Improvements are however necessary to improve community awareness and ownership of the project, therefore the project will develop a more thorough targeting and communication strategy.  Furthermore, new activities have been added, including on the analysis of economic perpsectives and market analysis for the regional rice production. Other activities will be based on lessons learned from the dissemination of MIRR practices and will be initiated in late 2016.","S"]
[{"$nulls":5},"TOTAL RATING","MU"]
[null,null,null,"Please Provide the Name and Contact information of person(s) reponsible for completeling the Rating section"]
[null,null,null,"Name: ","Joana Talafre"]
[null,null,null,"Email: ","Joana.talafre@okapiconsulting.ca"]
[]
[null,null,null,"Please justify your rating and address the following points:\n1. Indicate trends, both positive and negative, in achievement of outcomes as per the project indicators.  \n2.  Detail critical risks that have affected progress.  \n3.  Outline response to MTR undertaken this reporting period.  \n4.  Outline action plan to address projects with a rating of HU, U or MU. Please keep your input to 1200 words","The project has been delayed and it has not been possible to make up for lost time to this day.  Delivery is slow, with changes in senior staff implying the renegotiation of previous agreements and MOUs.  Procurement is also slow, and there is often a lack of suitable candidates for consultancies.  Procurement of goods and materials is also slow, and at this time there is no clear identified mechanism for accelerating procedures. There continue to be administrative bottlenecks within the MEF for approvals of various project actions (signature of agreements, contracts, procurement and payments). The quality of some outputs provided by consultants has sometimes left to be desired, creating longer delays for revision of documents and reports.  Monitoring of consultant's outputs has been ad hoc, with no clear system in place.  Clearer TORs, with added deliverables allowing for progressive quality assessment, are being pursued when feasible, to allow for review of outputs produced by consultants.  Roles and responsibilities between members of the project team are continuously being clarified, with lead responsibilities clearly remaining in the hands of the project manager.  Over the course of the next period, response delays for review of technical outputs produced by Consultants will be shortened to allow for more revisions.  In addition, project management capacities will be strengthened, including on the implementation of project management and tracking tools, financial controls, procurement procedures. Recommendations provided by the draft Midterm Review (MTR) have been reviewed by the project team and strategies will be developed to enhance output delivery (reviewing project partners, improving targeting strategy to target appropriate beneficiaries, strengthening multi-sectoral partnerships, establishing more rigorous monitoring on consultants' outputs, and conducting more regular and effectiving steering committee meetings). "]
[]
[]
[{"$nulls":4},"Highly Satisfactory (HS)"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Satisfactory (S)"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Marginally Satisfactory (MS)"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Marginally Unsatisfactory (MU)"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Unsatisfactory (U)"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Highly Unsatisfactory (U)"]

{"sheet":"Project Indicators ","index":5,"n_rows":37,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":37,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[2,2,2,6],[3,2,3,6],[4,2,4,6],[5,2,5,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,"PROJECT Indicators (*as revised following baseline study)"]
[null,null,"Please provide all indicators being tracked for the project as outlined in the project document"]
[]
[null,null,"Type of Indicator (indicators towards Objectives, Outcomes, etc…)"]
[null,null,"Type of Indicator","Indicator","Baseline","Progress since inception","Target for Project End"]
[null,null,"Outcome 1.1 Knowledge base on best practices for climate resilience in rice, based on existing local knowledge and international research","Percentage of farmers with access to selected and publicized MIRR ","There is currently no MIRR available although various ameliorated techniques have been developed in recent decades","Documentary analytical work has been completed and guidelines on the application of the MIRR are being finalized.  A workshop was held with all stakeholders to discuss and validate technical findings.  A MIRR is therefore now available for testing locally. (90% completed) ","Based on existing ameliorated techniques such as SCV, SRI & SRA, and based on new research, 1 Resilient Rice Model is selected and published.\nAt least 90% of farmers targeted by the project has received technical support and has been trained to implement the technique according to technical guidelines."]
[null,null,"Output 1.1.1 Best Available Technologies and Integrated Resilient Rice Model (Modèle Intégré de Riziculture Résiliente - MIRR) selected and publicized ","# and type of technical guidelines for MIRR developed and publicized based on best available technologies and technique","A series of guidelines for rice cultivation techniques, technical guidelines for direct seeding and system of rice intensification, are available from regional directorate of rural development but not yet widely disseminated","Work is being completed on the overall MIRR guidelines, with an interim draft submitted and a final draft under preparation. Technical guidelines on the individual MIRR elements (fertilizer, Integrated Pest Management etc.) are completed and will undergo a final modification to take into consideration the results of local testing.  Publication will follow  (90% completed)","1 Recommended Integrated Resilient Rice Model developed and published, including a series of at least 1 technical guidelines with the following key stages/techniques:\n Seeding\n Planting\n Harvest\n Post-harvest\n Fertilization\n Integrated pest\nmanagement\n Water management"]
[null,null,"Outcome 1.2 Malagasy government, research institutions and local communities have the tools and methods to assess, monitor, and understand climate change impacts on rice.","Level of use of the tools and methods made available to Malagasy government, research institutions and local communities to assess, monitor and understand climate change impacts on rice production","Current tools to address, monitor, and understand climate change impacts on rice are hampered by a lack of data and weak potential to convey information to farmers.                                            Data on observed climate patterns is not being systematically collected at an appropriately local level making it difficult to create models and planting calendars.                            Dissemination of what information exists is also weak given the limited number of extension staff. While these staff appear to already be trained in climate issues, the information is not being disseminated to farmers.","Work has been initiated in almost all planned activities, however there have been significant delays.  The theoretical part of the outcome (research, analysis and studies) have been completed, however the local implementation is yet to be completed. See below for detail (50% complete)","All regional extension services, research institutions including CALA, and at least 90% of targeted farmers are aware of climate change trends and impacts through awareness raising and information sessions, have access to regular climate forecasts through local communication channels (radio, newspapers), and have been trained and implement MIRR and its technical guidelines, including vulnerability maps."]
[null,null,"Output 1.2.1 Malagasy government, research institutions and local communities have the tools and methods to assess, monitor, and understand climate change impacts on rice.","Number of rice cropping system models based on expected climate change scenarios, including vulnerability maps of future rice production, and hydrological models developed","Currently, there is no rice cropping system model that includes vulnerability maps of future rice production under potential climate change impacts and hydrological models developed.","Work is underway to gather data and to run crop models based on training provided using ORYZA and DSSAT.  A hydrological model has been completed (70%)","Detailed available downscaled data on expected climate change risks and impacts on rice sector at the local level compiled; identified gaps on available data are filled in; and all data are disseminated to relevant stakeholders at the regional and local levels.\n4 rice cropping system models with vulnerability maps developed according to 4 different expected climate change scenarios (driest, low dry, low humid, and most humid scenarios) and 1 hydrological model developed based on available downscaled data on expected climate change risks and impacts."]
[null,null,"Output  1.2.2 Updated, dynamic agricultural calendars and climate early warnings taking into account current and projected variability disseminated to local population","Frequency of dissemination of updated dynamic agricultural calendars and climate information, including flood early warnings in the three projected sites","Agricultural calendars under current climate conditions are well defined for all seed varieties developed, yet farmers do not necessarily apply them. The challenge resides in distributing and encouraging the application of established calendars amongst farmers through training and diffusion.\nFurthermore, new agricultural calendars will need to be developed on the\nbasis of projected future climate trends.\nWith respect to the diffusion of climate information, networks for analyzing and disseminating climate data are also insufficient:\n Manakambahiny – In Ambalavato, farmers have access to daily meteorological forecasts in the newspaper and on the Radio Nationale Malgache. In Ambaibo, farmers also have access to daily forecasts. This information, however, is not very useful as it cannot provide longer forecasts that would aid in, for instance, determining seedling date or predicting potential floods.\n Bemaintso and Ambohijanahary – Farmers have access to daily forecasts, but the forecasts do not help them adapt their growing calendar with enough forewarning or to choose which seed variety to use.","Agricultural calendars have been updated and are ready for dissemination through extension services and radio.  An MOU with local radio is under negotiation, as well as consideration of alternative strategy for communication.   A rural communications specialist has provided advice on radio programming in support of producers.  Weather stations have been purchased but are not operational yet owing to some missing equipment which will be installed in Q1 of 2016.  The project is considering alternative approaches to ensure the delivery of climate and agronomic information to producers, owing to the lack of performance of the recruited service provider. (50% complete)","Climate information and 3- 4 day forecasts, including flood early warnings, made available to farmers through local communication systems. Dynamic agricultural calendars updated and disseminated to at least 80% of targeted farmers."]
[null,null,"Output 1.2.3 Agricultural extension staff trained on climate risk management in an agro– ecosystem context","Number of agricultural extension staff in the three districts trained on climate risk management in agro– ecosystem context (gender and district disaggregated)","Extension workers were trained in climate change issues through the BV Lac project, and they do not necessarily lack training. The challenge is disseminating information from extension workers to farmers given how little contact they have with farmers.\nThe presence of extension workers in the project sites is the following:\n Manakambahiny – The municipality contains the city Ambatondrazaka, which is the capital of the Alaotra-Mangoro Region. There are 15 to 20 agriculture staff, of which 9 to 11 extension workers cover the 5 districts of the region. Their presence in the field is weak.\n Bemaintso – The municipality is part of the Andilamena district where 2 extension workers for rural engineering are located. They use radio to broadcast information to farmers.\n Ambohijanahary – The municipality is part of the Amparafaravola district, for which there are 4 extension workers (2 for agriculture and 2 for engineering).","The recruitment of consultants has been completed and work is underway to develop training materials for local personnel. The output is expected to be completed in Q2 of 2016. (30% complete)","100 % of staff trained on climate change aspects and how to disseminate new knowledge to farmers, including women."]
[null,null,"Outcome 2.1. Sustainable increase in rice yields (using MIRR)","Percentage of change in rice yields in all three project sites","Rice yields in 2012-2013 for irrigated rice in the project areas were:\n Manakambahiny – 3.41 tons/ha average (roughly 3 tons/ha for Mk34 and 3.5 tons/ha for Dista and Tsemaka)    Bemaintso – 0.7 tons/ha for MK34 and 1.5 tons/ha for Dista (the low yields observed in Bemaintso are due to floods – care should therefore be taken while analyzing these data)\n Ambohijanahary – 2 tons/ha for MK34 and 3 tons for Tsemaka                               Tsemaka – Farmers use the variety to increase yields under challenging water conditions; however, farmers report that it does not sell as well at market as MK34.\n MKx – Variety developed and distributed by CALA.\n Dista – Farmers use the variety in cases where the planting rains start late.\n SEBOTA – The variety was developed for the BV Lac project in partnership with CALA and with help from CIRAD. It is designed to tolerate poor water management conditions, but the seed has not been distributed to many farmers due to limited reproduction of the seed and to patent issues.\n FOFIFA – This is a group of early maturing varieties that can be produced in the rainy and dry seasons. They are developed by CALA. The last variety developed under this group is FOFIFA 174.","The project has achieved some positive progress in the research oriented dimensions of its activities.  For example, rice produced using MIRR technologies and practices under a research setting (using CALA and volunteer farmers) has seen an increase in yield and quality of product.  Similarly, compost production and seed production have also all functioned well under controlled conditions.  The project is now shifting to the broader dissemination of these results to farmers, where the constraints of risk aversion, lack of technical capacity and means of implementation may hinder the detection of results in terms of yields.  Furthermore, the larger water rehabilitation works have yet to be completed, which constitutes a major constraint to rice production in the areas of the project.  (48% complete)","Individual rice yields for targeted producers increase by 25% in relation to current averages in each project area."]
[null,null,"Output 2.1.1 Climate resilient rice varieties selected through participatory field testing ","Number and types of climate resilient rice varieties tested and selected within the three project sites (Municipalities of Manakambahiny, Ambohijanahary and Bemaintso)","Current rice farming is dominated by the seed variety MK34, though it is not necessarily resilient. The next most prominent varieties are Dista and Tsemaka.\n","Rice varieties have been selected and final reports submitted.  The findings of the selection work were presented to the MIRR workshop in September 2014, and validated by stakeholders.  (100% complete)","CALA facilities and capacities are strengthened to develop at least 5 varieties that are tested and proven resilient in both laboratory and field settings in the three project sites."]
[null,null,"Output 2.1.2 An operational multiplication and dissemination scheme for adapted seed varieties","Annual quantity and quality of adapted certified seeds produced and distributed in each of the project sites","Seed multiplication appears to be dominated by four main facilities. Challenges include production capacity for CALA and the publication and dissemination of seed-specific planting guidelines.","Production of adapted seeds is being conducted, however it has been difficult to devolve this responsibility to local producers, who are still somewhat risk averse.  For now, production is being done by the CALA and seeds are being provided free of charge by the project to volunteer producers. The activity is expected to be finalized in Q3 2016 unless an ongoing need for seed supplies becomes apparent. (70% complete)","At least 5 tons total of seeds for all 5 varieties that were tested and proven resilient are produced annually and distributed in the 3 project sites."]
[null,null,"Output 2.1.3 Updated fertilisation guidelines according to best available standards and taking climate conditions into consideration","Number of farmers who apply updated fertilisation guidelines in all three project sites (Municipalities of Manakambahiny, Ambohijanahary and Bemaintso)","Farmers do not appear to follow any specific guidelines for fertilizer application. Farmers vary on how and when they use compost, manure, urea, NPK, and/or DAP. Many farmers do not use any chemical fertilizer practices.fertilisers are not commonly used ","Fertilisation guidelines have been reviewed, revised and updated.  Findings of research on fertilisation guidelines was presented at the MIRR workshop and validated by stakeholders in September 2014.  A study on the use of local fertilizers was completed, along with field testing of compost production.  A contract was concluded with the producer STOI for the supply in compost to project beneficiaries, along with training in order to assist local producers in becoming autonomous in compost production (80% complete). The activity is expected to complete in Q2 2016, however it may be prolonged until there is an autonomous production system in place. (70% complete)","90% of targeted farmers have been trained and/or received technical support and apply fertilisation guidelines updated as part of the development of the MIRR."]
[null,null,"Output 2.1.4 Integrated pest management is implemented","Number of farmers trained in integrated pest management in all three project sites (gender and age disaggregated)","In general, farmers had no information or training about the appropriate protocols for using pesticide in pest control. While some used commercial pesticides, they applied them with little knowledge of best practices.","The activities were postponed to 2016 owing to the delay in other project trainings and to the unavailability of local expertise.  The activities are expected to be delivered by the end of 2016. (0% complete)","400 farmers trained in integrated pest management, gender and age disaggregated (and among them 50% women and young)"]
[null,null,"Output\n2.1.5a Water efficiency, management and conservation technologies and infrastructures are implemented","Number of Km of rehabilitated irrigation canals and number of reservoirs dredged in all three project sites","Infrastructure in the 3 municipalities was in a state of significant disrepair with damaging siltation and reduced irrigation capacities throughout. There is a large need for rehabilitating canals and dam infrastructure.","The activities under this output have been delayed owing to lengthy negotiations with the MoW.  The project has opted to recruit a rural hydraulics expert to assist with the design of planned works, including all technical elements of the calls for proposals.  It is anticipated that this process will be launched and finalized in 2016. (0% complete)","The following targets will require costly investments for which the current available budget (US$575,000) may not be sufficient. Some fund reallocations between outputs may be possible (see recommendation 8) to increase the available budget envelope and achieve the following targets. If budget reallocations are not possible, the following targets would therefore need to be decreased.\nManakambahiny: 35 km of primary canals cured, dredged, and maintained with norms that takeexpected climate change impacts into account (future precipitation regimes, drainage and run-off); 4 water intake points along the Ilakana River rehabilitated, strengthened and made more resilient to expected climate change impacts.\nBemaintso: The dam is drained and dredged; 14 km of primary canals and 21 km of secondary canals are cured, dredged, and maintained all with norms that take expected climate change impacts into account.\nAmbohijanahary: The dam at Anony is rehabilitated, primary water control valves are repaired; 13 km of primary canal are drained, dredged, and repaired; and primary canal is extended to irrigate 600 ha of additional rice fields all with norms that take expected climate change impacts into account."]
[null,null,"Output\n2.1.5b Water efficiency, management and conservation technologies and infrastructures are implemented","Percentage of change in water availability and in water use efficiency in all seasons to water users associations in all three project sites","There is a decrease in water availability during the dry season in all 3 Districts, and water losses reach up to 50 %.","same as above (0% complete)","35 % increase in water availability in all seasons in all 3 districts. Water loss estimation decrease from 50% to 25%."]
[null,null,"Outcome 2.2. Ecosystem services maintained ","Percentage change in land covered by biomass and in overall productivity (rice, vegetables and livestock) in project sites","There is no evidence of activities to increase land covered by biomass such as agro forestry practices, reforestation, or vegetable crop rotations. No farmers use soil quality or water quality improvement techniques.","There have been significant delays in achieving this outcome, mostly owing to the difficulties encountered by the main service provider, the SNGF.  A plan of redress is underway, and the project team is exploring alternative options for delivering the targets.  (20% complete)","Change in overall land area covered by forests (i.e. net reforestation) of at least 50km2 across the combined 3 municipalities.\nData on vegetables and livestock productivity/yields collected by extension services, and increase in overall productivity of rice, vegetables and livestock of 5 % throughout the life of the project and across the project sites."]
[null,null,"Output 2.2.1 Best available land preparation, production and harvesting techniques disseminated to reduce deforestation, maintain soil fertility and integrity, and to provide adequate growing conditions ","Percentage application of resilient rice model, including rice–vegetables rotation systems, in all three project sites (gender disaggregated)","Rice/vegetable crop rotations are used on only very small pieces of rice fields. Guidelines for rice/vegetable rotation practices were developed under the BV Lac project, but their dissemination was somewhat limited.","Work is underway to support the training and dissemination of crop rotation systems and agro-forestry practices in the project sites.  A first round of MIRR training was completed with volunteer farmers as primary targeted beneficiaries.  A contract with the MinAgri is under negotiation for them to take over the broader dissesmination of MIRR guidelines and technological packets through the regular extension service.  This is expected to be completed at the end of the project (50% complete)","At least 75% of targeted farmers practice rice/vegetable crop rotation on an area larger than 0.1 ha and for commercial purposes (and among them at least 50%of women and young)."]
[null,null,"Output 2.2.2 Watershed rehabilitation in productive landscapes introduced, including through reforestation and adaptation of agro forestry practices ","# of ha reforested; # of farmers and land/forest users trained on sustainable agro-forestry and land management in all three project sites (gender and age disaggregated)","some reforestation underway in the broader basin but not in project sites; currently there are no people trained on SLM and agroforestry in the project sites","This output has encountered significant difficulties, with the selected service provider (SNGF) failing to provide the expected results due to managerial difficulties.  In addition, activities for reforestation through the communes have not yet begun.  The project is examining alternative options, including the transferring of the activity to a new service provider (NGO or otherwise) with more experience and expertise in the deployment of such programs. (15% complete)","In total, at least 50km2 of area distributed in the 3 districts are reforested (5,000 ha). At least 400 farmers trained in sustainable agro forestry and land management (and among them 50% of women and young)."]
[null,null,"Output Indicator 2.2.2.a"," Number of ha reforested in all three project sites","Rice/vegetable crop rotations are used on only very small pieces of rice fields. Data on vegetables and livestock productivity/yields are currently not collected by extension services.","Work has begun with the negotiation and signature of MOUS with the National Grain Silo for the production of seedlings and the three pilot communes for community-based reforestation. Materials will be purchased and reforestation works will begin in 2015 season (10% complete)","Data on vegetables and livestock productivity/yields collected by extension services, and increase in overall productivity of rice, vegetables and livestock of 5 % throughout the life of the project and across the project sites."]
[null,null,"Output Indicator 2.2.2.b ","Number of farmers and land/forest users trained on sustainable agro forestry and land management in all three project sites (gender and age disaggregated)","Farmers have currently not been trained in sustainable agro forestry and land management practices.","Activities foreseen for 2015"]
[null,null,"Output 2.2.3 Soil conservation and livestock management techniques adapted to topography and landscape in light of future climate conditions","% change in erosion rate","The project PRODAIRE has been training workers for the DREF in monitoring erosion rates. The DREF has therefore the in-house capacities to monitor erosion rates in the project sites.  Average erosion rate in the region is 12 mm.yr.1, according to Cox, R. et.al, 2009 “ Erosion Rates and Sediment Contributions in Madagascar Inferred from 10 Analysis of Lavaka, Slope, and River Sediment”","The assessment of resilience in livestock management has begun with a technical study, which has yet to be completed.  In addition, the MoU with the Ministry of Agriculture for the delivery of activities on soil erosion, has yet to be finalized.  Activities should begin in 2016. (10% complete)","50 % reduction in erosion rates."]
[null,null,"Output 2.2.4 Revitalization of producer’s cooperatives and water user associations for collaborative natural resources allocations (e.g. land and water) and management ","Number of members of farmer’s cooperatives and water user associations trained on water management and administrative management within the three project sites","Water user cooperatives exist in the three project areas; however, in all areas members expressed a need for training in administrative management as well as training in water management.","An analysis of the situation regarding Water user associations has been conducted and recommendations were made on means to strengthen the WUAs.  Plans are underway to develop training and to provide means for this strengthening, however the activity was postponed owing to the delay in achievement of output 2.1.5 (rehabilitation of water infrastructure), which was supposed to be conducted concurrently.  (15% complete)","75 % of the members of water user cooperatives in the project area have been trained on water management and administrative management."]
[null,null,"Output 2.2.5 Water quality assessments","Percentage change in water quality (e.g. reduction in turbidity, pollutant content, microbial content, sediment content) in all three project sites","There is currently no water quality analysis conducted in any of the three municipalities","Consultants were recruited and developed a methodological framework for water quality testing in project sites.  A contract is being signed with a laboratory to support water quality analyses on an annual basis.  A first set of water samples will be taken at the end of December 2014.  New samples and analyses will become available in 2016 (15% complete)","Water quality assessment is conducted in all 3 project sites by the DIREAU with technical support provided by the project if needed.\nWater quality increase by 10% from the date of the first analysis"]
[null,null,"Outcome 2.3. Post Harvest losses reduced ","Percentage change in post harvest losses","Post–harvest losses are estimated to be between 5 and 10% of total harvest.","Activities to lead to this outcome are underway, however, some research shows that the initial project assumptions regarding the potential use of rice by products may have been unproven, and therefore additional research will be conducted prior to conducting activities in the field.  Furthermore, there have been delays in the procurement of a service provider for the rehabilitation of post harvest facilities, which is expected to be resolved in 2016. (18 % complete)","Post-harvest losses are reduced to less than 4%."]
[null,null,"Output 2.3.1 Increased utilization of rice by–product especially rice straw"," Percentage change in use of rice straws in animal feeding and for briquetting","There are regional variations in the degree to which farmers exploit rice stalks for other uses. In some municipalities, residues are simply burned in the field.","Activities have been initiated in 2015 with the development of studies on the potential for utilization of rice by products.  Initial reports have however not been conclusive, therefore additional research was deemed necessary.  Once the studies are completed, the project will assess whether the potential for use of rice by-products is sinfiicant enough to warrant a pilot demonstration, in 2016 (15% complete)","75% of farmers use or commercialize rice straws."]
[null,null,"Output 2.3.2 Post–harvest storage facilities with phytosanitary control, serving as trading points and markets","Number of renovated storage facilities in all three project sites","Storage facilities in the project sites exist, but they are not in adequate condition","A comprehensive feasibility study has been completed and recommendations were made on the rehabilitation and construction of upgraded resilient storage facilities.  Negotiations were completed with local communities on the localization of facilities and a process is underway for making decisions on management systems for each of the rehabilitated or constructed structures.  The project will recruit a construction specialist to assist with the development of detailed technical plans and calls for tender, which will be launched in 2016. The activity is expected to be finalized in 2016.(20% complete)","75% of existing facilities have been renovated."]
[null,null,"Outcome 3.1 Technical norms and standards in rice cultivation reviewed and where necessary modified to take climate change into account","Number and types of technical norms and standards in rice cultivation reviewed and modified at the national level to take climate change into account","No recommendation or revision has currently been made to technical norms and standards in rice cultivation.","This outcome is designed to be initiated towards the end of the project, once sufficient lessons have been achieved from local activities. It is intended to be finalized in 2017 and real progress has been made on this thus far. ","At least one national strategy on rice cultivation and at least one technical guideline for the following rice cultivation stages/techniques are revised and updated at the national level:\n• Seeding\n• Planting\n• Harvest\n• Post–harvest\n• Fertilization\n• Integrated pest management\n• Water management"]
[null,null,"Output 3 .1.1a Gaps and possible maladaptations in the current rice policy are identified and recommendations on rice policy reform are made","Number and types of activities identified and implemented for up scaling and replication from MIRR application in broader Alaotra basin and in other regions","While there is an Agricultural Development Strategy at the national level, it does not have a true application at the regional level due to financing. There is no specific policy for growing rice.","The activities were postponed to the latter part of 2016, owing to delays in project implementation and absence of results upon which to convene a policy process. (10% complete)","1 replication strategy and action plan developed, including at least 5 to 10 operational activities for up scaling and replication of MIRR practices in the broader Alaotra basin and beyond."]
[null,null,"Output 3.1.1b Gaps and possible maladaptations in the current rice policy are identified and recommendations on rice policy reform are made ","Number and types of recommendations on rice policy reforms made","The National Strategy on Rural Development (SNDR) was completed; however, this strategy has not been published or disseminated.","Activities foreseen for 2017","The SNDR is revised with measures to increase climate change resilience of rice production, and then the strategy is published and disseminated."]
[null,null,"Outcome indicator 3.2 Conditions in place for a full adaptation of the rice sub–sector","Number and type of stakeholders to which the report on best practices and lessons learned is distributed","Lessons learned and best practices will be identified and collected during project implementation","Activities foreseen for 2017","1 report at end of project."]
[null,null,"Output indicator 3.2.1A report on best practices and lessons learned for rice adaptation in Madagascar","Number and type of stakeholders to which the report on best practices and lessons learned is distributed",0,"Activities foreseen for 2017","Target to be defined before next PPR December 2016"]
[null,null,"Output indicator 3.2.2  A strategy for communicating information on adaptation techniques to farmers is implemented","TBC","TBC","Activities have begun since 2014 and are designed to last until project completion.  A rural communication strategy was completed and the project has embarked on an awarness raising strategy.  A stronger targeting strategy will be developed to further support project activities. (25% complete)","Target to be defined before next PPR December 2016"]

{"sheet":"Lessons Learned ","index":6,"n_rows":28,"n_cols":4,"rows_kept":28,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[23,2,23,3],[2,2,2,3],[11,2,11,3],[13,2,13,3],[16,2,16,3],[19,2,19,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,"QUALITATIVE MEASURES and LESSONS LEARNED"]
[]
[null,null,"Please complete the following section every reporting period"]
[null,null,"Implementation and Adaptive Management","Response"]
[null,null,"What implementation issues/lessons, either positive or negative, affected progress?","The project has encountered significant difficulties with some service providers who did not have the required capacity to deliver results.  This is the case of the SNGF as well as some consultants.  A more thorough capacity assessment for service providers should be conducted before signing agreements, particularly those that are signed on a non-competitive basis.  The project has also encountered significant difficulties in terms of management processes, procurement, etc.  In future, comprehensive training and harmonization of procedures should be conducted early on. "]
[null,null,"Were there any delays in implementation?  If so, include any causes of delays. What measures have been taken to reduce delays?","Yes.  Delays were caused by a variety of reasons: changes in procedures at UNEP and within MEF, changes in personnel in MEF and other key ministries, lack of capacity of service providers and low quality of outputs, difficulties in procurement of required expertise and resources.  These have all been addressed individually and are being monitored through the CTA and TM.(see risk section for additional mitigation detail)"]
[null,null,"Describe any changes undertaken to improve results on the ground or any changes made to project outputs (i.e. changes to project design)","Changes to delivery strategies occur on an ongoing basis, to deal with shortcomings, challenges, or delays.  The project has opted to change some of the delivery mecahnisms for some activities and is considering additional measures in order to address shortcomings identified above. "]
[null,null,"How have gender considerations been taken into consideration during the reporting period? What have been the lessons learned as a consequence of inclusion of such considerations on project performance or impacts?","although gender considerations are fully integrated in the project's activities, there has not yet been any significant effort to provide gender disaggregated data or monitoring of gender aspects of the project.  This will be addressed in future. "]
[]
[null,null,"Please complete the following section at mid-term and project completion"]
[null,null,"Lessons for Adaptation","Response"]
[null,null,"Climate Resilience Measures"]
[null,null,"What have been the lessons learned, both positive and negative, in implementing climate adaptation measures that would be relevant to the design and implementation of future projects/programmes for enhanced resilience to climate change?","The MTR is currently in draft and will provide insights that can be shared in the next PPR submitted January 2017"]
[null,null,"What is the potential for the climate resilience measures undertaken by the project/programme to be replicated and scaled up both within and outside the project area?","The MTR is currently in draft and will provide insights that can be shared in the next PPR submitted January 2017"]
[null,null,"Concrete Adaptation Interventions"]
[null,null,"What have been the lessons learned, both positive and negative, in implementing concrete adaptation interventions that would be relevant to the design and implementation of future projects/programmes implementing concrete adaptation interventions?","The MTR is currently in draft and will provide insights that can be shared in the next PPR submitted January 2017"]
[null,null,"What is the potential for the concrete adaptation interventions undertaken by the project/programme to be replicated and scaled up both within and outside the project area?","The MTR is currently in draft and will provide insights that can be shared in the next PPR submitted January 2017"]
[null,null,"Community/National Impact"]
[null,null,"What would you consider to be the most successful aspects for the target communities?","The MTR is currently in draft and will provide insights that can be shared in the next PPR submitted January 2017"]
[null,null,"What measures are/have been put in place to ensure sustainability of the project/program results?","The MTR is currently in draft and will provide insights that can be shared in the next PPR submitted January 2017"]
[null,null,"What measures are being/could have been put in place to improve project/program results?","The MTR is currently in draft and will provide insights that can be shared in the next PPR submitted January 2017"]
[null,null,"Knowledge Management "]
[null,null,"How has existing information/data/knowledge been used to inform project development and implementation? What kinds of information/data/knowledge were used?","The MTR is currently in draft and will provide insights that can be shared in the next PPR submitted January 2017"]
[null,null,"If learning objectives have been established, have they been met? Please describe.","The MTR is currently in draft and will provide insights that can be shared in the next PPR submitted January 2017"]
[null,null,"Describe any difficulties there have been in  accessing or retrieving existing information (data or knowledge) that is relevant to the project. Please provide suggestions for improving access to the relevant data.","The MTR is currently in draft and will provide insights that can be shared in the next PPR submitted January 2017"]
[null,null,"Has the identification of learning objectives contributed to the outcomes of the project? In what ways have they contributed?","The MTR is currently in draft and will provide insights that can be shared in the next PPR submitted January 2017"]

{"sheet":"New Results Tracker","index":7,"n_rows":128,"n_cols":19,"rows_kept":128,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,"Results Tracker for Adaptation Fund (AF)  Projects    "]
[]
[]
[null,"Goal: Assist developing-country Parties to the Kyoto Protocol that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change in meeting the costs of concrete adaptation projects and programmes in order to implement climate-resilient measures. \nImpact: Increased resiliency at the community, national, and regional levels to climate variability and change. "]
[null,"Important: Please read the following guidance document (also posted on the Adaptation Fund website) before entering your data "]
[null,"Link: http://www.adaptation-fund.org/sites/default/files/Results%20Framework%20and%20Baseline%20Guidance%20final.pdf"]
[]
[null,"Adaptation Fund Strategic Results Framework"]
[]
[null,"Project ID","AFB-5060-1111-2G49"]
[null,"Implementing Entity","UNEP"]
[null,"Type of implementing entity","MIE"]
[null,"Country","Madagascar"]
[null,"Region","Africa"]
[null,"Sector","Agriculture"]
[]
[null,null,null,"Baseline information",null,null,null,"Target performance at completion",null,null,null,"Performance at mid-term",null,null,null,"Performance at completion"]
[null,"Impact: Increased resiliency at the community, national, and regional levels to climate variability and change","Core Indicator: No. of beneficiaries",null,"Total (direct + indirect beneficiaries)","Direct beneficiaries supported by the project","Indirect beneficiaries supported by the project",null,"Total (direct + indirect beneficiaries)","Direct beneficiaries supported by the project","Indirect beneficiaries supported by the project",null,"Total (direct + indirect beneficiaries)","Direct beneficiaries supported by the project","Indirect beneficiaries supported by the project",null,"Total (direct + indirect beneficiaries)","Direct beneficiaries supported by the project","Indirect beneficiaries supported by the project"]
[null,null,null,"Total",0,0,0,"Total",null,null,null,"Total",1200,200,1000,"Total"]
[null,null,null,"% of female beneficiaries",0,0,0,"% of female beneficiaries",0.4,null,null,"% of female beneficiaries",null,null,null,"% of female beneficiaries"]
[null,null,null,"% of Youth beneficiaries",0,0,0,"% of Youth beneficiaries",0.25,null,null,"% of Youth beneficiaries",null,null,null,"% of Youth beneficiaries"]
[]
[null,null,null,"Baseline information",null,null,null,"Target performance at completion",null,null,null,"Performance at mid-term",null,null,null,"Performance at completion"]
[null,"Outcome 1: Reduced exposure to climate-related hazards and threats","Indicator 1: Relevant threat and hazard information generated and disseminated to stakeholders on a timely basis","Number of targeted stakeholders",null,"Hazards information generated and disseminated","Overall effectiveness","Number of targeted stakeholders",null,"Hazards information generated and disseminated","Overall effectiveness","Number of targeted stakeholders",null,"Hazards information generated and disseminated","Overall effectiveness","Number of targeted stakeholders",null,"Hazards information generated and disseminated","Overall effectiveness"]
[null,null,null,"Total",null,null,null,"Total",null,null,null,"Total",null,null,null,"Total"]
[null,null,null,"% of female targeted",null,null,null,"% of female targeted",null,null,null,"% of female targeted",null,null,null,"% of female targeted"]
[null,"Output 1.1 Risk and vulnerability assessments conducted and updated","Indicator 1.1: No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status","No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status","No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status","No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status"]
[]
[null,null,null,"No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status","No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status","No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status","No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status"]
[]
[null,null,null,"No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status","No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status","No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status","No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status"]
[]
[null,null,null,"No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status","No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status","No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status","No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status"]
[]
[null,null,null,"No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status","No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status","No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status","No. of projects/programmes that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments","Sector","Scale","Status"]
[]
[null,"Output 1.2 Targeted population groups covered by adequate risk reduction systems","Core Indicator 1.2: No. of Early Warning Systems","No. of adopted Early Warning Systems","Category targeted","Hazard",null,"No. of adopted Early Warning Systems","Category targeted","Hazard",null,"No. of adopted Early Warning Systems","Category targeted","Hazard",null,"No. of adopted Early Warning Systems","Category targeted","Hazard"]
[null,null,null,0,null,"Geographical coverage",null,0,null,"Geographical coverage",null,null,null,"Geographical coverage",null,null,null,"Geographical coverage"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Number of municipalities",null,null,null,"Number of municipalities",null,null,null,"Number of municipalities",null,null,null,"Number of municipalities"]
[null,null,null,"No. of adopted Early Warning Systems","Category targeted","Hazard",null,"No. of adopted Early Warning Systems","Category targeted","Hazard",null,"No. of adopted Early Warning Systems","Category targeted","Hazard",null,"No. of adopted Early Warning Systems","Category targeted","Hazard"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Geographical coverage",null,null,null,"Geographical coverage",null,null,null,"Geographical coverage",null,null,null,"Geographical coverage"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Number of municipalities",null,null,null,"Number of municipalities",null,null,null,"Number of municipalities",null,null,null,"Number of municipalities"]
[null,null,null,"No. of adopted Early Warning Systems","Category targeted","Hazard",null,"No. of adopted Early Warning Systems","Category targeted","Hazard",null,"No. of adopted Early Warning Systems","Category targeted","Hazard",null,"No. of adopted Early Warning Systems","Category targeted","Hazard"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Geographical coverage",null,null,null,"Geographical coverage",null,null,null,"Geographical coverage",null,null,null,"Geographical coverage"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Number of municipalities",null,null,null,"Number of municipalities",null,null,null,"Number of municipalities",null,null,null,"Number of municipalities"]
[null,null,null,"No. of adopted Early Warning Systems","Category targeted","Hazard",null,"No. of adopted Early Warning Systems","Category targeted","Hazard",null,"No. of adopted Early Warning Systems","Category targeted","Hazard",null,"No. of adopted Early Warning Systems","Category targeted","Hazard"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Geographical coverage",null,null,null,"Geographical coverage",null,null,null,"Geographical coverage",null,null,null,"Geographical coverage"]
[{"$nulls":5},"Number of municipalities",null,null,null,"Number of municipalities",null,null,null,"Number of municipalities",null,null,null,"Number of municipalities"]
[]
[null,null,null,"Baseline information",null,null,null,"Target performance at completion",null,null,null,"Performance at mid-term",null,null,null,"Performance at completion"]
[null,"Outcome 2: Strengthened institutional capacity to reduce risks associated with climate-induced socioeconomic and environmental losses","Indicator 2: Capacity of staff to respond to, and mitigate impacts of, climate-related events from targeted institutions increased","Number of staff targeted",null,"Sector","Capacity level","Number of staff targeted",null,"Sector","Capacity level","Number of staff targeted",null,"Sector","Capacity level","Number of staff targeted",null,"Sector","Capacity level"]
[null,null,null,"Total",null,null,null,"Total",null,null,null,"Total",null,null,null,"Total"]
[null,null,null,"% of female targeted",null,null,null,"% of female targeted",null,null,null,"% of female targeted",null,null,null,"% of female targeted"]
[null,"Output 2.1 Strengthened capacity of national and sub-national centres and networks to respond rapidly to extreme weather events","Indicator 2.1.1: No. of staff trained to respond to, and mitigate impacts of, climate-related events","Total staff trained","% of female staff trained","Type",null,"Total staff trained","% of female staff trained","Type",null,"Total staff trained","% of female staff trained","Type",null,"Total staff trained","% of female staff trained","Type"]
[]
[null,null,"Indicator 2.1.2: No. of targeted institutions with increased capacity to minimize exposure to climate variability risks","Type","Scale","Sector","Capacity level","Type","Scale","Sector","Capacity level","Type","Scale","Sector","Capacity level","Type","Scale","Sector","Capacity level"]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,"Baseline information",null,null,null,"Target performance at completion",null,null,null,"Performance at mid-term",null,null,null,"Performance at completion"]
[null,"Outcome 3: Strengthened awareness and owernship of adaptation and climate risk reduction processes","Indicator 3.1: Increase in application of appropriate adaptation responses","Percentage of targeted population applying adaptation measures",null,"Sector",null,"Percentage of targeted population applying adaptation measures",null,"Sector",null,"Percentage of targeted population applying adaptation measures",null,"Sector",null,"Percentage of targeted population applying adaptation measures",null,"Sector"]
[null,null,null,0.1,null,"Agriculture",null,75,null,"Agriculture",null,0.25,null,"Agriculture"]
[null,"Output 3: Targeted population groups participating in adaptation and risk reduction awareness activities ","Indicator 3.1.1: Percentage of targeted population awareness of predicted adverse impacts of climate change, and of appropriate responses","No. of targeted beneficiaries","% of female participants targeted","Level of awareness",null,"No. of targeted beneficiaries","% of female participants targeted","Level of awareness",null,"No. of targeted beneficiaries","% of female participants targeted","Level of awareness",null,"No. of targeted beneficiaries","% of female participants targeted","Level of awareness"]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,"Baseline information",null,null,null,"Target performance at completion",null,null,null,"Performance at mid-term",null,null,null,"Target performance at completion"]
[null,"Outcome 4: Increased adaptive capacity within relevant development sector services and infrastructure assets","Indicator 4.1: Increased responsiveness of development sector services to evolving needs from changing and variable climate","Project/programme sector","Geographical scale","Response level",null,"Project/programme sector","Geographical scale","Response level",null,"Project/programme sector","Geographical scale","Response level",null,"Project/programme sector","Geographical scale","Response level"]
[]
[null,null,"Core Indicator 4.2: Assets produced, developed, improved or strengthened","Sector","Targeted asset","Changes in asset (quantitative or qualitative)",null,"Sector","Targeted asset","Changes in asset (quantitative or qualitative)",null,"Sector","Targeted asset","Changes in asset (quantitative or qualitative)",null,"Sector","Targeted asset","Changes in asset (quantitative or qualitative)"]
[null,null,null,"Agriculture","2: Physical asset (produced/improved/strenghtened)","1: Not improved",null,"Agriculture","2: Physical asset (produced/improved/strenghtened)","4: Mostly Improved",null,"Agriculture","2: Physical asset (produced/improved/strenghtened)","2: Somewhat improved"]
[null,null,null,"Water management","2: Physical asset (produced/improved/strenghtened)","1: Not improved",null,"Water management","2: Physical asset (produced/improved/strenghtened)","4: Mostly Improved",null,"Water management","2: Physical asset (produced/improved/strenghtened)","1: Not improved"]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,"Output 4: Vulnerable development sector services and infrastructure assets strengthened in response to climate change impacts, including variability","Indicator 4.1.1: No. and type of development sector services to respond to new conditions resulting from climate variability and change","Number of services","Type",null,"Sector","Number of services","Type",null,"Sector","Number of services","Type",null,"Sector","Number of services","Type",null,"Sector"]
{"$rows_empty":7}
[null,null,null,"Baseline information",null,null,null,"Baseline information",null,null,null,"Performance at mid-term",null,null,null,"Target performance at completion"]
[null,"Outcome 5: Increased ecosystem resilience in response to climate change and variability-induced stress","Indicator 5: Ecosystem services and natural resource assets maintained or improved under climate change and variability-induced stress","Natural resource improvement level",null,"Sector","Type","Natural resource improvement level",null,"Sector","Type","Natural resource improvement level",null,"Sector","Type","Natural resource improvement level",null,"Sector","Type"]
[]
[null,"Output 5: Vulnerable ecosystem services and natural resource assets strengthned in response to climate change impacts, including variability","Core Indicator 5.1: Natural Assets protected or rehabilitated","Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)","Total number of natural assets or ecosystems protected/rehabilitated","Unit","Effectiveness of protection/rehabilitation","Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)","Total number of natural assets or ecosystems protected/rehabilitated","Unit","Effectiveness of protection/rehabilitation","Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)","Total number of natural assets or ecosystems protected/rehabilitated","Unit","Effectiveness of protection/rehabilitation","Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)","Total number of natural assets or ecosystems protected/rehabilitated","Unit","Effectiveness of protection/rehabilitation"]
[null,null,null,"Cultivated land/Agricultural land",0,"ha rehabilitated","1: Ineffective","Cultivated land/Agricultural land",500,"ha rehabilitated","4: Effective","Cultivated land/Agricultural land",10,"ha rehabilitated","2: Partially effective"]
[]
[null,null,null,"Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)","Total number of natural assets or ecosystems protected/rehabilitated","Unit","Effectiveness of protection/rehabilitation","Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)","Total number of natural assets or ecosystems protected/rehabilitated","Unit","Effectiveness of protection/rehabilitation","Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)","Total number of natural assets or ecosystems protected/rehabilitated","Unit","Effectiveness of protection/rehabilitation","Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)","Total number of natural assets or ecosystems protected/rehabilitated","Unit","Effectiveness of protection/rehabilitation"]
[null,null,null,"Catchment area/Watershed/Aquifer",0,"ha rehabilitated","1: Ineffective","Catchment area/Watershed/Aquifer",4000,"ha rehabilitated","4: Effective","Forests",4000,"ha rehabilitated","1: Ineffective"]
[]
[null,null,null,"Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)","Total number of natural assets or ecosystems protected/rehabilitated","Unit","Effectiveness of protection/rehabilitation","Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)","Total number of natural assets or ecosystems protected/rehabilitated","Unit","Effectiveness of protection/rehabilitation","Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)","Total number of natural assets or ecosystems protected/rehabilitated","Unit","Effectiveness of protection/rehabilitation","Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)","Total number of natural assets or ecosystems protected/rehabilitated","Unit","Effectiveness of protection/rehabilitation"]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,"Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)","Total number of natural assets or ecosystems protected/rehabilitated","Unit","Effectiveness of protection/rehabilitation","Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)","Total number of natural assets or ecosystems protected/rehabilitated","Unit","Effectiveness of protection/rehabilitation","Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)","Total number of natural assets or ecosystems protected/rehabilitated","Unit","Effectiveness of protection/rehabilitation","Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)","Total number of natural assets or ecosystems protected/rehabilitated","Unit","Effectiveness of protection/rehabilitation"]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,"Baseline information",null,null,null,"Targeted performance at completion",null,null,null,"Performance at mid-term",null,null,null,"Performance at completion"]
[null,"Outcome 6: Diversified and strengthened livelihoods and sources of income for vulnerable people in targeted areas","Indicator 6.1: Increase in households and communities having more secure access to livelihood assets","No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","Improvement level",null,"No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","Improvement level",null,"No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","Improvement level",null,"No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","Improvement level"]
[]
[null,null,"Indicator 6.2: Increase in targeted population's sustained climate-resilient alternative livelihoods","No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","% increase in income level vis-à-vis baseline","Alternate Source","No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","% increase in income level vis-à-vis baseline","Alternate Source","No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","% increase in income level vis-à-vis baseline","Alternate Source","No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","% increase in income level vis-à-vis baseline","Alternate Source"]
[null,null,null,0,"N/A","N/A","N/A",1000,0.35,"From 10% to 20%","Agriculture",200,0.25,"From 1% to 5%","Agriculture"]
[null,null,null,"No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","% increase in income level vis-à-vis baseline","Alternate Source","No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","% increase in income level vis-à-vis baseline","Alternate Source","No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","% increase in income level vis-à-vis baseline","Alternate Source","No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","% increase in income level vis-à-vis baseline","Alternate Source"]
[]
[null,null,null,"No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","% increase in income level vis-à-vis baseline","Alternate Source","No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","% increase in income level vis-à-vis baseline","Alternate Source","No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","% increase in income level vis-à-vis baseline","Alternate Source","No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","% increase in income level vis-à-vis baseline","Alternate Source"]
[]
[null,null,null,"No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","% increase in income level vis-à-vis baseline","Alternate Source","No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","% increase in income level vis-à-vis baseline","Alternate Source","No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","% increase in income level vis-à-vis baseline","Alternate Source","No. of targeted households","% of female headed households","% increase in income level vis-à-vis baseline","Alternate Source"]
[]
[null,"Output 6 Targeted individual and community livelihood strategies strengthened in relation to climate change impacts, including variability","Indicator 6.1.1: No. and type of adaptation assets created or strengthened in support of individual or community livelihood strategies","Number of Assets","Type of Assets","Sector","Adaptation strategy","Number of Assets","Type of Assets","Sector","Adaptation strategy","Number of Assets","Type of Assets","Sector","Adaptation strategy","Number of Assets","Type of Assets","Sector","Adaptation strategy"]
[]
[null,null,"Core Indicator 6.1.2: Increased income, or avoided decrease in income","Number of households (total number in the project area)","Income source",null,"Income level (USD)","Number of households (total number in the project area)","Income source",null,"Income level (USD)","Number of households (total number in the project area)","Income source",null,"Income level (USD)","Number of households (total number in the project area)","Income source","Income source"]
[null,null,null,0,0,null,0,"Currently no data to support this target","Currently no data to support this target",null,"Currently no data to support this target","NA","NA","NA","NA"]
[null,null,null,"Number of households (total number in the project area)","Income source",null,"Income level (USD)","Number of households (total number in the project area)","Income source",null,"Income level (USD)","Number of households (total number in the project area)","Income source",null,"Income level (USD)","Number of households (total number in the project area)","Income source","Income source"]
[]
[null,null,null,"Number of households (total number in the project area)","Income source",null,"Income level (USD)","Number of households (total number in the project area)","Income source",null,"Income level (USD)","Number of households (total number in the project area)","Income source",null,"Income level (USD)","Number of households (total number in the project area)","Income source","Income source"]
[]
[null,null,null,"Number of households (total number in the project area)","Income source",null,"Income level (USD)","Number of households (total number in the project area)","Income source",null,"Income level (USD)","Number of households (total number in the project area)","Income source",null,"Income level (USD)","Number of households (total number in the project area)","Income source","Income source"]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,"Baseline information",null,null,null,"Target performance at completion",null,null,null,"Performance at mid-term",null,null,null,"Performance at completion"]
[null,"Outcome 7: Improved policies and regulations that promote and enforce resilience measures","Indicator 7: Climate change priorities are integrated into national development strategy","Integration level",null,null,null,"Integration level",null,null,null,"Integration level",null,null,null,"Integration level"]
[]
[null,"Output 7:Improved integration of climate-resilience strategies into country development plans","Indicator 7.1: No. of policies introduced or adjusted to address climate change risks","No. of Policies introduced or adjusted","Sector","Scale","Type","No. of Policies introduced or adjusted","Sector","Scale","Type","No. of Policies introduced or adjusted","Sector","Scale","Type","No. of Policies introduced or adjusted","Sector","Scale","Type"]
[]
[null,null,"Indicator 7.2: No. of targeted development strategies with incorporated climate change priorities enforced","No. of Development strategies","Regulation",null,"Effectiveness","No. of Development strategies","Regulation",null,"Effectiveness","No. of Development strategies","Regulation",null,"Effectiveness","No. of Development strategies","Regulation",null,"Effectiveness"]

{"sheet":"Old Results Tracker","index":8,"n_rows":39,"n_cols":12,"rows_kept":39,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[29,5,29,12],[30,5,30,6],[36,5,36,12],[34,5,34,6],[34,7,34,8],[34,9,34,10],[34,11,34,12],[35,5,35,6],[35,7,35,8],[35,9,35,10],[33,1,33,12],[37,5,37,6],[37,7,37,8],[37,9,37,10],[37,11,37,12],[38,5,38,6],[38,7,38,8],[38,9,38,10],[38,11,38,12],[35,11,35,12],[30,9,30,10],[30,11,30,12],[31,5,31,6],[31,7,31,8],[31,9,31,10],[31,11,31,12],[30,7,30,8],[27,7,27,8],[27,9,27,10],[27,11,27,12],[28,5,28,6],[24,5,24,6],[24,7,24,8],[24,9,24,10],[24,11,24,12],[28,7,28,8],[28,9,28,10],[28,11,28,12],[19,1,19,12],[22,5,22,12],[23,5,23,6],[23,7,23,8],[23,9,23,10],[23,11,23,12],[26,1,26,12],[27,5,27,6],[20,5,20,6],[20,7,20,8],[20,9,20,10],[20,11,20,12],[21,5,21,6],[21,7,21,8],[21,9,21,10],[21,11,21,12],[1,2,1,6],[13,7,13,8],[13,9,13,10],[5,1,6,12],[7,1,7,12],[8,1,8,12],[2,2,2,5],[12,1,12,12],[13,11,13,12],[14,5,14,6],[14,7,14,8],[14,9,14,10],[14,11,14,12],[15,5,15,12],[10,1,10,3],[13,5,13,6],[16,5,16,6],[16,7,16,8],[16,9,16,10],[16,11,16,12],[17,5,17,6],[17,7,17,8],[17,9,17,10],[17,11,17,12]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,null,"Results Tracker for Adaptation Fund (AF)  Projects    "]
[]
[]
[null,"Goal: Assist developing-country Parties to the Kyoto Protocol that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change in meeting the costs of concrete adaptation projects and programmes in order to implement climate-resilient measures. Impact: Increased resiliency at the community, national, and regional levels to climate variability and change. "]
[]
[null,"Important: Please read the following Results Framework and Baseline Guidance (also posted on the Adaptation Fund website) before entering your data "]
[null,"Link: http://www.adaptation-fund.org/sites/default/files/Results%20Framework%20and%20Baseline%20Guidance%20final.pdf"]
[]
[null,"Please select the relevant Fund level Outcome and Output indicators that allign with the project objectives and outcomes"]
[]
[null,"OBJECTIVE 1"]
[null,"Fund Outcome","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Fund Outcome Indicator","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Target at CEO Endorsement                    (see Units in next sheet)",null,"Baseline                 (see Units in next sheet)",null,"Mid-term Results",null,"Terminal Results"]
[null,"Outcome 1: Reduced exposure at national level to climate-related hazards and threats\nOutcome 2: Strengthened institutional capacity to reduce risks associated with climate-induced socioeconomic and environmental losses\nOutcome 3: Strengthened awareness and ownership of adaptation and climate risk reduction processes at local level\nOutcome 4: Increased adaptive capacity within relevant development and natural resource sectors\nOutcome 5: Increased ecosystem resilience in response to climate change and variability-induced stress\nOutcome 6: Diversified and strengthened livelihoods and sources of income for vulnerable people in targeted areas                                                                                                 Outcome 7: Improved policies and regulations that promote and enforce resilience measures",4,"1. Relevant threat and hazard information generated and disseminated to stakeholders on a timely basis\n2.1. No. and type of targeted institutions with increased capacity to minimize exposure to climate\nvariability risks\n2.2. Number of people with reduced risk to extreme weather events\n3.1. Percentage of targeted population aware of predicted adverse impacts of climate change, and of\nappropriate responses\n3.2. Modification in behavior of targeted population\n4.1. Development sectors' services responsive to evolving needs from changing and variable climate                                                                                            \n4.2. Physical infrastructure improved to withstand climate change and variability-induced stress                                                                                 \n5. Ecosystem services and natural assets maintained or improved under climate change and\nvariability-induced stress                                                                                                                                                          6.1. Percentage of households and communities having more secure (increased) access to livelihood\nassets                                                                                                                                                                                                6.2. Percentage of targeted population with sustained climate-resilient livelihoods                                                                                           7. Climate change priorities are integrated into national development strategy",4.2,4,null,2,null,"TBC"]
[]
[null,"Fund Output","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Fund Output Indicator","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Target at CEO Endorsement                    (see Units in next sheet)",null,"Baseline                 (see Units in next sheet)",null,"Mid-term Results",null,"Terminal Results"]
[null,"Output 1: Risk and vulnerability assessments conducted and updated at a national level\nOutput 2.1: Strengthened capacity of national and regional centres and networks to respond rapidly to extreme weather events\nOutput 2.2: Targeted population groups covered by adequate risk reduction systems\nOutput 3: Targeted population groups participating in\nadaptation and risk reduction awareness activities\nOutput 4: Vulnerable physical, natural, and social assets strengthened in response to climate change impacts, including variability\nOutput 5: Vulnerable physical, natural, and social assets strengthened in response to climate change impacts, including variability                                                                                             Output 6: Targeted individual and community livelihood strategies strengthened in relation to climate change impacts, including variability                                                                            Output 7: Improved integration of climate-resilience strategies into country development plans",4,"1.1. No. and type of projects that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments                                                                                      \n1.2. Development of early warning systems\n2.1.1. No. of staff trained to respond to, and mitigate impacts of, climate-related events\n2.1.2. Capacity of staff to respond to, and mitigate impacts of, climate-related events from targeted\ninstitutions increased\n2.2.1. Percentage of population covered by adequate risk-reduction systems\n2.2.2. No. of people affected by climate variability                                                                                                          3.1 No. and type of risk reduction actions or strategies introduced at local level                                                                                                     3.2 No. of news outlets in the local press and media that have covered the topic                                                                                                    4.1. No. and type of health or social infrastructure developed or modified to respond to new conditions\nresulting from climate variability and change (by type)                                                                                                                                                            4. 2. No. of physical assets strengthened or constructed to withstand conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by asset types)                                                                                                                                   5. No. and type of natural resource assets created, maintained or improved to withstand conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by type of assets)                                                                                                                   \n6.1. No. and type of adaptation assets (physical as well as knowledge) created in support of individualor\ncommunity-livelihood strategies                                                                                                                                                   6.2. Type of income sources for households generated under climate change scenario                                                                                    \n7.1. No., type, and sector of policies introduced or adjusted to address climate change risks                                                                                 \n7.2. No. or targeted development strategies with incorporated climate change priorities enforced",4.2,"Irrigation and drainage infrastructure is improved in 3 sites as follows: Manakambahiny: 35 km of primary canals cured, dredged, and maintained,; Bemaintso: The dam is drained and dredged; 14 km of primary canals and 21 km of secondary canals are cured, dredged, and maintained; Ambohijanahary: The dam at Anony is rehabilitated, primary water control valves are repaired; 13 km of primary canal are drained, dredged, and repaired; and primary canal is extended to irrigate 600 ha of additional rice fields. ",null,"0 physical assets are made resilient to impacts of climate change",null,"TBC"]
[]
[null,"OBJECTIVE 2"]
[null,"Fund Outcome","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Fund Outcome Indicator","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Target at CEO Endorsement ",null,"Baseline",null,"Mid-term Results",null,"Terminal Results"]
[null,"Outcome 1: Reduced exposure at national level to climate-related hazards and threats\nOutcome 2: Strengthened institutional capacity to reduce risks associated with climate-induced socioeconomic and environmental losses\nOutcome 3: Strengthened awareness and ownership of adaptation and climate risk reduction processes at local level\nOutcome 4: Increased adaptive capacity within relevant development and natural resource sectors\nOutcome 5: Increased ecosystem resilience in response to climate change and variability-induced stress\nOutcome 6: Diversified and strengthened livelihoods and sources of income for vulnerable people in targeted areas                                                                                                 Outcome 7: Improved policies and regulations that promote and enforce resilience measures",5,"1. Relevant threat and hazard information generated and disseminated to stakeholders on a timely basis\n2.1. No. and type of targeted institutions with increased capacity to minimize exposure to climate\nvariability risks\n2.2. Number of people with reduced risk to extreme weather events\n3.1. Percentage of targeted population aware of predicted adverse impacts of climate change, and of\nappropriate responses\n3.2. Modification in behavior of targeted population\n4.1. Development sectors' services responsive to evolving needs from changing and variable climate                                                                                            4.2. Physical infrastructure improved to withstand climate change and variability-induced stress                                                                                 5. Ecosystem services and natural assets maintained or improved under climate change and\nvariability-induced stress                                                                                                                                                          6.1. Percentage of households and communities having more secure (increased) access to livelihood\nassets                                                                                                                                                                                                6.2. Percentage of targeted population with sustained climate-resilient livelihoods                                                                                           7. Climate change priorities are integrated into national development strategy",5,"4 - Mostly Effective. Change in overall land area covered by forests (i.e. net reforestation) of at least 50km2 across the combined 3 municipalities.",null,2,null,"TBC"]
[]
[null,"Fund Output","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Fund Output Indicator","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Target at CEO Endorsement ",null,"Baseline",null,"Mid-term Results",null,"Terminal Results"]
[null,"Output 1: Risk and vulnerability assessments conducted and updated at a national level\nOutput 2.1: Strengthened capacity of national and regional centres and networks to respond rapidly to extreme weather events\nOutput 2.2: Targeted population groups covered by adequate risk reduction systems\nOutput 3: Targeted population groups participating in\nadaptation and risk reduction awareness activities\nOutput 4: Vulnerable physical, natural, and social assets strengthened in response to climate change impacts, including variability\nOutput 5: Vulnerable physical, natural, and social assets strengthened in response to climate change impacts, including variability                                                                                             Output 6: Targeted individual and community livelihood strategies strengthened in relation to climate change impacts, including variability                                                                            Output 7: Improved integration of climate-resilience strategies into country development plans",5,"1. Relevant threat and hazard information generated and disseminated to stakeholders on a timely basis\n2.1. No. and type of targeted institutions with increased capacity to minimize exposure to climate\nvariability risks\n2.2. Number of people with reduced risk to extreme weather events\n3.1. Percentage of targeted population aware of predicted adverse impacts of climate change, and of\nappropriate responses\n3.2. Modification in behavior of targeted population\n4.1. Development sectors' services responsive to evolving needs from changing and variable climate                                                                                            4.2. Physical infrastructure improved to withstand climate change and variability-induced stress                                                                                 5. Ecosystem services and natural assets maintained or improved under climate change and\nvariability-induced stress                                                                                                                                                          6.1. Percentage of households and communities having more secure (increased) access to livelihood\nassets                                                                                                                                                                                                6.2. Percentage of targeted population with sustained climate-resilient livelihoods                                                                                           7. Climate change priorities are integrated into national development strategy",5,"At least 5000 ha reforested across 3 districts",null,"Limited or no reforestation activities in target areas",null,"TBC"]
[]
[null,"OBJECTIVE 3"]
[null,"Fund Outcome","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Fund Outcome Indicator","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Target at CEO Endorsement ",null,"Baseline",null,"Mid-term Results",null,"Terminal Results"]
[null,"Outcome 1: Reduced exposure at national level to climate-related hazards and threats\nOutcome 2: Strengthened institutional capacity to reduce risks associated with climate-induced socioeconomic and environmental losses\nOutcome 3: Strengthened awareness and ownership of adaptation and climate risk reduction processes at local level\nOutcome 4: Increased adaptive capacity within relevant development and natural resource sectors\nOutcome 5: Increased ecosystem resilience in response to climate change and variability-induced stress\nOutcome 6: Diversified and strengthened livelihoods and sources of income for vulnerable people in targeted areas                                                                                                 Outcome 7: Improved policies and regulations that promote and enforce resilience measures",null,"1. Relevant threat and hazard information generated and disseminated to stakeholders on a timely basis\n2.1. No. and type of targeted institutions with increased capacity to minimize exposure to climate variability risks\n2.2. Number of people with reduced risk to extreme weather events\n3.1. Percentage of targeted population aware of predicted adverse impacts of climate change, and of appropriate responses\n3.2. Modification in behavior of targeted population\n4.1. Development sectors' services responsive to evolving needs from changing and variable climate                                                                                            4.2. Physical infrastructure improved to withstand climate change and variability-induced stress                                                                                 \n5. Ecosystem services and natural assets maintained or improved under climate change and variability-induced stress                                                                                                                                                          6.1. Percentage of households and communities having more secure (increased) access to livelihood assets                                                                                                                                                                                                6.2. Percentage of targeted population with sustained climate-resilient livelihoods                                                                                           \n7. Climate change priorities are integrated into national development strategy"]
[]
[null,"Fund Output","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Fund Output Indicator","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Target at CEO Endorsement ",null,"Baseline",null,"Mid-term Results",null,"Terminal Results"]
[null,"Output 1: Risk and vulnerability assessments conducted and updated at a national level\nOutput 2.1: Strengthened capacity of national and regional centres and networks to respond rapidly to extreme weather events\nOutput 2.2: Targeted population groups covered by adequate risk reduction systems\nOutput 3: Targeted population groups participating in\nadaptation and risk reduction awareness activities\nOutput 4: Vulnerable physical, natural, and social assets strengthened in response to climate change impacts, including variability\nOutput 5: Vulnerable physical, natural, and social assets strengthened in response to climate change impacts, including variability                                                                                             Output 6: Targeted individual and community livelihood strategies strengthened in relation to climate change impacts, including variability                                                                            Output 7: Improved integration of climate-resilience strategies into country development plans",null,"1.1. No. and type of projects that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments                                                                                      \n1.2. Development of early warning systems\n2.1.1. No. of staff trained to respond to, and mitigate impacts of, climate-related events\n2.1.2. Capacity of staff to respond to, and mitigate impacts of, climate-related events from targeted\ninstitutions increased\n2.2.1. Percentage of population covered by adequate risk-reduction systems\n2.2.2. No. of people affected by climate variability                                                                                                          3.1 No. and type of risk reduction actions or strategies introduced at local level                                                                                                     \n3.2 No. of news outlets in the local press and media that have covered the topic                                                                                                    \n4.1. No. and type of health or social infrastructure developed or modified to respond to new conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by type)                                                                                                                                                            4. 2. No. of physical assets strengthened or constructed to withstand conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by asset types)                                                                                                                                   5. No. and type of natural resource assets created, maintained or improved to withstand conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by type of assets)                                                                                                                   \n6.1. No. and type of adaptation assets (physical as well as knowledge) created in support of individualor\ncommunity-livelihood strategies                                                                                                                                                   6.2. Type of income sources for households generated under climate change scenario                                                                                    \n7.1. No., type, and sector of policies introduced or adjusted to address climate change risks                                                                                 \n7.2. No. or targeted development strategies with incorporated climate change priorities enforced"]
[]
[null,"OBJECTIVE 4"]
[null,"Fund Outcome","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Fund Outcome Indicator","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Target at CEO Endorsement ",null,"Baseline",null,"Mid-term Results",null,"Terminal Results"]
[null,"Outcome 1: Reduced exposure at national level to climate-related hazards and threats\nOutcome 2: Strengthened institutional capacity to reduce risks associated with climate-induced socioeconomic and environmental losses\nOutcome 3: Strengthened awareness and ownership of adaptation and climate risk reduction processes at local level\nOutcome 4: Increased adaptive capacity within relevant development and natural resource sectors\nOutcome 5: Increased ecosystem resilience in response to climate change and variability-induced stress\nOutcome 6: Diversified and strengthened livelihoods and sources of income for vulnerable people in targeted areas                                                                                                 Outcome 7: Improved policies and regulations that promote and enforce resilience measures",null,"1. Relevant threat and hazard information generated and disseminated to stakeholders on a timely basis\n2.1. No. and type of targeted institutions with increased capacity to minimize exposure to climate variability risks\n2.2. Number of people with reduced risk to extreme weather events\n3.1. Percentage of targeted population aware of predicted adverse impacts of climate change, and of appropriate responses\n3.2. Modification in behavior of targeted population\n4.1. Development sectors' services responsive to evolving needs from changing and variable climate                                                                                            4.2. Physical infrastructure improved to withstand climate change and variability-induced stress                                                                                 5. Ecosystem services and natural assets maintained or improved under climate change and variability-induced stress                                                                                                                                                          6.1. Percentage of households and communities having more secure (increased) access to livelihood assets                                                                                                                                                                                                6.2. Percentage of targeted population with sustained climate-resilient livelihoods                                                                                           7. Climate change priorities are integrated into national development strategy"]
[]
[null,"Fund Output","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Fund Output Indicator","Please select  from dropdown menu below","Target at CEO Endorsement ",null,"Baseline",null,"Mid-term Results",null,"Terminal Results"]
[null,"Output 1: Risk and vulnerability assessments conducted and updated at a national level\nOutput 2.1: Strengthened capacity of national and regional centres and networks to respond rapidly to extreme weather events\nOutput 2.2: Targeted population groups covered by adequate risk reduction systems\nOutput 3: Targeted population groups participating in\nadaptation and risk reduction awareness activities\nOutput 4: Vulnerable physical, natural, and social assets strengthened in response to climate change impacts, including variability\nOutput 5: Vulnerable physical, natural, and social assets strengthened in response to climate change impacts, including variability                                                                                             Output 6: Targeted individual and community livelihood strategies strengthened in relation to climate change impacts, including variability                                                                            Output 7: Improved integration of climate-resilience strategies into country development plans",null,"1.1. No. and type of projects that conduct and update risk and vulnerability assessments                                                                                      \n1.2. Development of early warning systems\n2.1.1. No. of staff trained to respond to, and mitigate impacts of, climate-related events\n2.1.2. Capacity of staff to respond to, and mitigate impacts of, climate-related events from targeted institutions increased\n2.2.1. Percentage of population covered by adequate risk-reduction systems\n2.2.2. No. of people affected by climate variability                                                                                                          3.1 No. and type of risk reduction actions or strategies introduced at local level                                                                                                     \n3.2 No. of news outlets in the local press and media that have covered the topic                                                                                                    \n4.1. No. and type of health or social infrastructure developed or modified to respond to new conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by type)                                                                                                                                                            4. 2. No. of physical assets strengthened or constructed to withstand conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by asset types)                                                                                                                                   5. No. and type of natural resource assets created, maintained or improved to withstand conditions resulting from climate variability and change (by type of assets)                                                                                                                   \n6.1. No. and type of adaptation assets (physical as well as knowledge) created in support of individualor community-livelihood strategies                                                                                                                                                   6.2. Type of income sources for households generated under climate change scenario                                                                                    \n7.1. No., type, and sector of policies introduced or adjusted to address climate change risks                                                                                 \n7.2. No. or targeted development strategies with incorporated climate change priorities enforced"]

{"sheet":"Old Units for Indicators","index":9,"n_rows":4,"n_cols":2,"rows_kept":4,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null," Fund Outcome Indicator Units"]
[null,"1. Generation of relevant data, Stakeholders, and Timeliness \n2.1. Include both qualitative and quantitative measures of capacity level within targeted institutions\n2.2. Number (men and women and other vulnerable groups)\n3.1. Use scale from 1 to 5: 5: Fully aware 4: Mostly aware 3: Partially aware 2: Partially not aware 1: Aware of neither predicted adverse impacts of climate change nor of appropriate responses\n3.2. Use scale from 1 to 5:  5: All 4: Almost all 3: Half 2: Some 1: None\n4.1. Summarize in an overall scale (1-5): 5: Highly responsive (All defined elements ) 4: Mostly responsive (Most defined elements) 3: Moderately responsive (Some defined elements) 2: Partially responsive (Lacks most elements) 1: Non responsive (Lacks all elements )                                                                                                                                                                                                                    4.2.  Summarize in an overall scale (1-5):  5: Fully improved 4: Mostly Improved 3: Moderately improved 2: Somewhat improved\n1: Not improved                                                                                                                                                                                                                           5.  Depends on the targeted natural asset: \nBiological (species): measure through changes in population numbers (dynamics, structure, etc.)\nLand: measure changes in hectares. Baseline data will be necessary to estimate the change. Supporting indicators baseline and target (as well as contextual information) are needed such as the following: Farmers adopting recommended technologies, Ha. of land improved, Average deforestation rate Etc.\nUse scale from 1 to 5.  5: Very effective (All elements are present) 4: Effective (Most elements are present) 3: Moderately effective (Some elements are present) 2: Partially effective (Most elements are not present) 1: Ineffective (No elements are present)\n6.1.  Summarize in an overall scale (1-5):  5: Very high improvement 4: High improvement 3: Moderate improvement 2: Limited improvement 1: No improvement                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         6.2.  Household income by source of livelihood in project area (USD) prior and post project intervention                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      7. Summarize in an overall scale (1-5).  5: All (Fully integrated) 4: Most 3: Some 2: Most not integrated 1: None"]
[null,"Fund Output Indicator Units"]
[null,"1.1.  Number, sector(s) and level(s) of projects or interventions in separate fields of monitoring plan                                                                                  1.2. Number\n2.1.1. Number of staff (male/female) of targeted institutions: a. Obtain baseline information: total number of staff from targeted institutions b. Define target\n2.1.2. Number of staff (male/female) of targeted institutions: a. Obtain baseline information: total number of staff from targeted institutions b. Define target: needs to be defined by project proponents\n2.2.1. Quantitative: Percentage (includes women – and other vulnerable groups – and men).\nQualitative: Adequacy: include direct analysis of major areas; adequacy/effectiveness of systems or analysis of perceptions of populations and institutions.\n2.2.2. Number (broken down by gender and, if possible, by vulnerable groups defined in the area of intervention) of people                                                                                                        3.1. Number and type (in separate columns) at local level.                                                                                                                                    3.2. Number                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     4.1. Number and type                                                                                                                                                                                                               4. 2.  Number and type (entered in separate columns)                                                                                                                                                     5.  Number of interventions by type of natural asset and intervention                                                                                                                    6.1.  Number and type (in separate columns of monitoring plan)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    6.2. Income sources per household; description of income source and number of households.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     7.1.  Number/Sector                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   7.2. Number; Effectiveness (see previous indicator) through enforcement level."]